Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option
Objectives To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of urology 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 685 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 679 |
container_title | International journal of urology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Komasara, Leszek Stefanowicz, Joanna Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna Gołębiewski, Andrzej Czauderna, Piotr |
description | Objectives
To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient.
Results
All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances.
Conclusions
The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iju.13120 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1811895934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1nbsdcINVVBKK_5UrfZoTWxn45LYi-1Q9jF4Y1x22xsSvoyl-eYbaX4IvaTkiJZ37G7mI1pTRh6hBeWcVYxw9hgtSEvbqqGSHaBnKd0QQmtGm6fogEkuGknkAv2-tDr4lOOss_tpcdhkFzyGPtuIIxinYcTTnN0I2fk1TnNc27jFzmM9uNFE6_GtywNeW-9ymKPzUNpxgM6EaRsSRB0meItXQyHTBuKdJQ8WdyMYU5a4hH3IGPx-93P0pIcx2Rf7eoiuP7y_OvlYXXw5PTt5d1Fp3hJSLYGRVlC-1KburWGEEbqUkolOGEl6AEs1bYXogfHGNtJIgE6Un25NQ2RdH6LXO-8mhh-zTVlNLmk7juBtmJOiDaVNK9qa_wdKpKgFI01B3-xQHUNK0fZqE91UTqIoUXdhqRKW-htWYV_ttXM3WfNA3qdTgOMdcOtGu_23SZ19ur5XVrsJl7L99TAB8btayloKtfp8qs6vvhL-7XKlzus_MvOwSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807535208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</creator><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient.
Results
All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances.
Conclusions
The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.13120</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27458707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bladder/prostate tumors ; Child ; Cystectomy ; genito/urinary tract ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; reconstructive surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; rhabdomyosarcoma ; Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Diversion ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685</ispartof><rights>2016 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2016 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.13120$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.13120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27458707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient.
Results
All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances.
Conclusions
The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</description><subject>bladder/prostate tumors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>genito/urinary tract</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>rhabdomyosarcoma</subject><subject>Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion</subject><subject>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1nbsdcINVVBKK_5UrfZoTWxn45LYi-1Q9jF4Y1x22xsSvoyl-eYbaX4IvaTkiJZ37G7mI1pTRh6hBeWcVYxw9hgtSEvbqqGSHaBnKd0QQmtGm6fogEkuGknkAv2-tDr4lOOss_tpcdhkFzyGPtuIIxinYcTTnN0I2fk1TnNc27jFzmM9uNFE6_GtywNeW-9ymKPzUNpxgM6EaRsSRB0meItXQyHTBuKdJQ8WdyMYU5a4hH3IGPx-93P0pIcx2Rf7eoiuP7y_OvlYXXw5PTt5d1Fp3hJSLYGRVlC-1KburWGEEbqUkolOGEl6AEs1bYXogfHGNtJIgE6Un25NQ2RdH6LXO-8mhh-zTVlNLmk7juBtmJOiDaVNK9qa_wdKpKgFI01B3-xQHUNK0fZqE91UTqIoUXdhqRKW-htWYV_ttXM3WfNA3qdTgOMdcOtGu_23SZ19ur5XVrsJl7L99TAB8btayloKtfp8qs6vvhL-7XKlzus_MvOwSA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Komasara, Leszek</creator><creator>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creator><creator>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creator><creator>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creator><creator>Czauderna, Piotr</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</title><author>Komasara, Leszek ; Stefanowicz, Joanna ; Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna ; Gołębiewski, Andrzej ; Czauderna, Piotr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4900-6a2095146cd3fed2020167725b5d70faae1c1955fa248e87d7aab58e8c9d80733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>bladder/prostate tumors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>genito/urinary tract</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>rhabdomyosarcoma</topic><topic>Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion</topic><topic>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komasara, Leszek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanowicz, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czauderna, Piotr</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komasara, Leszek</au><au>Stefanowicz, Joanna</au><au>Bryks-Laszkowska, Anna</au><au>Gołębiewski, Andrzej</au><au>Czauderna, Piotr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>679-685</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To present versatile surgical reconstructive techniques and their outcomes in pediatric patients with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the oncological and urological outcomes of seven patients treated between 1992 and 2014 according to the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe protocols. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study staging: local, six patients; and IV, one patient. Histology: embryonal, five patients; unclassified, one patient; triton tumor one patient. Surgical treatment included: cystectomy, uterectomy and partial vaginectomy, one patient; radical cystectomy, two patients; cystectomy, one patient; cystectomy with partial prostatectomy, one patient; partial cystectomy, one patient; and partial prostatectomy, one patient.
Results
All patients were alive in complete remission at last follow up. In four cases, ileal conduit with ureteral reimplantation with serous‐lined extramural tunnel (Abol‐Enein technique) was carried out, which was followed by conversion into ileal continent bladder with continent appendiceal stoma for clean intermittent catheterization in three patients. In one boy, partial cystectomy and continent reconstruction was carried out during a single surgical procedure. One child with incontinent urinary diversion is still awaiting a continence solution. One child after partial prostatectomy is continent without any voiding disturbances.
Conclusions
The timing and extent of radical surgery for treatment of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma depend on the local anatomical conditions, and the response to previous chemo‐ and radiotherapy. Cystectomy followed by various reconstructive techniques still remains an important option in the local treatment.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27458707</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.13120</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0919-8172 |
ispartof | International journal of urology, 2016-08, Vol.23 (8), p.679-685 |
issn | 0919-8172 1442-2042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895934 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | bladder/prostate tumors Child Cystectomy genito/urinary tract Humans Male Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery reconstructive surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures rhabdomyosarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma - surgery Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urinary Diversion Urinary Reservoirs, Continent |
title | Reconstructive option after radical mutilating surgery in children with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma: When sparing the bladder is not an option |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructive%20option%20after%20radical%20mutilating%20surgery%20in%20children%20with%20genitourinary%20rhabdomyosarcoma:%20When%20sparing%20the%20bladder%20is%20not%20an%20option&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Komasara,%20Leszek&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=679-685&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.13120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811895934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807535208&rft_id=info:pmid/27458707&rfr_iscdi=true |