Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment

The effects of the experimental fragmentation of native eucalypt forest on the beetle community were tested, in a controlled, replicated, long-term experiment. Included in our design were three fragment sizes, fragment edge and interior sites, and sites in the surrounding exotic pine plantation matr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2001-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1830-1846
Hauptverfasser: Davies, Kendi F., Melbourne, Brett A., Margules, Chris R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1846
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1830
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 82
creator Davies, Kendi F.
Melbourne, Brett A.
Margules, Chris R.
description The effects of the experimental fragmentation of native eucalypt forest on the beetle community were tested, in a controlled, replicated, long-term experiment. Included in our design were three fragment sizes, fragment edge and interior sites, and sites in the surrounding exotic pine plantation matrix. We followed 325 species through 28 sampling periods over seven years, including two years pre-fragmentation. We examined effects of fragmentation on four attributes of community structure: (1) species richness, (2) species composition, (3) relative abundance, and (4) the changes in occurrence of all species individually by the traits of rarity, degree of isolation (dispersal ability), and trophic group. We also considered how changes in these attributes altered community dynamics (turnover). We used both community-level and species-level responses to determine the relative importance of processes acting at the within-patch and between-patch scales. At the within-patch scale there were two findings. (1) There was no evidence of an increase in the extinction rate on fragments, as was hypothesized. Neither species richness nor the occurrence of rare species declined on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) Edge effects altered species occurrences and abundances on fragments compared to continuous forest. There was evidence of two edge effects, with different penetration distances. Species richness increased at fragment edges in response to a shallowly penetrating edge effect. Species relative abundance and composition changed on fragments in response to a deeply penetrating, edge effect, which also caused increases in the occurrences of detritivores and fungivores. At the between-patch scale there were three findings. (1) There was no evidence of a reduction in the colonization rate of fragments. There was no reduction in species richness or in the occurrence of individual species with poor dispersal abilities on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) The matrix between fragments altered between-patch processes by providing alternative habitat for some species. These species increased in occurrence on fragments compared to continuous forest, supporting the predictions of recent metacommunity theory. However, the matrix did not act as a source of invading species. (3) Turnover was reduced in fragments compared to continuous forest. Thus, the effect of fragmentation was to stabilize community dynamics.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1830:EOWABP]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18118354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2680050</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2680050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5450-f427542d20447245f7b9b518edc899169b075ac6b7fa70944742169104bc30d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV-L1DAUxYsoOK5-hyAq-tDZmzSZJO7TWrursDADKiIiIc2kboY2HZMO43x7E7qo-Ghe8u-Xc2_OKYpzDEssJJwDYFLKFRMvSVq-AkG-YlHB62b9-fLN5htZwrJeX5B7xQLLSpYSc7hfLH6_elg8inEHaWAqFkXbdJ01U0Rjh45uunW-RNpvUWuno7W-3OjJ3KJNGI2N0SbMo3ochoN30wm9PXk9OBOR80ijq6C_D9ZPenKJan7ubXB5_7h40Ok-2id381nx6ar5WL8rb9bX7-vLm9IwyqDsKOGMki0BSjmhrOOtbBkWdmuElHglW-BMm1XLO81BJoiSdIqBtqaCLanOihez7j6MPw42Tmpw0di-196Oh6iwwMkoRhP49B9wNx6CT70pgiVgzKhI0PUMmTDGGGyn9uk7OpwUBpWDUNlSlS1VOQiVglA5CDUHoYgCVa9V7uv5XTkdje67oL1x8Y8cxRgEk4n7MHNH19vT_5ZTTf0lA4LwfJ1Un82quziN4W9VUgFXZCUAGFS_AE6yrSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219011548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Davies, Kendi F. ; Melbourne, Brett A. ; Margules, Chris R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, Kendi F. ; Melbourne, Brett A. ; Margules, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of the experimental fragmentation of native eucalypt forest on the beetle community were tested, in a controlled, replicated, long-term experiment. Included in our design were three fragment sizes, fragment edge and interior sites, and sites in the surrounding exotic pine plantation matrix. We followed 325 species through 28 sampling periods over seven years, including two years pre-fragmentation. We examined effects of fragmentation on four attributes of community structure: (1) species richness, (2) species composition, (3) relative abundance, and (4) the changes in occurrence of all species individually by the traits of rarity, degree of isolation (dispersal ability), and trophic group. We also considered how changes in these attributes altered community dynamics (turnover). We used both community-level and species-level responses to determine the relative importance of processes acting at the within-patch and between-patch scales. At the within-patch scale there were two findings. (1) There was no evidence of an increase in the extinction rate on fragments, as was hypothesized. Neither species richness nor the occurrence of rare species declined on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) Edge effects altered species occurrences and abundances on fragments compared to continuous forest. There was evidence of two edge effects, with different penetration distances. Species richness increased at fragment edges in response to a shallowly penetrating edge effect. Species relative abundance and composition changed on fragments in response to a deeply penetrating, edge effect, which also caused increases in the occurrences of detritivores and fungivores. At the between-patch scale there were three findings. (1) There was no evidence of a reduction in the colonization rate of fragments. There was no reduction in species richness or in the occurrence of individual species with poor dispersal abilities on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) The matrix between fragments altered between-patch processes by providing alternative habitat for some species. These species increased in occurrence on fragments compared to continuous forest, supporting the predictions of recent metacommunity theory. However, the matrix did not act as a source of invading species. (3) Turnover was reduced in fragments compared to continuous forest. Thus, the effect of fragmentation was to stabilize community dynamics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1830:EOWABP]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Australia ; Beetles ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coleoptera ; community dynamics ; Community structure ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecosystems ; Edge effects ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Eucalyptus ; Extinct species ; Fall lines ; Forest ecology ; forest fragmentation ; Forest habitats ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; Insect Ecology ; Insects ; local processes ; Species ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2001-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1830-1846</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2001 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5450-f427542d20447245f7b9b518edc899169b075ac6b7fa70944742169104bc30d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5450-f427542d20447245f7b9b518edc899169b075ac6b7fa70944742169104bc30d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2680050$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2680050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14110859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, Kendi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melbourne, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margules, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>The effects of the experimental fragmentation of native eucalypt forest on the beetle community were tested, in a controlled, replicated, long-term experiment. Included in our design were three fragment sizes, fragment edge and interior sites, and sites in the surrounding exotic pine plantation matrix. We followed 325 species through 28 sampling periods over seven years, including two years pre-fragmentation. We examined effects of fragmentation on four attributes of community structure: (1) species richness, (2) species composition, (3) relative abundance, and (4) the changes in occurrence of all species individually by the traits of rarity, degree of isolation (dispersal ability), and trophic group. We also considered how changes in these attributes altered community dynamics (turnover). We used both community-level and species-level responses to determine the relative importance of processes acting at the within-patch and between-patch scales. At the within-patch scale there were two findings. (1) There was no evidence of an increase in the extinction rate on fragments, as was hypothesized. Neither species richness nor the occurrence of rare species declined on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) Edge effects altered species occurrences and abundances on fragments compared to continuous forest. There was evidence of two edge effects, with different penetration distances. Species richness increased at fragment edges in response to a shallowly penetrating edge effect. Species relative abundance and composition changed on fragments in response to a deeply penetrating, edge effect, which also caused increases in the occurrences of detritivores and fungivores. At the between-patch scale there were three findings. (1) There was no evidence of a reduction in the colonization rate of fragments. There was no reduction in species richness or in the occurrence of individual species with poor dispersal abilities on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) The matrix between fragments altered between-patch processes by providing alternative habitat for some species. These species increased in occurrence on fragments compared to continuous forest, supporting the predictions of recent metacommunity theory. However, the matrix did not act as a source of invading species. (3) Turnover was reduced in fragments compared to continuous forest. Thus, the effect of fragmentation was to stabilize community dynamics.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>community dynamics</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>Fall lines</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forest fragmentation</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insect Ecology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>local processes</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkV-L1DAUxYsoOK5-hyAq-tDZmzSZJO7TWrursDADKiIiIc2kboY2HZMO43x7E7qo-Ghe8u-Xc2_OKYpzDEssJJwDYFLKFRMvSVq-AkG-YlHB62b9-fLN5htZwrJeX5B7xQLLSpYSc7hfLH6_elg8inEHaWAqFkXbdJ01U0Rjh45uunW-RNpvUWuno7W-3OjJ3KJNGI2N0SbMo3ochoN30wm9PXk9OBOR80ijq6C_D9ZPenKJan7ubXB5_7h40Ok-2id381nx6ar5WL8rb9bX7-vLm9IwyqDsKOGMki0BSjmhrOOtbBkWdmuElHglW-BMm1XLO81BJoiSdIqBtqaCLanOihez7j6MPw42Tmpw0di-196Oh6iwwMkoRhP49B9wNx6CT70pgiVgzKhI0PUMmTDGGGyn9uk7OpwUBpWDUNlSlS1VOQiVglA5CDUHoYgCVa9V7uv5XTkdje67oL1x8Y8cxRgEk4n7MHNH19vT_5ZTTf0lA4LwfJ1Un82quziN4W9VUgFXZCUAGFS_AE6yrSc</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Davies, Kendi F.</creator><creator>Melbourne, Brett A.</creator><creator>Margules, Chris R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment</title><author>Davies, Kendi F. ; Melbourne, Brett A. ; Margules, Chris R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5450-f427542d20447245f7b9b518edc899169b075ac6b7fa70944742169104bc30d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>community dynamics</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>Fall lines</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forest fragmentation</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insect Ecology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>local processes</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, Kendi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melbourne, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margules, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, Kendi F.</au><au>Melbourne, Brett A.</au><au>Margules, Chris R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1830</spage><epage>1846</epage><pages>1830-1846</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The effects of the experimental fragmentation of native eucalypt forest on the beetle community were tested, in a controlled, replicated, long-term experiment. Included in our design were three fragment sizes, fragment edge and interior sites, and sites in the surrounding exotic pine plantation matrix. We followed 325 species through 28 sampling periods over seven years, including two years pre-fragmentation. We examined effects of fragmentation on four attributes of community structure: (1) species richness, (2) species composition, (3) relative abundance, and (4) the changes in occurrence of all species individually by the traits of rarity, degree of isolation (dispersal ability), and trophic group. We also considered how changes in these attributes altered community dynamics (turnover). We used both community-level and species-level responses to determine the relative importance of processes acting at the within-patch and between-patch scales. At the within-patch scale there were two findings. (1) There was no evidence of an increase in the extinction rate on fragments, as was hypothesized. Neither species richness nor the occurrence of rare species declined on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) Edge effects altered species occurrences and abundances on fragments compared to continuous forest. There was evidence of two edge effects, with different penetration distances. Species richness increased at fragment edges in response to a shallowly penetrating edge effect. Species relative abundance and composition changed on fragments in response to a deeply penetrating, edge effect, which also caused increases in the occurrences of detritivores and fungivores. At the between-patch scale there were three findings. (1) There was no evidence of a reduction in the colonization rate of fragments. There was no reduction in species richness or in the occurrence of individual species with poor dispersal abilities on fragments compared to continuous forest. (2) The matrix between fragments altered between-patch processes by providing alternative habitat for some species. These species increased in occurrence on fragments compared to continuous forest, supporting the predictions of recent metacommunity theory. However, the matrix did not act as a source of invading species. (3) Turnover was reduced in fragments compared to continuous forest. Thus, the effect of fragmentation was to stabilize community dynamics.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1830:EOWABP]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2001-07, Vol.82 (7), p.1830-1846
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18118354
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Australia
Beetles
Biological and medical sciences
Coleoptera
community dynamics
Community structure
Conservation biology
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ecosystems
Edge effects
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Eucalyptus
Extinct species
Fall lines
Forest ecology
forest fragmentation
Forest habitats
Forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats
Insect Ecology
Insects
local processes
Species
Statistical analysis
Studies
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Effects of within- and between-Patch Processes on Community Dynamics in a Fragmentation Experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20within-%20and%20between-Patch%20Processes%20on%20Community%20Dynamics%20in%20a%20Fragmentation%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Davies,%20Kendi%20F.&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1830&rft.epage=1846&rft.pages=1830-1846&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082%5B1830:EOWABP%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2680050%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219011548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2680050&rfr_iscdi=true