Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones
Separation of animals and humans using a protective set-back distance (Minimum Approaching Distance) is a popular tool for conservation managers to promote wildlife-human coexistence. In several cases,Minimum Approaching Distance is based on how animals respond to an approaching human, using Flight...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ornis fennica 2014-04, Vol.91 (2), p.57-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Ornis fennica |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Whitfield, D Philip Rae, Rab |
description | Separation of animals and humans using a protective set-back distance (Minimum Approaching Distance) is a popular tool for conservation managers to promote wildlife-human coexistence. In several cases,Minimum Approaching Distance is based on how animals respond to an approaching human, using Flight Initiation Distance or Alert Distance. Alert Distance, when animals first show increased vigilance to an approaching human, is considered the best basis for Minimum Approaching Distance because animals have time to adapt their response. Alert Distance is frequently difficult or impossible to measure in practice, however, especially in breeding birds. Using a study of breeding Wood Sandpipers Tringa glareola, in which Alert Distance could not be measured directly, we tested three possible solutions to this dilemma. This suggests that, this rule may have general utility in predicting Alert Distance when only the more readily measured Flight Initiation Distance metric is known. A Minimum Approaching Distance of 160 m is recommended for breeding Wood Sandpipers. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3423419381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p615-c3a98688944b20d30a89497fa3e1f9ff80cdf1073cc2746acb1fc8203acf686f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjjFPwzAUhDOARFX6H6yysESy49hx2FAFFKkSA5UYqxfnuXLl2MFOGPgD_G0MdOKWd3q6-3QXxYJSTkshlbgqVimdaFbdMibYovjazgN40ts0zbEDr5EEQ7qI2Ft_fAuhJ6_g-9GOGBPZx_wEcnQQMTi4I3YYndUw2eATMSGSNTiM0y_vB5bWxHoyRkw62i6Xsw8T6sl-IOlmYzCSz-AxXReXBlzC1fkui_3jw36zLXcvT8-b-105SiZKzaFVUqm2rruK9pxCtm1jgCMzrTGK6t4w2nCtq6aWoDtmtKooB22kkoYvi9s_bJ7xPmOaDoNNGp0Dj2FOB6YYU62oG5GjN_-ipzBHn8cdmJCUCaWo4N_MKG2d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560158805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Whitfield, D Philip ; Rae, Rab</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, D Philip ; Rae, Rab</creatorcontrib><description>Separation of animals and humans using a protective set-back distance (Minimum Approaching Distance) is a popular tool for conservation managers to promote wildlife-human coexistence. In several cases,Minimum Approaching Distance is based on how animals respond to an approaching human, using Flight Initiation Distance or Alert Distance. Alert Distance, when animals first show increased vigilance to an approaching human, is considered the best basis for Minimum Approaching Distance because animals have time to adapt their response. Alert Distance is frequently difficult or impossible to measure in practice, however, especially in breeding birds. Using a study of breeding Wood Sandpipers Tringa glareola, in which Alert Distance could not be measured directly, we tested three possible solutions to this dilemma. This suggests that, this rule may have general utility in predicting Alert Distance when only the more readily measured Flight Initiation Distance metric is known. A Minimum Approaching Distance of 160 m is recommended for breeding Wood Sandpipers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-5685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Helsinki: BirdLife Suomi</publisher><subject>Animals ; Behavior ; Birds ; Chemical industry ; Tringa glareola</subject><ispartof>Ornis fennica, 2014-04, Vol.91 (2), p.57-57</ispartof><rights>Copyright BirdLife Soumi 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, D Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, Rab</creatorcontrib><title>Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones</title><title>Ornis fennica</title><description>Separation of animals and humans using a protective set-back distance (Minimum Approaching Distance) is a popular tool for conservation managers to promote wildlife-human coexistence. In several cases,Minimum Approaching Distance is based on how animals respond to an approaching human, using Flight Initiation Distance or Alert Distance. Alert Distance, when animals first show increased vigilance to an approaching human, is considered the best basis for Minimum Approaching Distance because animals have time to adapt their response. Alert Distance is frequently difficult or impossible to measure in practice, however, especially in breeding birds. Using a study of breeding Wood Sandpipers Tringa glareola, in which Alert Distance could not be measured directly, we tested three possible solutions to this dilemma. This suggests that, this rule may have general utility in predicting Alert Distance when only the more readily measured Flight Initiation Distance metric is known. A Minimum Approaching Distance of 160 m is recommended for breeding Wood Sandpipers.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Tringa glareola</subject><issn>0030-5685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjjFPwzAUhDOARFX6H6yysESy49hx2FAFFKkSA5UYqxfnuXLl2MFOGPgD_G0MdOKWd3q6-3QXxYJSTkshlbgqVimdaFbdMibYovjazgN40ts0zbEDr5EEQ7qI2Ft_fAuhJ6_g-9GOGBPZx_wEcnQQMTi4I3YYndUw2eATMSGSNTiM0y_vB5bWxHoyRkw62i6Xsw8T6sl-IOlmYzCSz-AxXReXBlzC1fkui_3jw36zLXcvT8-b-105SiZKzaFVUqm2rruK9pxCtm1jgCMzrTGK6t4w2nCtq6aWoDtmtKooB22kkoYvi9s_bJ7xPmOaDoNNGp0Dj2FOB6YYU62oG5GjN_-ipzBHn8cdmJCUCaWo4N_MKG2d</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Whitfield, D Philip</creator><creator>Rae, Rab</creator><general>BirdLife Suomi</general><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones</title><author>Whitfield, D Philip ; Rae, Rab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p615-c3a98688944b20d30a89497fa3e1f9ff80cdf1073cc2746acb1fc8203acf686f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Tringa glareola</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitfield, D Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, Rab</creatorcontrib><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Ornis fennica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitfield, D Philip</au><au>Rae, Rab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones</atitle><jtitle>Ornis fennica</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>57-57</pages><issn>0030-5685</issn><abstract>Separation of animals and humans using a protective set-back distance (Minimum Approaching Distance) is a popular tool for conservation managers to promote wildlife-human coexistence. In several cases,Minimum Approaching Distance is based on how animals respond to an approaching human, using Flight Initiation Distance or Alert Distance. Alert Distance, when animals first show increased vigilance to an approaching human, is considered the best basis for Minimum Approaching Distance because animals have time to adapt their response. Alert Distance is frequently difficult or impossible to measure in practice, however, especially in breeding birds. Using a study of breeding Wood Sandpipers Tringa glareola, in which Alert Distance could not be measured directly, we tested three possible solutions to this dilemma. This suggests that, this rule may have general utility in predicting Alert Distance when only the more readily measured Flight Initiation Distance metric is known. A Minimum Approaching Distance of 160 m is recommended for breeding Wood Sandpipers.</abstract><cop>Helsinki</cop><pub>BirdLife Suomi</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-5685 |
ispartof | Ornis fennica, 2014-04, Vol.91 (2), p.57-57 |
issn | 0030-5685 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811895475 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Behavior Birds Chemical industry Tringa glareola |
title | Human disturbance of breedingWood Sandpipers Tringa glareola: implications for "alert distances" in prescribing protective buffer zones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20disturbance%20of%20breedingWood%20Sandpipers%20Tringa%20glareola:%20implications%20for%20%22alert%20distances%22%20in%20prescribing%20protective%20buffer%20zones&rft.jtitle=Ornis%20fennica&rft.au=Whitfield,%20D%20Philip&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=57-57&rft.issn=0030-5685&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3423419381%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560158805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |