Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution
In order to explore the droplet penetration of spraying with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on citrus trees with different shapes, the tests were carried out at different working heights. The material was five years old Cocktail grapefruit (Citrus paradisi cv. Cocktail) grafted on Trafoliata (Ponciru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of agricultural and biological engineering 2016-07, Vol.9 (4), p.45-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | International journal of agricultural and biological engineering |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Pan, Zhang Lie, Deng Qiang, Lyu Shaolan, He Shilai, Yi Yande, Liu Yongxu, Yu Haiyang, Pan |
description | In order to explore the droplet penetration of spraying with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on citrus trees with different shapes, the tests were carried out at different working heights. The material was five years old Cocktail grapefruit (Citrus paradisi cv. Cocktail) grafted on Trafoliata (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) and the type of UAV sprayer used was the 3W-LWS-Q60S. A solution of 300 times Ponceau 2R diluents liquid instead of pesticide was used for citrus fields spraying and the droplets were collected by paper cards. Droplets deposition parameters were extracted and analyzed using digital image processing after scanning the cards. The results showed that: 1) For the trees with round head shape canopy, the droplet depositions of the upper, middle and lower layers had a significant difference at 0.05 level. The droplet deposition had the best effect when the working height was 1.0 m, where the average droplet deposition densities were 39.97 droplets/cm^sup 2^ and the average droplet size was 0.30 mm, but the droplet coverage (3.19%) was lower than that at the working height of 1.5 m (4.27%). 2) Under three different working heights of UAV, the tree with open center shape can obtain higher droplet deposition density at all three layers than that with the round head shape canopy. It was especially prominent when the working height was 1.0 m, as the middle layer increased by 49.92%. However, the higher range of droplet deposition density meant larger fluctuation and dispersion. 3) The open center shape canopy and the 1.0 m working height obviously improved the droplet coverage rate and droplet density in the citrus plant. For these parameters of open center shape citrus tree, there was no obvious difference in the front and rear direction, but in the left and middle part of the tree crown, the difference reached a 0.05 significant level. Considering droplet deposition characteristics and the spray uniformity, the UAV performed better when working on open center shape plants at a 1.0 m working height. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2178 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815705175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4142419601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-151080b705c310d42b7d03d041ad85e3daafe4db4d053bbb8ce456ec5bb226063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzstKxDAYBeAgCo6jjyAE3Lhpzb2dpQzeYMCNrodc_k5TMmlNUsG3dwbFhatzFh-Hg9A1JTVfKXk31H7QBmpGqCIrImpGm_YELeiKi0pxyU7_uhDn6CLngRAlWi4XyD90HdiS8dhh60uaMy4JoMq9ngDr6HCekv7ycYd78Lu-HGHe6xDwHPc6RnBYQ_I64E_ovQ2Ax4hdGqcABTufS_JmLn6Ml-is0yHD1W8u0fvjw9v6udq8Pr2s7zeVZaotFZWUtMQ0RFpOiRPMNI5wRwTVrpXAndYdCGeEI5IbY1oLQiqw0hjGFFF8iW5_dqc0fsyQy3bvs4UQdIRxzlvaUnlYp4080Jt_dBjnFA_vjoqwRrKG8W_3qmrB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810275272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pan, Zhang ; Lie, Deng ; Qiang, Lyu ; Shaolan, He ; Shilai, Yi ; Yande, Liu ; Yongxu, Yu ; Haiyang, Pan</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhang ; Lie, Deng ; Qiang, Lyu ; Shaolan, He ; Shilai, Yi ; Yande, Liu ; Yongxu, Yu ; Haiyang, Pan</creatorcontrib><description>In order to explore the droplet penetration of spraying with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on citrus trees with different shapes, the tests were carried out at different working heights. The material was five years old Cocktail grapefruit (Citrus paradisi cv. Cocktail) grafted on Trafoliata (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) and the type of UAV sprayer used was the 3W-LWS-Q60S. A solution of 300 times Ponceau 2R diluents liquid instead of pesticide was used for citrus fields spraying and the droplets were collected by paper cards. Droplets deposition parameters were extracted and analyzed using digital image processing after scanning the cards. The results showed that: 1) For the trees with round head shape canopy, the droplet depositions of the upper, middle and lower layers had a significant difference at 0.05 level. The droplet deposition had the best effect when the working height was 1.0 m, where the average droplet deposition densities were 39.97 droplets/cm^sup 2^ and the average droplet size was 0.30 mm, but the droplet coverage (3.19%) was lower than that at the working height of 1.5 m (4.27%). 