Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture

The use of in-situ sensors capable of real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen (N) may facilitate improvements in agricultural N-use efficiency (NUE) through better fertiliser management. The optimal design of such sensor networks, consisting of clusters of sensors each attached to a data logger, depen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2016-08, Vol.230, p.294-306
Hauptverfasser: Shaw, R., Lark, R.M., Williams, A.P., Chadwick, D.R., Jones, D.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue
container_start_page 294
container_title Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 230
creator Shaw, R.
Lark, R.M.
Williams, A.P.
Chadwick, D.R.
Jones, D.L.
description The use of in-situ sensors capable of real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen (N) may facilitate improvements in agricultural N-use efficiency (NUE) through better fertiliser management. The optimal design of such sensor networks, consisting of clusters of sensors each attached to a data logger, depends upon the spatial variation of soil N and the relative cost of the data loggers and sensors. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate how in-situ networks of N sensors could be optimally designed to enable the cost-efficient monitoring of soil N within a grassland field (1.9ha). In the summer of 2014, two nested sampling campaigns (June & July) were undertaken to assess spatial variation in soil amino acids, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) at a range of scales that represented the within (less than 2m) and between (greater than 2m) data logger/sensor cluster variability. Variance at short range (less than 2m) was found to be dominant for all N forms. Variation at larger scales (greater than 2m) was not as large but was still considered an important spatial component for all N forms, especially NO3−. The variance components derived from the nested sampling were used to inform the efficient design of theoretical in-situ networks of NH4+ and NO3− sensors based on the costs of a commercially available data logger and ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Based on the spatial variance observed in the June nested sampling, and given a budget of £5000, the NO3− field mean could be estimated with a 95% confidence interval width of 1.70μgNg−1 using 2 randomly positioned data loggers each with 5 sensors. Further investigation into “aggregate-scale” (less than 1cm) spatial variance revealed further large variation at the sub 1-cm scale for all N forms. Sensors, for which the measurement represents an integration over a sensor-soil contact area of diameter less than 1cm, would be subject to this aggregate-scale variability. As such, local replication at scales less than 1cm would be needed to maintain the precision of the resulting field mean estimation. Adoption of in-situ sensor networks will depend upon the development of suitable low‐cost sensors, demonstration of the cost-benefit and the construction of a decision support system that utilises the generated data to improve the NUE of fertiliser N management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811903403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880916303188</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811903403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-11a15730e273497728961591d9259d5cb23dff52822a06a224be3ca288eba28b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1vGyEQRVUi1U3zB3ri2Mu6fOx6WamXyuqXFKmX9owwO6zHXYPLsIn6v_IDg-NKvQWNmBHMe8PjMfZOirUUcvPhsHYTwFrVei1qiPYVW0nT60Zp0V2xVb3oG2PE8Jq9ITqIupQ2K_a43bvsfIGMhHHiZQ_8AcseYxMQ5pGTdzNwOrmCbub3LmOtUuQp8Iglpwkix8gdn7Ijml2skIQzL6keh5SPz5QQAnqEWPgIhNMzvI4gLMt_GoJIKfMI5SHl38Qrmp8y-PqyOtBNGf0ylyXDW3Yd3Exw-y_fsF9fPv_cfmvufnz9vv1013jd96WR0smu1wJUr9uh75UZNrIb5Diobhg7v1N6DKFTRiknNk6pdgfaO2UM7Oq-0zfs_YX3lNOfBajYI5KHuaqEtJCVRspB6Fbo2qourT4nogzBnjIeXf5rpbBni-zBni2yZ4usqCHaCvp4AUEVcY-QLZ0_ycOIVXaxY8KX4E9HDZ5O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811903403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shaw, R. ; Lark, R.M. ; Williams, A.P. ; Chadwick, D.R. ; Jones, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaw, R. ; Lark, R.M. ; Williams, A.P. ; Chadwick, D.R. ; Jones, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of in-situ sensors capable of real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen (N) may facilitate improvements in agricultural N-use efficiency (NUE) through better fertiliser management. The optimal design of such sensor networks, consisting of clusters of sensors each attached to a data logger, depends upon the spatial variation of soil N and the relative cost of the data loggers and sensors. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate how in-situ networks of N sensors could be optimally designed to enable the cost-efficient monitoring of soil N within a grassland field (1.9ha). In the summer of 2014, two nested sampling campaigns (June &amp; July) were undertaken to assess spatial variation in soil amino acids, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) at a range of scales that represented the within (less than 2m) and between (greater than 2m) data logger/sensor cluster variability. Variance at short range (less than 2m) was found to be dominant for all N forms. Variation at larger scales (greater than 2m) was not as large but was still considered an important spatial component for all N forms, especially NO3−. The variance components derived from the nested sampling were used to inform the efficient design of theoretical in-situ networks of NH4+ and NO3− sensors based on the costs of a commercially available data logger and ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Based on the spatial variance observed in the June nested sampling, and given a budget of £5000, the NO3− field mean could be estimated with a 95% confidence interval width of 1.70μgNg−1 using 2 randomly positioned data loggers each with 5 sensors. Further investigation into “aggregate-scale” (less than 1cm) spatial variance revealed further large variation at the sub 1-cm scale for all N forms. Sensors, for which the measurement represents an integration over a sensor-soil contact area of diameter less than 1cm, would be subject to this aggregate-scale variability. As such, local replication at scales less than 1cm would be needed to maintain the precision of the resulting field mean estimation. Adoption of in-situ sensor networks will depend upon the development of suitable low‐cost sensors, demonstration of the cost-benefit and the construction of a decision support system that utilises the generated data to improve the NUE of fertiliser N management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Dissolved organic nitrogen ; Fertilizer management ; Nitrogen-use efficiency ; Nutrient cycling ; Precision agriculture ; Soil heterogeneity</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2016-08, Vol.230, p.294-306</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-11a15730e273497728961591d9259d5cb23dff52822a06a224be3ca288eba28b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-11a15730e273497728961591d9259d5cb23dff52822a06a224be3ca288eba28b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaw, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lark, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>The use of in-situ sensors capable of real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen (N) may facilitate improvements in agricultural N-use efficiency (NUE) through better fertiliser management. The optimal design of such sensor networks, consisting of clusters of sensors each attached to a data logger, depends upon the spatial variation of soil N and the relative cost of the data loggers and sensors. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate how in-situ networks of N sensors could be optimally designed to enable the cost-efficient monitoring of soil N within a grassland field (1.9ha). In the summer of 2014, two nested sampling campaigns (June &amp; July) were undertaken to assess spatial variation in soil amino acids, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) at a range of scales that represented the within (less than 2m) and between (greater than 2m) data logger/sensor cluster variability. Variance at short range (less than 2m) was found to be dominant for all N forms. Variation at larger scales (greater than 2m) was not as large but was still considered an important spatial component for all N forms, especially NO3−. The variance components derived from the nested sampling were used to inform the efficient design of theoretical in-situ networks of NH4+ and NO3− sensors based on the costs of a commercially available data logger and ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Based on the spatial variance observed in the June nested sampling, and given a budget of £5000, the NO3− field mean could be estimated with a 95% confidence interval width of 1.70μgNg−1 using 2 randomly positioned data loggers each with 5 sensors. Further investigation into “aggregate-scale” (less than 1cm) spatial variance revealed further large variation at the sub 1-cm scale for all N forms. Sensors, for which the measurement represents an integration over a sensor-soil contact area of diameter less than 1cm, would be subject to this aggregate-scale variability. As such, local replication at scales less than 1cm would be needed to maintain the precision of the resulting field mean estimation. Adoption of in-situ sensor networks will depend upon the development of suitable low‐cost sensors, demonstration of the cost-benefit and the construction of a decision support system that utilises the generated data to improve the NUE of fertiliser N management.</description><subject>Dissolved organic nitrogen</subject><subject>Fertilizer management</subject><subject>Nitrogen-use efficiency</subject><subject>Nutrient cycling</subject><subject>Precision agriculture</subject><subject>Soil heterogeneity</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1vGyEQRVUi1U3zB3ri2Mu6fOx6WamXyuqXFKmX9owwO6zHXYPLsIn6v_IDg-NKvQWNmBHMe8PjMfZOirUUcvPhsHYTwFrVei1qiPYVW0nT60Zp0V2xVb3oG2PE8Jq9ITqIupQ2K_a43bvsfIGMhHHiZQ_8AcseYxMQ5pGTdzNwOrmCbub3LmOtUuQp8Iglpwkix8gdn7Ijml2skIQzL6keh5SPz5QQAnqEWPgIhNMzvI4gLMt_GoJIKfMI5SHl38Qrmp8y-PqyOtBNGf0ylyXDW3Yd3Exw-y_fsF9fPv_cfmvufnz9vv1013jd96WR0smu1wJUr9uh75UZNrIb5Diobhg7v1N6DKFTRiknNk6pdgfaO2UM7Oq-0zfs_YX3lNOfBajYI5KHuaqEtJCVRspB6Fbo2qourT4nogzBnjIeXf5rpbBni-zBni2yZ4usqCHaCvp4AUEVcY-QLZ0_ycOIVXaxY8KX4E9HDZ5O</recordid><startdate>20160816</startdate><enddate>20160816</enddate><creator>Shaw, R.