Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management
Soil tillage and nitrogen (N) management effects on weed species composition were evaluated in 2013 and 2014 on a clayey soil after 5‐years of organic management at the Royal Agricultural University's Harnhill Manor Farm, UK. Three tillage systems – Conventional Tillage (CT), and High and Low I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of applied biology 2016-09, Vol.169 (2), p.236-247 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 247 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 236 |
container_title | Annals of applied biology |
container_volume | 169 |
creator | Rial-Lovera, K. Davies, W.P. Cannon, N.D. Conway, J.S. |
description | Soil tillage and nitrogen (N) management effects on weed species composition were evaluated in 2013 and 2014 on a clayey soil after 5‐years of organic management at the Royal Agricultural University's Harnhill Manor Farm, UK. Three tillage systems – Conventional Tillage (CT), and High and Low Intensity Non‐inversion Tillage (HINiT & LINiT) – were compared at four N fertiliser rates of 0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha−1. Broad‐spectrum herbicide was applied before soil operations across the site in both years. Previous organic management legacy of high weed biomass promoted greater weed prevalence in 2013 while 2‐years of herbicide inclusion reduced weed biomass. Contrasting weather conditions across the seasons affected weed incidence. In the 2014 wet season, early weed dry weight (DM) was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT, while no differences were observed in the 2013 dry year. At midseason, weed DM was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT in both years, which was related to higher DM of the dominant weeds Stellaria media (L.) Vill. and Sinapis arvensis L. Grass weed DM was higher under non‐inversion tillage than CT. N fertilisation increased midseason total weed DM and weed prevalence at harvest. Spring wheat yield was the highest under CT while LINiT produced 17% higher yields than HINiT. Despite higher but still tolerable weed prevalence under both non‐inversion tillage systems and with the application of N, weeds alone was not the only yield‐limiting factor. However, results show that CT is the most reliable option for weed control in changing weather, while N fertilisation rates needs to be considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aab.12294 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815701431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815701431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3694-b380524ea270b6a6acacf682c40703ea5c379b88ea984b63728773d931560d813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0ssbAE7NixnbFUQJEqYAA6WpfkWgKpU2KXwrfHaREDt9wf_d7T6RFyytkFj3UJUFzwNM3lHhlwLWWihTT7ZMAYE4nUUh2SI-_f4pqzPB2Q2QyxohV-YtOulugCrR31q652C7p5RQgU5gE7WrYudOBDf_dt3dBQNw0skIKrqKtD1y7Q0SW4eOttjsnBHBqPJ799SJ5vrp_Gk2T6cHs3Hk2TUqhcJoUwLEslQqpZoUBBCeVcmbSUTDOBkJVC54UxCLmRhRI6NVqLKhc8U6wyXAzJ-c531bUfa_TBLmtfYvzNYbv2lhueacal6NGzf-hbu-5c_K6nuNJM6yxSlztqUzf4bWMSS-i-LWe2z9fGfO02XzsaXW2HqEh2itoH_PpTQPdulRY6s7P7WysfX1Qmr3I7ET-z-n1P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811670775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rial-Lovera, K. ; Davies, W.P. ; Cannon, N.D. ; Conway, J.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rial-Lovera, K. ; Davies, W.P. ; Cannon, N.D. ; Conway, J.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil tillage and nitrogen (N) management effects on weed species composition were evaluated in 2013 and 2014 on a clayey soil after 5‐years of organic management at the Royal Agricultural University's Harnhill Manor Farm, UK. Three tillage systems – Conventional Tillage (CT), and High and Low Intensity Non‐inversion Tillage (HINiT & LINiT) – were compared at four N fertiliser rates of 0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha−1. Broad‐spectrum herbicide was applied before soil operations across the site in both years. Previous organic management legacy of high weed biomass promoted greater weed prevalence in 2013 while 2‐years of herbicide inclusion reduced weed biomass. Contrasting weather conditions across the seasons affected weed incidence. In the 2014 wet season, early weed dry weight (DM) was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT, while no differences were observed in the 2013 dry year. At midseason, weed DM was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT in both years, which was related to higher DM of the dominant weeds Stellaria media (L.) Vill. and Sinapis arvensis L. Grass weed DM was higher under non‐inversion tillage than CT. N fertilisation increased midseason total weed DM and weed prevalence at harvest. Spring wheat yield was the highest under CT while LINiT produced 17% higher yields than HINiT. Despite higher but still tolerable weed prevalence under both non‐inversion tillage systems and with the application of N, weeds alone was not the only yield‐limiting factor. However, results show that CT is the most reliable option for weed control in changing weather, while N fertilisation rates needs to be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aab.12294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Broadleaf weed ; conventional tillage ; grass weed ; N fertiliser ; reduced tillage ; Sinapis arvensis ; Stellaria media ; Triticum aestivum ; weed management</subject><ispartof>Annals of applied biology, 2016-09, Vol.169 (2), p.236-247</ispartof><rights>2016 Association of Applied Biologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3694-b380524ea270b6a6acacf682c40703ea5c379b88ea984b63728773d931560d813</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-7956-8747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faab.12294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faab.12294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rial-Lovera, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, W.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, J.