Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases

Background & Aims Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically contr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2016-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1266-1273.e1
Hauptverfasser: Liao, Zhuan, Hou, Xi, Lin-Hu, En-Qiang, Sheng, Jian-Qiu, Ge, Zhi-Zheng, Jiang, Bo, Hou, Xiao-Hua, Liu, Ji-Yong, Li, Zhen, Huang, Qi-Yang, Zhao, Xiao-Jun, Li, Na, Gao, Yun-Jie, Zhang, Yao, Zhou, Jie-Qiong, Wang, Xin-Ying, Liu, Jun, Xie, Xiao-Ping, Yang, Cong-Mei, Liu, Hua-Lin, Sun, Xiao-Tian, Zou, Wen-Bin, Li, Zhao-Shen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1273.e1
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1266
container_title Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 14
creator Liao, Zhuan
Hou, Xi
Lin-Hu, En-Qiang
Sheng, Jian-Qiu
Ge, Zhi-Zheng
Jiang, Bo
Hou, Xiao-Hua
Liu, Ji-Yong
Li, Zhen
Huang, Qi-Yang
Zhao, Xiao-Jun
Li, Na
Gao, Yun-Jie
Zhang, Yao
Zhou, Jie-Qiong
Wang, Xin-Ying
Liu, Jun
Xie, Xiao-Ping
Yang, Cong-Mei
Liu, Hua-Lin
Sun, Xiao-Tian
Zou, Wen-Bin
Li, Zhao-Shen
description Background & Aims Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been designed to explore the stomach. We performed a prospective study to compare the accuracy of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE vs conventional gastroscopy (the standard method). Methods We performed a multicenter blinded study comparing MCE with conventional gastroscopy in 350 patients (mean age, 46.6 y), with upper abdominal complaints scheduled to undergo gastroscopy at a tertiary center in China from August 2014 through December 2014. All patients underwent MCE, followed by conventional gastroscopy 2 hours later, without sedation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE, using gastroscopy as the standard. Results MCE detected gastric focal lesions in the whole stomach with 90.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7%–96.1%), 94.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.9%–97.5%), a positive predictive value of 87.9% (95% CI, 81.7%–94.0%), a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI, 93.4%–98.4%), and 93.4% accuracy (95% CI, 90.83%–96.02%). MCE detected focal lesions in the upper stomach (cardia, fundus, and body) with 90.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.0%–98.4%) and 96.7% specificity (95% CI, 94.4%–98.9%). MCE detected focal lesions in the lower stomach (angulus, antrum, and pylorus) with 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.7%–98.4%) and 97.9% specificity (95% CI, 96.1%–99.7%). MCE detected 1 advanced gastric carcinoma, 2 malignant lymphomas, and 1 early stage gastric tumor. MCE did not miss any lesions of significance (including tumors or large ulcers). Among the 350 patients, 5 reported 9 adverse events (1.4%) and 335 preferred MCE over gastroscopy (95.7%). Conclusions MCE detects focal lesions in the upper and lower stomach with comparable accuracy with conventional gastroscopy. MCE is preferred by almost all patients, compared with gastroscopy, and can be used to screen gastric diseases without sedation. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02219529.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1812884884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1542356516302002</els_id><sourcerecordid>1812884884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-69753f0cb7e0908a2d09b5277564a430bf55283dda3c7770dee1a9879765d4c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEYxYMotlYfwI3M0oV3zN_JDIJQbmsVKi5UXIbc5Js219xkTGYKs_NR-ix9MjPeaxcuCoEEzjlf-H4HoZcE1wST5u22NlfXNS3PGosaE_YIHRPB6UpKwh8f3kw04gg9y3mLMe14J5-iIyopIQKzY_T71JgpaTNXsa8-66sAozPa-7laxzCm6D3Yaq2HPHmozoON2cRhflPU3aBT0X648Xrx3kAYXQzaVxc6l-DB50J1BiOYRStf3N3-VZ2pzlwGnSE_R0967TO8ONwn6PuH82_rj6vLLxef1qeXK8MFGVdNJwXrsdlIwB1uNbW42wgqpWi45gxveiFoy6zVzEgpsQUgumtlJxthueHsBL3ezx1S_DVBHtXOZQPe6wBxyoq0hLYtL6dYyd5qyho5Qa-G5HY6zYpgtYBXW1XAqwW8wkIV8CXz6jB-2uzA3if-kS6Gd3sDlCVvHCSVjYNgwLpU8Cgb3YPj3_-XNt6FpamfMEPexikV9GULlanC6uvS_FI8aRimpXf2Bx_Rqcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812884884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liao, Zhuan ; Hou, Xi ; Lin-Hu, En-Qiang ; Sheng, Jian-Qiu ; Ge, Zhi-Zheng ; Jiang, Bo ; Hou, Xiao-Hua ; Liu, Ji-Yong ; Li, Zhen ; Huang, Qi-Yang ; Zhao, Xiao-Jun ; Li, Na ; Gao, Yun-Jie ; Zhang, Yao ; Zhou, Jie-Qiong ; Wang, Xin-Ying ; Liu, Jun ; Xie, Xiao-Ping ; Yang, Cong-Mei ; Liu, Hua-Lin ; Sun, Xiao-Tian ; Zou, Wen-Bin ; Li, Zhao-Shen</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan ; Hou, Xi ; Lin-Hu, En-Qiang ; Sheng, Jian-Qiu ; Ge, Zhi-Zheng ; Jiang, Bo ; Hou, Xiao-Hua ; Liu, Ji-Yong ; Li, Zhen ; Huang, Qi-Yang ; Zhao, Xiao-Jun ; Li, Na ; Gao, Yun-Jie ; Zhang, Yao ; Zhou, Jie-Qiong ; Wang, Xin-Ying ; Liu, Jun ; Xie, Xiao-Ping ; Yang, Cong-Mei ; Liu, Hua-Lin ; Sun, Xiao-Tian ; Zou, Wen-Bin ; Li, Zhao-Shen</creatorcontrib><description>Background &amp; Aims Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been designed to explore the stomach. We performed a prospective study to compare the accuracy of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE vs conventional gastroscopy (the standard method). Methods We performed a multicenter blinded study comparing MCE with conventional gastroscopy in 350 patients (mean age, 46.6 y), with upper abdominal complaints scheduled to undergo gastroscopy at a tertiary center in China from August 2014 through December 2014. All patients underwent MCE, followed by conventional gastroscopy 2 hours later, without sedation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE, using gastroscopy as the standard. Results MCE detected gastric focal lesions in the whole stomach with 90.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7%–96.1%), 94.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.9%–97.5%), a positive predictive value of 87.9% (95% CI, 81.7%–94.0%), a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI, 93.4%–98.4%), and 93.4% accuracy (95% CI, 90.83%–96.02%). MCE detected focal lesions in the upper stomach (cardia, fundus, and body) with 90.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.0%–98.4%) and 96.7% specificity (95% CI, 94.4%–98.9%). MCE detected focal lesions in the lower stomach (angulus, antrum, and pylorus) with 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.7%–98.4%) and 97.9% specificity (95% CI, 96.1%–99.7%). MCE detected 1 advanced gastric carcinoma, 2 malignant lymphomas, and 1 early stage gastric tumor. MCE did not miss any lesions of significance (including tumors or large ulcers). Among the 350 patients, 5 reported 9 adverse events (1.4%) and 335 preferred MCE over gastroscopy (95.7%). Conclusions MCE detects focal lesions in the upper and lower stomach with comparable accuracy with conventional gastroscopy. MCE is preferred by almost all patients, compared with gastroscopy, and can be used to screen gastric diseases without sedation. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02219529.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-3565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27211503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Capsule Endoscopy - methods ; China ; Diagnostic Accuracy ; Female ; Gastric Diseases ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroscopy ; Gastroscopy - methods ; Humans ; Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy ; Magnetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stomach Diseases - diagnosis ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1266-1273.e1</ispartof><rights>AGA Institute</rights><rights>2016 AGA Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-69753f0cb7e0908a2d09b5277564a430bf55283dda3c7770dee1a9879765d4c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-69753f0cb7e0908a2d09b5277564a430bf55283dda3c7770dee1a9879765d4c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7932-5403</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356516302002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin-Hu, En-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Jian-Qiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Zhi-Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xiao-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qi-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiao-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie-Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Cong-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hua-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xiao-Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Wen-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background &amp; Aims Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been designed to explore the stomach. We performed a prospective study to compare the accuracy of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE vs conventional gastroscopy (the standard method). Methods We performed a multicenter blinded study comparing MCE with conventional gastroscopy in 350 patients (mean age, 46.6 y), with upper abdominal complaints scheduled to undergo gastroscopy at a tertiary center in China from August 2014 through December 2014. All patients underwent MCE, followed by conventional gastroscopy 2 hours later, without sedation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE, using gastroscopy as the standard. Results MCE detected gastric focal lesions in the whole stomach with 90.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7%–96.1%), 94.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.9%–97.5%), a positive predictive value of 87.9% (95% CI, 81.7%–94.0%), a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI, 93.4%–98.4%), and 93.4% accuracy (95% CI, 90.83%–96.02%). MCE detected focal lesions in the upper stomach (cardia, fundus, and body) with 90.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.0%–98.4%) and 96.7% specificity (95% CI, 94.4%–98.9%). MCE detected focal lesions in the lower stomach (angulus, antrum, and pylorus) with 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.7%–98.4%) and 97.9% specificity (95% CI, 96.1%–99.7%). MCE detected 1 advanced gastric carcinoma, 2 malignant lymphomas, and 1 early stage gastric tumor. MCE did not miss any lesions of significance (including tumors or large ulcers). Among the 350 patients, 5 reported 9 adverse events (1.4%) and 335 preferred MCE over gastroscopy (95.7%). Conclusions MCE detects focal lesions in the upper and lower stomach with comparable accuracy with conventional gastroscopy. MCE is preferred by almost all patients, compared with gastroscopy, and can be used to screen gastric diseases without sedation. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02219529.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Diagnostic Accuracy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Diseases</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroscopy</subject><subject>Gastroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy</subject><subject>Magnetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stomach Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEYxYMotlYfwI3M0oV3zN_JDIJQbmsVKi5UXIbc5Js219xkTGYKs_NR-ix9MjPeaxcuCoEEzjlf-H4HoZcE1wST5u22NlfXNS3PGosaE_YIHRPB6UpKwh8f3kw04gg9y3mLMe14J5-iIyopIQKzY_T71JgpaTNXsa8-66sAozPa-7laxzCm6D3Yaq2HPHmozoON2cRhflPU3aBT0X648Xrx3kAYXQzaVxc6l-DB50J1BiOYRStf3N3-VZ2pzlwGnSE_R0967TO8ONwn6PuH82_rj6vLLxef1qeXK8MFGVdNJwXrsdlIwB1uNbW42wgqpWi45gxveiFoy6zVzEgpsQUgumtlJxthueHsBL3ezx1S_DVBHtXOZQPe6wBxyoq0hLYtL6dYyd5qyho5Qa-G5HY6zYpgtYBXW1XAqwW8wkIV8CXz6jB-2uzA3if-kS6Gd3sDlCVvHCSVjYNgwLpU8Cgb3YPj3_-XNt6FpamfMEPexikV9GULlanC6uvS_FI8aRimpXf2Bx_Rqcs</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Liao, Zhuan</creator><creator>Hou, Xi</creator><creator>Lin-Hu, En-Qiang</creator><creator>Sheng, Jian-Qiu</creator><creator>Ge, Zhi-Zheng</creator><creator>Jiang, Bo</creator><creator>Hou, Xiao-Hua</creator><creator>Liu, Ji-Yong</creator><creator>Li, Zhen</creator><creator>Huang, Qi-Yang</creator><creator>Zhao, Xiao-Jun</creator><creator>Li, Na</creator><creator>Gao, Yun-Jie</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Zhou, Jie-Qiong</creator><creator>Wang, Xin-Ying</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><creator>Xie, Xiao-Ping</creator><creator>Yang, Cong-Mei</creator><creator>Liu, Hua-Lin</creator><creator>Sun, Xiao-Tian</creator><creator>Zou, Wen-Bin</creator><creator>Li, Zhao-Shen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-5403</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases</title><author>Liao, Zhuan ; Hou, Xi ; Lin-Hu, En-Qiang ; Sheng, Jian-Qiu ; Ge, Zhi-Zheng ; Jiang, Bo ; Hou, Xiao-Hua ; Liu, Ji-Yong ; Li, Zhen ; Huang, Qi-Yang ; Zhao, Xiao-Jun ; Li, Na ; Gao, Yun-Jie ; Zhang, Yao ; Zhou, Jie-Qiong ; Wang, Xin-Ying ; Liu, Jun ; Xie, Xiao-Ping ; Yang, Cong-Mei ; Liu, Hua-Lin ; Sun, Xiao-Tian ; Zou, Wen-Bin ; Li, Zhao-Shen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-69753f0cb7e0908a2d09b5277564a430bf55283dda3c7770dee1a9879765d4c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Capsule Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Diagnostic Accuracy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Diseases</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroscopy</topic><topic>Gastroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy</topic><topic>Magnetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stomach Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin-Hu, En-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Jian-Qiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Zhi-Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xiao-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qi-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiao-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie-Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xiao-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Cong-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hua-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Xiao-Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Wen-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhao-Shen</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Zhuan</au><au>Hou, Xi</au><au>Lin-Hu, En-Qiang</au><au>Sheng, Jian-Qiu</au><au>Ge, Zhi-Zheng</au><au>Jiang, Bo</au><au>Hou, Xiao-Hua</au><au>Liu, Ji-Yong</au><au>Li, Zhen</au><au>Huang, Qi-Yang</au><au>Zhao, Xiao-Jun</au><au>Li, Na</au><au>Gao, Yun-Jie</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Zhou, Jie-Qiong</au><au>Wang, Xin-Ying</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><au>Xie, Xiao-Ping</au><au>Yang, Cong-Mei</au><au>Liu, Hua-Lin</au><au>Sun, Xiao-Tian</au><au>Zou, Wen-Bin</au><au>Li, Zhao-Shen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1266</spage><epage>1273.e1</epage><pages>1266-1273.e1</pages><issn>1542-3565</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>Background &amp; Aims Diseases of the stomach, including gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, are the most common digestive diseases. It is impossible to visualize the entire stomach with the passive capsule currently used in practice because of the large size of the gastric cavity. A magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system has been designed to explore the stomach. We performed a prospective study to compare the accuracy of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE vs conventional gastroscopy (the standard method). Methods We performed a multicenter blinded study comparing MCE with conventional gastroscopy in 350 patients (mean age, 46.6 y), with upper abdominal complaints scheduled to undergo gastroscopy at a tertiary center in China from August 2014 through December 2014. All patients underwent MCE, followed by conventional gastroscopy 2 hours later, without sedation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of detection of gastric focal lesions by MCE, using gastroscopy as the standard. Results MCE detected gastric focal lesions in the whole stomach with 90.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.7%–96.1%), 94.7% specificity (95% CI, 91.9%–97.5%), a positive predictive value of 87.9% (95% CI, 81.7%–94.0%), a negative predictive value of 95.9% (95% CI, 93.4%–98.4%), and 93.4% accuracy (95% CI, 90.83%–96.02%). MCE detected focal lesions in the upper stomach (cardia, fundus, and body) with 90.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.0%–98.4%) and 96.7% specificity (95% CI, 94.4%–98.9%). MCE detected focal lesions in the lower stomach (angulus, antrum, and pylorus) with 90.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 82.7%–98.4%) and 97.9% specificity (95% CI, 96.1%–99.7%). MCE detected 1 advanced gastric carcinoma, 2 malignant lymphomas, and 1 early stage gastric tumor. MCE did not miss any lesions of significance (including tumors or large ulcers). Among the 350 patients, 5 reported 9 adverse events (1.4%) and 335 preferred MCE over gastroscopy (95.7%). Conclusions MCE detects focal lesions in the upper and lower stomach with comparable accuracy with conventional gastroscopy. MCE is preferred by almost all patients, compared with gastroscopy, and can be used to screen gastric diseases without sedation. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02219529.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27211503</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-5403</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-3565
ispartof Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2016-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1266-1273.e1
issn 1542-3565
1542-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1812884884
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Animals
Capsule Endoscopy - methods
China
Diagnostic Accuracy
Female
Gastric Diseases
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroscopy
Gastroscopy - methods
Humans
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy
Magnetics
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stomach Diseases - diagnosis
Tertiary Care Centers
Young Adult
title Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Magnetically%20Controlled%20Capsule%20Endoscopy,%20Compared%20With%20Conventional%20Gastroscopy,%20in%20Detection%20of%C2%A0Gastric%20Diseases&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Liao,%20Zhuan&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1266&rft.epage=1273.e1&rft.pages=1266-1273.e1&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1812884884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812884884&rft_id=info:pmid/27211503&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1542356516302002&rfr_iscdi=true