Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option

Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of urology 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685
Hauptverfasser: Komasara, Leszek, Stefanowicz, Joanna, Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna, Gołębiewski, Andrzej, Czauderna, Piotr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 8
container_start_page 679
container_title International journal of urology
container_volume 23
creator Komasara, Leszek
Stefanowicz, Joanna
Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna
Gołębiewski, Andrzej
Czauderna, Piotr
description Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient. Results All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances. Conclusions The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iju.13120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1811895934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1nbsdcINVVBKK_5UrfZoTWxn45LYi-1Q9jF4Y1x22xsSvoyl-eYbaX4IvaTkiJZ37G7mI1pTRh6hBeWcVYxw9hgtSEvbqqGSHaBnKd0QQmtGm6fogEkuGknkAv2-tDr4lOOss_tpcdhkFzyGPtuIIxinYcTTnN0I2fk1TnNc27jFzmM9uNFE6_GtywNeW-9ymKPzUNpxgM6EaRsSRB0meItXQyHTBuKdJQ8WdyMYU5a4hH3IGPx-93P0pIcx2Rf7eoiuP7y_OvlYXXw5PTt5d1Fp3hJSLYGRVlC-1KburWGEEbqUkolOGEl6AEs1bYXogfHGNtJIgE6Un25NQ2RdH6LXO-8mhh-zTVlNLmk7juBtmJOiDaVNK9qa_wdKpKgFI01B3-xQHUNK0fZqE91UTqIoUXdhqRKW-htWYV_ttXM3WfNA3qdTgOMdcOtGu_23SZ19ur5XVrsJl7L99TAB8btayloKtfp8qs6vvhL-7XKlzus_MvOwSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807535208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</creator><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient. Results All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances. Conclusions The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.13120</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27458707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bladder/prostate tumors ; Child ; Cystectomy ; genito/urinary tract ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; reconstructive surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; rhabdomyosarcoma ; Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Diversion ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685</ispartof><rights>2016 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2016 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.13120$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.13120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27458707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient. Results All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances. Conclusions The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</description><subject>bladder/prostate tumors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>genito/urinary tract</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>rhabdomyosarcoma</subject><subject>Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion</subject><subject>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1nbsdcINVVBKK_5UrfZoTWxn45LYi-1Q9jF4Y1x22xsSvoyl-eYbaX4IvaTkiJZ37G7mI1pTRh6hBeWcVYxw9hgtSEvbqqGSHaBnKd0QQmtGm6fogEkuGknkAv2-tDr4lOOss_tpcdhkFzyGPtuIIxinYcTTnN0I2fk1TnNc27jFzmM9uNFE6_GtywNeW-9ymKPzUNpxgM6EaRsSRB0meItXQyHTBuKdJQ8WdyMYU5a4hH3IGPx-93P0pIcx2Rf7eoiuP7y_OvlYXXw5PTt5d1Fp3hJSLYGRVlC-1KburWGEEbqUkolOGEl6AEs1bYXogfHGNtJIgE6Un25NQ2RdH6LXO-8mhh-zTVlNLmk7juBtmJOiDaVNK9qa_wdKpKgFI01B3-xQHUNK0fZqE91UTqIoUXdhqRKW-htWYV_ttXM3WfNA3qdTgOMdcOtGu_23SZ19ur5XVrsJl7L99TAB8btayloKtfp8qs6vvhL-7XKlzus_MvOwSA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Komasara, Leszek</creator><creator>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creator><creator>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creator><creator>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creator><creator>Czauderna, Piotr</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><author>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>bladder/prostate tumors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>genito/urinary tract</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>rhabdomyosarcoma</topic><topic>Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion</topic><topic>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komasara, Leszek</au><au>Stefanowicz, Joanna</au><au>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</au><au>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</au><au>Czauderna, Piotr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>679-685</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient. Results All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances. Conclusions The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27458707</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.13120</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-8172
ispartof International journal of urology, 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685
issn 0919-8172
1442-2042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895934
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects bladder/prostate tumors
Child
Cystectomy
genito/urinary tract
Humans
Male
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
reconstructive surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
rhabdomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary Diversion
Urinary Reservoirs, Continent
title Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructive%20option%20after%20radical%20mutilating%20surgery%20in%20children%20with%20genitourinary%20rhabdomyosarcoma:%20When%20sparing%20the%20bladder%20is%20not%20an%20option&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Komasara,%20Leszek&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=679-685&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.13120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811895934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807535208&rft_id=info:pmid/27458707&rfr_iscdi=true