External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study

Objective To perform an external validation and direct comparison of published prognostic models for early prediction of the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, including predictors applicable in the first trimester of pregnancy.Design External validation of all published prognostic models in lar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2016-08, Vol.354, p.i4338-i4338
Hauptverfasser: Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije, Kwee, Anneke, Naaktgeboren, Christiana A, de Groot, Inge, Evers, Inge M, Groenendaal, Floris, Hering, Yolanda R, Huisjes, Anjoke J M, Kirpestein, Cornel, Monincx, Wilma M, Siljee, Jacqueline E, Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil, van Oirschot, Charlotte M, Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A, Vonk, Mariska A A W, Wiegers, Therese A, Zwart, Joost J, Franx, Arie, Moons, Karel G M, Koster, Maria P H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page i4338
container_issue
container_start_page i4338
container_title BMJ (Online)
container_volume 354
creator Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije
Kwee, Anneke
Naaktgeboren, Christiana A
de Groot, Inge
Evers, Inge M
Groenendaal, Floris
Hering, Yolanda R
Huisjes, Anjoke J M
Kirpestein, Cornel
Monincx, Wilma M
Siljee, Jacqueline E
Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil
van Oirschot, Charlotte M
Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A
Vonk, Mariska A A W
Wiegers, Therese A
Zwart, Joost J
Franx, Arie
Moons, Karel G M
Koster, Maria P H
description Objective To perform an external validation and direct comparison of published prognostic models for early prediction of the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, including predictors applicable in the first trimester of pregnancy.Design External validation of all published prognostic models in large scale, prospective, multicentre cohort study.Setting 31 independent midwifery practices and six hospitals in the Netherlands.Participants Women recruited in their first trimester (
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.i4338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815975997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815975997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-fa1e7ef9139144c539f9a1c818ef8e3fdbbedfe89aca7c29d5003b9bdf52f3833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1OxCAUhYnRqNFZ-AKGxJjoYrQMpYA7439i4kbXDYWLMrZlLHSiz-ELS2dGY3QFge-ee889CO2R7IQQWpxWzfTE5ZSKNbRNOCvGRFC6_uu-hUYhTLMsm1AuZME20daEM16Igm-jz6v3CF2rajxXtTMqOt9ib_Gs88-tD9Fp3HgDdcDRp0cwTkfcufA6QM8Q4qIilRunKogQcAN17WIfsEtCLeDLPuoXrP2L7-LZoBtmoKObA276OulDGztY_eMQe_OxizasqgOMVucOerq-ery4Hd8_3NxdnN-Pq2Qkjq0iwMFKQiXJc82otFIRLYgAK4BaU1VgLAiptOJ6Ig3LMlrJylg2sTQtZgcdLXXTUG998lI2Lug0vmrB96EkgjDJmZQ8oQd_0Knvh7WFkpK8yCUTQibqeEnp5DJ0YMtZ5xrVfZQkK4ewyhRWuQgrsfsrxb5qwPyQ39Ek4HAJDDU_3f4LfQGqxqAx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146495889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije ; Kwee, Anneke ; Naaktgeboren, Christiana A ; de Groot, Inge ; Evers, Inge M ; Groenendaal, Floris ; Hering, Yolanda R ; Huisjes, Anjoke J M ; Kirpestein, Cornel ; Monincx, Wilma M ; Siljee, Jacqueline E ; Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil ; van Oirschot, Charlotte M ; Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A ; Vonk, Mariska A A W ; Wiegers, Therese A ; Zwart, Joost J ; Franx, Arie ; Moons, Karel G M ; Koster, Maria P H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije ; Kwee, Anneke ; Naaktgeboren, Christiana A ; de Groot, Inge ; Evers, Inge M ; Groenendaal, Floris ; Hering, Yolanda R ; Huisjes, Anjoke J M ; Kirpestein, Cornel ; Monincx, Wilma M ; Siljee, Jacqueline E ; Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil ; van Oirschot, Charlotte M ; Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A ; Vonk, Mariska A A W ; Wiegers, Therese A ; Zwart, Joost J ; Franx, Arie ; Moons, Karel G M ; Koster, Maria P H</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To perform an external validation and direct comparison of published prognostic models for early prediction of the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, including predictors applicable in the first trimester of pregnancy.Design External validation of all published prognostic models in large scale, prospective, multicentre cohort study.Setting 31 independent midwifery practices and six hospitals in the Netherlands.Participants Women recruited in their first trimester (&lt;14 weeks) of pregnancy between December 2012 and January 2014, at their initial prenatal visit. Women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus of any type were excluded. Main outcome measures Discrimination of the prognostic models was assessed by the C statistic, and calibration assessed by calibration plots. Results 3723 women were included for analysis, of whom 181 (4.9%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. 12 prognostic models for the disorder could be validated in the cohort. C statistics ranged from 0.67 to 0.78. Calibration plots showed that eight of the 12 models were well calibrated. The four models with the highest C statistics included almost all of the following predictors: maternal age, maternal body mass index, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, and family history of diabetes. Prognostic models had a similar performance in a subgroup of nulliparous women only. Decision curve analysis showed that the use of these four models always had a positive net benefit.Conclusions In this external validation study, most of the published prognostic models for gestational diabetes mellitus show acceptable discrimination and calibration. The four models with the highest discriminative abilities in this study cohort, which also perform well in a subgroup of nulliparous women, are easy models to apply in clinical practice and therefore deserve further evaluation regarding their clinical impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27576867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood pressure ; Body Mass Index ; Calibration ; Cohort analysis ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes Mellitus - genetics ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Diabetes, Gestational - ethnology ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Gestational diabetes ; Glucose ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Medical prognosis ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Ovaries ; Parity ; Patients ; Polycystic ovary syndrome ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics as Topic ; Systematic review ; Validation studies ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2016-08, Vol.354, p.i4338-i4338</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2016 BMJ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-fa1e7ef9139144c539f9a1c818ef8e3fdbbedfe89aca7c29d5003b9bdf52f3833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-fa1e7ef9139144c539f9a1c818ef8e3fdbbedfe89aca7c29d5003b9bdf52f3833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4338.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4338.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3183,27901,27902,55321,77401,77427</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naaktgeboren, Christiana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenendaal, Floris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hering, Yolanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisjes, Anjoke J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpestein, Cornel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monincx, Wilma M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siljee, Jacqueline E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oirschot, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonk, Mariska A A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegers, Therese A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwart, Joost J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franx, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, Karel G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Maria P H</creatorcontrib><title>External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Objective To perform an external validation and direct comparison of published prognostic models for early prediction of the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, including predictors applicable in the first trimester of pregnancy.Design External validation of all published prognostic models in large scale, prospective, multicentre cohort study.Setting 31 independent midwifery practices and six hospitals in the Netherlands.Participants Women recruited in their first trimester (&lt;14 weeks) of pregnancy between December 2012 and January 2014, at their initial prenatal visit. Women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus of any type were excluded. Main outcome measures Discrimination of the prognostic models was assessed by the C statistic, and calibration assessed by calibration plots. Results 3723 women were included for analysis, of whom 181 (4.9%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. 12 prognostic models for the disorder could be validated in the cohort. C statistics ranged from 0.67 to 0.78. Calibration plots showed that eight of the 12 models were well calibrated. The four models with the highest C statistics included almost all of the following predictors: maternal age, maternal body mass index, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, and family history of diabetes. Prognostic models had a similar performance in a subgroup of nulliparous women only. Decision curve analysis showed that the use of these four models always had a positive net benefit.Conclusions In this external validation study, most of the published prognostic models for gestational diabetes mellitus show acceptable discrimination and calibration. The four models with the highest discriminative abilities in this study cohort, which also perform well in a subgroup of nulliparous women, are easy models to apply in clinical practice and therefore deserve further evaluation regarding their clinical impact.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - genetics</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - ethnology</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1OxCAUhYnRqNFZ-AKGxJjoYrQMpYA7439i4kbXDYWLMrZlLHSiz-ELS2dGY3QFge-ee889CO2R7IQQWpxWzfTE5ZSKNbRNOCvGRFC6_uu-hUYhTLMsm1AuZME20daEM16Igm-jz6v3CF2rajxXtTMqOt9ib_Gs88-tD9Fp3HgDdcDRp0cwTkfcufA6QM8Q4qIilRunKogQcAN17WIfsEtCLeDLPuoXrP2L7-LZoBtmoKObA276OulDGztY_eMQe_OxizasqgOMVucOerq-ery4Hd8_3NxdnN-Pq2Qkjq0iwMFKQiXJc82otFIRLYgAK4BaU1VgLAiptOJ6Ig3LMlrJylg2sTQtZgcdLXXTUG998lI2Lug0vmrB96EkgjDJmZQ8oQd_0Knvh7WFkpK8yCUTQibqeEnp5DJ0YMtZ5xrVfZQkK4ewyhRWuQgrsfsrxb5qwPyQ39Ek4HAJDDU_3f4LfQGqxqAx</recordid><startdate>20160830</startdate><enddate>20160830</enddate><creator>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije</creator><creator>Kwee, Anneke</creator><creator>Naaktgeboren, Christiana A</creator><creator>de Groot, Inge</creator><creator>Evers, Inge M</creator><creator>Groenendaal, Floris</creator><creator>Hering, Yolanda R</creator><creator>Huisjes, Anjoke J M</creator><creator>Kirpestein, Cornel</creator><creator>Monincx, Wilma M</creator><creator>Siljee, Jacqueline E</creator><creator>Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil</creator><creator>van Oirschot, Charlotte M</creator><creator>Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A</creator><creator>Vonk, Mariska A A W</creator><creator>Wiegers, Therese A</creator><creator>Zwart, Joost J</creator><creator>Franx, Arie</creator><creator>Moons, Karel G M</creator><creator>Koster, Maria P H</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160830</creationdate><title>External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study</title><author>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije ; Kwee, Anneke ; Naaktgeboren, Christiana A ; de Groot, Inge ; Evers, Inge M ; Groenendaal, Floris ; Hering, Yolanda R ; Huisjes, Anjoke J M ; Kirpestein, Cornel ; Monincx, Wilma M ; Siljee, Jacqueline E ; Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil ; van Oirschot, Charlotte M ; Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A ; Vonk, Mariska A A W ; Wiegers, Therese A ; Zwart, Joost J ; Franx, Arie ; Moons, Karel G M ; Koster, Maria P H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-fa1e7ef9139144c539f9a1c818ef8e3fdbbedfe89aca7c29d5003b9bdf52f3833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - genetics</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - ethnology</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwee, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naaktgeboren, Christiana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Inge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenendaal, Floris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hering, Yolanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisjes, Anjoke J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpestein, Cornel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monincx, Wilma M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siljee, Jacqueline E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oirschot, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonk, Mariska A A W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegers, Therese A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwart, Joost J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franx, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moons, Karel G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Maria P H</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije</au><au>Kwee, Anneke</au><au>Naaktgeboren, Christiana A</au><au>de Groot, Inge</au><au>Evers, Inge M</au><au>Groenendaal, Floris</au><au>Hering, Yolanda R</au><au>Huisjes, Anjoke J M</au><au>Kirpestein, Cornel</au><au>Monincx, Wilma M</au><au>Siljee, Jacqueline E</au><au>Van ’t Zelfde, Annewil</au><au>van Oirschot, Charlotte M</au><au>Vankan-Buitelaar, Simone A</au><au>Vonk, Mariska A A W</au><au>Wiegers, Therese A</au><au>Zwart, Joost J</au><au>Franx, Arie</au><au>Moons, Karel G M</au><au>Koster, Maria P H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><stitle>BMJ</stitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2016-08-30</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>354</volume><spage>i4338</spage><epage>i4338</epage><pages>i4338-i4338</pages><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Objective To perform an external validation and direct comparison of published prognostic models for early prediction of the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, including predictors applicable in the first trimester of pregnancy.Design External validation of all published prognostic models in large scale, prospective, multicentre cohort study.Setting 31 independent midwifery practices and six hospitals in the Netherlands.Participants Women recruited in their first trimester (&lt;14 weeks) of pregnancy between December 2012 and January 2014, at their initial prenatal visit. Women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus of any type were excluded. Main outcome measures Discrimination of the prognostic models was assessed by the C statistic, and calibration assessed by calibration plots. Results 3723 women were included for analysis, of whom 181 (4.9%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. 12 prognostic models for the disorder could be validated in the cohort. C statistics ranged from 0.67 to 0.78. Calibration plots showed that eight of the 12 models were well calibrated. The four models with the highest C statistics included almost all of the following predictors: maternal age, maternal body mass index, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, and family history of diabetes. Prognostic models had a similar performance in a subgroup of nulliparous women only. Decision curve analysis showed that the use of these four models always had a positive net benefit.Conclusions In this external validation study, most of the published prognostic models for gestational diabetes mellitus show acceptable discrimination and calibration. The four models with the highest discriminative abilities in this study cohort, which also perform well in a subgroup of nulliparous women, are easy models to apply in clinical practice and therefore deserve further evaluation regarding their clinical impact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27576867</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.i4338</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1756-1833
ispartof BMJ (Online), 2016-08, Vol.354, p.i4338-i4338
issn 1756-1833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815975997
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adult
Blood pressure
Body Mass Index
Calibration
Cohort analysis
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus - genetics
Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology
Diabetes, Gestational - ethnology
Ethnicity
Female
Gestational diabetes
Glucose
Humans
Maternal Age
Medical prognosis
Netherlands - epidemiology
Ovaries
Parity
Patients
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy complications
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Statistical analysis
Statistics as Topic
Systematic review
Validation studies
Womens health
title External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=External%20validation%20of%20prognostic%20models%20to%20predict%20risk%20of%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus%20in%20one%20Dutch%20cohort:%20prospective%20multicentre%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Lamain-de%20Ruiter,%20Marije&rft.date=2016-08-30&rft.volume=354&rft.spage=i4338&rft.epage=i4338&rft.pages=i4338-i4338&rft.issn=1756-1833&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.i4338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815975997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146495889&rft_id=info:pmid/27576867&rfr_iscdi=true