Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest

•We investigate how oak regeneration methods affect herpetofauna in productive hardwood sites.•Salamander capture rates decreased in shelterwood harvests after a 2–3year delay.•Lizard and five-lined skink capture rates increased in shelterwoods within a year.•Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management 2016-10, Vol.377, p.139-149
Hauptverfasser: Greenberg, Cathryn H., Moorman, Christopher E., Raybuck, Amy L., Sundol, Chad, Keyser, Tara L., Bush, Janis, Simon, Dean M., Warburton, Gordon S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue
container_start_page 139
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 377
creator Greenberg, Cathryn H.
Moorman, Christopher E.
Raybuck, Amy L.
Sundol, Chad
Keyser, Tara L.
Bush, Janis
Simon, Dean M.
Warburton, Gordon S.
description •We investigate how oak regeneration methods affect herpetofauna in productive hardwood sites.•Salamander capture rates decreased in shelterwood harvests after a 2–3year delay.•Lizard and five-lined skink capture rates increased in shelterwoods within a year.•Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect herpetofaunal capture rate.•Considering multiple taxa provides perspective in assessing silviculture impacts on wildlife. Forest restoration efforts commonly employ silvicultural methods that alter light and competition to influence species composition. Changes to forest structure and microclimate may adversely affect some taxa (e.g., terrestrial salamanders), but positively affect others (e.g., early successional birds). Salamanders are cited as indicators of ecosystem health because of their sensitivity to forest floor microclimate. We used drift fences with pitfall and funnel traps in a replicated Before-After-Control-Impact design to experimentally assess herpetofaunal community response to initial application of three silvicultural methods proposed to promote oak regeneration: prescribed burning; midstory herbicide; and shelterwood harvests (initial treatment of the shelterwood-burn method) and controls, before and for five years post-treatment. Species richness of all herpetofauna, amphibians, reptiles, frogs, salamanders, or snakes was unaffected by any treatment, but lizard species richness increased in the shelterwood harvest. Capture rate of total salamanders decreased post-harvest in shelterwood units after a 2–3year delay; Plethodon teyahalee decreased post-harvest in shelterwoods, but also in control units. In contrast, capture rate of total lizards and Plestiodon fasciatus increased in shelterwood stands within the first year post-harvest. Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect any reptile or amphibian species. A marginally lower proportion of juvenile to adult P. teyahalee, and a higher proportion of juvenile P. fasciatus in shelterwood than control units suggested that heavy canopy removal and associated change in microclimate may differentially affect reproductive success among species. Our study illustrates the importance of longer-term studies to detect potential changes in herpetofaunal communities that may not be immediately apparent after disturbances, and highlights the importance of including multiple taxa for a balanced perspective when weighing impacts of forest management activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811897806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112716303206</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811897806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-f3b0407699a6c4b6bf2065e86a9dd9d55ce8aa7ad125f1ae5d38d625ee0aa52a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLg-vgDDzl6mTXJTGYyF0HEFywIoufQm_S4WWeTMckq_r1Z1rPQ0BRUVVcXIReczTnj7dV6PoSIJsxFQXNWRtQHZMZVJ6qONeKQzFjdqYpz0R2Tk5TWjDEpGzUj0wtO2Y1IwVsKm2nllg48jZim4BPSHGiAj4Lf0WOE7IKnOSLkDfqcqPN0isFuTXZfSFPY5hVGT2-mCUYwq53VCqL9DsHSXcaUz8jRAGPC8799St7u715vH6vF88PT7c2iMrWSuRrqJWtY1_Y9tKZZtstBsFaiaqG3trdSGlQAHVgu5MABpa2VbYVEZABSQH1KLve-Jd_nthzWG5cMjiN4DNukueJc9Z1ibaE2e6qJIaWIg56i20D80ZzpXcF6rfcF613BmpURdZFd72VY3vhyGHUyDr1B6wo3axvc_wa_aOCJkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811897806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Raybuck, Amy L. ; Sundol, Chad ; Keyser, Tara L. ; Bush, Janis ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Raybuck, Amy L. ; Sundol, Chad ; Keyser, Tara L. ; Bush, Janis ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><description>•We investigate how oak regeneration methods affect herpetofauna in productive hardwood sites.•Salamander capture rates decreased in shelterwood harvests after a 2–3year delay.•Lizard and five-lined skink capture rates increased in shelterwoods within a year.•Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect herpetofaunal capture rate.•Considering multiple taxa provides perspective in assessing silviculture impacts on wildlife. Forest restoration efforts commonly employ silvicultural methods that alter light and competition to influence species composition. Changes to forest structure and microclimate may adversely affect some taxa (e.g., terrestrial salamanders), but positively affect others (e.g., early successional birds). Salamanders are cited as indicators of ecosystem health because of their sensitivity to forest floor microclimate. We used drift fences with pitfall and funnel traps in a replicated Before-After-Control-Impact design to experimentally assess herpetofaunal community response to initial application of three silvicultural methods proposed to promote oak regeneration: prescribed burning; midstory herbicide; and shelterwood harvests (initial treatment of the shelterwood-burn method) and controls, before and for five years post-treatment. Species richness of all herpetofauna, amphibians, reptiles, frogs, salamanders, or snakes was unaffected by any treatment, but lizard species richness increased in the shelterwood harvest. Capture rate of total salamanders decreased post-harvest in shelterwood units after a 2–3year delay; Plethodon teyahalee decreased post-harvest in shelterwoods, but also in control units. In contrast, capture rate of total lizards and Plestiodon fasciatus increased in shelterwood stands within the first year post-harvest. Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect any reptile or amphibian species. A marginally lower proportion of juvenile to adult P. teyahalee, and a higher proportion of juvenile P. fasciatus in shelterwood than control units suggested that heavy canopy removal and associated change in microclimate may differentially affect reproductive success among species. Our study illustrates the importance of longer-term studies to detect potential changes in herpetofaunal communities that may not be immediately apparent after disturbances, and highlights the importance of including multiple taxa for a balanced perspective when weighing impacts of forest management activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amphibian ; Anura ; Caudata ; Lacertilia ; Oak ecosystem restoration ; Plethodon teyahalee ; Prescribed fire ; Reptile ; Salamander ; Shelterwood harvest</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2016-10, Vol.377, p.139-149</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-f3b0407699a6c4b6bf2065e86a9dd9d55ce8aa7ad125f1ae5d38d625ee0aa52a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-f3b0407699a6c4b6bf2065e86a9dd9d55ce8aa7ad125f1ae5d38d625ee0aa52a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716303206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundol, Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyser, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>•We investigate how oak regeneration methods affect herpetofauna in productive hardwood sites.•Salamander capture rates decreased in shelterwood harvests after a 2–3year delay.•Lizard and five-lined skink capture rates increased in shelterwoods within a year.•Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect herpetofaunal capture rate.•Considering multiple taxa provides perspective in assessing silviculture impacts on wildlife. Forest restoration efforts commonly employ silvicultural methods that alter light and competition to influence species composition. Changes to forest structure and microclimate may adversely affect some taxa (e.g., terrestrial salamanders), but positively affect others (e.g., early successional birds). Salamanders are cited as indicators of ecosystem health because of their sensitivity to forest floor microclimate. We used drift fences with pitfall and funnel traps in a replicated Before-After-Control-Impact design to experimentally assess herpetofaunal community response to initial application of three silvicultural methods proposed to promote oak regeneration: prescribed burning; midstory herbicide; and shelterwood harvests (initial treatment of the shelterwood-burn method) and controls, before and for five years post-treatment. Species richness of all herpetofauna, amphibians, reptiles, frogs, salamanders, or snakes was unaffected by any treatment, but lizard species richness increased in the shelterwood harvest. Capture rate of total salamanders decreased post-harvest in shelterwood units after a 2–3year delay; Plethodon teyahalee decreased post-harvest in shelterwoods, but also in control units. In contrast, capture rate of total lizards and Plestiodon fasciatus increased in shelterwood stands within the first year post-harvest. Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect any reptile or amphibian species. A marginally lower proportion of juvenile to adult P. teyahalee, and a higher proportion of juvenile P. fasciatus in shelterwood than control units suggested that heavy canopy removal and associated change in microclimate may differentially affect reproductive success among species. Our study illustrates the importance of longer-term studies to detect potential changes in herpetofaunal communities that may not be immediately apparent after disturbances, and highlights the importance of including multiple taxa for a balanced perspective when weighing impacts of forest management activities.</description><subject>Amphibian</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Caudata</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Oak ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Plethodon teyahalee</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Reptile</subject><subject>Salamander</subject><subject>Shelterwood harvest</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLg-vgDDzl6mTXJTGYyF0HEFywIoufQm_S4WWeTMckq_r1Z1rPQ0BRUVVcXIReczTnj7dV6PoSIJsxFQXNWRtQHZMZVJ6qONeKQzFjdqYpz0R2Tk5TWjDEpGzUj0wtO2Y1IwVsKm2nllg48jZim4BPSHGiAj4Lf0WOE7IKnOSLkDfqcqPN0isFuTXZfSFPY5hVGT2-mCUYwq53VCqL9DsHSXcaUz8jRAGPC8799St7u715vH6vF88PT7c2iMrWSuRrqJWtY1_Y9tKZZtstBsFaiaqG3trdSGlQAHVgu5MABpa2VbYVEZABSQH1KLve-Jd_nthzWG5cMjiN4DNukueJc9Z1ibaE2e6qJIaWIg56i20D80ZzpXcF6rfcF613BmpURdZFd72VY3vhyGHUyDr1B6wo3axvc_wa_aOCJkg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creator><creator>Moorman, Christopher E.</creator><creator>Raybuck, Amy L.</creator><creator>Sundol, Chad</creator><creator>Keyser, Tara L.</creator><creator>Bush, Janis</creator><creator>Simon, Dean M.</creator><creator>Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest</title><author>Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Raybuck, Amy L. ; Sundol, Chad ; Keyser, Tara L. ; Bush, Janis ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-f3b0407699a6c4b6bf2065e86a9dd9d55ce8aa7ad125f1ae5d38d625ee0aa52a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amphibian</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Caudata</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Oak ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Plethodon teyahalee</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Reptile</topic><topic>Salamander</topic><topic>Shelterwood harvest</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundol, Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keyser, Tara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Janis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</au><au>Moorman, Christopher E.</au><au>Raybuck, Amy L.</au><au>Sundol, Chad</au><au>Keyser, Tara L.</au><au>Bush, Janis</au><au>Simon, Dean M.</au><au>Warburton, Gordon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>377</volume><spage>139</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>139-149</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><abstract>•We investigate how oak regeneration methods affect herpetofauna in productive hardwood sites.•Salamander capture rates decreased in shelterwood harvests after a 2–3year delay.•Lizard and five-lined skink capture rates increased in shelterwoods within a year.•Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect herpetofaunal capture rate.•Considering multiple taxa provides perspective in assessing silviculture impacts on wildlife. Forest restoration efforts commonly employ silvicultural methods that alter light and competition to influence species composition. Changes to forest structure and microclimate may adversely affect some taxa (e.g., terrestrial salamanders), but positively affect others (e.g., early successional birds). Salamanders are cited as indicators of ecosystem health because of their sensitivity to forest floor microclimate. We used drift fences with pitfall and funnel traps in a replicated Before-After-Control-Impact design to experimentally assess herpetofaunal community response to initial application of three silvicultural methods proposed to promote oak regeneration: prescribed burning; midstory herbicide; and shelterwood harvests (initial treatment of the shelterwood-burn method) and controls, before and for five years post-treatment. Species richness of all herpetofauna, amphibians, reptiles, frogs, salamanders, or snakes was unaffected by any treatment, but lizard species richness increased in the shelterwood harvest. Capture rate of total salamanders decreased post-harvest in shelterwood units after a 2–3year delay; Plethodon teyahalee decreased post-harvest in shelterwoods, but also in control units. In contrast, capture rate of total lizards and Plestiodon fasciatus increased in shelterwood stands within the first year post-harvest. Prescribed burn and midstory herbicide treatments did not affect any reptile or amphibian species. A marginally lower proportion of juvenile to adult P. teyahalee, and a higher proportion of juvenile P. fasciatus in shelterwood than control units suggested that heavy canopy removal and associated change in microclimate may differentially affect reproductive success among species. Our study illustrates the importance of longer-term studies to detect potential changes in herpetofaunal communities that may not be immediately apparent after disturbances, and highlights the importance of including multiple taxa for a balanced perspective when weighing impacts of forest management activities.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 2016-10, Vol.377, p.139-149
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811897806
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Amphibian
Anura
Caudata
Lacertilia
Oak ecosystem restoration
Plethodon teyahalee
Prescribed fire
Reptile
Salamander
Shelterwood harvest
title Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A43%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reptile%20and%20amphibian%20response%20to%20oak%20regeneration%20treatments%20in%20productive%20southern%20Appalachian%20hardwood%20forest&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Greenberg,%20Cathryn%20H.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=377&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=139-149&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811897806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811897806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112716303206&rfr_iscdi=true