Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics

The phylogeny of insects has been both extensively studied and vigorously debated for over a century. A relatively accurate deep phylogeny had been produced by 1904. It was not substantially improved in topology until recently when phylogenomics settled many long-standing controversies. Intervening...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Royal Society interface 2016-08, Vol.13 (121), p.20160363-20160363
Hauptverfasser: Kjer, Karl M., Simon, Chris, Yavorskaya, Margarita, Beutel, Rolf G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20160363
container_issue 121
container_start_page 20160363
container_title Journal of the Royal Society interface
container_volume 13
creator Kjer, Karl M.
Simon, Chris
Yavorskaya, Margarita
Beutel, Rolf G.
description The phylogeny of insects has been both extensively studied and vigorously debated for over a century. A relatively accurate deep phylogeny had been produced by 1904. It was not substantially improved in topology until recently when phylogenomics settled many long-standing controversies. Intervening advances came instead through methodological improvement. Early molecular phylogenetic studies (1985–2005), dominated by a few genes, provided datasets that were too small to resolve controversial phylogenetic problems. Adding to the lack of consensus, this period was characterized by a polarization of philosophies, with individuals belonging to either parsimony or maximum-likelihood camps; each largely ignoring the insights of the other. The result was an unfortunate detour in which the few perceived phylogenetic revolutions published by both sides of the philosophical divide were probably erroneous. The size of datasets has been growing exponentially since the mid-1980s accompanied by a wave of confidence that all relationships will soon be known. However, large datasets create new challenges, and a large number of genes does not guarantee reliable results. If history is a guide, then the quality of conclusions will be determined by an improved understanding of both molecular and morphological evolution, and not simply the number of genes analysed.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsif.2016.0363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814659575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1814659575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-d3bcaf54b3f34ee033f3d3111c8e3dc2b07fa1981e933055507b571439b87c4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw5Yhy5MAuHk-cDw5IVUWh0kogPs5W4kx2XWXj4ElWCn89jrasqBCI04zln9-88RPiOcg1yLJ4Hdi1ayUhW0vM8IE4hzxVK51l6uGpL8oz8YT5VkrMUevH4kzlWheFxnOx-RT8NhDzq2RwY1t1HSdV3yRDFWJPXTL17kCBid8kVbJzPPowJ75NXM9kx2TYzZ3fUk-js_xUPIoKTM_u6oX4dv3u69WH1ebj-5ury83KZqocVw3Wtmp1WmOLKZHEWBsEAFsQNlbVMm8rKAugElFqrWVe6xxSLOsit2mDF-LtUXeY6j01lvoxujVDcPsqzMZXzty_6d3ObP3BaAmpzDAKvLwTCP77RDyavWNLXVf15Cc2UKi8hEzJ4j9QSDNd6lxHdH1EbfDMgdqTI5BmScssaZklLbOkFR-8-H2PE_4rnghsj0Dwc_xQbx2Ns7n1U-jj0Xz-cnN9AHSgwESrILO4nDQ_3HCcBGgc80RmAe7P_tMK_mvSXxb4CQ2gxR4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1814659575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kjer, Karl M. ; Simon, Chris ; Yavorskaya, Margarita ; Beutel, Rolf G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kjer, Karl M. ; Simon, Chris ; Yavorskaya, Margarita ; Beutel, Rolf G.</creatorcontrib><description>The phylogeny of insects has been both extensively studied and vigorously debated for over a century. A relatively accurate deep phylogeny had been produced by 1904. It was not substantially improved in topology until recently when phylogenomics settled many long-standing controversies. Intervening advances came instead through methodological improvement. Early molecular phylogenetic studies (1985–2005), dominated by a few genes, provided datasets that were too small to resolve controversial phylogenetic problems. Adding to the lack of consensus, this period was characterized by a polarization of philosophies, with individuals belonging to either parsimony or maximum-likelihood camps; each largely ignoring the insights of the other. The result was an unfortunate detour in which the few perceived phylogenetic revolutions published by both sides of the philosophical divide were probably erroneous. The size of datasets has been growing exponentially since the mid-1980s accompanied by a wave of confidence that all relationships will soon be known. However, large datasets create new challenges, and a large number of genes does not guarantee reliable results. If history is a guide, then the quality of conclusions will be determined by an improved understanding of both molecular and morphological evolution, and not simply the number of genes analysed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-5689</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-5662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0363</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27558853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cladistics ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Insecta - genetics ; Insects ; Likelihood ; Morphology ; Parsimony ; Phylogenomics ; Phylogeny ; Review ; Review Articles</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Society interface, 2016-08, Vol.13 (121), p.20160363-20160363</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2016 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2016 The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-d3bcaf54b3f34ee033f3d3111c8e3dc2b07fa1981e933055507b571439b87c4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-d3bcaf54b3f34ee033f3d3111c8e3dc2b07fa1981e933055507b571439b87c4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7370-9617</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014063/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5014063/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27558853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kjer, Karl M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavorskaya, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutel, Rolf G.