Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat

The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of food microbiology 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64
Hauptverfasser: Seliwiorstow, T., De Zutter, L., Houf, K., Botteldoorn, N., Baré, J., Van Damme, I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue
container_start_page 60
container_title International journal of food microbiology
container_volume 234
creator Seliwiorstow, T.
De Zutter, L.
Houf, K.
Botteldoorn, N.
Baré, J.
Van Damme, I.
description The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter. •The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811842660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160516303336</els_id><sourcerecordid>1811842660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRCIbgu_gMyNAwl2nDjZI0RQkCrBAc6W1x6zXsVxsJ2i5Rv5KGa7peKINJLlN2_es-cR8pKzmjMu3xxqf3Ax2uBNinWDUM2wWvaIbPjQbyvRSvaYbLAxVFyy7oJc5nxgjHVCsKfkounFljdNsyG_xxgWnXTxt0AXSC6moGcDNDrqc5ywEWcaoOyjzXTNfv5OvyTIBdFdimX_mr6L08ON6tnSsgefaIjWO2_uBDJF3RNOLRQwd5poMOqwHKe406ZAonlZaupSDHTWZU16mo7UxLno4BEAiz3IZwdk_YKZJv2TLnGdSjriE3V5Rp44PWV4fn9ekW8f3n8dP1Y3n68_jW9vKiP6vlROGu5EZxuwjnfMAu92TjqjjRUMBgaykbyXZtt3wgy22wrZ8qYdNBfcOejEFXl11l1S_LHiMlTw2cA06RnimhUfOB_aRkqG1O2ZiknlnMCpJfmg01Fxpk5hqoP6J0x1ClMxrPY0--LeZt0FsA-Tf9NDwngmAH721kNS2XjA9KxPuGVlo_8Pmz-K5L0n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811842660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter. •The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27391222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification ; Cefoperazone ; Chickens - microbiology ; Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology ; Comparison of methods ; Culture Media ; Detection ; Food Microbiology ; Freezing ; Meat - microbiology ; Polymyxin B ; Poultry - microbiology ; Retail poultry meat ; Triclosan - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botteldoorn, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter. •The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cefoperazone</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Comparison of methods</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymyxin B</subject><subject>Poultry - microbiology</subject><subject>Retail poultry meat</subject><subject>Triclosan - pharmacology</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRCIbgu_gMyNAwl2nDjZI0RQkCrBAc6W1x6zXsVxsJ2i5Rv5KGa7peKINJLlN2_es-cR8pKzmjMu3xxqf3Ax2uBNinWDUM2wWvaIbPjQbyvRSvaYbLAxVFyy7oJc5nxgjHVCsKfkounFljdNsyG_xxgWnXTxt0AXSC6moGcDNDrqc5ywEWcaoOyjzXTNfv5OvyTIBdFdimX_mr6L08ON6tnSsgefaIjWO2_uBDJF3RNOLRQwd5poMOqwHKe406ZAonlZaupSDHTWZU16mo7UxLno4BEAiz3IZwdk_YKZJv2TLnGdSjriE3V5Rp44PWV4fn9ekW8f3n8dP1Y3n68_jW9vKiP6vlROGu5EZxuwjnfMAu92TjqjjRUMBgaykbyXZtt3wgy22wrZ8qYdNBfcOejEFXl11l1S_LHiMlTw2cA06RnimhUfOB_aRkqG1O2ZiknlnMCpJfmg01Fxpk5hqoP6J0x1ClMxrPY0--LeZt0FsA-Tf9NDwngmAH721kNS2XjA9KxPuGVlo_8Pmz-K5L0n</recordid><startdate>20161003</startdate><enddate>20161003</enddate><creator>Seliwiorstow, T.</creator><creator>De Zutter, L.</creator><creator>Houf, K.</creator><creator>Botteldoorn, N.</creator><creator>Baré, J.</creator><creator>Van Damme, I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161003</creationdate><title>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</title><author>Seliwiorstow, T. ; De Zutter, L. ; Houf, K. ; Botteldoorn, N. ; Baré, J. ; Van Damme, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f6c1f35d2edf150de15bf6fcacd30e80e626176c9753c8d593641248a131ffe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cefoperazone</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Comparison of methods</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymyxin B</topic><topic>Poultry - microbiology</topic><topic>Retail poultry meat</topic><topic>Triclosan - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seliwiorstow, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botteldoorn, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baré, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seliwiorstow, T.</au><au>De Zutter, L.</au><au>Houf, K.</au><au>Botteldoorn, N.</au><au>Baré, J.</au><au>Van Damme, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2016-10-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>234</volume><spage>60</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>60-64</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter. •The performance of different Campylobacter isolation methods is presented.•Results can support laboratories in the selection of the most appropriate method.•Bolton broth resulted in more positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth.•Supplementation of Bolton broth enhanced the Campylobacter recovery.•Application of RAPID'Campylobacter plates results in more positive samples.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27391222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-1132</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1605
ispartof International journal of food microbiology, 2016-10, Vol.234, p.60-64
issn 0168-1605
1879-3460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811842660
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Campylobacter
Campylobacter - isolation & purification
Cefoperazone
Chickens - microbiology
Clavulanic Acid - pharmacology
Comparison of methods
Culture Media
Detection
Food Microbiology
Freezing
Meat - microbiology
Polymyxin B
Poultry - microbiology
Retail poultry meat
Triclosan - pharmacology
title Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20performance%20of%20isolation%20methods%20using%20Preston%20broth,%20Bolton%20broth%20and%20their%20modifications%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Campylobacter%20spp.%20from%20naturally%20contaminated%20fresh%20and%20frozen%20raw%20poultry%20meat&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Seliwiorstow,%20T.&rft.date=2016-10-03&rft.volume=234&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=60-64&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811842660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811842660&rft_id=info:pmid/27391222&rft_els_id=S0168160516303336&rfr_iscdi=true