Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka

Organic agriculture has the potential to provide improved livelihood opportunities, increased income and social benefits for resource-poor small-scale farmers. It has thus become a popular strategy for economic development and poverty reduction in many areas of the global south. However, there has b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable agriculture and food systems 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.246-257
Hauptverfasser: Qiao, Yuhui, Halberg, Niels, Vaheesan, Saminathan, Scott, Steffanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 3
container_start_page 246
container_title Renewable agriculture and food systems
container_volume 31
creator Qiao, Yuhui
Halberg, Niels
Vaheesan, Saminathan
Scott, Steffanie
description Organic agriculture has the potential to provide improved livelihood opportunities, increased income and social benefits for resource-poor small-scale farmers. It has thus become a popular strategy for economic development and poverty reduction in many areas of the global south. However, there has been limited empirical research regarding the actual benefits of certified organic production, particularly when organic is combined with fair trade certification, and for small-scale farmers who are not engaged in coffee or banana production. Further research is needed to demonstrate experiences of farmers under diverse socioeconomic conditions, organizational contexts and degrees of market access. To address these gaps, two surveys of certified organic and fair trade tea producers in China and Sri Lanka were undertaken to investigate the contributions of organic crops to the household economy. In both cases, organic production required lower investment in terms of external inputs but a higher input of farmers’ labor. The price premium received by farmers for the organic tea compensated for the extra labor input and lower yield, resulting in a net profit. However, given the relatively small plots of tea gardens of each household, organic production could not fully provide for the households’ livelihood. Non-farm income dominated the total income of the households across the study cases, despite the earnings from organic farming. In both sites, market-oriented organic tea projects have created more options for paid work locally, which benefits women of reproductive age. Social benefits of organic farming were also reported. Pursuing fair trade certification on top of organic production facilitated farmer organizing, training and community development. Organic agriculture and fair trade certification offer important prospects to improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in other, less favored areas of Asia. These forms of certified production could provide economic and social benefits in instances where farm income is the main source of household income.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1742170515000162
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815992187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1742170515000162</cupid><jstor_id>26344901</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26344901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ed1b961c4112a83377b44973648a5319271256ae1655684b23628d35037998133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39AB6EgBcvramkk3S8DYP_YMDD6rmpTqdnM3YnY6p7Yb-PH9SMsyyiiKeEqt97j0dV1XPgr4GDeXMFphFguALFOQctHlQXp1ENBuTD-z9Xj6snRAfORWuNvKh-bIg8UYh7tlx7RskFnBjGgXmXYpqDY72PfgwLsTSylPcYy-wEjBgyWzIOni0e2TGnYXVLSJGNKTOacZpqcjj5QubZZ2Ihsg0FfMuQuTQfMeMSbjxzSCV5WYfbU8T2OkT8FXCVA9th_IZPq0cjTuSf3b2X1df3775sP9a7zx8-bTe72jUGltoP0FsNrgEQ2EppTN80paVuWlQSrDAglEYPWindNr2QWrSDVFwaa1uQ8rJ6dfYtXb6vnpZuDuT8NGH0aaUOWlDWCmjN_1FjuVVWSF7Ql3-gh7TmWIoUqlVWa66bQsGZcjkRZT92xxxmzLcd8O504u6vExfNi7PmQEvK9wKhZenNoezlnSfOfQ7D3v8W_U_Xn2d-r5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785966064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Qiao, Yuhui ; Halberg, Niels ; Vaheesan, Saminathan ; Scott, Steffanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Yuhui ; Halberg, Niels ; Vaheesan, Saminathan ; Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><description>Organic agriculture has the potential to provide improved livelihood opportunities, increased income and social benefits for resource-poor small-scale farmers. It has thus become a popular strategy for economic development and poverty reduction in many areas of the global south. However, there has been limited empirical research regarding the actual benefits of certified organic production, particularly when organic is combined with fair trade certification, and for small-scale farmers who are not engaged in coffee or banana production. Further research is needed to demonstrate experiences of farmers under diverse socioeconomic conditions, organizational contexts and degrees of market access. To address these gaps, two surveys of certified organic and fair trade tea producers in China and Sri Lanka were undertaken to investigate the contributions of organic crops to the household economy. In both cases, organic production required lower investment in terms of external inputs but a higher input of farmers’ labor. The price premium received by farmers for the organic tea compensated for the extra labor input and lower yield, resulting in a net profit. However, given the relatively small plots of tea gardens of each household, organic production could not fully provide for the households’ livelihood. Non-farm income dominated the total income of the households across the study cases, despite the earnings from organic farming. In both sites, market-oriented organic tea projects have created more options for paid work locally, which benefits women of reproductive age. Social benefits of organic farming were also reported. Pursuing fair trade certification on top of organic production facilitated farmer organizing, training and community development. Organic agriculture and fair trade certification offer important prospects to improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in other, less favored areas of Asia. These forms of certified production could provide economic and social benefits in instances where farm income is the main source of household income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742170515000162</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAAEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Certification ; Community development ; Comparative studies ; Economic development ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Fair trade ; Farm income ; Farmers ; Farming ; Households ; Income ; Livelihood ; Musa ; Organic farming ; Poverty ; Research Paper ; Research Papers ; Small farms ; Small scale ; Small-scale farming ; Social impact ; Socioeconomics ; Tea</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.246-257</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ed1b961c4112a83377b44973648a5319271256ae1655684b23628d35037998133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ed1b961c4112a83377b44973648a5319271256ae1655684b23628d35037998133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1742170515000162/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Yuhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halberg, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaheesan, Saminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><description>Organic agriculture has the potential to provide improved livelihood opportunities, increased income and social benefits for resource-poor small-scale farmers. It has thus become a popular strategy for economic development and poverty reduction in many areas of the global south. However, there has been