Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-08, Vol.134 (9), p.681-688
Hauptverfasser: Mounsey, Craig A, Mawhinney, Jamie A, Werner, Raphael S, Taggart, David P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 688
container_issue 9
container_start_page 681
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 134
creator Mounsey, Craig A
Mawhinney, Jamie A
Werner, Raphael S
Taggart, David P
description The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, there has been concern for many years that these transradial procedures may have a detrimental impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now comprehensive evidence that such interventions cause morphologic and functional damage to the artery in situ. Despite this, there remain remarkably few studies investigating the use of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterization. This article will review concisely the evidence that transradial procedures cause damage to the RA, and discuss the impact this could have on previously cannulated RAs used as coronary artery bypass grafting conduits. On the basis of the evidence assessed, we make a number of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022992
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815680790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815680790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-a19549214d564b8fb1d47d49bb1732839f3d82ddeab80548bd4e0353cc3187483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVtv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0DmjZeU8S2xn1AIl660alHZfbac2GED2XhrJ1Slfx5H2SLxZM8534w1xwi9JXBJSE7eV-vbarcpt-ub6_KqnLVLoFQp-gytiKA844Kp52gFACorGKXn6GWMP1OZs0K8QOe0EAWVElbo8ZN3EX8L7nfnp4i3wQwxGNuZHldm3LvRhe6PGTs_zFDTT9bhXXTYtzi5-HZBy5C4B2wiNrjyg526EXdDugY_mGSc_I8PRxMj_j6FH6n88AqdtaaP7vXpvEC7L5-31VW2ufm6rspN1nDCZGaIElxRwq3IeS3bmlheWK7qmqTdJFMts5Ja60wtQXBZW-6ACdY0jMiCS3aB3i1zj8HfTS6O-tDFxvW9GVxaWhNJRC6hUJBQtaBN8DEG1-pj6A5pBU1Az9nr_7OfNb1kn3rfnJ6Z6oOz_zqfwk4AX4B736c84q9-undB753px71OvwMMSJFRIDlIBpDNkmR_AZObkXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815680790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Mounsey, Craig A ; Mawhinney, Jamie A ; Werner, Raphael S ; Taggart, David P</creator><creatorcontrib>Mounsey, Craig A ; Mawhinney, Jamie A ; Werner, Raphael S ; Taggart, David P</creatorcontrib><description>The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, there has been concern for many years that these transradial procedures may have a detrimental impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now comprehensive evidence that such interventions cause morphologic and functional damage to the artery in situ. Despite this, there remain remarkably few studies investigating the use of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterization. This article will review concisely the evidence that transradial procedures cause damage to the RA, and discuss the impact this could have on previously cannulated RAs used as coronary artery bypass grafting conduits. On the basis of the evidence assessed, we make a number of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27572880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods ; Humans ; Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Radial Artery - physiology ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Vascular Patency - physiology</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2016-08, Vol.134 (9), p.681-688</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-a19549214d564b8fb1d47d49bb1732839f3d82ddeab80548bd4e0353cc3187483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-a19549214d564b8fb1d47d49bb1732839f3d82ddeab80548bd4e0353cc3187483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27572880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mounsey, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawhinney, Jamie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Raphael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, David P</creatorcontrib><title>Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, there has been concern for many years that these transradial procedures may have a detrimental impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now comprehensive evidence that such interventions cause morphologic and functional damage to the artery in situ. Despite this, there remain remarkably few studies investigating the use of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterization. This article will review concisely the evidence that transradial procedures cause damage to the RA, and discuss the impact this could have on previously cannulated RAs used as coronary artery bypass grafting conduits. On the basis of the evidence assessed, we make a number of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular procedures.</description><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radial Artery - physiology</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><subject>Vascular Patency - physiology</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVtv1DAQhS1ERZfCX0DmjZeU8S2xn1AIl660alHZfbac2GED2XhrJ1Slfx5H2SLxZM8534w1xwi9JXBJSE7eV-vbarcpt-ub6_KqnLVLoFQp-gytiKA844Kp52gFACorGKXn6GWMP1OZs0K8QOe0EAWVElbo8ZN3EX8L7nfnp4i3wQwxGNuZHldm3LvRhe6PGTs_zFDTT9bhXXTYtzi5-HZBy5C4B2wiNrjyg526EXdDugY_mGSc_I8PRxMj_j6FH6n88AqdtaaP7vXpvEC7L5-31VW2ufm6rspN1nDCZGaIElxRwq3IeS3bmlheWK7qmqTdJFMts5Ja60wtQXBZW-6ACdY0jMiCS3aB3i1zj8HfTS6O-tDFxvW9GVxaWhNJRC6hUJBQtaBN8DEG1-pj6A5pBU1Az9nr_7OfNb1kn3rfnJ6Z6oOz_zqfwk4AX4B736c84q9-undB753px71OvwMMSJFRIDlIBpDNkmR_AZObkXI</recordid><startdate>20160830</startdate><enddate>20160830</enddate><creator>Mounsey, Craig A</creator><creator>Mawhinney, Jamie A</creator><creator>Werner, Raphael S</creator><creator>Taggart, David P</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160830</creationdate><title>Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?</title><author>Mounsey, Craig A ; Mawhinney, Jamie A ; Werner, Raphael S ; Taggart, David P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-a19549214d564b8fb1d47d49bb1732839f3d82ddeab80548bd4e0353cc3187483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radial Artery - physiology</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><topic>Vascular Patency - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mounsey, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawhinney, Jamie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Raphael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, David P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mounsey, Craig A</au><au>Mawhinney, Jamie A</au><au>Werner, Raphael S</au><au>Taggart, David P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2016-08-30</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>681-688</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>The radial artery (RA) is a commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting, and recent studies have demonstrated that it provides superior long-term patency rates to the saphenous vein in most situations. In addition, the RA is also being used with increasing frequency as the access point for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. However, there has been concern for many years that these transradial procedures may have a detrimental impact on the function of RA grafts used in coronary artery bypass grafting, and there is now comprehensive evidence that such interventions cause morphologic and functional damage to the artery in situ. Despite this, there remain remarkably few studies investigating the use of previously cannulated RAs as grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery, and there are no clear guidelines on the use of the RA in coronary artery bypass grafting after its catheterization. This article will review concisely the evidence that transradial procedures cause damage to the RA, and discuss the impact this could have on previously cannulated RAs used as coronary artery bypass grafting conduits. On the basis of the evidence assessed, we make a number of recommendations to both surgeons and cardiologists regarding use of the RA in cardiovascular procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>27572880</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022992</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2016-08, Vol.134 (9), p.681-688
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815680790
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Bypass - methods
Humans
Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging
Radial Artery - physiology
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Vascular Patency - physiology
title Does Previous Transradial Catheterization Preclude Use of the Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A21%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Previous%20Transradial%20Catheterization%20Preclude%20Use%20of%20the%20Radial%20Artery%20as%20a%20Conduit%20in%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Surgery?&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Mounsey,%20Craig%20A&rft.date=2016-08-30&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=681-688&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815680790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815680790&rft_id=info:pmid/27572880&rfr_iscdi=true