Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat
The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
container_volume | 234 |
creator | Seliwiorstow, T. De Zutter, L. Houf, K. Botteldoorn, N. Baré, J. Van Damme, I. |
description | The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter.
•The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811842660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160516303336</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811842660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRCIbgu_gMyNAwl2nDjZI0RQkCrBAc6W1x6zXsVxsJ2i5Rv5KGa7peKINJLlN2_es-cR8pKzmjMu3xxqf3Ax2uBNinWDUM2wWvaIbPjQbyvRSvaYbLAxVFyy7oJc5nxgjHVCsKfkounFljdNsyG_xxgWnXTxt0AXSC6moGcDNDrqc5ywEWcaoOyjzXTNfv5OvyTIBdFdimX_mr6L08ON6tnSsgefaIjWO2_uBDJF3RNOLRQwd5poMOqwHKe406ZAonlZaupSDHTWZU16mo7UxLno4BEAiz3IZwdk_YKZJv2TLnGdSjriE3V5Rp44PWV4fn9ekW8f3n8dP1Y3n68_jW9vKiP6vlROGu5EZxuwjnfMAu92TjqjjRUMBgaykbyXZtt3wgy22wrZ8qYdNBfcOejEFXl11l1S_LHiMlTw2cA06RnimhUfOB_aRkqG1O2ZiknlnMCpJfmg01Fxpk5hqoP6J0x1ClMxrPY0--LeZt0FsA-Tf9NDwngmAH721kNS2XjA9KxPuGVlo_8Pmz-K5L0n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811842660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter.
•The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27391222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation & purification ; Cefoperazone ; Chickens - microbiology ; Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology ; Comparison of methods ; Culture Media ; Detection ; Food Microbiology ; Freezing ; Meat - microbiology ; Polymyxin B ; Poultry - microbiology ; Retail poultry meat ; Triclosan - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botteldoorn, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter.
•The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Cefoperazone</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Comparison of methods</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymyxin B</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>Retail poultry meat</subject><subject>Triclosan - pharmacology</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRCIbgu_gMyNAwl2nDjZI0RQkCrBAc6W1x6zXsVxsJ2i5Rv5KGa7peKINJLlN2_es-cR8pKzmjMu3xxqf3Ax2uBNinWDUM2wWvaIbPjQbyvRSvaYbLAxVFyy7oJc5nxgjHVCsKfkounFljdNsyG_xxgWnXTxt0AXSC6moGcDNDrqc5ywEWcaoOyjzXTNfv5OvyTIBdFdimX_mr6L08ON6tnSsgefaIjWO2_uBDJF3RNOLRQwd5poMOqwHKe406ZAonlZaupSDHTWZU16mo7UxLno4BEAiz3IZwdk_YKZJv2TLnGdSjriE3V5Rp44PWV4fn9ekW8f3n8dP1Y3n68_jW9vKiP6vlROGu5EZxuwjnfMAu92TjqjjRUMBgaykbyXZtt3wgy22wrZ8qYdNBfcOejEFXl11l1S_LHiMlTw2cA06RnimhUfOB_aRkqG1O2ZiknlnMCpJfmg01Fxpk5hqoP6J0x1ClMxrPY0--LeZt0FsA-Tf9NDwngmAH721kNS2XjA9KxPuGVlo_8Pmz-K5L0n</recordid><startdate>20161003</startdate><enddate>20161003</enddate><creator>Seliwiorstow, T.</creator><creator>De Zutter, L.</creator><creator>Houf, K.</creator><creator>Botteldoorn, N.</creator><creator>Baré, J.</creator><creator>Van Damme, I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161003</creationdate><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><author>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Cefoperazone</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Comparison of methods</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymyxin B</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>Retail poultry meat</topic><topic>Triclosan - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botteldoorn, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seliwiorstow, T.</au><au>De Zutter, L.</au><au>Houf, K.</au><au>Botteldoorn, N.</au><au>Baré, J.</au><au>Van Damme, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2016-10-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>234</volume><spage>60</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>60-64</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter.
•The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27391222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64 |
issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811842660 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Campylobacter Campylobacter - isolation & purification Cefoperazone Chickens - microbiology Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology Comparison of methods Culture Media Detection Food Microbiology Freezing Meat - microbiology Polymyxin B Poultry - microbiology Retail poultry meat Triclosan - pharmacology |
title | Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20performance%20of%20isolation%20methods%20using%20Preston%20broth,%20Bolton%20broth%20and%20their%20modifications%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Campylobacter%20spp.%20from%20naturally%20contaminated%20fresh%20and%20frozen%20raw%20poultry%20meat&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Seliwiorstow,%20T.&rft.date=2016-10-03&rft.volume=234&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=60-64&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811842660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811842660&rft_id=info:pmid/27391222&rft_els_id=S0168160516303336&rfr_iscdi=true |