Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort

Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental research 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154
Hauptverfasser: Durham, J., Shen, J., Breckons, M., Steele, J.G., Araujo-Soares, V., Exley, C., Vale, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1154
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1147
container_title Journal of dental research
container_volume 95
creator Durham, J.
Shen, J.
Breckons, M.
Steele, J.G.
Araujo-Soares, V.
Exley, C.
Vale, L.
description Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P < 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P < 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022034516648088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814140965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022034516648088</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1814140965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMyGPLIFnx46TEVWUVqrUDjBbjv0CqfJRbGfgvydVCwMS0xvud6d7R8gtgwfGlHoE4BxSIVmWiRzy_IxMmRQiAVmwczI9yMlBn5CrEHYArOB5ekkmXI2YSsWUqCWaJn5Y45HO-xCp6RxdtXtjI-0rukUf6hCxi3Tj-8rY2jR0a-rumlxUpgl4c7oz8rZ4fp0vk_XmZTV_Wid2bBYTFJhJhxxMzrnlpSidtU4qdC51VhmOogBwAIV0BiqnuKvSnAEvywKVZOmM3B9z977_HDBE3dbBYtOYDvshaJYzwQQUmRxROKLW9yF4rPTe163xX5qBPsyl_841Wu5O6UPZovs1_OwzAskRCOYd9a4ffDd--3_gN8M9cKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1814140965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P &lt; 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P &lt; 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-0591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022034516648088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27154734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chronic Pain - economics ; Facial Pain - economics ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Referral and Consultation - economics ; State Medicine - economics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental research, 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154</ispartof><rights>International &amp; American Associations for Dental Research 2016</rights><rights>International &amp; American Associations for Dental Research 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022034516648088$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022034516648088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durham, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Soares, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exley, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</title><title>Journal of dental research</title><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><description>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P &lt; 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P &lt; 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - economics</subject><subject>Facial Pain - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - economics</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0022-0345</issn><issn>1544-0591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAUxC0EoqWwMyGPLIFnx46TEVWUVqrUDjBbjv0CqfJRbGfgvydVCwMS0xvud6d7R8gtgwfGlHoE4BxSIVmWiRzy_IxMmRQiAVmwczI9yMlBn5CrEHYArOB5ekkmXI2YSsWUqCWaJn5Y45HO-xCp6RxdtXtjI-0rukUf6hCxi3Tj-8rY2jR0a-rumlxUpgl4c7oz8rZ4fp0vk_XmZTV_Wid2bBYTFJhJhxxMzrnlpSidtU4qdC51VhmOogBwAIV0BiqnuKvSnAEvywKVZOmM3B9z977_HDBE3dbBYtOYDvshaJYzwQQUmRxROKLW9yF4rPTe163xX5qBPsyl_841Wu5O6UPZovs1_OwzAskRCOYd9a4ffDd--3_gN8M9cKg</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Durham, J.</creator><creator>Shen, J.</creator><creator>Breckons, M.</creator><creator>Steele, J.G.</creator><creator>Araujo-Soares, V.</creator><creator>Exley, C.</creator><creator>Vale, L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain</title><author>Durham, J. ; Shen, J. ; Breckons, M. ; Steele, J.G. ; Araujo-Soares, V. ; Exley, C. ; Vale, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-e4e65de20a822c2b4bdccd57edd3dc7a2e4900d0095da0fd72df38102bb9e7513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - economics</topic><topic>Facial Pain - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - economics</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durham, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo-Soares, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Exley, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vale, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durham, J.</au><au>Shen, J.</au><au>Breckons, M.</au><au>Steele, J.G.</au><au>Araujo-Soares, V.</au><au>Exley, C.</au><au>Vale, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1147</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1147-1154</pages><issn>0022-0345</issn><eissn>1544-0591</eissn><abstract>Few data are available on the healthcare costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP). This cohort and cost analysis study examined the direct costs of POFP from the perspective of the healthcare provider (specifically, the UK National Health Service) in 2012 pounds sterling and sought to identify whether dichotomized (high, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost of healthcare over the last 6 mo. The healthcare utilization data of 198 patients with POFP were collected using a structured interview and a validated “use of services and productivity” questionnaire. Unit costs were used with these utilization data to calculate direct healthcare costs in 3 categories: consultation, medication, and appliances and interventions. Consultation costs were a significant proportion of cumulative healthcare cost (P &lt; 0.001). Dichotomized GCPS status was predictive of increased healthcare cost over the last 6 mo, accounting for an average increase of £366 (95% confidence interval, 135 to 598; P &lt; 0.01) when moving from a low GCPS status to a high GCPS status. Given the predictive capability of dichotomized GCPS status and the success of stratified models of care for other persistent pain conditions, dichotomized GCPS status may offer an opportunity to help determine stratification of care for patients with POFP.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27154734</pmid><doi>10.1177/0022034516648088</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0345
ispartof Journal of dental research, 2016-09, Vol.95 (10), p.1147-1154
issn 0022-0345
1544-0591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1814140965
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Chronic Pain - economics
Facial Pain - economics
Female
Health Care Costs
Health Services Research
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Quality of Life
Referral and Consultation - economics
State Medicine - economics
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom
title Healthcare Cost and Impact of Persistent Orofacial Pain: The DEEP Study Cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20Cost%20and%20Impact%20of%20Persistent%20Orofacial%20Pain:%20The%20DEEP%20Study%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Durham,%20J.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1147&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1147-1154&rft.issn=0022-0345&rft.eissn=1544-0591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022034516648088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1814140965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1814140965&rft_id=info:pmid/27154734&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022034516648088&rfr_iscdi=true