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management</title><title>Annals of applied biology</title><addtitle>Ann Appl Biol</addtitle><description>Soil tillage and nitrogen (N) management effects on weed species composition were evaluated in 2013 and 2014 on a clayey soil after 5‐years of organic management at the Royal Agricultural University's Harnhill Manor Farm, UK. Three tillage systems – Conventional Tillage (CT), and High and Low Intensity Non‐inversion Tillage (HINiT & LINiT) – were compared at four N fertiliser rates of 0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha−1. Broad‐spectrum herbicide was applied before soil operations across the site in both years. Previous organic management legacy of high weed biomass promoted greater weed prevalence in 2013 while 2‐years of herbicide inclusion reduced weed biomass. Contrasting weather conditions across the seasons affected weed incidence. In the 2014 wet season, early weed dry weight (DM) was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT, while no differences were observed in the 2013 dry year. At midseason, weed DM was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT in both years, which was related to higher DM of the dominant weeds Stellaria media (L.) Vill. and Sinapis arvensis L. Grass weed DM was higher under non‐inversion tillage than CT. N fertilisation increased midseason total weed DM and weed prevalence at harvest. Spring wheat yield was the highest under CT while LINiT produced 17% higher yields than HINiT. Despite higher but still tolerable weed prevalence under both non‐inversion tillage systems and with the application of N, weeds alone was not the only yield‐limiting factor. However, results show that CT is the most reliable option for weed control in changing weather, while N fertilisation rates needs to be considered.</description><subject>Broadleaf weed</subject><subject>conventional tillage</subject><subject>grass weed</subject><subject>N fertiliser</subject><subject>reduced tillage</subject><subject>Sinapis arvensis</subject><subject>Stellaria media</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>weed management</subject><issn>0003-4746</issn><issn>1744-7348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8A0ssbAE7NixnbFUQJEqYAA6WpfkWgKpU2KXwrfHaREDt9wf_d7T6RFyytkFj3UJUFzwNM3lHhlwLWWihTT7ZMAYE4nUUh2SI-_f4pqzPB2Q2QyxohV-YtOulugCrR31q652C7p5RQgU5gE7WrYudOBDf_dt3dBQNw0skIKrqKtD1y7Q0SW4eOttjsnBHBqPJ799SJ5vrp_Gk2T6cHs3Hk2TUqhcJoUwLEslQqpZoUBBCeVcmbSUTDOBkJVC54UxCLmRhRI6NVqLKhc8U6wyXAzJ-c531bUfa_TBLmtfYvzNYbv2lhueacal6NGzf-hbu-5c_K6nuNJM6yxSlztqUzf4bWMSS-i-LWe2z9fGfO02XzsaXW2HqEh2itoH_PpTQPdulRY6s7P7WysfX1Qmr3I7ET-z-n1P</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Rial-Lovera, K.</creator><creator>Davies, W.P.</creator><creator>Cannon, N.D.</creator><creator>Conway, J.S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QO</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-8747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management</title><author>Rial-Lovera, K. ; Davies, W.P. ; Cannon, N.D. ; Conway, J.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3694-b380524ea270b6a6acacf682c40703ea5c379b88ea984b63728773d931560d813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Broadleaf weed</topic><topic>conventional tillage</topic><topic>grass weed</topic><topic>N fertiliser</topic><topic>reduced tillage</topic><topic>Sinapis arvensis</topic><topic>Stellaria media</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>weed management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rial-Lovera, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, W.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, N.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, J.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rial-Lovera, K.</au><au>Davies, W.P.</au><au>Cannon, N.D.</au><au>Conway, J.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management</atitle><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Appl Biol</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>236-247</pages><issn>0003-4746</issn><eissn>1744-7348</eissn><abstract>Soil tillage and nitrogen (N) management effects on weed species composition were evaluated in 2013 and 2014 on a clayey soil after 5‐years of organic management at the Royal Agricultural University's Harnhill Manor Farm, UK. Three tillage systems – Conventional Tillage (CT), and High and Low Intensity Non‐inversion Tillage (HINiT & LINiT) – were compared at four N fertiliser rates of 0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha−1. Broad‐spectrum herbicide was applied before soil operations across the site in both years. Previous organic management legacy of high weed biomass promoted greater weed prevalence in 2013 while 2‐years of herbicide inclusion reduced weed biomass. Contrasting weather conditions across the seasons affected weed incidence. In the 2014 wet season, early weed dry weight (DM) was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT, while no differences were observed in the 2013 dry year. At midseason, weed DM was higher under HINiT than CT and LINiT in both years, which was related to higher DM of the dominant weeds Stellaria media (L.) Vill. and Sinapis arvensis L. Grass weed DM was higher under non‐inversion tillage than CT. N fertilisation increased midseason total weed DM and weed prevalence at harvest. Spring wheat yield was the highest under CT while LINiT produced 17% higher yields than HINiT. Despite higher but still tolerable weed prevalence under both non‐inversion tillage systems and with the application of N, weeds alone was not the only yield‐limiting factor. However, results show that CT is the most reliable option for weed control in changing weather, while N fertilisation rates needs to be considered.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aab.12294</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-8747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4746 |
ispartof | Annals of applied biology, 2016-09, Vol.169 (2), p.236-247 |
issn | 0003-4746 1744-7348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815701431 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Broadleaf weed conventional tillage grass weed N fertiliser reduced tillage Sinapis arvensis Stellaria media Triticum aestivum weed management |
title | Weed development in spring wheat after contrasting soil tillage and nitrogen management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weed%20development%20in%20spring%20wheat%20after%20contrasting%20soil%20tillage%20and%20nitrogen%20management&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20applied%20biology&rft.au=Rial-Lovera,%20K.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=236-247&rft.issn=0003-4746&rft.eissn=1744-7348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aab.12294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1815701431%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811670775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |