Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan
A coalition of states, utilities, energy producers, and other industry groups has brought a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which limits carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's existin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental law reporter 2016-03, Vol.46 (3), p.1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Environmental law reporter |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Revesz, Richard L Grab, Denise A Lienke, Jack |
description | A coalition of states, utilities, energy producers, and other industry groups has brought a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which limits carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's existing power plants pursuant to CAA ...111(d). (A competing cohort of states, municipalities, companies, and environmental organizations has intervened in support of the rule.) As of this writing, merits briefing has yet to begin, but the petitioners offered a preview of their arguments in a set of motions to stay the CPP pending resolution of their suit. In support of the stay requests, the petitioners filed dozens of declarations from state government officials and industry representatives, many of which made exaggerated claims regarding the "unprecedented" nature of the CPP. In this Comment, the authors highlight a wide variety of regulations from the CAA's 45-year history that provide substantial precedent for the flexible design of the CPP. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815476737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815476737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18154767373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUANAOmojiP9zRhaRAecTNEIkmDiSykwYvWlOo3hYNf6-DP-B0ljNjHuciDaIoFwu2tPbOeRQmXHjsWMpeaSUJaiRSztC0hR2cR3rhBKaDE16lhoqwxQsOzkJnCNwNodAoB6jMGwkqLQefzTupLa5_rtim3NfFIXiQeY5oXdMr26L-VjSjbcI8TESWZnEW_1E_FO0-0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1815476737</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Revesz, Richard L ; Grab, Denise A ; Lienke, Jack</creator><creatorcontrib>Revesz, Richard L ; Grab, Denise A ; Lienke, Jack</creatorcontrib><description>A coalition of states, utilities, energy producers, and other industry groups has brought a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which limits carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's existing power plants pursuant to CAA ...111(d). (A competing cohort of states, municipalities, companies, and environmental organizations has intervened in support of the rule.) As of this writing, merits briefing has yet to begin, but the petitioners offered a preview of their arguments in a set of motions to stay the CPP pending resolution of their suit. In support of the stay requests, the petitioners filed dozens of declarations from state government officials and industry representatives, many of which made exaggerated claims regarding the "unprecedented" nature of the CPP. In this Comment, the authors highlight a wide variety of regulations from the CAA's 45-year history that provide substantial precedent for the flexible design of the CPP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Environmental Law Institute</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Companies ; Energy ; Environmental groups ; Environmental organizations ; Environmental protection ; Local government ; Power plants ; Public officials ; State government ; Territory</subject><ispartof>Environmental law reporter, 2016-03, Vol.46 (3), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Environmental Law Institute Mar 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Revesz, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Denise A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lienke, Jack</creatorcontrib><title>Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan</title><title>Environmental law reporter</title><description>A coalition of states, utilities, energy producers, and other industry groups has brought a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which limits carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's existing power plants pursuant to CAA ...111(d). (A competing cohort of states, municipalities, companies, and environmental organizations has intervened in support of the rule.) As of this writing, merits briefing has yet to begin, but the petitioners offered a preview of their arguments in a set of motions to stay the CPP pending resolution of their suit. In support of the stay requests, the petitioners filed dozens of declarations from state government officials and industry representatives, many of which made exaggerated claims regarding the "unprecedented" nature of the CPP. In this Comment, the authors highlight a wide variety of regulations from the CAA's 45-year history that provide substantial precedent for the flexible design of the CPP.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental groups</subject><subject>Environmental organizations</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Territory</subject><issn>0046-2284</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUANAOmojiP9zRhaRAecTNEIkmDiSykwYvWlOo3hYNf6-DP-B0ljNjHuciDaIoFwu2tPbOeRQmXHjsWMpeaSUJaiRSztC0hR2cR3rhBKaDE16lhoqwxQsOzkJnCNwNodAoB6jMGwkqLQefzTupLa5_rtim3NfFIXiQeY5oXdMr26L-VjSjbcI8TESWZnEW_1E_FO0-0A</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Revesz, Richard L</creator><creator>Grab, Denise A</creator><creator>Lienke, Jack</creator><general>Environmental Law Institute</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan</title><author>Revesz, Richard L ; Grab, Denise A ; Lienke, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18154767373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental groups</topic><topic>Environmental organizations</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Territory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Revesz, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grab, Denise A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lienke, Jack</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental law reporter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Revesz, Richard L</au><au>Grab, Denise A</au><au>Lienke, Jack</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan</atitle><jtitle>Environmental law reporter</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0046-2284</issn><abstract>A coalition of states, utilities, energy producers, and other industry groups has brought a challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which limits carbon dioxide emissions from the nation's existing power plants pursuant to CAA ...111(d). (A competing cohort of states, municipalities, companies, and environmental organizations has intervened in support of the rule.) As of this writing, merits briefing has yet to begin, but the petitioners offered a preview of their arguments in a set of motions to stay the CPP pending resolution of their suit. In support of the stay requests, the petitioners filed dozens of declarations from state government officials and industry representatives, many of which made exaggerated claims regarding the "unprecedented" nature of the CPP. In this Comment, the authors highlight a wide variety of regulations from the CAA's 45-year history that provide substantial precedent for the flexible design of the CPP.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Environmental Law Institute</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-2284 |
ispartof | Environmental law reporter, 2016-03, Vol.46 (3), p.1 |
issn | 0046-2284 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815476737 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Carbon dioxide Companies Energy Environmental groups Environmental organizations Environmental protection Local government Power plants Public officials State government Territory |
title | Familiar Territory: A Survey of Legal Precedents for the Clean Power Plan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A53%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Familiar%20Territory:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Legal%20Precedents%20for%20the%20Clean%20Power%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20law%20reporter&rft.au=Revesz,%20Richard%20L&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0046-2284&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1815476737%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815476737&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |