Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics

Harvested hay or biomass are traditionally baled for better handling and they are transported to the outlet for final utilization. For better management of bale logistics, producers often aggregate bales into stacks so that bale-hauling equipment can haul multiple bales for improved efficiency. Obje...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomass & bioenergy 2016-08, Vol.91, p.217-226
Hauptverfasser: Igathinathane, C., Tumuluru, J.S., Keshwani, D., Schmer, M., Archer, D., Liebig, M., Halvorson, J., Hendrickson, J., Kronberg, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue
container_start_page 217
container_title Biomass & bioenergy
container_volume 91
creator Igathinathane, C.
Tumuluru, J.S.
Keshwani, D.
Schmer, M.
Archer, D.
Liebig, M.
Halvorson, J.
Hendrickson, J.
Kronberg, S.
description Harvested hay or biomass are traditionally baled for better handling and they are transported to the outlet for final utilization. For better management of bale logistics, producers often aggregate bales into stacks so that bale-hauling equipment can haul multiple bales for improved efficiency. Objectives of this research include simulation of bale collection logistics after forming subfield stacks, evaluation of location effects of bale stack and field outlet, the number of stacks, transported bales/trip, and other field parameters on logistics distances (aggregation, transportation, and total). The software ‘R’ performed the simulation, statistical analysis, and data visualization. Formation of bale stacks decoupled aggregation and transportation components. Stacks formation thus allows for aggregation and transportation to be performed at different times. Increasing the number of subfield stacks and the number of transported bales/trip significantly reduced the total logistics distances. The order for the best bale stack and outlet locations was: middle, near middle, mid-edge along the length, mid-edge along the width, and finally, corners. Except for swath and windrow variation, the studied field variables had a highly significant influence on the logistics distances. Increased bales/trip (≥6) reduced the variations of outlet locations. Locating the field outlet at or near the center of the field along with an appropriate number of square subfields with stacks at the middle, and increased bales/trip will be the most efficient infield logistics strategy. [Display omitted] •Forming bales into subfield stacks decouples aggregation and transportation.•Increased subfield stacks and transported bales/trip make efficient logistics.•Bale stack and field outlet ranking: middle, mid-edge length, mid-edge width, and corner.•Except swath and windrow variation, field parameters significantly affected the logistics.•Stacks at subfield middle and outlet at a corner with ≥6 bales/trip is a practical solution.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811880560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0961953416301738</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811880560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-85c4ac63d60b444e41506f646860d6b530774d4a81a3e374295963cf0bc257f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BcnSTevNNEnbnQ98wYAbBXchTW8kY9uMvRnBf2_L6NrF5XLgnAPnY-xcQC5A6MtN3oTYT4f5atI5qBxEfcAWoiqLbFVDfcgWUGuR1aqQx-yEaAMgJEixYG83U9YS8cZ2yClZ98Ht0HIfsGt53KUOE--isynEgfjkRKIeh8R9HDl6H1yYVRj2iS6-B0rB0Sk78rYjPPv9S_Z6f_dy-5itnx-ebq_XmZNKpKxSTlqni1ZDI6VEKRRor6WuNLS6UQWUpWylrYQtsCjlqla1LpyHxq1U6atiyS72vdsxfu6QkukDOew6O2DckRGVEFUFSsNk1XurGyPRiN5sx9Db8dsIMDNKszF_KM2M0oAyE8opeLUP4jTkK-BoaF7tsA0jumTaGP6r-AFDwoBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811880560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Igathinathane, C. ; Tumuluru, J.S. ; Keshwani, D. ; Schmer, M. ; Archer, D. ; Liebig, M. ; Halvorson, J. ; Hendrickson, J. ; Kronberg, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C. ; Tumuluru, J.S. ; Keshwani, D. ; Schmer, M. ; Archer, D. ; Liebig, M. ; Halvorson, J. ; Hendrickson, J. ; Kronberg, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Harvested hay or biomass are traditionally baled for better handling and they are transported to the outlet for final utilization. For better management of bale logistics, producers often aggregate bales into stacks so that bale-hauling equipment can haul multiple bales for improved efficiency. Objectives of this research include simulation of bale collection logistics after forming subfield stacks, evaluation of location effects of bale stack and field outlet, the number of stacks, transported bales/trip, and other field parameters on logistics distances (aggregation, transportation, and total). The software ‘R’ performed the simulation, statistical analysis, and data visualization. Formation of bale stacks decoupled aggregation and transportation components. Stacks formation thus allows for aggregation and transportation to be performed at different times. Increasing the number of subfield stacks and the number of transported bales/trip significantly reduced the total logistics distances. The order for the best bale stack and outlet locations was: middle, near middle, mid-edge along the length, mid-edge along the width, and finally, corners. Except for swath and windrow variation, the studied field variables had a highly significant influence on the logistics distances. Increased bales/trip (≥6) reduced the variations of outlet locations. Locating the field outlet at or near the center of the field along with an appropriate number of square subfields with stacks at the middle, and increased bales/trip will be the most efficient infield logistics strategy. [Display omitted] •Forming bales into subfield stacks decouples aggregation and transportation.•Increased subfield stacks and transported bales/trip make efficient logistics.•Bale stack and field outlet ranking: middle, mid-edge length, mid-edge width, and corner.•Except swath and windrow variation, field parameters significantly affected the logistics.•Stacks at subfield middle and outlet at a corner with ≥6 bales/trip is a practical solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-9534</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioenergy feedstocks ; Biomass utilization ; Farm machinery ; Field operation ; Infield storage ; Renewable energy</subject><ispartof>Biomass &amp; bioenergy, 2016-08, Vol.91, p.217-226</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-85c4ac63d60b444e41506f646860d6b530774d4a81a3e374295963cf0bc257f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-85c4ac63d60b444e41506f646860d6b530774d4a81a3e374295963cf0bc257f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumuluru, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshwani, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronberg, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics</title><title>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</title><description>Harvested hay or biomass are traditionally baled for better handling and they are transported to the outlet for final utilization. For better management of bale logistics, producers often aggregate bales into stacks so that bale-hauling equipment can haul multiple bales for improved efficiency. Objectives of this research include simulation of bale collection logistics after forming subfield stacks, evaluation of location effects of bale stack and field outlet, the number of stacks, transported bales/trip, and other field parameters on logistics distances (aggregation, transportation, and total). The software ‘R’ performed the simulation, statistical analysis, and data visualization. Formation of bale stacks decoupled aggregation and transportation components. Stacks formation thus allows for aggregation and transportation to be performed at different times. Increasing the number of subfield stacks and the number of transported bales/trip significantly reduced the total logistics distances. The order for the best bale stack and outlet locations was: middle, near middle, mid-edge along the length, mid-edge along the width, and finally, corners. Except for swath and windrow variation, the studied field variables had a highly significant influence on the logistics distances. Increased bales/trip (≥6) reduced the variations of outlet locations. Locating the field outlet at or near the center of the field along with an appropriate number of square subfields with stacks at the middle, and increased bales/trip will be the most efficient infield logistics strategy. [Display omitted] •Forming bales into subfield stacks decouples aggregation and transportation.•Increased subfield stacks and transported bales/trip make efficient logistics.•Bale stack and field outlet ranking: middle, mid-edge length, mid-edge width, and corner.•Except swath and windrow variation, field parameters significantly affected the logistics.•Stacks at subfield middle and outlet at a corner with ≥6 bales/trip is a practical solution.</description><subject>Bioenergy feedstocks</subject><subject>Biomass utilization</subject><subject>Farm machinery</subject><subject>Field operation</subject><subject>Infield storage</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><issn>0961-9534</issn><issn>1873-2909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BcnSTevNNEnbnQ98wYAbBXchTW8kY9uMvRnBf2_L6NrF5XLgnAPnY-xcQC5A6MtN3oTYT4f5atI5qBxEfcAWoiqLbFVDfcgWUGuR1aqQx-yEaAMgJEixYG83U9YS8cZ2yClZ98Ht0HIfsGt53KUOE--isynEgfjkRKIeh8R9HDl6H1yYVRj2iS6-B0rB0Sk78rYjPPv9S_Z6f_dy-5itnx-ebq_XmZNKpKxSTlqni1ZDI6VEKRRor6WuNLS6UQWUpWylrYQtsCjlqla1LpyHxq1U6atiyS72vdsxfu6QkukDOew6O2DckRGVEFUFSsNk1XurGyPRiN5sx9Db8dsIMDNKszF_KM2M0oAyE8opeLUP4jTkK-BoaF7tsA0jumTaGP6r-AFDwoBo</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Igathinathane, C.