What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice
Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2016-09, Vol.165, p.10-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 165 |
creator | Determann, Domino Lambooij, Mattijs S. de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. Hayen, Arthur P. Varkevisser, Marco Schut, Frederik T. Wit, G. Ardine de |
description | Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about these preferences and how they vary across consumers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) we quantified trade-offs between basic health plan characteristics and analysed whether there are differences in preferences according to age, health status and income. We selected four health plan characteristics to be included in the DCE: (i) the level of provider choice and associated level of reimbursement, (ii) the primary focus of provider contracting (price, quality, social responsibility), (iii) the level of service benefits, and (iv) the monthly premium. This selection was based on a literature study, expert interviews and focus group discussions. The DCE consisted of 17 choice sets, each comprising two hypothetical health plan alternatives. A representative sample (n = 533) of the Dutch adult population, based on age, gender and educational level, completed the online questionnaire during the annual open enrolment period for 2015. The final model with four latent classes showed that being able to choose a care provider freely was by far the most decisive characteristic for respondents aged over 45, those with chronic conditions, and those with a gross income over €3000/month. Monthly premium was the most important choice determinant for young, healthy, and lower income respondents. We conclude that it would be very unlikely for half of the sample to opt for health plans with restricted provider choice. However, a premium discount up to €15/month by restricted health plans might motivate especially younger, healthier, and less wealthy consumers to choose these plans.
•Understanding health plan preferences is vital in a managed competition health system.•Level of choice of care providers was overall the most decisive characteristic.•Limited consumer appreciation for health insurers that steer on quality of care.•Preferences differ across consumers according to age, health status and income. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815368833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953616303835</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815368833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8bbdf6d02047b9fa3863833d8600350dccc6b0b3c76f0fa61becc8f340101fce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9v3CAQxVGVqtmm_QotUi692B3MGthTFEX9J0XqJVGPCMMgs7KNA3aifPuy3SSHXHoaNPObN7xHyGcGNQMmvu7rHG22YURXN6VRg6yhad6QDVOSVy3fyhOygUbKatdycUre57wHAAaKvyOnjdyqVjZqQ27_9GahPZph6ek8mClTF-mMcR6Qzgk9pgt60yNdknFYRe9ph8sD4nSYjmEdqZlcecf74DBR28dg8QN5682Q8eNTPSO337_dXP2srn__-HV1eV3ZVqilUl3nvHDQwFZ2O2-4Elxx7pQA4C04a63ooONWCg_eCNahtcrzbfHBvEV-Rr4cdcv9uxXzoseQLQ7FB8Y1a6ZYca-KZkHPX6H7uKap_O4ftZOSMSiUPFI2xZyLfT2nMJr0qBnoQ_J6r1-S14fkNUhdki-bn5701-4we957jroAl0cASyD3AZMuKjhZdCGhXbSL4b9H_gJX5JiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815977110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Determann, Domino ; Lambooij, Mattijs S. ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ; Hayen, Arthur P. ; Varkevisser, Marco ; Schut, Frederik T. ; Wit, G. Ardine de</creator><creatorcontrib>Determann, Domino ; Lambooij, Mattijs S. ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ; Hayen, Arthur P. ; Varkevisser, Marco ; Schut, Frederik T. ; Wit, G. Ardine de</creatorcontrib><description>Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about these preferences and how they vary across consumers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) we quantified trade-offs between basic health plan characteristics and analysed whether there are differences in preferences according to age, health status and income. We selected four health plan characteristics to be included in the DCE: (i) the level of provider choice and associated level of reimbursement, (ii) the primary focus of provider contracting (price, quality, social responsibility), (iii) the level of service benefits, and (iv) the monthly premium. This selection was based on a literature study, expert interviews and focus group discussions. The DCE consisted of 17 choice sets, each comprising two hypothetical health plan alternatives. A representative sample (n = 533) of the Dutch adult population, based on age, gender and educational level, completed the online questionnaire during the annual open enrolment period for 2015. The final model with four latent classes showed that being able to choose a care provider freely was by far the most decisive characteristic for respondents aged over 45, those with chronic conditions, and those with a gross income over €3000/month. Monthly premium was the most important choice determinant for young, healthy, and lower income respondents. We conclude that it would be very unlikely for half of the sample to opt for health plans with restricted provider choice. However, a premium discount up to €15/month by restricted health plans might motivate especially younger, healthier, and less wealthy consumers to choose these plans.
