Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign

Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060
Hauptverfasser: Kylling, A., Bais, A. F., Blumthaler, M., Schreder, J., Zerefos, C. S., Kosmidis, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26060
container_issue D20
container_start_page 26051
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC
container_volume 103
creator Kylling, A.
Bais, A. F.
Blumthaler, M.
Schreder, J.
Zerefos, C. S.
Kosmidis, E.
description Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/98JD02350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18116319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1uEzEURi0EElHpgjfwAiGxGOp_j5elLWlLBShQWFo3jt0YJuPUdkrz9riaqqzw5krWOZ_u_RB6Tcl7Spg5Mv3lKWFckmdoxqhUHWOEPUczQkXfEcb0S3RYyi_SnpBKEDpDu7MQvKs4BQw-p5KGgtOI24SMr3_gmDOsIozOF7za5Tje4Lr2-Os61eTWfhMdDPjY1XgX6x7DuMLfJnWoGe5iGnzFi4eEGlusg80W4s34Cr0IMBR_-DgP0PXHs-8n593Vl_nFyfFV50RbsQMWNA9GgSZcMyXpimtgkhsnFBgpuV6C5EBEkDrIJdNKcdK-tFAq8KXkB-jtlLvN6XbnS7WbWJwfBhh92hVLe0oVp6aB7ybQtQ5K9sFuc9xA3ltK7EO39qnbxr55DIXSrg-5tRPLP0Ea05u-YUcT9icOfv__PHs5X5wqKkQzusmIpfr7JwPyb6s019L-_Dy3in4g8tP5wir-Fw38lNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18116319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/98JD02350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F98JD02350$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F98JD02350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1599898$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bais, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumthaler, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreder, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerefos, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1uEzEURi0EElHpgjfwAiGxGOp_j5elLWlLBShQWFo3jt0YJuPUdkrz9riaqqzw5krWOZ_u_RB6Tcl7Spg5Mv3lKWFckmdoxqhUHWOEPUczQkXfEcb0S3RYyi_SnpBKEDpDu7MQvKs4BQw-p5KGgtOI24SMr3_gmDOsIozOF7za5Tje4Lr2-Os61eTWfhMdDPjY1XgX6x7DuMLfJnWoGe5iGnzFi4eEGlusg80W4s34Cr0IMBR_-DgP0PXHs-8n593Vl_nFyfFV50RbsQMWNA9GgSZcMyXpimtgkhsnFBgpuV6C5EBEkDrIJdNKcdK-tFAq8KXkB-jtlLvN6XbnS7WbWJwfBhh92hVLe0oVp6aB7ybQtQ5K9sFuc9xA3ltK7EO39qnbxr55DIXSrg-5tRPLP0Ea05u-YUcT9icOfv__PHs5X5wqKkQzusmIpfr7JwPyb6s019L-_Dy3in4g8tP5wir-Fw38lNU</recordid><startdate>19981027</startdate><enddate>19981027</enddate><creator>Kylling, A.</creator><creator>Bais, A. F.</creator><creator>Blumthaler, M.</creator><creator>Schreder, J.</creator><creator>Zerefos, C. S.</creator><creator>Kosmidis, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981027</creationdate><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><author>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bais, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumthaler, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreder, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerefos, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kylling, A.</au><au>Bais, A. F.</au><au>Blumthaler, M.</au><au>Schreder, J.</au><au>Zerefos, C. S.</au><au>Kosmidis, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>1998-10-27</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>D20</issue><spage>26051</spage><epage>26060</epage><pages>26051-26060</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/98JD02350</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116319
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Meteorology
Radiative transfer. Solar radiation
title Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20aerosols%20on%20solar%20UV%20irradiances%20during%20the%20Photochemical%20Activity%20and%20Solar%20Ultraviolet%20Radiation%20campaign&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research,%20Washington,%20DC&rft.au=Kylling,%20A.&rft.date=1998-10-27&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=D20&rft.spage=26051&rft.epage=26060&rft.pages=26051-26060&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/98JD02350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18116319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18116319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true