Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento
Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Simpson, J.R. McPherson, E.G. |
description | Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18120218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231097001817</els_id><sourcerecordid>18120218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpoK7Tn1DQIYTmsIm0Wq1Wp1BMvsCQg9OzGGtHrsqu5EjrgP995djtNacZmOd9Bx5CvnN2zRlvb1ZcyLqqBWc_tLpijHe8Up_IjHdKVHXXNJ_L_g_5Qr7m_IcxJpRWM2JWftwNMPkYaHR0Sog0_4YeqR-3YKdMyyFh9j2GycNAMWDa7OkuI3Ux0VwgpDaG3h86fNhQH-gKbIKxJOI5OXMwZPx2mnPy6_7uZfFYLZ8fnhY_l5UVupuqNfBGamfdWknXIndCMNuj5K1aayudqp0tJwmybUE2HDS0miNrhRWd6LWYk8tj7zbF1x3myYw-WxwGCBh32RQnNat59zHYNB2r2wMoj6BNMeeEzmyTHyHtDWfm4N28ezcHqUYr8-7dqJK7OD2AbGFwCYL1-X-45roRxf6c3B4xLFbePCaTrcdgsfcJ7WT66D949BePFZed</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14480268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Energy ; Energy management and energy conservation in building ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Environmental engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General. Regulations ; Generalities, techniques ; Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production ; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation ; Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231097001817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,4010,4036,4037,23911,23912,25120,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2194300$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy management and energy conservation in building</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General. Regulations</subject><subject>Generalities, techniques</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production</subject><subject>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</subject><subject>Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpoK7Tn1DQIYTmsIm0Wq1Wp1BMvsCQg9OzGGtHrsqu5EjrgP995djtNacZmOd9Bx5CvnN2zRlvb1ZcyLqqBWc_tLpijHe8Up_IjHdKVHXXNJ_L_g_5Qr7m_IcxJpRWM2JWftwNMPkYaHR0Sog0_4YeqR-3YKdMyyFh9j2GycNAMWDa7OkuI3Ux0VwgpDaG3h86fNhQH-gKbIKxJOI5OXMwZPx2mnPy6_7uZfFYLZ8fnhY_l5UVupuqNfBGamfdWknXIndCMNuj5K1aayudqp0tJwmybUE2HDS0miNrhRWd6LWYk8tj7zbF1x3myYw-WxwGCBh32RQnNat59zHYNB2r2wMoj6BNMeeEzmyTHyHtDWfm4N28ezcHqUYr8-7dqJK7OD2AbGFwCYL1-X-45roRxf6c3B4xLFbePCaTrcdgsfcJ7WT66D949BePFZed</recordid><startdate>1998</startdate><enddate>1998</enddate><creator>Simpson, J.R.</creator><creator>McPherson, E.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1998</creationdate><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><author>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy management and energy conservation in building</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General. Regulations</topic><topic>Generalities, techniques</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production</topic><topic>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</topic><topic>Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, J.R.</au><au>McPherson, E.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>1998</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>69-74</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74 |
issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18120218 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agricultural and forest meteorology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Building technical equipments Buildings Buildings. Public works Energy Energy management and energy conservation in building Energy. Thermal use of fuels Environmental engineering Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production General. Regulations Generalities, techniques Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production Heating, air conditioning and ventilation Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy |
title | Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20tree%20shade%20impacts%20on%20residential%20energy%20use%20for%20space%20conditioning%20in%20Sacramento&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Simpson,%20J.R.&rft.date=1998&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=69-74&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18120218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14480268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231097001817&rfr_iscdi=true |