Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review

Summary Background Environmental influences during pregnancy are able to affect off spring phenotype with lifelong effects. Clinical applicable markers are needed to identify foetuses at risk for neonatal adiposity. This systematic review aims to 1) review the current literature on prenatal markers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2016-10, Vol.35 (5), p.995-1007
Hauptverfasser: Roelants, Jorine A, de Jonge, Rogier C.J, Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M, Reiss, Irwin K.M, Joosten, Koen F.M, Vermeulen, Marijn J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1007
container_issue 5
container_start_page 995
container_title Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 35
creator Roelants, Jorine A
de Jonge, Rogier C.J
Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M
Reiss, Irwin K.M
Joosten, Koen F.M
Vermeulen, Marijn J
description Summary Background Environmental influences during pregnancy are able to affect off spring phenotype with lifelong effects. Clinical applicable markers are needed to identify foetuses at risk for neonatal adiposity. This systematic review aims to 1) review the current literature on prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass, and 2) appraise the clinical applicability of the assessed markers. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) original research papers in English; 2) research on dynamic and measurable prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass; 3) neonatal fat mass measurement within one month after birth, using the four-compartment model, magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or air displacement plethysmography. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, assessment of methodological (QUADAS-II) and statistical quality and appraisal of clinical applicability. Results Of 2333 studies primarily identified by the search strategy, 16 studies were included. Four of these were both methodologically and statistically of moderate or high quality. Prenatal markers investigated were ultrasound parameters, maternal biochemical markers and maternal characteristics. Markers of predefined interest were maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, fasting glucose and HbA1c, showing varying results. A meta-analysis was not possible due to substantial methodological heterogeneity. Clinically applicability of all markers was rated poor. Conclusions Although associations were found, no useful marker was identified, due to lack of methodological and statistical quality, inconsistent results and poor clinical applicability. No markers were investigated in the periconceptional and embryonic period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1813628332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261561415002368</els_id><sourcerecordid>1813628332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4aac85676ff4fbd2c3d5d92ff01325b078fd9adc7c4ffd0cd7012504f73f2b603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVJabZp_kAOwcdc7M5IlmyHEgghTQqBFtKchVYagTZeO5XshP33kdm0hxx6Ghjee8z7hrEThAoB1ddNZfthrjigrKCrAMQHtkIpeIldKw7YCrjCUiqsD9nnlDYAIEXTfmKHXNVdB4Kv2PmvSIOZTF9sTXykmIrRFwON-503U96ndF5cFmmXJtqaKdgi0nOgly_sozd9ouO3ecQevl__vrot737e_Li6vCttjTiVtTG2lapR3td-7bgVTrqOew8ouFxD03rXGWcbW3vvwLoGkEuofSM8XysQR-xsn_sUxz8zpUlvQ7LU9ybfOSeNLQrFWyF4lvK91MYxpUheP8WQi-00gl6Y6Y1emOmFmYZOZ2bZdPqWP6-35P5Z_kLKgm97AeWWuXnUyQYaLLkQyU7ajeH_-Rfv7LYPQ7Cmf6Qdpc04xyHz06gT16Dvl68tT0MJwIVqxSt5wJGi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813628332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Roelants, Jorine A ; de Jonge, Rogier C.J ; Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M ; Reiss, Irwin K.M ; Joosten, Koen F.M ; Vermeulen, Marijn J</creator><creatorcontrib>Roelants, Jorine A ; de Jonge, Rogier C.J ; Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M ; Reiss, Irwin K.M ; Joosten, Koen F.M ; Vermeulen, Marijn J</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Environmental influences during pregnancy are able to affect off spring phenotype with lifelong effects. Clinical applicable markers are needed to identify foetuses at risk for neonatal adiposity. This systematic review aims to 1) review the current literature on prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass, and 2) appraise the clinical applicability of the assessed markers. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) original research papers in English; 2) research on dynamic and measurable prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass; 3) neonatal fat mass measurement within one month after birth, using the four-compartment model, magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or air displacement plethysmography. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, assessment of methodological (QUADAS-II) and statistical quality and appraisal of clinical applicability. Results Of 2333 studies primarily identified by the search strategy, 16 studies were included. Four of these were both methodologically and statistically of moderate or high quality. Prenatal markers investigated were ultrasound parameters, maternal biochemical markers and maternal characteristics. Markers of predefined interest were maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, fasting glucose and HbA1c, showing varying results. A meta-analysis was not possible due to substantial methodological heterogeneity. Clinically applicability of all markers was rated poor. Conclusions Although associations were found, no useful marker was identified, due to lack of methodological and statistical quality, inconsistent results and poor clinical applicability. No markers were investigated in the periconceptional and embryonic period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-5614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26499032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adiposity ; Biomarkers - blood ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Body Composition ; Body Mass Index ; Fat mass ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism ; Humans ; Infant ; Newborn ; Obesity ; Plethysmography ; Predictor ; Pregnancy ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2016-10, Vol.35 (5), p.995-1007</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4aac85676ff4fbd2c3d5d92ff01325b078fd9adc7c4ffd0cd7012504f73f2b603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4aac85676ff4fbd2c3d5d92ff01325b078fd9adc7c4ffd0cd7012504f73f2b603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561415002368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roelants, Jorine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Rogier C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Irwin K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosten, Koen F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Marijn J</creatorcontrib><title>Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review</title><title>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Summary Background Environmental influences during pregnancy are able to affect off spring phenotype with lifelong effects. Clinical applicable markers are needed to identify foetuses at risk for neonatal adiposity. This systematic review aims to 1) review the current literature on prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass, and 2) appraise the clinical applicability of the assessed markers. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) original research papers in English; 2) research on dynamic and measurable prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass; 3) neonatal fat mass measurement within one month after birth, using the four-compartment model, magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or air displacement plethysmography. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, assessment of methodological (QUADAS-II) and statistical quality and appraisal of clinical applicability. Results Of 2333 studies primarily identified by the search strategy, 16 studies were included. Four of these were both methodologically and statistically of moderate or high quality. Prenatal markers investigated were ultrasound parameters, maternal biochemical markers and maternal characteristics. Markers of predefined interest were maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, fasting glucose and HbA1c, showing varying results. A meta-analysis was not possible due to substantial methodological heterogeneity. Clinically applicability of all markers was rated poor. Conclusions Although associations were found, no useful marker was identified, due to lack of methodological and statistical quality, inconsistent results and poor clinical applicability. No markers were investigated in the periconceptional and embryonic period.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Fat mass</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Newborn</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Plethysmography</subject><subject>Predictor</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0261-5614</issn><issn>1532-1983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVJabZp_kAOwcdc7M5IlmyHEgghTQqBFtKchVYagTZeO5XshP33kdm0hxx6Ghjee8z7hrEThAoB1ddNZfthrjigrKCrAMQHtkIpeIldKw7YCrjCUiqsD9nnlDYAIEXTfmKHXNVdB4Kv2PmvSIOZTF9sTXykmIrRFwON-503U96ndF5cFmmXJtqaKdgi0nOgly_sozd9ouO3ecQevl__vrot737e_Li6vCttjTiVtTG2lapR3td-7bgVTrqOew8ouFxD03rXGWcbW3vvwLoGkEuofSM8XysQR-xsn_sUxz8zpUlvQ7LU9ybfOSeNLQrFWyF4lvK91MYxpUheP8WQi-00gl6Y6Y1emOmFmYZOZ2bZdPqWP6-35P5Z_kLKgm97AeWWuXnUyQYaLLkQyU7ajeH_-Rfv7LYPQ7Cmf6Qdpc04xyHz06gT16Dvl68tT0MJwIVqxSt5wJGi</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Roelants, Jorine A</creator><creator>de Jonge, Rogier C.J</creator><creator>Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M</creator><creator>Reiss, Irwin K.M</creator><creator>Joosten, Koen F.M</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Marijn J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review</title><author>Roelants, Jorine A ; de Jonge, Rogier C.J ; Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M ; Reiss, Irwin K.M ; Joosten, Koen F.M ; Vermeulen, Marijn J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4aac85676ff4fbd2c3d5d92ff01325b078fd9adc7c4ffd0cd7012504f73f2b603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Fat mass</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Newborn</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Plethysmography</topic><topic>Predictor</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roelants, Jorine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Rogier C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Irwin K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joosten, Koen F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Marijn J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roelants, Jorine A</au><au>de Jonge, Rogier C.J</au><au>Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P.M</au><au>Reiss, Irwin K.M</au><au>Joosten, Koen F.M</au><au>Vermeulen, Marijn J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>995</spage><epage>1007</epage><pages>995-1007</pages><issn>0261-5614</issn><eissn>1532-1983</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Environmental influences during pregnancy are able to affect off spring phenotype with lifelong effects. Clinical applicable markers are needed to identify foetuses at risk for neonatal adiposity. This systematic review aims to 1) review the current literature on prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass, and 2) appraise the clinical applicability of the assessed markers. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) original research papers in English; 2) research on dynamic and measurable prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass; 3) neonatal fat mass measurement within one month after birth, using the four-compartment model, magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or air displacement plethysmography. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, assessment of methodological (QUADAS-II) and statistical quality and appraisal of clinical applicability. Results Of 2333 studies primarily identified by the search strategy, 16 studies were included. Four of these were both methodologically and statistically of moderate or high quality. Prenatal markers investigated were ultrasound parameters, maternal biochemical markers and maternal characteristics. Markers of predefined interest were maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, fasting glucose and HbA1c, showing varying results. A meta-analysis was not possible due to substantial methodological heterogeneity. Clinically applicability of all markers was rated poor. Conclusions Although associations were found, no useful marker was identified, due to lack of methodological and statistical quality, inconsistent results and poor clinical applicability. No markers were investigated in the periconceptional and embryonic period.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26499032</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.003</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-5614
ispartof Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2016-10, Vol.35 (5), p.995-1007
issn 0261-5614
1532-1983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1813628332
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adiposity
Biomarkers - blood
Blood Glucose - metabolism
Body Composition
Body Mass Index
Fat mass
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Glycated Hemoglobin A - metabolism
Humans
Infant
Newborn
Obesity
Plethysmography
Predictor
Pregnancy
Risk Factors
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title Prenatal markers of neonatal fat mass: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prenatal%20markers%20of%20neonatal%20fat%20mass:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nutrition%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Roelants,%20Jorine%20A&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=995&rft.epage=1007&rft.pages=995-1007&rft.issn=0261-5614&rft.eissn=1532-1983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1813628332%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813628332&rft_id=info:pmid/26499032&rft_els_id=S0261561415002368&rfr_iscdi=true