Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis

Objective To assess the utility of anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti‐MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP‐ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Methods A single‐center cohort of 64...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2013-08, Vol.65 (8), p.1316-1324
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Zhiyong, Cao, Mengshu, Plana, Maria Nieves, Liang, Jun, Cai, Hourong, Kuwana, Masataka, Sun, Lingyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1324
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1316
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 65
creator Chen, Zhiyong
Cao, Mengshu
Plana, Maria Nieves
Liang, Jun
Cai, Hourong
Kuwana, Masataka
Sun, Lingyun
description Objective To assess the utility of anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti‐MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP‐ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Methods A single‐center cohort of 64 consecutive Chinese patients with PM/DM was examined. Serum anti‐MDA5 antibody was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. For meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge for original studies that measured anti‐MDA5 antibodies in patients with PM/DM. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. Results In Chinese patients, anti‐MDA5 antibodies were detected in 26 patients with classic DM or clinically amyopathic DM (CADM). Compared with anti‐MDA5–negative patients, anti‐MDA5–positive patients showed a higher prevalence of RP‐ILD (P = 0.001). In a total of 233 patients with anti‐MDA5 antibody, derived from 16 studies, a higher frequency of CADM was found in Japanese than in non‐Japanese patients (74.7% versus 39.2%; P = 1.2 × 10−7). Meta‐analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti‐MDA5 antibody for RP‐ILD was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 64–87%) and 86% (95% CI 79–90%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 20.41 (95% CI 9.02–46.20) with a favorable area under the sROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.63–0.98). Conclusion Detection of anti‐MDA5 antibody is a valuable tool for identifying DM patients with a high risk for developing RP‐ILD, but the distribution of classic DM and CADM in patients with this antibody varies among ethnic groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.21985
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811898976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1417532000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3585-689b6bddf14e96897452d44bb6acffe5fe84f1978520feea7b84b8f624b0e7053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFv0zAUxyMEYlPZgS-A3hEO3ewkTh1u0QpbpVZMFRPcIid5bh8kcbHdTrntIyDxDfdFwF3Lbghf7Gf__v9nP78oes3ZOWcsvlC1PY95LsWz6DTmgo_TTMjnT-v060l05tw3FkYSS5nkL6OTOMmZZEycRr9vPbXkBzAait7Tw_2vBbaqN52CKWmNFsOu8mT6cFQ4Z-oQYQNX2COIR01lmgEWqNzWYhdwoB5mzV6nB-pXcBPkIXLwhfwapmg75U03GEeeHKi-AQXXtFrDktx30MYGZoet2ezFS7Whph3gxpqVRedohzDrPVrng1y1MN8Gakou5Mf3UMASd4R3-_f4NcKcAqp8uNkx0QK9erj_WfSqHRy5V9ELrVqHZ8d5FN1-_PD58no8_3Q1uyzm4zoRUowzmVdZ1TSap5iHYJKKuEnTqspUHYokNMpU83wiRcw0oppUMq2kzuK0YjhhIhlFbw--G2t-bNH5siNXYxtKjWbrSi45l3kwzv6Ppnwiknj_n6Po3QGtrXHOoi43ljplh5Kzct8dZeiO8rE7AvvmaLutOmyeyL-9EICLA3BHLQ7_diqLy-XB8g9mMswL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417532000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chen, Zhiyong ; Cao, Mengshu ; Plana, Maria Nieves ; Liang, Jun ; Cai, Hourong ; Kuwana, Masataka ; Sun, Lingyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiyong ; Cao, Mengshu ; Plana, Maria Nieves ; Liang, Jun ; Cai, Hourong ; Kuwana, Masataka ; Sun, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the utility of anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti‐MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP‐ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Methods A single‐center cohort of 64 consecutive Chinese patients with PM/DM was examined. Serum anti‐MDA5 antibody was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. For meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge for original studies that measured anti‐MDA5 antibodies in patients with PM/DM. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. Results In Chinese patients, anti‐MDA5 antibodies were detected in 26 patients with classic DM or clinically amyopathic DM (CADM). Compared with anti‐MDA5–negative patients, anti‐MDA5–positive patients showed a higher prevalence of RP‐ILD (P = 0.001). In a total of 233 patients with anti‐MDA5 antibody, derived from 16 studies, a higher frequency of CADM was found in Japanese than in non‐Japanese patients (74.7% versus 39.2%; P = 1.2 × 10−7). Meta‐analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti‐MDA5 antibody for RP‐ILD was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 64–87%) and 86% (95% CI 79–90%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 20.41 (95% CI 9.02–46.20) with a favorable area under the sROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.63–0.98). Conclusion Detection of anti‐MDA5 antibody is a valuable tool for identifying DM patients with a high risk for developing RP‐ILD, but the distribution of classic DM and CADM in patients with this antibody varies among ethnic groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.21985</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23908005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Autoantibodies - blood ; Biomarkers - blood ; Cohort Studies ; DEAD-box RNA Helicases - immunology ; Dermatomyositis - blood ; Dermatomyositis - complications ; Dermatomyositis - diagnosis ; Dermatomyositis - immunology ; Female ; Humans ; Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1 ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial - immunology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polymyositis - blood ; Polymyositis - complications ; Polymyositis - diagnosis ; Polymyositis - immunology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2013-08, Vol.65 (8), p.1316-1324</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3585-689b6bddf14e96897452d44bb6acffe5fe84f1978520feea7b84b8f624b0e7053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3585-689b6bddf14e96897452d44bb6acffe5fe84f1978520feea7b84b8f624b0e7053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.21985$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.21985$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23908005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Mengshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plana, Maria Nieves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Hourong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwana, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the utility of anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti‐MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP‐ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Methods A single‐center cohort of 64 consecutive Chinese patients with PM/DM was examined. Serum anti‐MDA5 antibody was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. For meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge for original studies that measured anti‐MDA5 antibodies in patients with PM/DM. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. Results In Chinese patients, anti‐MDA5 antibodies were detected in 26 patients with classic DM or clinically amyopathic DM (CADM). Compared with anti‐MDA5–negative patients, anti‐MDA5–positive patients showed a higher prevalence of RP‐ILD (P = 0.001). In a total of 233 patients with anti‐MDA5 antibody, derived from 16 studies, a higher frequency of CADM was found in Japanese than in non‐Japanese patients (74.7% versus 39.2%; P = 1.2 × 10−7). Meta‐analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti‐MDA5 antibody for RP‐ILD was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 64–87%) and 86% (95% CI 79–90%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 20.41 (95% CI 9.02–46.20) with a favorable area under the sROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.63–0.98). Conclusion Detection of anti‐MDA5 antibody is a valuable tool for identifying DM patients with a high risk for developing RP‐ILD, but the distribution of classic DM and CADM in patients with this antibody varies among ethnic groups.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Autoantibodies - blood</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>DEAD-box RNA Helicases - immunology</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis - blood</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis - complications</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis - immunology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - immunology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polymyositis - blood</subject><subject>Polymyositis - complications</subject><subject>Polymyositis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polymyositis - immunology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkFv0zAUxyMEYlPZgS-A3hEO3ewkTh1u0QpbpVZMFRPcIid5bh8kcbHdTrntIyDxDfdFwF3Lbghf7Gf__v9nP78oes3ZOWcsvlC1PY95LsWz6DTmgo_TTMjnT-v060l05tw3FkYSS5nkL6OTOMmZZEycRr9vPbXkBzAait7Tw_2vBbaqN52CKWmNFsOu8mT6cFQ4Z-oQYQNX2COIR01lmgEWqNzWYhdwoB5mzV6nB-pXcBPkIXLwhfwapmg75U03GEeeHKi-AQXXtFrDktx30MYGZoet2ezFS7Whph3gxpqVRedohzDrPVrng1y1MN8Gakou5Mf3UMASd4R3-_f4NcKcAqp8uNkx0QK9erj_WfSqHRy5V9ELrVqHZ8d5FN1-_PD58no8_3Q1uyzm4zoRUowzmVdZ1TSap5iHYJKKuEnTqspUHYokNMpU83wiRcw0oppUMq2kzuK0YjhhIhlFbw--G2t-bNH5siNXYxtKjWbrSi45l3kwzv6Ppnwiknj_n6Po3QGtrXHOoi43ljplh5Kzct8dZeiO8rE7AvvmaLutOmyeyL-9EICLA3BHLQ7_diqLy-XB8g9mMswL</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Chen, Zhiyong</creator><creator>Cao, Mengshu</creator><creator>Plana, Maria Nieves</creator><creator>Liang, Jun</creator><creator>Cai, Hourong</creator><creator>Kuwana, Masataka</creator><creator>Sun, Lingyun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Chen, Zhiyong ; Cao, Mengshu ; Plana, Maria Nieves ; Liang, Jun ; Cai, Hourong ; Kuwana, Masataka ; Sun, Lingyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3585-689b6bddf14e96897452d44bb6acffe5fe84f1978520feea7b84b8f624b0e7053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Autoantibodies - blood</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>DEAD-box RNA Helicases - immunology</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis - blood</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis - complications</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis - immunology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Interstitial - immunology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polymyositis - blood</topic><topic>Polymyositis - complications</topic><topic>Polymyositis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polymyositis - immunology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Mengshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plana, Maria Nieves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Hourong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwana, Masataka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Zhiyong</au><au>Cao, Mengshu</au><au>Plana, Maria Nieves</au><au>Liang, Jun</au><au>Cai, Hourong</au><au>Kuwana, Masataka</au><au>Sun, Lingyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1316</spage><epage>1324</epage><pages>1316-1324</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the utility of anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti‐MDA5) antibody measurement for predicting a risk for developing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP‐ILD) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM). Methods A single‐center cohort of 64 consecutive Chinese patients with PM/DM was examined. Serum anti‐MDA5 antibody was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. For meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed and the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge for original studies that measured anti‐MDA5 antibodies in patients with PM/DM. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. Results In Chinese patients, anti‐MDA5 antibodies were detected in 26 patients with classic DM or clinically amyopathic DM (CADM). Compared with anti‐MDA5–negative patients, anti‐MDA5–positive patients showed a higher prevalence of RP‐ILD (P = 0.001). In a total of 233 patients with anti‐MDA5 antibody, derived from 16 studies, a higher frequency of CADM was found in Japanese than in non‐Japanese patients (74.7% versus 39.2%; P = 1.2 × 10−7). Meta‐analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti‐MDA5 antibody for RP‐ILD was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 64–87%) and 86% (95% CI 79–90%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 20.41 (95% CI 9.02–46.20) with a favorable area under the sROC curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.63–0.98). Conclusion Detection of anti‐MDA5 antibody is a valuable tool for identifying DM patients with a high risk for developing RP‐ILD, but the distribution of classic DM and CADM in patients with this antibody varies among ethnic groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23908005</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.21985</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2013-08, Vol.65 (8), p.1316-1324
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811898976
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Autoantibodies - blood
Biomarkers - blood
Cohort Studies
DEAD-box RNA Helicases - immunology
Dermatomyositis - blood
Dermatomyositis - complications
Dermatomyositis - diagnosis
Dermatomyositis - immunology
Female
Humans
Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1
Lung Diseases, Interstitial - immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Polymyositis - blood
Polymyositis - complications
Polymyositis - diagnosis
Polymyositis - immunology
Young Adult
title Utility of Anti–Melanoma Differentiation–Associated Gene 5 Antibody Measurement in Identifying Patients With Dermatomyositis and a High Risk for Developing Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review of the Literature and a Meta‐Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20Anti%E2%80%93Melanoma%20Differentiation%E2%80%93Associated%20Gene%205%20Antibody%20Measurement%20in%20Identifying%20Patients%20With%20Dermatomyositis%20and%20a%20High%20Risk%20for%20Developing%20Rapidly%20Progressive%20Interstitial%20Lung%20Disease:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature%20and%20a%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Chen,%20Zhiyong&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1316&rft.epage=1324&rft.pages=1316-1324&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.21985&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1417532000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417532000&rft_id=info:pmid/23908005&rfr_iscdi=true