</creatorcontrib><title>Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics</title><title>Journal of the Royal Society interface</title><addtitle>J. R. Soc. Interface</addtitle><addtitle>J R Soc Interface</addtitle><description>The phylogeny of insects has been both extensively studied and vigorously debated for over a century. A relatively accurate deep phylogeny had been produced by 1904. It was not substantially improved in topology until recently when phylogenomics settled many long-standing controversies. Intervening advances came instead through methodological improvement. Early molecular phylogenetic studies (1985–2005), dominated by a few genes, provided datasets that were too small to resolve controversial phylogenetic problems. Adding to the lack of consensus, this period was characterized by a polarization of philosophies, with individuals belonging to either parsimony or maximum-likelihood camps; each largely ignoring the insights of the other. The result was an unfortunate detour in which the few perceived phylogenetic revolutions published by both sides of the philosophical divide were probably erroneous. The size of datasets has been growing exponentially since the mid-1980s accompanied by a wave of confidence that all relationships will soon be known. However, large datasets create new challenges, and a large number of genes does not guarantee reliable results. If history is a guide, then the quality of conclusions will be determined by an improved understanding of both molecular and morphological evolution, and not simply the number of genes analysed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cladistics</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Insecta - genetics</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Likelihood</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Parsimony</subject><subject>Phylogenomics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><issn>1742-5689</issn><issn>1742-5662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw5Yhy5MAuHk-cDw5IVUWh0kogPs5W4kx2XWXj4ElWCn89jrasqBCI04zln9-88RPiOcg1yLJ4Hdi1ayUhW0vM8IE4hzxVK51l6uGpL8oz8YT5VkrMUevH4kzlWheFxnOx-RT8NhDzq2RwY1t1HSdV3yRDFWJPXTL17kCBid8kVbJzPPowJ75NXM9kx2TYzZ3fUk-js_xUPIoKTM_u6oX4dv3u69WH1ebj-5ury83KZqocVw3Wtmp1WmOLKZHEWBsEAFsQNlbVMm8rKAugElFqrWVe6xxSLOsit2mDF-LtUXeY6j01lvoxujVDcPsqzMZXzty_6d3ObP3BaAmpzDAKvLwTCP77RDyavWNLXVf15Cc2UKi8hEzJ4j9QSDNd6lxHdH1EbfDMgdqTI5BmScssaZklLbOkFR-8-H2PE_4rnghsj0Dwc_xQbx2Ns7n1U-jj0Xz-cnN9AHSgwESrILO4nDQ_3HCcBGgc80RmAe7P_tMK_mvSXxb4CQ2gxR4</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Kjer, Karl M.</creator><creator>Simon, Chris</creator><creator>Yavorskaya, Margarita</creator><creator>Beutel, Rolf G.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7370-9617</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics</title><author>Kjer, Karl M. ; Simon, Chris ; Yavorskaya, Margarita ; Beutel, Rolf G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-d3bcaf54b3f34ee033f3d3111c8e3dc2b07fa1981e933055507b571439b87c4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cladistics</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Insecta - genetics</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Likelihood</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Parsimony</topic><topic>Phylogenomics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kjer, Karl M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavorskaya, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutel, Rolf G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society interface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kjer, Karl M.</au><au>Simon, Chris</au><au>Yavorskaya, Margarita</au><au>Beutel, Rolf G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society interface</jtitle><stitle>J. R. Soc. Interface</stitle><addtitle>J R Soc Interface</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>121</issue><spage>20160363</spage><epage>20160363</epage><pages>20160363-20160363</pages><issn>1742-5689</issn><eissn>1742-5662</eissn><abstract>The phylogeny of insects has been both extensively studied and vigorously debated for over a century. A relatively accurate deep phylogeny had been produced by 1904. It was not substantially improved in topology until recently when phylogenomics settled many long-standing controversies. Intervening advances came instead through methodological improvement. Early molecular phylogenetic studies (1985–2005), dominated by a few genes, provided datasets that were too small to resolve controversial phylogenetic problems. Adding to the lack of consensus, this period was characterized by a polarization of philosophies, with individuals belonging to either parsimony or maximum-likelihood camps; each largely ignoring the insights of the other. The result was an unfortunate detour in which the few perceived phylogenetic revolutions published by both sides of the philosophical divide were probably erroneous. The size of datasets has been growing exponentially since the mid-1980s accompanied by a wave of confidence that all relationships will soon be known. However, large datasets create new challenges, and a large number of genes does not guarantee reliable results. If history is a guide, then the quality of conclusions will be determined by an improved understanding of both molecular and morphological evolution, and not simply the number of genes analysed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>27558853</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsif.2016.0363</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7370-9617</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-5689
ispartof Journal of the Royal Society interface, 2016-08, Vol.13 (121), p.20160363-20160363
issn 1742-5689
1742-5662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814659575
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Cladistics
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Insecta - genetics
Insects
Likelihood
Morphology
Parsimony
Phylogenomics
Phylogeny
Review
Review Articles
title Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A20%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress,%20pitfalls%20and%20parallel%20universes:%20a%20history%20of%20insect%20phylogenetics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20interface&rft.au=Kjer,%20Karl%20M.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=121&rft.spage=20160363&rft.epage=20160363&rft.pages=20160363-20160363&rft.issn=1742-5689&rft.eissn=1742-5662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsif.2016.0363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1814659575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1814659575&rft_id=info:pmid/27558853&rfr_iscdi=true