Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties

Background Industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons in the United States are now publicly reported in the Sunshine Act Open Payments database. We sought to present these data in a more easily understandable format and to describe how industry relationships in orthopaedic surgery com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2015-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1288-1295
Hauptverfasser: Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD, Chalmers, Peter N., MD, Bach, Bernard R., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1295
container_issue 15
container_start_page 1288
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 97
creator Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD
Chalmers, Peter N., MD
Bach, Bernard R., MD
description Background Industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons in the United States are now publicly reported in the Sunshine Act Open Payments database. We sought to present these data in a more easily understandable format and to describe how industry relationships in orthopaedic surgery compare with other surgical subspecialties. Methods The Open Payments database was searched for all records of industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons. Data analyzed included the value of reported financial relationships per surgeon, the type of financial relationship, and geographic region. Similar analytics were collected for neurological surgery, urology, plastic surgery, and otolaryngology. Data were normalized to the overall number of providers in each subspecialty in the United States from the American Medical Association 2012 data. Results For 12,320 orthopaedic surgeons, 58,127 industry financial relationships were reported, with a total value of $80.2 million. Royalties or licensing fees, which were received by 1.7% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, accounted for 69.5% of the total monetary value of payments to orthopaedic surgeons. Between August and December 2013, 50.1% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons had a reported financial relationship. Orthopaedics had the second lowest percentage of physicians with industry financial relationships among the five surgical subspecialties studied. The overall value of payments per orthopaedic surgeon was higher than in the other subspecialties, driven by the large value of royalties and licensing. Conclusions One-half of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons have industry financial relationships reported in the Open Payments database. Orthopaedic surgeons are less likely than most surgical subspecialists to receive industry payments, and the majority of the overall value of orthopaedic financial relationships is driven by a small number of orthopaedic surgeons receiving royalties and licensing for reimbursable innovation within the field.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.N.01093
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811901898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021935515302204</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811901898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-4ecd4f9a9cfce0d6e98bb8500db3933e77c7260d50e8c026f92b2d9b7420987c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhxhn5yIEsY-evOSAtC4VWVRexcLYcZ0LcJk5qO6zyZfisOLuFKydL49-beZo3UfSSwppRyN9efbjar2_WQIEnj6IVzZIspkmZP45WAIzGPMmys-iZc7cAkKZQPI3OWM7SnOXpKvp9aerJeTuTC22kUVp25Bt20uvBuFaPjmhDdta3wyix1orsJ_sT7fyObIzsZqcdGRriWwwfi8Ag2ShPdiMa8lXOPRrvyEfpZSUdEmlqsh36UVrtBkMO2rdkF8T22FarMHw_VW7ExYfX6J5HTxrZOXzx8J5HPy4-fd9-ia93ny-3m-tYJSWFOEVVpw2XXDUKoc6Rl1VVZgB1lfAkwaJQBcuhzgBLBSxvOKtYzasiZcDLQiXn0etT39EO9xM6L3rtFHadNDhMTtCSUg605OX_0SIMyPKcQkDfnFBlB-csNmK0upd2FhTEEp5YwhM34hhewF89dJ6qHut_8N-0ApCegMPQebTurpsOaEWLYVmtgCXfnCUxA5pBCRnEoXK08f4kw7DBXzooVKfNsu07nNHdDpMNWQbnwjEBYr-czXI14ZSAMUiTP5lSu2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1702656610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD ; Chalmers, Peter N., MD ; Bach, Bernard R., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD ; Chalmers, Peter N., MD ; Bach, Bernard R., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons in the United States are now publicly reported in the Sunshine Act Open Payments database. We sought to present these data in a more easily understandable format and to describe how industry relationships in orthopaedic surgery compare with other surgical subspecialties. Methods The Open Payments database was searched for all records of industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons. Data analyzed included the value of reported financial relationships per surgeon, the type of financial relationship, and geographic region. Similar analytics were collected for neurological surgery, urology, plastic surgery, and otolaryngology. Data were normalized to the overall number of providers in each subspecialty in the United States from the American Medical Association 2012 data. Results For 12,320 orthopaedic surgeons, 58,127 industry financial relationships were reported, with a total value of $80.2 million. Royalties or licensing fees, which were received by 1.7% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, accounted for 69.5% of the total monetary value of payments to orthopaedic surgeons. Between August and December 2013, 50.1% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons had a reported financial relationship. Orthopaedics had the second lowest percentage of physicians with industry financial relationships among the five surgical subspecialties studied. The overall value of payments per orthopaedic surgeon was higher than in the other subspecialties, driven by the large value of royalties and licensing. Conclusions One-half of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons have industry financial relationships reported in the Open Payments database. Orthopaedic surgeons are less likely than most surgical subspecialists to receive industry payments, and the majority of the overall value of orthopaedic financial relationships is driven by a small number of orthopaedic surgeons receiving royalties and licensing for reimbursable innovation within the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26246264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>American Medical Association ; Databases, Factual - economics ; Female ; Humans ; Industry - economics ; Interinstitutional Relations ; Male ; Orthopedic Procedures - economics ; Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Orthopedics ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics ; Prospective Payment System - economics ; Specialties, Surgical - economics ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1288-1295</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-4ecd4f9a9cfce0d6e98bb8500db3933e77c7260d50e8c026f92b2d9b7420987c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Peter N., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bach, Bernard R., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Background Industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons in the United States are now publicly reported in the Sunshine Act Open Payments database. We sought to present these data in a more easily understandable format and to describe how industry relationships in orthopaedic surgery compare with other surgical subspecialties. Methods The Open Payments database was searched for all records of industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons. Data analyzed included the value of reported financial relationships per surgeon, the type of financial relationship, and geographic region. Similar analytics were