Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families

The positive relationship between complexity of work and the validity of general mental ability (GMA) measures across a variety of occupations is well supported by research and provides important practical and theoretical support for cognitive ability measures. However, there is currently no researc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of selection and assessment 2015-12, Vol.23 (4), p.316-331
Hauptverfasser: MacLane, Charles N., Cucina, Jeffrey M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 4
container_start_page 316
container_title International journal of selection and assessment
container_volume 23
creator MacLane, Charles N.
Cucina, Jeffrey M.
description The positive relationship between complexity of work and the validity of general mental ability (GMA) measures across a variety of occupations is well supported by research and provides important practical and theoretical support for cognitive ability measures. However, there is currently no research demonstrating a systematic relationship between the size of the validities of any personality measure and the personality requirements of jobs, thus leaving open to question the predictive and construct validity of personality measures for applicant selection. We compared the validities of two biodata measures – one scored to measure social competence and one to measure GMA – across six job families that varied in social requirements. The validity of the GMA measure generalized at approximately the same level across the job families while the validity of the social competence measure decreased as social requirements diminished.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijsa.12117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815693120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815693120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4037-8d47800a63079bde0ebe4f5bb967f6c563ffdcee793c0a6deba091c9b94f56193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EFLwzAYBuAgCs7pxV9Q8CJCZ9K0SXOcw02H6GC6eZGQtl8ls2tm0qnz15s53cGDuSR8PG_gexE6JrhD_DnXM6c6JCKE76AWiVkaRjQVu6iFBUtCzJPHfXTg3AxjTCmPWuhpADVYVelP1WhTB6YMeua51o1-g0DVRXBr6nw7mHhY-Ce4QOXWOBeMwDpT-3GzCjPloAiGJgv6aq4rrw7RXqkqB0c_dxs99C_ve1fhzd3gute9CfMYUx6mRcxTjBWjmIusAAwZxGWSZYLxkuUJo2VZ5ABc0NyrAjKFBclFJrxiRNA2Ot38u7DmdQmukXPtcqgqVYNZOklSkjBBSYQ9PflDZ2Zp_QZe8YjHKcUp8epso763tFDKhdVzZVeSYLluWq6blt9Ne0w2-F1XsPpHyuvhuPubCTcZ7Rr42GaUfZGMU57I6e1AjtLxxSSaxjKmX90-kKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727483081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>MacLane, Charles N. ; Cucina, Jeffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacLane, Charles N. ; Cucina, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>The positive relationship between complexity of work and the validity of general mental ability (GMA) measures across a variety of occupations is well supported by research and provides important practical and theoretical support for cognitive ability measures. However, there is currently no research demonstrating a systematic relationship between the size of the validities of any personality measure and the personality requirements of jobs, thus leaving open to question the predictive and construct validity of personality measures for applicant selection. We compared the validities of two biodata measures – one scored to measure social competence and one to measure GMA – across six job families that varied in social requirements. The validity of the GMA measure generalized at approximately the same level across the job families while the validity of the social competence measure decreased as social requirements diminished.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-075X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cognitive ability ; Personality ; Selection ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International journal of selection and assessment, 2015-12, Vol.23 (4), p.316-331</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4037-8d47800a63079bde0ebe4f5bb967f6c563ffdcee793c0a6deba091c9b94f56193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4037-8d47800a63079bde0ebe4f5bb967f6c563ffdcee793c0a6deba091c9b94f56193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijsa.12117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijsa.12117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacLane, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucina, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families</title><title>International journal of selection and assessment</title><addtitle>International Journal of Selection and Assessment</addtitle><description>The positive relationship between complexity of work and the validity of general mental ability (GMA) measures across a variety of occupations is well supported by research and provides important practical and theoretical support for cognitive ability measures. However, there is currently no research demonstrating a systematic relationship between the size of the validities of any personality measure and the personality requirements of jobs, thus leaving open to question the predictive and construct validity of personality measures for applicant selection. We compared the validities of two biodata measures – one scored to measure social competence and one to measure GMA – across six job families that varied in social requirements. The validity of the GMA measure generalized at approximately the same level across the job families while the validity of the social competence measure decreased as social requirements diminished.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Selection</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0965-075X</issn><issn>1468-2389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EFLwzAYBuAgCs7pxV9Q8CJCZ9K0SXOcw02H6GC6eZGQtl8ls2tm0qnz15s53cGDuSR8PG_gexE6JrhD_DnXM6c6JCKE76AWiVkaRjQVu6iFBUtCzJPHfXTg3AxjTCmPWuhpADVYVelP1WhTB6YMeua51o1-g0DVRXBr6nw7mHhY-Ce4QOXWOBeMwDpT-3GzCjPloAiGJgv6aq4rrw7RXqkqB0c_dxs99C_ve1fhzd3gute9CfMYUx6mRcxTjBWjmIusAAwZxGWSZYLxkuUJo2VZ5ABc0NyrAjKFBclFJrxiRNA2Ot38u7DmdQmukXPtcqgqVYNZOklSkjBBSYQ9PflDZ2Zp_QZe8YjHKcUp8epso763tFDKhdVzZVeSYLluWq6blt9Ne0w2-F1XsPpHyuvhuPubCTcZ7Rr42GaUfZGMU57I6e1AjtLxxSSaxjKmX90-kKs</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>MacLane, Charles N.</creator><creator>Cucina, Jeffrey M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families</title><author>MacLane, Charles N. ; Cucina, Jeffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4037-8d47800a63079bde0ebe4f5bb967f6c563ffdcee793c0a6deba091c9b94f56193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Selection</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacLane, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucina, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacLane, Charles N.</au><au>Cucina, Jeffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families</atitle><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle><addtitle>International Journal of Selection and Assessment</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>316-331</pages><issn>0965-075X</issn><eissn>1468-2389</eissn><abstract>The positive relationship between complexity of work and the validity of general mental ability (GMA) measures across a variety of occupations is well supported by research and provides important practical and theoretical support for cognitive ability measures. However, there is currently no research demonstrating a systematic relationship between the size of the validities of any personality measure and the personality requirements of jobs, thus leaving open to question the predictive and construct validity of personality measures for applicant selection. We compared the validities of two biodata measures – one scored to measure social competence and one to measure GMA – across six job families that varied in social requirements. The validity of the GMA measure generalized at approximately the same level across the job families while the validity of the social competence measure decreased as social requirements diminished.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijsa.12117</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-075X
ispartof International journal of selection and assessment, 2015-12, Vol.23 (4), p.316-331
issn 0965-075X
1468-2389
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815693120
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Analysis
Cognitive ability
Personality
Selection
Social conditions & trends
Studies
Validity
title Generalization of Cognitive and Noncognitive Validities across Personality-based Job Families
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generalization%20of%20Cognitive%20and%20Noncognitive%20Validities%20across%20Personality-based%20Job%20Families&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20selection%20and%20assessment&rft.au=MacLane,%20Charles%20N.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=316-331&rft.issn=0965-075X&rft.eissn=1468-2389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijsa.12117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815693120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727483081&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true