Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay

DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microbiological methods 2016-09, Vol.128, p.24-30
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jungho, Wang, Hye-young, Kim, Seoyong, Park, Soon Deok, Yu, Kwangmin, Kim, Hyo Youl, Uh, Young, Lee, Hyeyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue
container_start_page 24
container_title Journal of microbiological methods
container_volume 128
creator Kim, Jungho
Wang, Hye-young
Kim, Seoyong
Park, Soon Deok
Yu, Kwangmin
Kim, Hyo Youl
Uh, Young
Lee, Hyeyoung
description DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 103CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 103CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 104CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay. •Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit and boiling method for DNA extraction were compared.•Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles.•The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit does not require enzyme to digest cell walls.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815697989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167701216301300</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815697989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-35839c8b1668dddaeb8347e357d2d63a30779a4d4eab2601291d9d1de96d52303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2KUzEUx4MoTmf0CQTJ0s2t-ejNTRYuSh1HYRgHP9YhNzm1qbk3Nckt1LU738JH80lM7ehShAMh5Hfy55wfQk8omVNCxfPtfPADlDmrlzmpReg9NKOyY43krbqPZvWhazpC2Rk6z3lbgZYv5EN0xjomuOR0hr5f7k2YTPFxxHGNywbw7TTaTePLz28_8M2yeW-GXQD82Re8jgk7KGCLHz_hwdsUe28CfnmzxH7EfYjRYTuFMiXAfSwlQMZTPsK3q3dNgj2kDEeu4M2hT975r6dok7M5PEIP1iZkeHx3XqCPry4_rF4312-v3qyW143lipWGt5IrK3sqhHTOGeglX3TA284xJ7jhpOuUWbgFmJ6JOr2iTjnqQAnXMk74BXp2-neX4pcJctGDzxZCMCPEKWsqaStUp6T6H5S0raCMVZSf0LqVnBOs9S75waSDpkQfhemt_i1MH4VpUovQ2vX0LmDqB3B_e_4YqsCLEwB1I3sPSWfrYbTgfKoitIv-nwG_AF_SqYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810556122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kim, Jungho ; Wang, Hye-young ; Kim, Seoyong ; Park, Soon Deok ; Yu, Kwangmin ; Kim, Hyo Youl ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Hyeyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungho ; Wang, Hye-young ; Kim, Seoyong ; Park, Soon Deok ; Yu, Kwangmin ; Kim, Hyo Youl ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><description>DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 103CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 103CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 104CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay. •Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit and boiling method for DNA extraction were compared.•Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles.•The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit does not require enzyme to digest cell walls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27263831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Bacteria ; Blood Culture ; Candida ; Candida - isolation & purification ; Colony Count, Microbial ; DNA extraction ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; DNA, Fungal - isolation & purification ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Hybridization ; Limit of Detection ; Molecular diagnosis ; Nucleic Acid Hybridization ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sepsis - diagnosis ; Sepsis - microbiology ; Sequence Analysis, DNA]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2016-09, Vol.128, p.24-30</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-35839c8b1668dddaeb8347e357d2d63a30779a4d4eab2601291d9d1de96d52303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-35839c8b1668dddaeb8347e357d2d63a30779a4d4eab2601291d9d1de96d52303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1572-5250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701216301300$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27263831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hye-young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seoyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soon Deok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kwangmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyo Youl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uh, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 103CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 103CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 104CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay. •Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit and boiling method for DNA extraction were compared.•Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles.•The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit does not require enzyme to digest cell walls.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Blood Culture</subject><subject>Candida</subject><subject>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>DNA extraction</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Molecular diagnosis</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Hybridization</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sepsis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sepsis - microbiology</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2KUzEUx4MoTmf0CQTJ0s2t-ejNTRYuSh1HYRgHP9YhNzm1qbk3Nckt1LU738JH80lM7ehShAMh5Hfy55wfQk8omVNCxfPtfPADlDmrlzmpReg9NKOyY43krbqPZvWhazpC2Rk6z3lbgZYv5EN0xjomuOR0hr5f7k2YTPFxxHGNywbw7TTaTePLz28_8M2yeW-GXQD82Re8jgk7KGCLHz_hwdsUe28CfnmzxH7EfYjRYTuFMiXAfSwlQMZTPsK3q3dNgj2kDEeu4M2hT975r6dok7M5PEIP1iZkeHx3XqCPry4_rF4312-v3qyW143lipWGt5IrK3sqhHTOGeglX3TA284xJ7jhpOuUWbgFmJ6JOr2iTjnqQAnXMk74BXp2-neX4pcJctGDzxZCMCPEKWsqaStUp6T6H5S0raCMVZSf0LqVnBOs9S75waSDpkQfhemt_i1MH4VpUovQ2vX0LmDqB3B_e_4YqsCLEwB1I3sPSWfrYbTgfKoitIv-nwG_AF_SqYM</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Kim, Jungho</creator><creator>Wang, Hye-young</creator><creator>Kim, Seoyong</creator><creator>Park, Soon Deok</creator><creator>Yu, Kwangmin</creator><creator>Kim, Hyo Youl</creator><creator>Uh, Young</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeyoung</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-5250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay</title><author>Kim, Jungho ; Wang, Hye-young ; Kim, Seoyong ; Park, Soon Deok ; Yu, Kwangmin ; Kim, Hyo Youl ; Uh, Young ; Lee, Hyeyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-35839c8b1668dddaeb8347e357d2d63a30779a4d4eab2601291d9d1de96d52303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Blood Culture</topic><topic>Candida</topic><topic>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>DNA extraction</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Molecular diagnosis</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Hybridization</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sepsis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sepsis - microbiology</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jungho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hye-young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seoyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soon Deok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kwangmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyo Youl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uh, Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jungho</au><au>Wang, Hye-young</au><au>Kim, Seoyong</au><au>Park, Soon Deok</au><au>Yu, Kwangmin</au><au>Kim, Hyo Youl</au><au>Uh, Young</au><au>Lee, Hyeyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>24-30</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><abstract>DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 103CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 103CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 104CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay. •Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit and boiling method for DNA extraction were compared.•Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles.•The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit does not require enzyme to digest cell walls.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27263831</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-5250</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-7012
ispartof Journal of microbiological methods, 2016-09, Vol.128, p.24-30
issn 0167-7012
1872-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815697989
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bacteria
Blood Culture
Candida
Candida - isolation & purification
Colony Count, Microbial
DNA extraction
DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification
DNA, Fungal - isolation & purification
Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification
Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification
Hybridization
Limit of Detection
Molecular diagnosis
Nucleic Acid Hybridization
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - isolation & purification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sepsis - diagnosis
Sepsis - microbiology
Sequence Analysis, DNA
title Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Punch-it%E2%84%A2%20NA-Sample%20kit%20for%20detecting%20microbial%20DNA%20in%20blood%20culture%20bottles%20using%20PCR-reverse%20blot%20hybridization%20assay&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Kim,%20Jungho&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=128&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=24-30&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815697989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810556122&rft_id=info:pmid/27263831&rft_els_id=S0167701216301300&rfr_iscdi=true