Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations
Suboptimal laboratory procedures resulting in genotyping errors, misdiagnosis, or incorrect reporting bear greatly on a patient's health management, therapeutic decisions made on their behalf, and ultimate outcome. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) is a key element of quality a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2016-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1084-1095 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1095 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1084 |
container_title | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Haselmann, Verena Geilenkeuser, Wolf J Helfert, Simona Eichner, Romy Hetjens, Svetlana Neumaier, Michael Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz |
description | Suboptimal laboratory procedures resulting in genotyping errors, misdiagnosis, or incorrect reporting bear greatly on a patient's health management, therapeutic decisions made on their behalf, and ultimate outcome. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) is a key element of quality assurance in molecular genetic diagnostics. Therefore, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics has tried for 13 years to improve the quality of genetic testing by offering an EQA for different clinically relevant sequence variations.
Within each of the biannual EQA schemes offered, up to 18 samples of lyophilized human genomic DNA were provided for up to 50 different molecular genetic tests. Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures for genotyping. At least 2 expert peer assessors reviewed the final returns. Data from 2002 to 2014 were evaluated.
In total, 82 462 reported results from 812 characterized samples were evaluated. Globally, the number of participants increased each year along with the number of sequence variations offered. The error rate decreased significantly over the years with an overall error rate of 1.44%. Additionally, a decreased error rate for samples repeated over time was noted. Interestingly, the error rate showed a high difference depending on the locus analyzed and the method used.
Based on the evaluation of this long-term EQA scheme, various recommendations can be given to improve the quality of molecular genetic testing, such as the use of 2 different methods for genotyping. Furthermore, some methods are inappropriate for analysis of certain sequence variations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1373/clinchem.2016.254482 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811881288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4154559851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-bfe2ce9b0aac945871a7679da7d0fb799523abee5a9caa60e3f0e9aa54ebca183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2qqCzQf1BVlnrhksVfie3eEAKKhFS10ENP0cSZlKDEXmxHYv89yS700FNPMyM982g0LyGfOFtzqeWZG3rvHnBcC8artSiVMuIdWfFSssKUFX9PVowxW1iu9CE5SulxHpU21QdyKLQUSstqRZ7uH_qYET39jRATDR0FT298xugh98HDQC-fd9NAf0ww9HlLz1PClEb0md4tJyDtQqTX6EPebnr_5yv9iWkacppd7dy7MM5wu_OlE3LQwZDw42s9Jr-uLu8vvhW3369vLs5vC6e4ykXToXBoGwbgrCqN5qArbVvQLesabW0pJDSIJVgHUDGUHUMLUCpsHHAjj8np3ruJ4WnClOuxTw6HATyGKdXccG4MF-Z_UKbt8kw7o1_-QR_DtDxnJxTG6pKzmVJ7ysWQUsSu3sR-hLitOauX9Oq39OolvXqf3rz2-VU-NSO2f5fe4pIvFkOZuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812897510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Haselmann, Verena ; Geilenkeuser, Wolf J ; Helfert, Simona ; Eichner, Romy ; Hetjens, Svetlana ; Neumaier, Michael ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creator><creatorcontrib>Haselmann, Verena ; Geilenkeuser, Wolf J ; Helfert, Simona ; Eichner, Romy ; Hetjens, Svetlana ; Neumaier, Michael ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><description>Suboptimal laboratory procedures resulting in genotyping errors, misdiagnosis, or incorrect reporting bear greatly on a patient's health management, therapeutic decisions made on their behalf, and ultimate outcome. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) is a key element of quality assurance in molecular genetic diagnostics. Therefore, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics has tried for 13 years to improve the quality of genetic testing by offering an EQA for different clinically relevant sequence variations.
Within each of the biannual EQA schemes offered, up to 18 samples of lyophilized human genomic DNA were provided for up to 50 different molecular genetic tests. Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures for genotyping. At least 2 expert peer assessors reviewed the final returns. Data from 2002 to 2014 were evaluated.
In total, 82 462 reported results from 812 characterized samples were evaluated. Globally, the number of participants increased each year along with the number of sequence variations offered. The error rate decreased significantly over the years with an overall error rate of 1.44%. Additionally, a decreased error rate for samples repeated over time was noted. Interestingly, the error rate showed a high difference depending on the locus analyzed and the method used.
Based on the evaluation of this long-term EQA scheme, various recommendations can be given to improve the quality of molecular genetic testing, such as the use of 2 different methods for genotyping. Furthermore, some methods are inappropriate for analysis of certain sequence variations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.254482</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27324736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Blood & organ donations ; Conflicts of interest ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - genetics ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Genetic Testing - standards ; Genetics ; Genomes ; Genotype ; Humans ; ISO standards ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Quality assurance ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Quality standards</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2016-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1084-1095</ispartof><rights>2016 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.</rights><rights>Copyright American Association for Clinical Chemistry Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-bfe2ce9b0aac945871a7679da7d0fb799523abee5a9caa60e3f0e9aa54ebca183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-bfe2ce9b0aac945871a7679da7d0fb799523abee5a9caa60e3f0e9aa54ebca183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haselmann, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geilenkeuser, Wolf J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helfert, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichner, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetjens, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumaier, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><title>Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>Suboptimal laboratory procedures resulting in genotyping errors, misdiagnosis, or incorrect reporting bear greatly on a patient's health management, therapeutic decisions made on their behalf, and ultimate outcome. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) is a key element of quality assurance in molecular genetic diagnostics. Therefore, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics has tried for 13 years to improve the quality of genetic testing by offering an EQA for different clinically relevant sequence variations.
