A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway

The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 201...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86
Hauptverfasser: Saito, T., Chew, S.T.H., Liu, W.L., Thinn, K.K., Asai, T., Ti, L.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page i86
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page i83
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 117
creator Saito, T.
Chew, S.T.H.
Liu, W.L.
Thinn, K.K.
Asai, T.
Ti, L.K.
description The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis. The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aew191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815364994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aew191</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217337728</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815364994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo5u_AGSjSBCNa9N2mYp4hcIbnQd0szrGOk0NUkd5t8b6ehKXN3NuRfuIeQE2CUwWVw17_pK4xok7JAZ8Aqysqpgl8wYY1XGJOQH5DCEd8agyqXYJwd5xbmUspqR5poO3g0u6I62zlNNe1zTYJy3_ZKGTYi4otElCBfWRLqwbWvN2EX6iX20nY7W9TS-eTcu31I7jIPXy87FaA3V1q_15ojstboLeLzNOXm9u325ecienu8fb66fMsNLHrNCCCZyKKUQyDhyztuaYwPCNFhoNE1dlKXOUaLgCG3JNNSCN1pWvGihLoo5OZ9206GPEUNUKxsMdp3u0Y1BQQ2iKNNvntCLCTXeheCxVYO3K-03Cpj6dqqSUzU5TfDpdndsVrj4RX8kJuBsAtw4_D_EJw6ThU-LXgVjsTfJrEcT1cLZv2pf2xqSvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815364994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age &gt;45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis. The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27449997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; airway management ; Airway Management - instrumentation ; Airway Management - methods ; Anesthesia, General - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Predictive Value of Tests ; predictive values of tests ; Prospective Studies ; prospective study ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saito, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, S.T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinn, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age &gt;45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis. The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>airway management</subject><subject>Airway Management - instrumentation</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>predictive values of tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>prospective study</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo5u_AGSjSBCNa9N2mYp4hcIbnQd0szrGOk0NUkd5t8b6ehKXN3NuRfuIeQE2CUwWVw17_pK4xok7JAZ8Aqysqpgl8wYY1XGJOQH5DCEd8agyqXYJwd5xbmUspqR5poO3g0u6I62zlNNe1zTYJy3_ZKGTYi4otElCBfWRLqwbWvN2EX6iX20nY7W9TS-eTcu31I7jIPXy87FaA3V1q_15ojstboLeLzNOXm9u325ecienu8fb66fMsNLHrNCCCZyKKUQyDhyztuaYwPCNFhoNE1dlKXOUaLgCG3JNNSCN1pWvGihLoo5OZ9206GPEUNUKxsMdp3u0Y1BQQ2iKNNvntCLCTXeheCxVYO3K-03Cpj6dqqSUzU5TfDpdndsVrj4RX8kJuBsAtw4_D_EJw6ThU-LXgVjsTfJrEcT1cLZv2pf2xqSvA</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Saito, T.</creator><creator>Chew, S.T.H.</creator><creator>Liu, W.L.</creator><creator>Thinn, K.K.</creator><creator>Asai, T.</creator><creator>Ti, L.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><author>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>airway management</topic><topic>Airway Management - instrumentation</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>predictive values of tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>prospective study</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saito, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, S.T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinn, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saito, T.</au><au>Chew, S.T.H.</au><au>Liu, W.L.</au><au>Thinn, K.K.</au><au>Asai, T.</au><au>Ti, L.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>i83</spage><epage>i86</epage><pages>i83-i86</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age &gt;45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis. The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27449997</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aew191</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815364994
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
airway management
Airway Management - instrumentation
Airway Management - methods
Anesthesia, General - methods
Female
Humans
Laryngeal Masks
Male
Middle Aged
Point-of-Care Systems
Predictive Value of Tests
predictive values of tests
Prospective Studies
prospective study
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Young Adult
title A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A14%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20proposal%20for%20a%20new%20scoring%20system%20to%20predict%20difficult%20ventilation%20through%20a%20supraglottic%20airway&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Saito,%20T.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=i83&rft.epage=i86&rft.pages=i83-i86&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aew191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815364994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815364994&rft_id=info:pmid/27449997&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aew191&rft_els_id=S0007091217337728&rfr_iscdi=true