</creator><creator>Tumuluru, J.S.</creator><creator>Keshwani, D.</creator><creator>Schmer, M.</creator><creator>Archer, D.</creator><creator>Liebig, M.</creator><creator>Halvorson, J.</creator><creator>Hendrickson, J.</creator><creator>Kronberg, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics</title><author>Igathinathane, C. ; Tumuluru, J.S. ; Keshwani, D. ; Schmer, M. ; Archer, D. ; Liebig, M. ; Halvorson, J. ; Hendrickson, J. ; Kronberg, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-85c4ac63d60b444e41506f646860d6b530774d4a81a3e374295963cf0bc257f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bioenergy feedstocks</topic><topic>Biomass utilization</topic><topic>Farm machinery</topic><topic>Field operation</topic><topic>Infield storage</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumuluru, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshwani, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronberg, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Igathinathane, C.</au><au>Tumuluru, J.S.</au><au>Keshwani, D.</au><au>Schmer, M.</au><au>Archer, D.</au><au>Liebig, M.</au><au>Halvorson, J.</au><au>Hendrickson, J.</au><au>Kronberg, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics</atitle><jtitle>Biomass &amp; bioenergy</jtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>217</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>217-226</pages><issn>0961-9534</issn><eissn>1873-2909</eissn><abstract>Harvested hay or biomass are traditionally baled for better handling and they are transported to the outlet for final utilization. For better management of bale logistics, producers often aggregate bales into stacks so that bale-hauling equipment can haul multiple bales for improved efficiency. Objectives of this research include simulation of bale collection logistics after forming subfield stacks, evaluation of location effects of bale stack and field outlet, the number of stacks, transported bales/trip, and other field parameters on logistics distances (aggregation, transportation, and total). The software ‘R’ performed the simulation, statistical analysis, and data visualization. Formation of bale stacks decoupled aggregation and transportation components. Stacks formation thus allows for aggregation and transportation to be performed at different times. Increasing the number of subfield stacks and the number of transported bales/trip significantly reduced the total logistics distances. The order for the best bale stack and outlet locations was: middle, near middle, mid-edge along the length, mid-edge along the width, and finally, corners. Except for swath and windrow variation, the studied field variables had a highly significant influence on the logistics distances. Increased bales/trip (≥6) reduced the variations of outlet locations. Locating the field outlet at or near the center of the field along with an appropriate number of square subfields with stacks at the middle, and increased bales/trip will be the most efficient infield logistics strategy. [Display omitted] •Forming bales into subfield stacks decouples aggregation and transportation.•Increased subfield stacks and transported bales/trip make efficient logistics.•Bale stack and field outlet ranking: middle, mid-edge length, mid-edge width, and corner.•Except swath and windrow variation, field parameters significantly affected the logistics.•Stacks at subfield middle and outlet at a corner with ≥6 bales/trip is a practical solution.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-9534
ispartof Biomass & bioenergy, 2016-08, Vol.91, p.217-226
issn 0961-9534
1873-2909
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811880560
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bioenergy feedstocks
Biomass utilization
Farm machinery
Field operation
Infield storage
Renewable energy
title Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20bale%20stack%20and%20field%20outlet%20locations%20assessment%20for%20efficient%20infield%20logistics&rft.jtitle=Biomass%20&%20bioenergy&rft.au=Igathinathane,%20C.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=217-226&rft.issn=0961-9534&rft.eissn=1873-2909&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811880560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811880560&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0961953416301738&rfr_iscdi=true