Evidence for animal grief?

The nature of evidence appropriate to the study of animal emotion (and cognition) is discussed in this review with reference to Barbara King's book. How Animals Grieve is beautifully written, but it intermixes examples meeting King's criteria for evidence of grief with other poignant but f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal sentience 2016-01, Vol.1 (4)
1. Verfasser: Ristau, Carolyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Animal sentience
container_volume 1
creator Ristau, Carolyn
description The nature of evidence appropriate to the study of animal emotion (and cognition) is discussed in this review with reference to Barbara King's book. How Animals Grieve is beautifully written, but it intermixes examples meeting King's criteria for evidence of grief with other poignant but far less convincing examples. Yet, as noted earlier by Griffin (1958/1974), "Excessive caution can sometimes lead one as far astray as rash enthusiasm." King cites strong evidence from long-term scientific field studies, often involving known individuals; from videotapes; from convergent evidence in neurophysiological studies; and, notwithstanding possible emotional bias, from animals living closely with humans. She makes salient points about data from one-time occurrences and variability, distinguishing experience from expression, and cautioning about over-emphasis on statistics without adequate contextual description. She is persuasive, with both caveats and recognition of the need to be open to the likelihood of animal emotional experience. Such possibilities have a great impact on our treatment of animals, individually and as a society.
doi_str_mv 10.51291/2377-7478.1014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811884864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1811884864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1144-1d3ace12c5ac119f7d453f912048e3c0c9415cd18e8ca9ad001b26a36df238833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMFKAzEUDKJgaXsWPO3Ry7bvJdlNchIptQqFXvQcYvIiK9vdmljBv3fXiniaYRiGmWHsCmFRITe45EKpUkmlFwgoz9jkTzj_xy_ZPOc3AOAVyFqZCbtefzaBOk9F7FPhumbv2uI1NRRvZ-wiujbT_Ben7Pl-_bR6KLe7zePqblt6RClLDMJ5Qu4rNwgmqiArEQ1ykJqEB28kVj6gJu2dcQEAX3jtRB0iF1oLMWU3p9xD6t-PlD_svsme2tZ11B-zRY2otdS1HKzLk9WnPudE0R7S0Dh9WQT7c4Qdt9pxqx2PEN-8M00X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811884864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for animal grief?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ristau, Carolyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Ristau, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><description>The nature of evidence appropriate to the study of animal emotion (and cognition) is discussed in this review with reference to Barbara King's book. How Animals Grieve is beautifully written, but it intermixes examples meeting King's criteria for evidence of grief with other poignant but far less convincing examples. Yet, as noted earlier by Griffin (1958/1974), "Excessive caution can sometimes lead one as far astray as rash enthusiasm." King cites strong evidence from long-term scientific field studies, often involving known individuals; from videotapes; from convergent evidence in neurophysiological studies; and, notwithstanding possible emotional bias, from animals living closely with humans. She makes salient points about data from one-time occurrences and variability, distinguishing experience from expression, and cautioning about over-emphasis on statistics without adequate contextual description. She is persuasive, with both caveats and recognition of the need to be open to the likelihood of animal emotional experience. Such possibilities have a great impact on our treatment of animals, individually and as a society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2377-7478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-7478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1014</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Animal sentience, 2016-01, Vol.1 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ristau, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for animal grief?</title><title>Animal sentience</title><description>The nature of evidence appropriate to the study of animal emotion (and cognition) is discussed in this review with reference to Barbara King's book. How Animals Grieve is beautifully written, but it intermixes examples meeting King's criteria for evidence of grief with other poignant but far less convincing examples. Yet, as noted earlier by Griffin (1958/1974), "Excessive caution can sometimes lead one as far astray as rash enthusiasm." King cites strong evidence from long-term scientific field studies, often involving known individuals; from videotapes; from convergent evidence in neurophysiological studies; and, notwithstanding possible emotional bias, from animals living closely with humans. She makes salient points about data from one-time occurrences and variability, distinguishing experience from expression, and cautioning about over-emphasis on statistics without adequate contextual description. She is persuasive, with both caveats and recognition of the need to be open to the likelihood of animal emotional experience. Such possibilities have a great impact on our treatment of animals, individually and as a society.</description><issn>2377-7478</issn><issn>2377-7478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMFKAzEUDKJgaXsWPO3Ry7bvJdlNchIptQqFXvQcYvIiK9vdmljBv3fXiniaYRiGmWHsCmFRITe45EKpUkmlFwgoz9jkTzj_xy_ZPOc3AOAVyFqZCbtefzaBOk9F7FPhumbv2uI1NRRvZ-wiujbT_Ben7Pl-_bR6KLe7zePqblt6RClLDMJ5Qu4rNwgmqiArEQ1ykJqEB28kVj6gJu2dcQEAX3jtRB0iF1oLMWU3p9xD6t-PlD_svsme2tZ11B-zRY2otdS1HKzLk9WnPudE0R7S0Dh9WQT7c4Qdt9pxqx2PEN-8M00X</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Ristau, Carolyn</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Evidence for animal grief?</title><author>Ristau, Carolyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1144-1d3ace12c5ac119f7d453f912048e3c0c9415cd18e8ca9ad001b26a36df238833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ristau, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal sentience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ristau, Carolyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for animal grief?</atitle><jtitle>Animal sentience</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2377-7478</issn><eissn>2377-7478</eissn><abstract>The nature of evidence appropriate to the study of animal emotion (and cognition) is discussed in this review with reference to Barbara King's book. How Animals Grieve is beautifully written, but it intermixes examples meeting King's criteria for evidence of grief with other poignant but far less convincing examples. Yet, as noted earlier by Griffin (1958/1974), "Excessive caution can sometimes lead one as far astray as rash enthusiasm." King cites strong evidence from long-term scientific field studies, often involving known individuals; from videotapes; from convergent evidence in neurophysiological studies; and, notwithstanding possible emotional bias, from animals living closely with humans. She makes salient points about data from one-time occurrences and variability, distinguishing experience from expression, and cautioning about over-emphasis on statistics without adequate contextual description. She is persuasive, with both caveats and recognition of the need to be open to the likelihood of animal emotional experience. Such possibilities have a great impact on our treatment of animals, individually and as a society.</abstract><doi>10.51291/2377-7478.1014</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2377-7478
ispartof Animal sentience, 2016-01, Vol.1 (4)
issn 2377-7478
2377-7478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811884864
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Evidence for animal grief?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20animal%20grief?&rft.jtitle=Animal%20sentience&rft.au=Ristau,%20Carolyn&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2377-7478&rft.eissn=2377-7478&rft_id=info:doi/10.51291/2377-7478.1014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811884864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811884864&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true