collected for neurological surgery, urology, plastic surgery, and otolaryngology. Data were normalized to the overall number of providers in each subspecialty in the United States from the American Medical Association 2012 data. Results For 12,320 orthopaedic surgeons, 58,127 industry financial relationships were reported, with a total value of $80.2 million. Royalties or licensing fees, which were received by 1.7% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, accounted for 69.5% of the total monetary value of payments to orthopaedic surgeons. Between August and December 2013, 50.1% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons had a reported financial relationship. Orthopaedics had the second lowest percentage of physicians with industry financial relationships among the five surgical subspecialties studied. The overall value of payments per orthopaedic surgeon was higher than in the other subspecialties, driven by the large value of royalties and licensing. Conclusions One-half of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons have industry financial relationships reported in the Open Payments database. Orthopaedic surgeons are less likely than most surgical subspecialists to receive industry payments, and the majority of the overall value of orthopaedic financial relationships is driven by a small number of orthopaedic surgeons receiving royalties and licensing for reimbursable innovation within the field.</description><subject>American Medical Association</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry - economics</subject><subject>Interinstitutional Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - economics</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</subject><subject>Prospective Payment System - economics</subject><subject>Specialties, Surgical - economics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk9v1DAQxSMEokvhxhn5yIEsY-evOSAtC4VWVRexcLYcZ0LcJk5qO6zyZfisOLuFKydL49-beZo3UfSSwppRyN9efbjar2_WQIEnj6IVzZIspkmZP45WAIzGPMmys-iZc7cAkKZQPI3OWM7SnOXpKvp9aerJeTuTC22kUVp25Bt20uvBuFaPjmhDdta3wyix1orsJ_sT7fyObIzsZqcdGRriWwwfi8Ag2ShPdiMa8lXOPRrvyEfpZSUdEmlqsh36UVrtBkMO2rdkF8T22FarMHw_VW7ExYfX6J5HTxrZOXzx8J5HPy4-fd9-ia93ny-3m-tYJSWFOEVVpw2XXDUKoc6Rl1VVZgB1lfAkwaJQBcuhzgBLBSxvOKtYzasiZcDLQiXn0etT39EO9xM6L3rtFHadNDhMTtCSUg605OX_0SIMyPKcQkDfnFBlB-csNmK0upd2FhTEEp5YwhM34hhewF89dJ6qHut_8N-0ApCegMPQebTurpsOaEWLYVmtgCXfnCUxA5pBCRnEoXK08f4kw7DBXzooVKfNsu07nNHdDpMNWQbnwjEBYr-czXI14ZSAMUiTP5lSu2k</recordid><startdate>20150805</startdate><enddate>20150805</enddate><creator>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD</creator><creator>Chalmers, Peter N., MD</creator><creator>Bach, Bernard R., MD</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150805</creationdate><title>Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties</title><author>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD ; Chalmers, Peter N., MD ; Bach, Bernard R., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-4ecd4f9a9cfce0d6e98bb8500db3933e77c7260d50e8c026f92b2d9b7420987c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>American Medical Association</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry - economics</topic><topic>Interinstitutional Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - economics</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics</topic><topic>Prospective Payment System - economics</topic><topic>Specialties, Surgical - economics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Peter N., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bach, Bernard R., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., MD</au><au>Chalmers, Peter N., MD</au><au>Bach, Bernard R., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2015-08-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1288</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1288-1295</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Background Industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons in the United States are now publicly reported in the Sunshine Act Open Payments database. We sought to present these data in a more easily understandable format and to describe how industry relationships in orthopaedic surgery compare with other surgical subspecialties. Methods The Open Payments database was searched for all records of industry financial relationships for orthopaedic surgeons. Data analyzed included the value of reported financial relationships per surgeon, the type of financial relationship, and geographic region. Similar analytics were collected for neurological surgery, urology, plastic surgery, and otolaryngology. Data were normalized to the overall number of providers in each subspecialty in the United States from the American Medical Association 2012 data. Results For 12,320 orthopaedic surgeons, 58,127 industry financial relationships were reported, with a total value of $80.2 million. Royalties or licensing fees, which were received by 1.7% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, accounted for 69.5% of the total monetary value of payments to orthopaedic surgeons. Between August and December 2013, 50.1% of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons had a reported financial relationship. Orthopaedics had the second lowest percentage of physicians with industry financial relationships among the five surgical subspecialties studied. The overall value of payments per orthopaedic surgeon was higher than in the other subspecialties, driven by the large value of royalties and licensing. Conclusions One-half of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons have industry financial relationships reported in the Open Payments database. Orthopaedic surgeons are less likely than most surgical subspecialists to receive industry payments, and the majority of the overall value of orthopaedic financial relationships is driven by a small number of orthopaedic surgeons receiving royalties and licensing for reimbursable innovation within the field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>26246264</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.N.01093</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1288-1295
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811901898
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects American Medical Association
Databases, Factual - economics
Female
Humans
Industry - economics
Interinstitutional Relations
Male
Orthopedic Procedures - economics
Orthopedic Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Orthopedics
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - economics
Prospective Payment System - economics
Specialties, Surgical - economics
United States
title Industry Financial Relationships in Orthopaedic Surgery: Analysis of the Sunshine Act Open Payments Database and Comparison with Other Surgical Subspecialties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A07%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industry%20Financial%20Relationships%20in%20Orthopaedic%20Surgery:%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Sunshine%20Act%20Open%20Payments%20Database%20and%20Comparison%20with%20Other%20Surgical%20Subspecialties&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Cvetanovich,%20Gregory%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-08-05&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1288&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1288-1295&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.N.01093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811901898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702656610&rft_id=info:pmid/26246264&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021935515302204&rfr_iscdi=true