Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign
Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26060 |
---|---|
container_issue | D20 |
container_start_page | 26051 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Kylling, A. Bais, A. F. Blumthaler, M. Schreder, J. Zerefos, C. S. Kosmidis, E. |
description | Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/98JD02350 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18116319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1uEzEURi0EElHpgjfwAiGxGOp_j5elLWlLBShQWFo3jt0YJuPUdkrz9riaqqzw5krWOZ_u_RB6Tcl7Spg5Mv3lKWFckmdoxqhUHWOEPUczQkXfEcb0S3RYyi_SnpBKEDpDu7MQvKs4BQw-p5KGgtOI24SMr3_gmDOsIozOF7za5Tje4Lr2-Os61eTWfhMdDPjY1XgX6x7DuMLfJnWoGe5iGnzFi4eEGlusg80W4s34Cr0IMBR_-DgP0PXHs-8n593Vl_nFyfFV50RbsQMWNA9GgSZcMyXpimtgkhsnFBgpuV6C5EBEkDrIJdNKcdK-tFAq8KXkB-jtlLvN6XbnS7WbWJwfBhh92hVLe0oVp6aB7ybQtQ5K9sFuc9xA3ltK7EO39qnbxr55DIXSrg-5tRPLP0Ea05u-YUcT9icOfv__PHs5X5wqKkQzusmIpfr7JwPyb6s019L-_Dy3in4g8tP5wir-Fw38lNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18116319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/98JD02350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F98JD02350$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F98JD02350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1599898$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bais, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumthaler, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreder, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerefos, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1uEzEURi0EElHpgjfwAiGxGOp_j5elLWlLBShQWFo3jt0YJuPUdkrz9riaqqzw5krWOZ_u_RB6Tcl7Spg5Mv3lKWFckmdoxqhUHWOEPUczQkXfEcb0S3RYyi_SnpBKEDpDu7MQvKs4BQw-p5KGgtOI24SMr3_gmDOsIozOF7za5Tje4Lr2-Os61eTWfhMdDPjY1XgX6x7DuMLfJnWoGe5iGnzFi4eEGlusg80W4s34Cr0IMBR_-DgP0PXHs-8n593Vl_nFyfFV50RbsQMWNA9GgSZcMyXpimtgkhsnFBgpuV6C5EBEkDrIJdNKcdK-tFAq8KXkB-jtlLvN6XbnS7WbWJwfBhh92hVLe0oVp6aB7ybQtQ5K9sFuc9xA3ltK7EO39qnbxr55DIXSrg-5tRPLP0Ea05u-YUcT9icOfv__PHs5X5wqKkQzusmIpfr7JwPyb6s019L-_Dy3in4g8tP5wir-Fw38lNU</recordid><startdate>19981027</startdate><enddate>19981027</enddate><creator>Kylling, A.</creator><creator>Bais, A. F.</creator><creator>Blumthaler, M.</creator><creator>Schreder, J.</creator><creator>Zerefos, C. S.</creator><creator>Kosmidis, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981027</creationdate><title>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</title><author>Kylling, A. ; Bais, A. F. ; Blumthaler, M. ; Schreder, J. ; Zerefos, C. S. ; Kosmidis, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-a2f73f96a70372651d37a2539c46a95537ba53a04f57f5b276630ba57466f3b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Radiative transfer. Solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kylling, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bais, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumthaler, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreder, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerefos, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kylling, A.</au><au>Bais, A. F.</au><au>Blumthaler, M.</au><au>Schreder, J.</au><au>Zerefos, C. S.</au><au>Kosmidis, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>1998-10-27</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>D20</issue><spage>26051</spage><epage>26060</epage><pages>26051-26060</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Surface UV irradiances were measured at two different sites in Greece during June 1996 under noncloudy conditions. The measured UV irradiances are simulated by a radiative transfer model using measured ozone density and aerosol optical depth profiles. The absolute difference between model and measurements ranges between −5% and +5% with little dependence on wavelength. The temporal and solar zenith angle dependence in the difference between model and measurement suggests that part of this difference may be explained by assumptions made about the aerosol single‐scattering albedo and phase function. Simulated spectra including aerosols are compared with calculated spectra excluding aerosols. It is found that for otherwise similar atmospheric conditions the UVB irradiance is reduced with respect to aerosol free conditions by 5% to 35% depending on the aerosol optical depth and single‐scattering albedo. For the campaign period, changes in the aerosol loading gave larger variations in the surface UV irradiances than the changes seen in the ozone column.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/98JD02350</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.26051-26060 |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116319 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Meteorology Radiative transfer. Solar radiation |
title | Effect of aerosols on solar UV irradiances during the Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20aerosols%20on%20solar%20UV%20irradiances%20during%20the%20Photochemical%20Activity%20and%20Solar%20Ultraviolet%20Radiation%20campaign&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research,%20Washington,%20DC&rft.au=Kylling,%20A.&rft.date=1998-10-27&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=D20&rft.spage=26051&rft.epage=26060&rft.pages=26051-26060&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/98JD02350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18116319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18116319&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |