Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy
Intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine provides postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OHE) alone or in combination with incisional (INC) bupivacaine. This study investigated whether the combination of INC and IP bupivacaine is superior to IP bupivacaine alone. Prospective, randomi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 2016-09, Vol.43 (5), p.571-578 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 578 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 571 |
| container_title | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S Campagna, Ivo Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia Guerrero, Tomas G |
| description | Intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine provides postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OHE) alone or in combination with incisional (INC) bupivacaine. This study investigated whether the combination of INC and IP bupivacaine is superior to IP bupivacaine alone.
Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study.
Thirty-nine privately owned dogs undergoing OHE, aged 25 ± 23 months and weighing 11.8 ± 5.7 kg.
Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg kg−1) and morphine (0.5 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM); anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Carprofen (4 mg kg−1) was administered subcutaneously (SC) after intubation. Bupivacaine (3 mg kg−1) IP was administered before complete closure of the linea alba to all dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups: group B received bupivacaine (n = 20; 1 mg kg−1) and group S received saline (n = 19; 0.2 mL kg−1) INC as a subcutaneous ‘splash’ before skin closure. Postoperative analgesia was assessed with a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale, and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 hours after surgery by one blinded observer. Parametric data were tested using t-test; nonparametric data were analysed using the two-sample Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05).
There was no significant difference between groups with regard to age, weight, surgical and anaesthetic duration, incision length, sedation and pain scores. MNT values decreased in both groups at all time points as compared with the baseline. No dog required rescue analgesia. No postoperative complications were observed.
Bupivacaine IP and carprofen SC after morphine IM did provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing OHE with the anaesthetic protocol used. There appears to be no clinical advantage to adding bupivacaine INC. Neither protocol could prevent the development of primary hyperalgesia. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vaa.12348 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1812439053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1467298716300150</els_id><sourcerecordid>1812439053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-f7b7d08993b0540a214d461a1b68492ed008032faf9e2943f58064ebff25f0913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQQC1UBBQ48AeqHNvDsrbjJPZxhfqBhNRL4Wo5yXiZKmuntpPV3vvDa1iWAyq-jA9vnq1HyBWj1yyf5WzMNeOlkEfkjIm6WXClqg-vd9mcko8x_qaUNaqiJ-SU17Khildn5O-tS8GMEDB5B2Yo2mnE2XQGHRRbTI-FD8_TT6lA12FE795gNiOjj8lnjUk4Q2EysoaIJq8UvV_HYnI9hLVHty78bAL6x11MEKBLfrO7IMfWDBEuX-Y5uf_29dfNj8Xdz--3N6u7RSdKJRe2aZueSqXKllaCGs5EL2pmWFtLoTj0lEpacmusAq5EaStJawGttbyyVLHynHzee8fg_0wQk95g7GAYjAM_Rc0k4_klWpUZ_bJHu-BjDGD1GHBjwk4zqp-i6xxdP0fP7KcX7dRuoH8lD5UzsNwDWxxg975JP6xWB2W534CcY0YIOnYIroMen5rp3uN_PvIPusOgnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812439053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S ; Campagna, Ivo ; Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo ; Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia ; Guerrero, Tomas G</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S ; Campagna, Ivo ; Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo ; Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia ; Guerrero, Tomas G</creatorcontrib><description>Intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine provides postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OHE) alone or in combination with incisional (INC) bupivacaine. This study investigated whether the combination of INC and IP bupivacaine is superior to IP bupivacaine alone.
Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study.
Thirty-nine privately owned dogs undergoing OHE, aged 25 ± 23 months and weighing 11.8 ± 5.7 kg.
Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg kg−1) and morphine (0.5 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM); anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Carprofen (4 mg kg−1) was administered subcutaneously (SC) after intubation. Bupivacaine (3 mg kg−1) IP was administered before complete closure of the linea alba to all dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups: group B received bupivacaine (n = 20; 1 mg kg−1) and group S received saline (n = 19; 0.2 mL kg−1) INC as a subcutaneous ‘splash’ before skin closure. Postoperative analgesia was assessed with a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale, and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 hours after surgery by one blinded observer. Parametric data were tested using t-test; nonparametric data were analysed using the two-sample Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05).
There was no significant difference between groups with regard to age, weight, surgical and anaesthetic duration, incision length, sedation and pain scores. MNT values decreased in both groups at all time points as compared with the baseline. No dog required rescue analgesia. No postoperative complications were observed.
Bupivacaine IP and carprofen SC after morphine IM did provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing OHE with the anaesthetic protocol used. There appears to be no clinical advantage to adding bupivacaine INC. Neither protocol could prevent the development of primary hyperalgesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26870925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesia - veterinary ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Animals ; Bupivacaine - administration & dosage ; canine ; Dogs - surgery ; Female ; hyperalgesia ; Hysterectomy - veterinary ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; local anaesthesia ; Ovariectomy - veterinary ; ovariohysterectomy ; pain ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - veterinary ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Surgical Wound</subject><ispartof>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2016-09, Vol.43 (5), p.571-578</ispartof><rights>2016 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia</rights><rights>2016 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia</rights><rights>2016 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-f7b7d08993b0540a214d461a1b68492ed008032faf9e2943f58064ebff25f0913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-f7b7d08993b0540a214d461a1b68492ed008032faf9e2943f58064ebff25f0913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvaa.12348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvaa.12348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagna, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Tomas G</creatorcontrib><title>Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy</title><title>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><description>Intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine provides postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OHE) alone or in combination with incisional (INC) bupivacaine. This study investigated whether the combination of INC and IP bupivacaine is superior to IP bupivacaine alone.
Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study.
Thirty-nine privately owned dogs undergoing OHE, aged 25 ± 23 months and weighing 11.8 ± 5.7 kg.
Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg kg−1) and morphine (0.5 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM); anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Carprofen (4 mg kg−1) was administered subcutaneously (SC) after intubation. Bupivacaine (3 mg kg−1) IP was administered before complete closure of the linea alba to all dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups: group B received bupivacaine (n = 20; 1 mg kg−1) and group S received saline (n = 19; 0.2 mL kg−1) INC as a subcutaneous ‘splash’ before skin closure. Postoperative analgesia was assessed with a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale, and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 hours after surgery by one blinded observer. Parametric data were tested using t-test; nonparametric data were analysed using the two-sample Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05).
There was no significant difference between groups with regard to age, weight, surgical and anaesthetic duration, incision length, sedation and pain scores. MNT values decreased in both groups at all time points as compared with the baseline. No dog required rescue analgesia. No postoperative complications were observed.
Bupivacaine IP and carprofen SC after morphine IM did provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing OHE with the anaesthetic protocol used. There appears to be no clinical advantage to adding bupivacaine INC. Neither protocol could prevent the development of primary hyperalgesia.</description><subject>Analgesia - veterinary</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>canine</subject><subject>Dogs - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hyperalgesia</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - veterinary</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal</subject><subject>local anaesthesia</subject><subject>Ovariectomy - veterinary</subject><subject>ovariohysterectomy</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - veterinary</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Surgical Wound</subject><issn>1467-2987</issn><issn>1467-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQQC1UBBQ48AeqHNvDsrbjJPZxhfqBhNRL4Wo5yXiZKmuntpPV3vvDa1iWAyq-jA9vnq1HyBWj1yyf5WzMNeOlkEfkjIm6WXClqg-vd9mcko8x_qaUNaqiJ-SU17Khildn5O-tS8GMEDB5B2Yo2mnE2XQGHRRbTI-FD8_TT6lA12FE795gNiOjj8lnjUk4Q2EysoaIJq8UvV_HYnI9hLVHty78bAL6x11MEKBLfrO7IMfWDBEuX-Y5uf_29dfNj8Xdz--3N6u7RSdKJRe2aZueSqXKllaCGs5EL2pmWFtLoTj0lEpacmusAq5EaStJawGttbyyVLHynHzee8fg_0wQk95g7GAYjAM_Rc0k4_klWpUZ_bJHu-BjDGD1GHBjwk4zqp-i6xxdP0fP7KcX7dRuoH8lD5UzsNwDWxxg975JP6xWB2W534CcY0YIOnYIroMen5rp3uN_PvIPusOgnw</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S</creator><creator>Campagna, Ivo</creator><creator>Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia</creator><creator>Guerrero, Tomas G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy</title><author>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S ; Campagna, Ivo ; Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo ; Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia ; Guerrero, Tomas G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4398-f7b7d08993b0540a214d461a1b68492ed008032faf9e2943f58064ebff25f0913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analgesia - veterinary</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>canine</topic><topic>Dogs - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hyperalgesia</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - veterinary</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal</topic><topic>local anaesthesia</topic><topic>Ovariectomy - veterinary</topic><topic>ovariohysterectomy</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - veterinary</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Surgical Wound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagna, Ivo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Tomas G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalchofner Guerrero, Karin S</au><au>Campagna, Ivo</au><au>Bruhl-Day, Rodolfo</au><au>Hegamin-Younger, Cecilia</au><au>Guerrero, Tomas G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>571</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>571-578</pages><issn>1467-2987</issn><eissn>1467-2995</eissn><abstract>Intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine provides postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy (OHE) alone or in combination with incisional (INC) bupivacaine. This study investigated whether the combination of INC and IP bupivacaine is superior to IP bupivacaine alone.
Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study.
Thirty-nine privately owned dogs undergoing OHE, aged 25 ± 23 months and weighing 11.8 ± 5.7 kg.
Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg kg−1) and morphine (0.5 mg kg−1) intramuscularly (IM); anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Carprofen (4 mg kg−1) was administered subcutaneously (SC) after intubation. Bupivacaine (3 mg kg−1) IP was administered before complete closure of the linea alba to all dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups: group B received bupivacaine (n = 20; 1 mg kg−1) and group S received saline (n = 19; 0.2 mL kg−1) INC as a subcutaneous ‘splash’ before skin closure. Postoperative analgesia was assessed with a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale, the short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale, and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 hours after surgery by one blinded observer. Parametric data were tested using t-test; nonparametric data were analysed using the two-sample Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05).
There was no significant difference between groups with regard to age, weight, surgical and anaesthetic duration, incision length, sedation and pain scores. MNT values decreased in both groups at all time points as compared with the baseline. No dog required rescue analgesia. No postoperative complications were observed.
Bupivacaine IP and carprofen SC after morphine IM did provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing OHE with the anaesthetic protocol used. There appears to be no clinical advantage to adding bupivacaine INC. Neither protocol could prevent the development of primary hyperalgesia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26870925</pmid><doi>10.1111/vaa.12348</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1467-2987 |
| ispartof | Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2016-09, Vol.43 (5), p.571-578 |
| issn | 1467-2987 1467-2995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1812439053 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Analgesia - veterinary Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Animals Bupivacaine - administration & dosage canine Dogs - surgery Female hyperalgesia Hysterectomy - veterinary Injections, Intraperitoneal local anaesthesia Ovariectomy - veterinary ovariohysterectomy pain Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Pain, Postoperative - veterinary Prospective Studies Single-Blind Method Surgical Wound |
| title | Intraperitoneal bupivacaine with or without incisional bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A06%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraperitoneal%20bupivacaine%20with%20or%20without%20incisional%20bupivacaine%20for%20postoperative%20analgesia%20in%20dogs%20undergoing%20ovariohysterectomy&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20anaesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Kalchofner%20Guerrero,%20Karin%20S&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=571-578&rft.issn=1467-2987&rft.eissn=1467-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vaa.12348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1812439053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812439053&rft_id=info:pmid/26870925&rft_els_id=S1467298716300150&rfr_iscdi=true |