</creator><creator>Lark, R.M.</creator><creator>Williams, A.P.</creator><creator>Chadwick, D.R.</creator><creator>Jones, D.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160816</creationdate><title>Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture</title><author>Shaw, R. ; Lark, R.M. ; Williams, A.P. ; Chadwick, D.R. ; Jones, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-11a15730e273497728961591d9259d5cb23dff52822a06a224be3ca288eba28b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Dissolved organic nitrogen</topic><topic>Fertilizer management</topic><topic>Nitrogen-use efficiency</topic><topic>Nutrient cycling</topic><topic>Precision agriculture</topic><topic>Soil heterogeneity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaw, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lark, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaw, R.</au><au>Lark, R.M.</au><au>Williams, A.P.</au><au>Chadwick, D.R.</au><au>Jones, D.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2016-08-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>230</volume><spage>294</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>294-306</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><abstract>The use of in-situ sensors capable of real-time monitoring of soil nitrogen (N) may facilitate improvements in agricultural N-use efficiency (NUE) through better fertiliser management. The optimal design of such sensor networks, consisting of clusters of sensors each attached to a data logger, depends upon the spatial variation of soil N and the relative cost of the data loggers and sensors. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate how in-situ networks of N sensors could be optimally designed to enable the cost-efficient monitoring of soil N within a grassland field (1.9ha). In the summer of 2014, two nested sampling campaigns (June &amp; July) were undertaken to assess spatial variation in soil amino acids, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) at a range of scales that represented the within (less than 2m) and between (greater than 2m) data logger/sensor cluster variability. Variance at short range (less than 2m) was found to be dominant for all N forms. Variation at larger scales (greater than 2m) was not as large but was still considered an important spatial component for all N forms, especially NO3−. The variance components derived from the nested sampling were used to inform the efficient design of theoretical in-situ networks of NH4+ and NO3− sensors based on the costs of a commercially available data logger and ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Based on the spatial variance observed in the June nested sampling, and given a budget of £5000, the NO3− field mean could be estimated with a 95% confidence interval width of 1.70μgNg−1 using 2 randomly positioned data loggers each with 5 sensors. Further investigation into “aggregate-scale” (less than 1cm) spatial variance revealed further large variation at the sub 1-cm scale for all N forms. Sensors, for which the measurement represents an integration over a sensor-soil contact area of diameter less than 1cm, would be subject to this aggregate-scale variability. As such, local replication at scales less than 1cm would be needed to maintain the precision of the resulting field mean estimation. Adoption of in-situ sensor networks will depend upon the development of suitable low‐cost sensors, demonstration of the cost-benefit and the construction of a decision support system that utilises the generated data to improve the NUE of fertiliser N management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.004</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8809
ispartof Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2016-08, Vol.230, p.294-306
issn 0167-8809
1873-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811903403
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Dissolved organic nitrogen
Fertilizer management
Nitrogen-use efficiency
Nutrient cycling
Precision agriculture
Soil heterogeneity
title Characterising the within-field scale spatial variation of nitrogen in a grassland soil to inform the efficient design of in-situ nitrogen sensor networks for precision agriculture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A18%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterising%20the%20within-field%20scale%20spatial%20variation%20of%20nitrogen%20in%20a%20grassland%20soil%20to%20inform%20the%20efficient%20design%20of%20in-situ%20nitrogen%20sensor%20networks%20for%20precision%20agriculture&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Shaw,%20R.&rft.date=2016-08-16&rft.volume=230&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=294-306&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811903403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811903403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880916303188&rfr_iscdi=true