A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway
The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 201...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | i86 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_1 |
container_start_page | i83 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Saito, T. Chew, S.T.H. Liu, W.L. Thinn, K.K. Asai, T. Ti, L.K. |
description | The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis.
The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bja/aew191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815364994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aew191</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217337728</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815364994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo5u_AGSjSBCNa9N2mYp4hcIbnQd0szrGOk0NUkd5t8b6ehKXN3NuRfuIeQE2CUwWVw17_pK4xok7JAZ8Aqysqpgl8wYY1XGJOQH5DCEd8agyqXYJwd5xbmUspqR5poO3g0u6I62zlNNe1zTYJy3_ZKGTYi4otElCBfWRLqwbWvN2EX6iX20nY7W9TS-eTcu31I7jIPXy87FaA3V1q_15ojstboLeLzNOXm9u325ecienu8fb66fMsNLHrNCCCZyKKUQyDhyztuaYwPCNFhoNE1dlKXOUaLgCG3JNNSCN1pWvGihLoo5OZ9206GPEUNUKxsMdp3u0Y1BQQ2iKNNvntCLCTXeheCxVYO3K-03Cpj6dqqSUzU5TfDpdndsVrj4RX8kJuBsAtw4_D_EJw6ThU-LXgVjsTfJrEcT1cLZv2pf2xqSvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815364994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis.
The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27449997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; airway management ; Airway Management - instrumentation ; Airway Management - methods ; Anesthesia, General - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Predictive Value of Tests ; predictive values of tests ; Prospective Studies ; prospective study ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saito, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, S.T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinn, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis.
The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>airway management</subject><subject>Airway Management - instrumentation</subject><subject>Airway Management - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>predictive values of tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>prospective study</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo5u_AGSjSBCNa9N2mYp4hcIbnQd0szrGOk0NUkd5t8b6ehKXN3NuRfuIeQE2CUwWVw17_pK4xok7JAZ8Aqysqpgl8wYY1XGJOQH5DCEd8agyqXYJwd5xbmUspqR5poO3g0u6I62zlNNe1zTYJy3_ZKGTYi4otElCBfWRLqwbWvN2EX6iX20nY7W9TS-eTcu31I7jIPXy87FaA3V1q_15ojstboLeLzNOXm9u325ecienu8fb66fMsNLHrNCCCZyKKUQyDhyztuaYwPCNFhoNE1dlKXOUaLgCG3JNNSCN1pWvGihLoo5OZ9206GPEUNUKxsMdp3u0Y1BQQ2iKNNvntCLCTXeheCxVYO3K-03Cpj6dqqSUzU5TfDpdndsVrj4RX8kJuBsAtw4_D_EJw6ThU-LXgVjsTfJrEcT1cLZv2pf2xqSvA</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Saito, T.</creator><creator>Chew, S.T.H.</creator><creator>Liu, W.L.</creator><creator>Thinn, K.K.</creator><creator>Asai, T.</creator><creator>Ti, L.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</title><author>Saito, T. ; Chew, S.T.H. ; Liu, W.L. ; Thinn, K.K. ; Asai, T. ; Ti, L.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-35505216955e04e444f84eb15cbe3aecb8366a2e9e54e1f60a1854ba9743f1833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>airway management</topic><topic>Airway Management - instrumentation</topic><topic>Airway Management - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>predictive values of tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>prospective study</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saito, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, S.T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thinn, K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, L.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saito, T.</au><au>Chew, S.T.H.</au><au>Liu, W.L.</au><au>Thinn, K.K.</au><au>Asai, T.</au><au>Ti, L.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>i83</spage><epage>i86</epage><pages>i83-i86</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis.
The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0–3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4–7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device.
The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27449997</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aew191</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i83-i86 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815364994 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged airway management Airway Management - instrumentation Airway Management - methods Anesthesia, General - methods Female Humans Laryngeal Masks Male Middle Aged Point-of-Care Systems Predictive Value of Tests predictive values of tests Prospective Studies prospective study Respiration, Artificial - methods Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors ROC Curve Young Adult |
title | A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A14%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20proposal%20for%20a%20new%20scoring%20system%20to%20predict%20difficult%20ventilation%20through%20a%20supraglottic%20airway&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Saito,%20T.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=i83&rft.epage=i86&rft.pages=i83-i86&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aew191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815364994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815364994&rft_id=info:pmid/27449997&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aew191&rft_els_id=S0007091217337728&rfr_iscdi=true |