Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento

Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74
Hauptverfasser: Simpson, J.R., McPherson, E.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 32
creator Simpson, J.R.
McPherson, E.G.
description Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18120218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231097001817</els_id><sourcerecordid>18120218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpoK7Tn1DQIYTmsIm0Wq1Wp1BMvsCQg9OzGGtHrsqu5EjrgP995djtNacZmOd9Bx5CvnN2zRlvb1ZcyLqqBWc_tLpijHe8Up_IjHdKVHXXNJ_L_g_5Qr7m_IcxJpRWM2JWftwNMPkYaHR0Sog0_4YeqR-3YKdMyyFh9j2GycNAMWDa7OkuI3Ux0VwgpDaG3h86fNhQH-gKbIKxJOI5OXMwZPx2mnPy6_7uZfFYLZ8fnhY_l5UVupuqNfBGamfdWknXIndCMNuj5K1aayudqp0tJwmybUE2HDS0miNrhRWd6LWYk8tj7zbF1x3myYw-WxwGCBh32RQnNat59zHYNB2r2wMoj6BNMeeEzmyTHyHtDWfm4N28ezcHqUYr8-7dqJK7OD2AbGFwCYL1-X-45roRxf6c3B4xLFbePCaTrcdgsfcJ7WT66D949BePFZed</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14480268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Energy ; Energy management and energy conservation in building ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Environmental engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; General. Regulations ; Generalities, techniques ; Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production ; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation ; Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231097001817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,4010,4036,4037,23911,23912,25120,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2194300$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy management and energy conservation in building</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>General. Regulations</subject><subject>Generalities, techniques</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production</subject><subject>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</subject><subject>Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpoK7Tn1DQIYTmsIm0Wq1Wp1BMvsCQg9OzGGtHrsqu5EjrgP995djtNacZmOd9Bx5CvnN2zRlvb1ZcyLqqBWc_tLpijHe8Up_IjHdKVHXXNJ_L_g_5Qr7m_IcxJpRWM2JWftwNMPkYaHR0Sog0_4YeqR-3YKdMyyFh9j2GycNAMWDa7OkuI3Ux0VwgpDaG3h86fNhQH-gKbIKxJOI5OXMwZPx2mnPy6_7uZfFYLZ8fnhY_l5UVupuqNfBGamfdWknXIndCMNuj5K1aayudqp0tJwmybUE2HDS0miNrhRWd6LWYk8tj7zbF1x3myYw-WxwGCBh32RQnNat59zHYNB2r2wMoj6BNMeeEzmyTHyHtDWfm4N28ezcHqUYr8-7dqJK7OD2AbGFwCYL1-X-45roRxf6c3B4xLFbePCaTrcdgsfcJ7WT66D949BePFZed</recordid><startdate>1998</startdate><enddate>1998</enddate><creator>Simpson, J.R.</creator><creator>McPherson, E.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1998</creationdate><title>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</title><author>Simpson, J.R. ; McPherson, E.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-ba1459fcfb75f6e1f330cde5167b9c5f72fcb755a566a541a9a691e063c383d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy management and energy conservation in building</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>General. Regulations</topic><topic>Generalities, techniques</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production</topic><topic>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</topic><topic>Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simpson, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, E.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simpson, J.R.</au><au>McPherson, E.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>1998</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>69-74</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Tree shade reduces summer air conditioning demand and increases winter heating load by intercepting solar energy that would otherwise heat the shaded structure. We evaluate the magnitude of these effects here for 254 residential properties participating in a utility sponsored tree planting program in Sacramento, California. Tree and building characteristics and typical weather data are used to model hourly shading and energy used for space conditioning for each building for a period of one year. There were an average of 3.1 program trees per property which reduced annual and peak (8 h average from 1 to 9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time) cooling energy use 153 kWh (7.1%) and 0.08 kW (2.3%) per tree, respectively. Annual heating load increased 0.85 GJ (0.80 MBtu, 1.9%) per tree. Changes in cooling load were smaller, but percentage changes larger, for newer buildings. Averaged over all homes, annual cooling savings of $15.25 per tree were reduced by a heating penalty of $5.25 per tree, for net savings of $10.00 per tree from shade. We estimate an annual cooling penalty of $2.80 per tree and heating savings of $6.80 per tree from reduced wind speed, for a net savings of $4.00 per tree, and total annual savings of $14.00 per tree ($43.00 per property). Results are found to be consistent with previous simulations and the limited measurements available.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 1998, Vol.32 (1), p.69-74
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18120218
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agricultural and forest meteorology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Building technical equipments
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Energy
Energy management and energy conservation in building
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Environmental engineering
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
General. Regulations
Generalities, techniques
Generalities. Techniques. Climatology. Meteorology. Climatic models of plant production
Heating, air conditioning and ventilation
Rational use of energy: conservation and recovery of energy
title Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20tree%20shade%20impacts%20on%20residential%20energy%20use%20for%20space%20conditioning%20in%20Sacramento&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Simpson,%20J.R.&rft.date=1998&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=69-74&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00181-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18120218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14480268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231097001817&rfr_iscdi=true