2) Under three different working heights of UAV, the tree with open center shape can obtain higher droplet deposition density at all three layers than that with the round head shape canopy. It was especially prominent when the working height was 1.0 m, as the middle layer increased by 49.92%. However, the higher range of droplet deposition density meant larger fluctuation and dispersion. 3) The open center shape canopy and the 1.0 m working height obviously improved the droplet coverage rate and droplet density in the citrus plant. For these parameters of open center shape citrus tree, there was no obvious difference in the front and rear direction, but in the left and middle part of the tree crown, the difference reached a 0.05 significant level. Considering droplet deposition characteristics and the spray uniformity, the UAV performed better when working on open center shape plants at a 1.0 m working height.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-6344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-6352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (IJABE)</publisher><subject>Citrus fruits ; Citrus paradisi ; Flowers & plants ; Poncirus trifoliata ; Trees ; Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><ispartof>International journal of agricultural and biological engineering, 2016-07, Vol.9 (4), p.45-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (IJABE) Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-151080b705c310d42b7d03d041ad85e3daafe4db4d053bbb8ce456ec5bb226063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lie, Deng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiang, Lyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaolan, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shilai, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yande, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yongxu, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haiyang, Pan</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution</title><title>International journal of agricultural and biological engineering</title><description>In order to explore the droplet penetration of spraying with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on citrus trees with different shapes, the tests were carried out at different working heights. The material was five years old Cocktail grapefruit (Citrus paradisi cv. Cocktail) grafted on Trafoliata (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) and the type of UAV sprayer used was the 3W-LWS-Q60S. A solution of 300 times Ponceau 2R diluents liquid instead of pesticide was used for citrus fields spraying and the droplets were collected by paper cards. Droplets deposition parameters were extracted and analyzed using digital image processing after scanning the cards. The results showed that: 1) For the trees with round head shape canopy, the droplet depositions of the upper, middle and lower layers had a significant difference at 0.05 level. The droplet deposition had the best effect when the working height was 1.0 m, where the average droplet deposition densities were 39.97 droplets/cm^sup 2^ and the average droplet size was 0.30 mm, but the droplet coverage (3.19%) was lower than that at the working height of 1.5 m (4.27%). 2) Under three different working heights of UAV, the tree with open center shape can obtain higher droplet deposition density at all three layers than that with the round head shape canopy. It was especially prominent when the working height was 1.0 m, as the middle layer increased by 49.92%. However, the higher range of droplet deposition density meant larger fluctuation and dispersion. 3) The open center shape canopy and the 1.0 m working height obviously improved the droplet coverage rate and droplet density in the citrus plant. For these parameters of open center shape citrus tree, there was no obvious difference in the front and rear direction, but in the left and middle part of the tree crown, the difference reached a 0.05 significant level. Considering droplet deposition characteristics and the spray uniformity, the UAV performed better when working on open center shape plants at a 1.0 m working height.</description><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Citrus paradisi</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Poncirus trifoliata</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><issn>1934-6344</issn><issn>1934-6352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzstKxDAYBeAgCo6jjyAE3Lhpzb2dpQzeYMCNrodc_k5TMmlNUsG3dwbFhatzFh-Hg9A1JTVfKXk31H7QBmpGqCIrImpGm_YELeiKi0pxyU7_uhDn6CLngRAlWi4XyD90HdiS8dhh60uaMy4JoMq9ngDr6HCekv7ycYd78Lu-HGHe6xDwHPc6RnBYQ_I64E_ovQ2Ax4hdGqcABTufS_JmLn6Ml-is0yHD1W8u0fvjw9v6udq8Pr2s7zeVZaotFZWUtMQ0RFpOiRPMNI5wRwTVrpXAndYdCGeEI5IbY1oLQiqw0hjGFFF8iW5_dqc0fsyQy3bvs4UQdIRxzlvaUnlYp4080Jt_dBjnFA_vjoqwRrKG8W_3qmrB</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Pan, Zhang</creator><creator>Lie, Deng</creator><creator>Qiang, Lyu</creator><creator>Shaolan, He</creator><creator>Shilai, Yi</creator><creator>Yande, Liu</creator><creator>Yongxu, Yu</creator><creator>Haiyang, Pan</creator><general>International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (IJABE)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution</title><author>Pan, Zhang ; Lie, Deng ; Qiang, Lyu ; Shaolan, He ; Shilai, Yi ; Yande, Liu ; Yongxu, Yu ; Haiyang, Pan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-151080b705c310d42b7d03d041ad85e3daafe4db4d053bbb8ce456ec5bb226063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Citrus paradisi</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Poncirus trifoliata</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lie, Deng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiang, Lyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaolan, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shilai, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yande, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yongxu, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haiyang, Pan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of agricultural and biological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Zhang</au><au>Lie, Deng</au><au>Qiang, Lyu</au><au>Shaolan, He</au><au>Shilai, Yi</au><au>Yande, Liu</au><au>Yongxu, Yu</au><au>Haiyang, Pan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution</atitle><jtitle>International journal of agricultural and biological engineering</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>45-45</pages><issn>1934-6344</issn><eissn>1934-6352</eissn><abstract>In order to explore the droplet penetration of spraying with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on citrus trees with different shapes, the tests were carried out at different working heights. The material was five years old Cocktail grapefruit (Citrus paradisi cv. Cocktail) grafted on Trafoliata (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) and the type of UAV sprayer used was the 3W-LWS-Q60S. A solution of 300 times Ponceau 2R diluents liquid instead of pesticide was used for citrus fields spraying and the droplets were collected by paper cards. Droplets deposition parameters were extracted and analyzed using digital image processing after scanning the cards. The results showed that: 1) For the trees with round head shape canopy, the droplet depositions of the upper, middle and lower layers had a significant difference at 0.05 level. The droplet deposition had the best effect when the working height was 1.0 m, where the average droplet deposition densities were 39.97 droplets/cm^sup 2^ and the average droplet size was 0.30 mm, but the droplet coverage (3.19%) was lower than that at the working height of 1.5 m (4.27%). 2) Under three different working heights of UAV, the tree with open center shape can obtain higher droplet deposition density at all three layers than that with the round head shape canopy. It was especially prominent when the working height was 1.0 m, as the middle layer increased by 49.92%. However, the higher range of droplet deposition density meant larger fluctuation and dispersion. 3) The open center shape canopy and the 1.0 m working height obviously improved the droplet coverage rate and droplet density in the citrus plant. For these parameters of open center shape citrus tree, there was no obvious difference in the front and rear direction, but in the left and middle part of the tree crown, the difference reached a 0.05 significant level. Considering droplet deposition characteristics and the spray uniformity, the UAV performed better when working on open center shape plants at a 1.0 m working height.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (IJABE)</pub><doi>10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2178</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1934-6344 |
ispartof | International journal of agricultural and biological engineering, 2016-07, Vol.9 (4), p.45-45 |
issn | 1934-6344 1934-6352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815705175 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Citrus fruits Citrus paradisi Flowers & plants Poncirus trifoliata Trees Unmanned aerial vehicles |
title | Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20citrus%20tree-shape%20and%20spraying%20height%20of%20small%20unmanned%20aerial%20vehicle%20on%20droplet%20distribution&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20biological%20engineering&rft.au=Pan,%20Zhang&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=45-45&rft.issn=1934-6344&rft.eissn=1934-6352&rft_id=info:doi/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4142419601%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810275272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |