Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study

Background Narrowing of the femoral neck under the femoral component of the hip resurfacing has been noted previously and has raised concern. In this study we examined the X‐rays of patients following Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery at 6‐years follow‐up. Methods Bony changes proximally and distal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.639-642
Hauptverfasser: Kohan, Lawrence, Field, Clarice, Kerr, Dennis, Ben-Nissan, Besim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 9
container_start_page 639
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 84
creator Kohan, Lawrence
Field, Clarice
Kerr, Dennis
Ben-Nissan, Besim
description Background Narrowing of the femoral neck under the femoral component of the hip resurfacing has been noted previously and has raised concern. In this study we examined the X‐rays of patients following Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery at 6‐years follow‐up. Methods Bony changes proximally and distally were measured. Fifty‐two patients were available for evaluation. Results There were 40 (76.9%) men and 12 (23.1%) women, with a mean age of 52 years (25–64). The unoperated contralateral femoral neck was measured as a control. We found femoral neck narrowing proximally in 82.7% of patients and distally in 26.9% and on the contralateral side in 54.5%. The average narrowing was 3.6%. Widening was observed proximally in 17.3% and distally in 73.1% and on the contralateral side in 45.5%. The average widening was 3.9%. Four of the 52 patients had proximal narrowing exceeding 10% of the femoral neck diameter, and one of the 52 patients had inferior narrowing exceeding 10%. Conclusion Gender, body mass index, component size and age did not affect remodelling. We conclude that the observed findings are likely to be a manifestation of a generalized remodelling response in the femoral neck rather than a localized and isolated narrowing at the junction of the component and the femoral neck.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.12706
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815701778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815701778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5306-d4d1c903363874aa9456062af56a346cca51c960f71dacb25f8d71e48d320fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gEziRs3A-30Oe4IETQSXKBx2ZS2gwPDDLZMdP695SELN3bT03u_c9P2AHCNYBeF1VOl76KEQ3YC2ogQGico5acHjQjGLXDh_QJCxFhKz0ErISmnUKRtMB7aVeVUEZVWLyMXDsYWRV7OI5VtrIs-8nWo-tplSm-rQc2ta-4jFTll8qqo5rkOdr-pTXMJzjJVeHt12DvgbfjwOniMxy-jp0F_HGuKIYsNMUinEGOGBSdKpYQyyBKVUaYwYVorGvoMZhwZpWcJzYThyBJhcAIzM8MdcLefu3bVZ239Rq5yr8O9VWmr2kskEOUQcS7-RykVFAkmkoDe_kEXVe3K8JAtxRDmCaeBujlQ9WxljVy7fKVcI3-_NAC9PfCVF7Y59hGU26xkyEruspL9yXQngiPeO3K_sd9Hh3JLyTjmVL5PRnI4fR5NhkGM8A9zZJPJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1556137275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kohan, Lawrence ; Field, Clarice ; Kerr, Dennis ; Ben-Nissan, Besim</creator><creatorcontrib>Kohan, Lawrence ; Field, Clarice ; Kerr, Dennis ; Ben-Nissan, Besim</creatorcontrib><description>Background Narrowing of the femoral neck under the femoral component of the hip resurfacing has been noted previously and has raised concern. In this study we examined the X‐rays of patients following Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery at 6‐years follow‐up. Methods Bony changes proximally and distally were measured. Fifty‐two patients were available for evaluation. Results There were 40 (76.9%) men and 12 (23.1%) women, with a mean age of 52 years (25–64). The unoperated contralateral femoral neck was measured as a control. We found femoral neck narrowing proximally in 82.7% of patients and distally in 26.9% and on the contralateral side in 54.5%. The average narrowing was 3.6%. Widening was observed proximally in 17.3% and distally in 73.1% and on the contralateral side in 45.5%. The average widening was 3.9%. Four of the 52 patients had proximal narrowing exceeding 10% of the femoral neck diameter, and one of the 52 patients had inferior narrowing exceeding 10%. Conclusion Gender, body mass index, component size and age did not affect remodelling. We conclude that the observed findings are likely to be a manifestation of a generalized remodelling response in the femoral neck rather than a localized and isolated narrowing at the junction of the component and the femoral neck.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.12706</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24975089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Bone Remodeling ; Female ; femoral neck width ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Neck - physiology ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; hip resurfacing ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; neck remodelling ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Radiography ; Radiology ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.639-642</ispartof><rights>2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5306-d4d1c903363874aa9456062af56a346cca51c960f71dacb25f8d71e48d320fdb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.12706$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.12706$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24975089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kohan, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Clarice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Nissan, Besim</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Narrowing of the femoral neck under the femoral component of the hip resurfacing has been noted previously and has raised concern. In this study we examined the X‐rays of patients following Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery at 6‐years follow‐up. Methods Bony changes proximally and distally were measured. Fifty‐two patients were available for evaluation. Results There were 40 (76.9%) men and 12 (23.1%) women, with a mean age of 52 years (25–64). The unoperated contralateral femoral neck was measured as a control. We found femoral neck narrowing proximally in 82.7% of patients and distally in 26.9% and on the contralateral side in 54.5%. The average narrowing was 3.6%. Widening was observed proximally in 17.3% and distally in 73.1% and on the contralateral side in 45.5%. The average widening was 3.9%. Four of the 52 patients had proximal narrowing exceeding 10% of the femoral neck diameter, and one of the 52 patients had inferior narrowing exceeding 10%. Conclusion Gender, body mass index, component size and age did not affect remodelling. We conclude that the observed findings are likely to be a manifestation of a generalized remodelling response in the femoral neck rather than a localized and isolated narrowing at the junction of the component and the femoral neck.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>femoral neck width</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Neck - physiology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>hip resurfacing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>neck remodelling</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPAjEUhRujEUQX_gEziRs3A-30Oe4IETQSXKBx2ZS2gwPDDLZMdP695SELN3bT03u_c9P2AHCNYBeF1VOl76KEQ3YC2ogQGico5acHjQjGLXDh_QJCxFhKz0ErISmnUKRtMB7aVeVUEZVWLyMXDsYWRV7OI5VtrIs-8nWo-tplSm-rQc2ta-4jFTll8qqo5rkOdr-pTXMJzjJVeHt12DvgbfjwOniMxy-jp0F_HGuKIYsNMUinEGOGBSdKpYQyyBKVUaYwYVorGvoMZhwZpWcJzYThyBJhcAIzM8MdcLefu3bVZ239Rq5yr8O9VWmr2kskEOUQcS7-RykVFAkmkoDe_kEXVe3K8JAtxRDmCaeBujlQ9WxljVy7fKVcI3-_NAC9PfCVF7Y59hGU26xkyEruspL9yXQngiPeO3K_sd9Hh3JLyTjmVL5PRnI4fR5NhkGM8A9zZJPJ</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Kohan, Lawrence</creator><creator>Field, Clarice</creator><creator>Kerr, Dennis</creator><creator>Ben-Nissan, Besim</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study</title><author>Kohan, Lawrence ; Field, Clarice ; Kerr, Dennis ; Ben-Nissan, Besim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5306-d4d1c903363874aa9456062af56a346cca51c960f71dacb25f8d71e48d320fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>femoral neck width</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Neck - physiology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>hip resurfacing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>neck remodelling</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohan, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Clarice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Nissan, Besim</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohan, Lawrence</au><au>Field, Clarice</au><au>Kerr, Dennis</au><au>Ben-Nissan, Besim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>639-642</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background Narrowing of the femoral neck under the femoral component of the hip resurfacing has been noted previously and has raised concern. In this study we examined the X‐rays of patients following Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery at 6‐years follow‐up. Methods Bony changes proximally and distally were measured. Fifty‐two patients were available for evaluation. Results There were 40 (76.9%) men and 12 (23.1%) women, with a mean age of 52 years (25–64). The unoperated contralateral femoral neck was measured as a control. We found femoral neck narrowing proximally in 82.7% of patients and distally in 26.9% and on the contralateral side in 54.5%. The average narrowing was 3.6%. Widening was observed proximally in 17.3% and distally in 73.1% and on the contralateral side in 45.5%. The average widening was 3.9%. Four of the 52 patients had proximal narrowing exceeding 10% of the femoral neck diameter, and one of the 52 patients had inferior narrowing exceeding 10%. Conclusion Gender, body mass index, component size and age did not affect remodelling. We conclude that the observed findings are likely to be a manifestation of a generalized remodelling response in the femoral neck rather than a localized and isolated narrowing at the junction of the component and the femoral neck.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24975089</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.12706</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2014-09, Vol.84 (9), p.639-642
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815701778
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Bone Remodeling
Female
femoral neck width
Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging
Femur Neck - physiology
Femur Neck - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis
hip resurfacing
Humans
Male
Medical research
Middle Aged
neck remodelling
Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Radiography
Radiology
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
title Femoral neck remodelling after hip resurfacing surgery: a radiological study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20neck%20remodelling%20after%20hip%20resurfacing%20surgery:%20a%20radiological%20study&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kohan,%20Lawrence&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=639-642&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.12706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1815701778%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1556137275&rft_id=info:pmid/24975089&rfr_iscdi=true