•Understanding health plan preferences is vital in a managed competition health system.•Level of choice of care providers was overall the most decisive characteristic.•Limited consumer appreciation for health insurers that steer on quality of care.•Preferences differ across consumers according to age, health status and income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27485728</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult care services ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Alternative approaches ; Choice Behavior ; Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Consumers ; Discrete choice experiment (DCE) ; Educational attainment ; Experiments ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Free provider choice ; Health behavior ; Health insurance ; Health plan choice ; Health problems ; Health services ; Humans ; Income ; Income - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance Coverage - classification ; Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Internet ; Latent class analysis ; Low income groups ; Male ; Managed competition ; Management ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - economics ; Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - statistics & numerical data ; Preferences ; Quality of care ; Social responsibility ; Stated preferences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; The Netherlands ; Willingness-to-pay (WTP)</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2016-09, Vol.165, p.10-18</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8bbdf6d02047b9fa3863833d8600350dccc6b0b3c76f0fa61becc8f340101fce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8bbdf6d02047b9fa3863833d8600350dccc6b0b3c76f0fa61becc8f340101fce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616303835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27485728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Determann, Domino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, Mattijs S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Arthur P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varkevisser, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schut, Frederik T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wit, G. Ardine de</creatorcontrib><title>What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about these preferences and how they vary across consumers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) we quantified trade-offs between basic health plan characteristics and analysed whether there are differences in preferences according to age, health status and income. We selected four health plan characteristics to be included in the DCE: (i) the level of provider choice and associated level of reimbursement, (ii) the primary focus of provider contracting (price, quality, social responsibility), (iii) the level of service benefits, and (iv) the monthly premium. This selection was based on a literature study, expert interviews and focus group discussions. The DCE consisted of 17 choice sets, each comprising two hypothetical health plan alternatives. A representative sample (n = 533) of the Dutch adult population, based on age, gender and educational level, completed the online questionnaire during the annual open enrolment period for 2015. The final model with four latent classes showed that being able to choose a care provider freely was by far the most decisive characteristic for respondents aged over 45, those with chronic conditions, and those with a gross income over €3000/month. Monthly premium was the most important choice determinant for young, healthy, and lower income respondents. We conclude that it would be very unlikely for half of the sample to opt for health plans with restricted provider choice. However, a premium discount up to €15/month by restricted health plans might motivate especially younger, healthier, and less wealthy consumers to choose these plans.
•Understanding health plan preferences is vital in a managed competition health system.•Level of choice of care providers was overall the most decisive characteristic.•Limited consumer appreciation for health insurers that steer on quality of care.•Preferences differ across consumers according to age, health status and income.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult care services</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alternative approaches</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Discrete choice experiment (DCE)</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Free provider choice</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health plan choice</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - classification</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Latent class analysis</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed competition</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - economics</subject><subject>Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stated preferences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>The Netherlands</subject><subject>Willingness-to-pay (WTP)</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9v3CAQxVGVqtmm_QotUi692B3MGthTFEX9J0XqJVGPCMMgs7KNA3aifPuy3SSHXHoaNPObN7xHyGcGNQMmvu7rHG22YURXN6VRg6yhad6QDVOSVy3fyhOygUbKatdycUre57wHAAaKvyOnjdyqVjZqQ27_9GahPZph6ek8mClTF-mMcR6Qzgk9pgt60yNdknFYRe9ph8sD4nSYjmEdqZlcecf74DBR28dg8QN5682Q8eNTPSO337_dXP2srn__-HV1eV3ZVqilUl3nvHDQwFZ2O2-4Elxx7pQA4C04a63ooONWCg_eCNahtcrzbfHBvEV-Rr4cdcv9uxXzoseQLQ7FB8Y1a6ZYca-KZkHPX6H7uKap_O4ftZOSMSiUPFI2xZyLfT2nMJr0qBnoQ_J6r1-S14fkNUhdki-bn5701-4we957jroAl0cASyD3AZMuKjhZdCGhXbSL4b9H_gJX5JiQ</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Determann, Domino</creator><creator>Lambooij, Mattijs S.</creator><creator>de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.</creator><creator>Hayen, Arthur P.</creator><creator>Varkevisser, Marco</creator><creator>Schut, Frederik T.</creator><creator>Wit, G. Ardine de</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice</title><author>Determann, Domino ; Lambooij, Mattijs S. ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ; Hayen, Arthur P. ; Varkevisser, Marco ; Schut, Frederik T. ; Wit, G. Ardine de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-8bbdf6d02047b9fa3863833d8600350dccc6b0b3c76f0fa61becc8f340101fce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult care services</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alternative approaches</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Discrete choice experiment (DCE)</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Free provider choice</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health plan choice</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - classification</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Latent class analysis</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed competition</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - economics</topic><topic>Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stated preferences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>The Netherlands</topic><topic>Willingness-to-pay (WTP)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Determann, Domino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, Mattijs S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Arthur P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varkevisser, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schut, Frederik T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wit, G. Ardine de</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Determann, Domino</au><au>Lambooij, Mattijs S.</au><au>de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.</au><au>Hayen, Arthur P.</au><au>Varkevisser, Marco</au><au>Schut, Frederik T.</au><au>Wit, G. Ardine de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>165</volume><spage>10</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>10-18</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>Within a healthcare system with managed competition, health insurers are expected to act as prudent buyers of care on behalf of their customers. To fulfil this role adequately, understanding consumer preferences for health plan characteristics is of vital importance. Little is known, however, about these preferences and how they vary across consumers. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) we quantified trade-offs between basic health plan characteristics and analysed whether there are differences in preferences according to age, health status and income. We selected four health plan characteristics to be included in the DCE: (i) the level of provider choice and associated level of reimbursement, (ii) the primary focus of provider contracting (price, quality, social responsibility), (iii) the level of service benefits, and (iv) the monthly premium. This selection was based on a literature study, expert interviews and focus group discussions. The DCE consisted of 17 choice sets, each comprising two hypothetical health plan alternatives. A representative sample (n = 533) of the Dutch adult population, based on age, gender and educational level, completed the online questionnaire during the annual open enrolment period for 2015. The final model with four latent classes showed that being able to choose a care provider freely was by far the most decisive characteristic for respondents aged over 45, those with chronic conditions, and those with a gross income over €3000/month. Monthly premium was the most important choice determinant for young, healthy, and lower income respondents. We conclude that it would be very unlikely for half of the sample to opt for health plans with restricted provider choice. However, a premium discount up to €15/month by restricted health plans might motivate especially younger, healthier, and less wealthy consumers to choose these plans.
•Understanding health plan preferences is vital in a managed competition health system.•Level of choice of care providers was overall the most decisive characteristic.•Limited consumer appreciation for health insurers that steer on quality of care.•Preferences differ across consumers according to age, health status and income.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27485728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2016-09, Vol.165, p.10-18 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815368833 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adult care services Age Factors Aged Alternative approaches Choice Behavior Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data Consumers Discrete choice experiment (DCE) Educational attainment Experiments Female Focus Groups Free provider choice Health behavior Health insurance Health plan choice Health problems Health services Humans Income Income - statistics & numerical data Insurance Coverage - classification Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data Insurance, Health - economics Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data Internet Latent class analysis Low income groups Male Managed competition Management Middle Aged Netherlands Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - economics Patient Freedom of Choice Laws - statistics & numerical data Preferences Quality of care Social responsibility Stated preferences Surveys and Questionnaires The Netherlands Willingness-to-pay (WTP) |
title | What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A44%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20health%20plans%20do%20people%20prefer?%20The%20trade-off%20between%20premium%20and%20provider%20choice&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Determann,%20Domino&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=165&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=10-18&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815368833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815977110&rft_id=info:pmid/27485728&rft_els_id=S0277953616303835&rfr_iscdi=true |