Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model

This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United St...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of climate 1996-09, Vol.9 (9), p.2233-2249
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Mingxuan, Dickinson, Robert E., Zeng, Xubin, Hahmann, Andrea N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2249
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2233
container_title Journal of climate
container_volume 9
creator Chen, Mingxuan
Dickinson, Robert E.
Zeng, Xubin
Hahmann, Andrea N.
description This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h−1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3–4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<2233:COPOOT>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18157115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26201406</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26201406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e4ac8df470829accb67f2d23ae7b7b33ba22ac7b50834bed947383c856f1b40a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rHCEYRqU00G3Sn1DwopT2YjZ-jk4bCmVI0kDCBLK5FnUcYnDHrbqB_Ps6bNjbXvnxHB7xPQCcY7TGWPBzzAlqEGPkG-669jtC3QUhlP7oh_th2Pwia7Tuh5_kHVgdyfdghWTHGik4_wA-5vyMECYtQisQ-rjd6eRznGGc4H1y1u980cXXi8Fkl17cCOOLS7A8OdjHufjZzUUH-Dj7UrOHCrsMS4SbJ13gg9_ug14C8wo17IPf1hO8i6MLZ-Bk0iG7T2_rKXi8utz0f5rb4fqm_33bWNrx0jimrRwnJpAknbbWtGIiI6HaCSMMpUYToq0wHEnKjBs7JqikVvJ2woYhTU_B10PvLsW_e5eL2vpsXQh6dnGfFZaYC4z5_0EuGekYqeD1AbQp5pzcpHapfiy9KozUokUtw1bLsNWiRVUtatGiDloUUahu1dL05e1Jna0OU9Kz9flYRwmjnLUV-3zAnnOJ6RiTliDMUEv_Afcemxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15842942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chen, Mingxuan ; Dickinson, Robert E. ; Zeng, Xubin ; Hahmann, Andrea N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mingxuan ; Dickinson, Robert E. ; Zeng, Xubin ; Hahmann, Andrea N.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h−1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3–4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009&lt;2233:COPOOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate models ; Climatic zones ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Global climate models ; Meteorology ; Modeling ; Overestimates ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Seasons ; Simulations ; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 1996-09, Vol.9 (9), p.2233-2249</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996, American Meteorological Society (AMS)</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26201406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26201406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3243546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mingxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahmann, Andrea N.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h−1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3–4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatic zones</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Overestimates</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1rHCEYRqU00G3Sn1DwopT2YjZ-jk4bCmVI0kDCBLK5FnUcYnDHrbqB_Ps6bNjbXvnxHB7xPQCcY7TGWPBzzAlqEGPkG-669jtC3QUhlP7oh_th2Pwia7Tuh5_kHVgdyfdghWTHGik4_wA-5vyMECYtQisQ-rjd6eRznGGc4H1y1u980cXXi8Fkl17cCOOLS7A8OdjHufjZzUUH-Dj7UrOHCrsMS4SbJ13gg9_ug14C8wo17IPf1hO8i6MLZ-Bk0iG7T2_rKXi8utz0f5rb4fqm_33bWNrx0jimrRwnJpAknbbWtGIiI6HaCSMMpUYToq0wHEnKjBs7JqikVvJ2woYhTU_B10PvLsW_e5eL2vpsXQh6dnGfFZaYC4z5_0EuGekYqeD1AbQp5pzcpHapfiy9KozUokUtw1bLsNWiRVUtatGiDloUUahu1dL05e1Jna0OU9Kz9flYRwmjnLUV-3zAnnOJ6RiTliDMUEv_Afcemxw</recordid><startdate>19960901</startdate><enddate>19960901</enddate><creator>Chen, Mingxuan</creator><creator>Dickinson, Robert E.</creator><creator>Zeng, Xubin</creator><creator>Hahmann, Andrea N.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model</title><author>Chen, Mingxuan ; Dickinson, Robert E. ; Zeng, Xubin ; Hahmann, Andrea N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-e4ac8df470829accb67f2d23ae7b7b33ba22ac7b50834bed947383c856f1b40a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatic zones</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Overestimates</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mingxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahmann, Andrea N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Mingxuan</au><au>Dickinson, Robert E.</au><au>Zeng, Xubin</au><au>Hahmann, Andrea N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>1996-09-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2233</spage><epage>2249</epage><pages>2233-2249</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h−1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3–4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009&lt;2233:COPOOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8755
ispartof Journal of climate, 1996-09, Vol.9 (9), p.2233-2249
issn 0894-8755
1520-0442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18157115
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Climate
Climate models
Climatic zones
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Global climate models
Meteorology
Modeling
Overestimates
Precipitation
Rain
Seasons
Simulations
Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)
title Comparison of Precipitation Observed over the Continental United States to That Simulated by a Climate Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T11%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Precipitation%20Observed%20over%20the%20Continental%20United%20States%20to%20That%20Simulated%20by%20a%20Climate%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Chen,%20Mingxuan&rft.date=1996-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2233&rft.epage=2249&rft.pages=2233-2249&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009%3C2233:COPOOT%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26201406%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15842942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26201406&rfr_iscdi=true