Within each of the biannual EQA schemes offered, up to 18 samples of lyophilized human genomic DNA were provided for up to 50 different molecular genetic tests. Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures for genotyping. At least 2 expert peer assessors reviewed the final returns. Data from 2002 to 2014 were evaluated.
In total, 82 462 reported results from 812 characterized samples were evaluated. Globally, the number of participants increased each year along with the number of sequence variations offered. The error rate decreased significantly over the years with an overall error rate of 1.44%. Additionally, a decreased error rate for samples repeated over time was noted. Interestingly, the error rate showed a high difference depending on the locus analyzed and the method used.
Based on the evaluation of this long-term EQA scheme, various recommendations can be given to improve the quality of molecular genetic testing, such as the use of 2 different methods for genotyping. Furthermore, some methods are inappropriate for analysis of certain sequence variations.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - standards</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2qqCzQf1BVlnrhksVfie3eEAKKhFS10ENP0cSZlKDEXmxHYv89yS700FNPMyM982g0LyGfOFtzqeWZG3rvHnBcC8artSiVMuIdWfFSssKUFX9PVowxW1iu9CE5SulxHpU21QdyKLQUSstqRZ7uH_qYET39jRATDR0FT298xugh98HDQC-fd9NAf0ww9HlLz1PClEb0md4tJyDtQqTX6EPebnr_5yv9iWkacppd7dy7MM5wu_OlE3LQwZDw42s9Jr-uLu8vvhW3369vLs5vC6e4ykXToXBoGwbgrCqN5qArbVvQLesabW0pJDSIJVgHUDGUHUMLUCpsHHAjj8np3ruJ4WnClOuxTw6HATyGKdXccG4MF-Z_UKbt8kw7o1_-QR_DtDxnJxTG6pKzmVJ7ysWQUsSu3sR-hLitOauX9Oq39OolvXqf3rz2-VU-NSO2f5fe4pIvFkOZuQ</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Haselmann, Verena</creator><creator>Geilenkeuser, Wolf J</creator><creator>Helfert, Simona</creator><creator>Eichner, Romy</creator><creator>Hetjens, Svetlana</creator><creator>Neumaier, Michael</creator><creator>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations</title><author>Haselmann, Verena ; Geilenkeuser, Wolf J ; Helfert, Simona ; Eichner, Romy ; Hetjens, Svetlana ; Neumaier, Michael ; Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-bfe2ce9b0aac945871a7679da7d0fb799523abee5a9caa60e3f0e9aa54ebca183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - standards</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haselmann, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geilenkeuser, Wolf J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helfert, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichner, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetjens, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumaier, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haselmann, Verena</au><au>Geilenkeuser, Wolf J</au><au>Helfert, Simona</au><au>Eichner, Romy</au><au>Hetjens, Svetlana</au><au>Neumaier, Michael</au><au>Ahmad-Nejad, Parviz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1084</spage><epage>1095</epage><pages>1084-1095</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><abstract>Suboptimal laboratory procedures resulting in genotyping errors, misdiagnosis, or incorrect reporting bear greatly on a patient's health management, therapeutic decisions made on their behalf, and ultimate outcome. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) is a key element of quality assurance in molecular genetic diagnostics. Therefore, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics has tried for 13 years to improve the quality of genetic testing by offering an EQA for different clinically relevant sequence variations.
Within each of the biannual EQA schemes offered, up to 18 samples of lyophilized human genomic DNA were provided for up to 50 different molecular genetic tests. Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures for genotyping. At least 2 expert peer assessors reviewed the final returns. Data from 2002 to 2014 were evaluated.
In total, 82 462 reported results from 812 characterized samples were evaluated. Globally, the number of participants increased each year along with the number of sequence variations offered. The error rate decreased significantly over the years with an overall error rate of 1.44%. Additionally, a decreased error rate for samples repeated over time was noted. Interestingly, the error rate showed a high difference depending on the locus analyzed and the method used.
Based on the evaluation of this long-term EQA scheme, various recommendations can be given to improve the quality of molecular genetic testing, such as the use of 2 different methods for genotyping. Furthermore, some methods are inappropriate for analysis of certain sequence variations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27324736</pmid><doi>10.1373/clinchem.2016.254482</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9147 |
ispartof | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2016-08, Vol.62 (8), p.1084-1095 |
issn | 0009-9147 1530-8561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811881288 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Accreditation Blood & organ donations Conflicts of interest Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA - genetics Genetic screening Genetic testing Genetic Testing - standards Genetics Genomes Genotype Humans ISO standards Laboratories Methods Quality assurance Quality Assurance, Health Care Quality standards |
title | Thirteen Years of an International External Quality Assessment Scheme for Genotyping: Results and Recommendations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A30%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thirteen%20Years%20of%20an%20International%20External%20Quality%20Assessment%20Scheme%20for%20Genotyping:%20Results%20and%20Recommendations&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Haselmann,%20Verena&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1084&rft.epage=1095&rft.pages=1084-1095&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2016.254482&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4154559851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812897510&rft_id=info:pmid/27324736&rfr_iscdi=true |