Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort
Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dental research 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1147 |
container_title | Journal of dental research |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Durham, J. Shen, J. Breckons, M. Steele, J.G. Araujo-Soares, V. Exley, C. Vale, L. |
description | Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P < 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P < 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022034516648088 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814140965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022034516648088</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1814140965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMyGPLIFnx46TEVWUVqrUDjBbjv0CqfJRbGfgvydVCwMS0xvud6d7R8gtgwfGlHoE4BxSIVmWiRzy_IxMmRQiAVmwczI9yMlBn5CrEHYArOB5ekkmXI2YSsWUqCWaJn5Y45HO-xCp6RxdtXtjI-0rukUf6hCxi3Tj-8rY2jR0a-rumlxUpgl4c7oz8rZ4fp0vk_XmZTV_Wid2bBYTFJhJhxxMzrnlpSidtU4qdC51VhmOogBwAIV0BiqnuKvSnAEvywKVZOmM3B9z977_HDBE3dbBYtOYDvshaJYzwQQUmRxROKLW9yF4rPTe163xX5qBPsyl_841Wu5O6UPZovs1_OwzAskRCOYd9a4ffDd--3_gN8M9cKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1814140965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P < 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P < 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-0591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022034516648088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27154734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chronic Pain - economics ; Facial Pain - economics ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Referral and Consultation - economics ; State Medicine - economics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental research, 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154</ispartof><rights>International & American Associations for Dental Research 2016</rights><rights>International & American Associations for Dental Research 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022034516648088$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022034516648088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durham, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Soares, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exley, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</title><title>Journal of dental research</title><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><description>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P < 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P < 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - economics</subject><subject>Facial Pain - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - economics</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0022-0345</issn><issn>1544-0591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMyGPLIFnx46TEVWUVqrUDjBbjv0CqfJRbGfgvydVCwMS0xvud6d7R8gtgwfGlHoE4BxSIVmWiRzy_IxMmRQiAVmwczI9yMlBn5CrEHYArOB5ekkmXI2YSsWUqCWaJn5Y45HO-xCp6RxdtXtjI-0rukUf6hCxi3Tj-8rY2jR0a-rumlxUpgl4c7oz8rZ4fp0vk_XmZTV_Wid2bBYTFJhJhxxMzrnlpSidtU4qdC51VhmOogBwAIV0BiqnuKvSnAEvywKVZOmM3B9z977_HDBE3dbBYtOYDvshaJYzwQQUmRxROKLW9yF4rPTe163xX5qBPsyl_841Wu5O6UPZovs1_OwzAskRCOYd9a4ffDd--3_gN8M9cKg</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Durham, J.</creator><creator>Shen, J.</creator><creator>Breckons, M.</creator><creator>Steele, J.G.</creator><creator>Araujo-Soares, V.</creator><creator>Exley, C.</creator><creator>Vale, L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain</title><author>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - economics</topic><topic>Facial Pain - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - economics</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durham, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Soares, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exley, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durham, J.</au><au>Shen, J.</au><au>Breckons, M.</au><au>Steele, J.G.</au><au>Araujo-Soares, V.</au><au>Exley, C.</au><au>Vale, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1147</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1147-1154</pages><issn>0022-0345</issn><eissn>1544-0591</eissn><abstract>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P < 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P < 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27154734</pmid><doi>10.1177/0022034516648088</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0345 |
ispartof | Journal of dental research, 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154 |
issn | 0022-0345 1544-0591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814140965 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Chronic Pain - economics Facial Pain - economics Female Health Care Costs Health Services Research Humans Interviews as Topic Male Middle Aged Pain Measurement Patient Acceptance of Health Care Quality of Life Referral and Consultation - economics State Medicine - economics Surveys and Questionnaires United Kingdom |
title | Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20Cost%20and%20Impact%20of%20Persistent%20Orofacial%20Pain:%20The%20DEEP%20Study%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Durham,%20J.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1147&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1147-1154&rft.issn=0022-0345&rft.eissn=1544-0591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022034516648088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1814140965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1814140965&rft_id=info:pmid/27154734&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022034516648088&rfr_iscdi=true |