limited empirical research regarding the actual benefits of certified organic production, particularly when organic is combined with fair trade certification, and for small-scale farmers who are not engaged in coffee or banana production. Further research is needed to demonstrate experiences of farmers under diverse socioeconomic conditions, organizational contexts and degrees of market access. To address these gaps, two surveys of certified organic and fair trade tea producers in China and Sri Lanka were undertaken to investigate the contributions of organic crops to the household economy. In both cases, organic production required lower investment in terms of external inputs but a higher input of farmers’ labor. The price premium received by farmers for the organic tea compensated for the extra labor input and lower yield, resulting in a net profit. However, given the relatively small plots of tea gardens of each household, organic production could not fully provide for the households’ livelihood. Non-farm income dominated the total income of the households across the study cases, despite the earnings from organic farming. In both sites, market-oriented organic tea projects have created more options for paid work locally, which benefits women of reproductive age. Social benefits of organic farming were also reported. Pursuing fair trade certification on top of organic production facilitated farmer organizing, training and community development. Organic agriculture and fair trade certification offer important prospects to improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in other, less favored areas of Asia. These forms of certified production could provide economic and social benefits in instances where farm income is the main source of household income.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Community development</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fair trade</subject><subject>Farm income</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>Musa</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>Small scale</subject><subject>Small-scale farming</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Tea</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxRtRcF39AB6EgBcvramkk3S8DYP_YMDD6rmpTqdnM3YnY6p7Yb-PH9SMsyyiiKeEqt97j0dV1XPgr4GDeXMFphFguALFOQctHlQXp1ENBuTD-z9Xj6snRAfORWuNvKh-bIg8UYh7tlx7RskFnBjGgXmXYpqDY72PfgwLsTSylPcYy-wEjBgyWzIOni0e2TGnYXVLSJGNKTOacZpqcjj5QubZZ2Ihsg0FfMuQuTQfMeMSbjxzSCV5WYfbU8T2OkT8FXCVA9th_IZPq0cjTuSf3b2X1df3775sP9a7zx8-bTe72jUGltoP0FsNrgEQ2EppTN80paVuWlQSrDAglEYPWindNr2QWrSDVFwaa1uQ8rJ6dfYtXb6vnpZuDuT8NGH0aaUOWlDWCmjN_1FjuVVWSF7Ql3-gh7TmWIoUqlVWa66bQsGZcjkRZT92xxxmzLcd8O504u6vExfNi7PmQEvK9wKhZenNoezlnSfOfQ7D3v8W_U_Xn2d-r5k</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Qiao, Yuhui</creator><creator>Halberg, Niels</creator><creator>Vaheesan, Saminathan</creator><creator>Scott, Steffanie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka</title><author>Qiao, Yuhui ; Halberg, Niels ; Vaheesan, Saminathan ; Scott, Steffanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-ed1b961c4112a83377b44973648a5319271256ae1655684b23628d35037998133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Community development</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fair trade</topic><topic>Farm income</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>Musa</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>Small scale</topic><topic>Small-scale farming</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Tea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Yuhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halberg, Niels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaheesan, Saminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiao, Yuhui</au><au>Halberg, Niels</au><au>Vaheesan, Saminathan</au><au>Scott, Steffanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>246-257</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><coden>AJAAEZ</coden><abstract>Organic agriculture has the potential to provide improved livelihood opportunities, increased income and social benefits for resource-poor small-scale farmers. It has thus become a popular strategy for economic development and poverty reduction in many areas of the global south. However, there has been limited empirical research regarding the actual benefits of certified organic production, particularly when organic is combined with fair trade certification, and for small-scale farmers who are not engaged in coffee or banana production. Further research is needed to demonstrate experiences of farmers under diverse socioeconomic conditions, organizational contexts and degrees of market access. To address these gaps, two surveys of certified organic and fair trade tea producers in China and Sri Lanka were undertaken to investigate the contributions of organic crops to the household economy. In both cases, organic production required lower investment in terms of external inputs but a higher input of farmers’ labor. The price premium received by farmers for the organic tea compensated for the extra labor input and lower yield, resulting in a net profit. However, given the relatively small plots of tea gardens of each household, organic production could not fully provide for the households’ livelihood. Non-farm income dominated the total income of the households across the study cases, despite the earnings from organic farming. In both sites, market-oriented organic tea projects have created more options for paid work locally, which benefits women of reproductive age. Social benefits of organic farming were also reported. Pursuing fair trade certification on top of organic production facilitated farmer organizing, training and community development. Organic agriculture and fair trade certification offer important prospects to improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in other, less favored areas of Asia. These forms of certified production could provide economic and social benefits in instances where farm income is the main source of household income.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742170515000162</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-1705
ispartof Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2016-06, Vol.31 (3), p.246-257
issn 1742-1705
1742-1713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815992187
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural economics
Agriculture
Certification
Community development
Comparative studies
Economic development
Economic impact
Economics
Fair trade
Farm income
Farmers
Farming
Households
Income
Livelihood
Musa
Organic farming
Poverty
Research Paper
Research Papers
Small farms
Small scale
Small-scale farming
Social impact
Socioeconomics
Tea
title Assessing the social and economic benefits of organic and fair trade tea production for small-scale farmers in Asia: a comparative case study of China and Sri Lanka
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A44%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20social%20and%20economic%20benefits%20of%20organic%20and%20fair%20trade%20tea%20production%20for%20small-scale%20farmers%20in%20Asia:%20a%20comparative%20case%20study%20of%20China%20and%20Sri%20Lanka&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=Qiao,%20Yuhui&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=246-257&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft.coden=AJAAEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742170515000162&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26344901%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785966064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1742170515000162&rft_jstor_id=26344901&rfr_iscdi=true