The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern: Model Simulation and Relevance to Climate Change Detection
Surface air temperatures from a 1000-yr integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with constant forcing are analyzed by using a method that decomposes temperature variations into a component associated with a characteristic spatial structure and a residual. The structure function obtained from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of climate 1998-11, Vol.11 (11), p.2743-2763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2743 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Broccoli, Anthony J. Lau, Ngar-Cheung Nath, Mary Jo |
description | Surface air temperatures from a 1000-yr integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with constant forcing are analyzed by using a method that decomposes temperature variations into a component associated with a characteristic spatial structure and a residual. The structure function obtained from the coupled model output is almost identical to the so-called cold ocean–warm land (COWL) pattern based on observations, in which above-average spatial mean temperature is associated with anomalously cold oceans and anomalously warm land. This pattern features maxima over the high-latitude interiors of Eurasia and North America. The temperature fluctuations at the two continental centers exhibit almost no temporal correlation with each other. The temperature variations at the individual centers are related to teleconnection patterns in sea level pressure and 500-mb height that are similar to those identified in previous observational and modeling studies. As in observations, variations in the polarity and amplitude of this structure function are an important source of spatially averaged surface air temperature variability.
Results from parallel integrations of models with more simplified treatments of the ocean confirm that the contrast in thermal inertia between land and ocean is the primary factor for the existence of the COWL pattern, whereas dynamical air–sea interactions do not play a significant role. The internally generated variability in structure function amplitude in the coupled model integration is used to assess the importance of the upward trend in the amplitude of the observed structure function over the last 25 yr. This trend, which has contributed to the accelerated warming of Northern Hemisphere temperature over recent decades, is unusually large compared with the trends generated internally by the coupled model. If the coupled model adequately estimates the internal variability of the real climate system, this would imply that the recent upturn in the observed structure function may not be purely a manifestation of unforced variability. A similar monotonic trend occurs when the same methodology is applied to a model integration with time-varying radiative forcing based on past and future CO₂ and sulfate aerosol increases. This finding illustrates that this decomposition methodology yields ambiguous results when two distinct spatial patterns, the “natural” COWL pattern (i.e., that associated with internally generated variability) and the anthr |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2743:tcowlp>2.0.co;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26244227</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26244227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-87b159c0ba5980511f689864c5a9dcb8491f95c73740d76a3a49dd1c6affad1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1q20AQgJfQQF0nj1AwJoT0YHtmtb9JCBTROgGDfXDwcRmvJGIjS86uTOkt79A37JNUwiaFXnqaw3x8w3yMTRDGiFpOUHIYgRD8Bq01XwDxnmuR3Da-_lHuH_gYxr6-42es905-YD0wVoyMlvIj-xTjFgC5Auix4fIlH6R1mQ3mPqfq99uvFYXdYEZVNlhQ0-ShumDnBZUxvzzNPnv-_m2ZPo5m8-lT-nU28oInTStfo7Qe1iStAYlYKGONEl6SzfzaCIuFlV4nWkCmFSUkbJahV1QUlCElfXZ99O5D_XrIY-N2m-jzsqQqrw_RoUFUIM3_QS2VRdOBw3_AbX0IVfuE45xbaG22haZHyIc6xpAXbh82Owo_HYLriruuo-s6uq64a4u7rrhbpvPVbOG4A5fOHW9NV6dzFD2VRaDKb-JfnUqk0rLFPh-xbWzq8L7mircnuE7-ANvijCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222906059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern: Model Simulation and Relevance to Climate Change Detection</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Broccoli, Anthony J. ; Lau, Ngar-Cheung ; Nath, Mary Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Broccoli, Anthony J. ; Lau, Ngar-Cheung ; Nath, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><description>Surface air temperatures from a 1000-yr integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with constant forcing are analyzed by using a method that decomposes temperature variations into a component associated with a characteristic spatial structure and a residual. The structure function obtained from the coupled model output is almost identical to the so-called cold ocean–warm land (COWL) pattern based on observations, in which above-average spatial mean temperature is associated with anomalously cold oceans and anomalously warm land. This pattern features maxima over the high-latitude interiors of Eurasia and North America. The temperature fluctuations at the two continental centers exhibit almost no temporal correlation with each other. The temperature variations at the individual centers are related to teleconnection patterns in sea level pressure and 500-mb height that are similar to those identified in previous observational and modeling studies. As in observations, variations in the polarity and amplitude of this structure function are an important source of spatially averaged surface air temperature variability.
Results from parallel integrations of models with more simplified treatments of the ocean confirm that the contrast in thermal inertia between land and ocean is the primary factor for the existence of the COWL pattern, whereas dynamical air–sea interactions do not play a significant role. The internally generated variability in structure function amplitude in the coupled model integration is used to assess the importance of the upward trend in the amplitude of the observed structure function over the last 25 yr. This trend, which has contributed to the accelerated warming of Northern Hemisphere temperature over recent decades, is unusually large compared with the trends generated internally by the coupled model. If the coupled model adequately estimates the internal variability of the real climate system, this would imply that the recent upturn in the observed structure function may not be purely a manifestation of unforced variability. A similar monotonic trend occurs when the same methodology is applied to a model integration with time-varying radiative forcing based on past and future CO₂ and sulfate aerosol increases. This finding illustrates that this decomposition methodology yields ambiguous results when two distinct spatial patterns, the “natural” COWL pattern (i.e., that associated with internally generated variability) and the anthropogenic fingerprint, are present in the simulated climate record.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2743:tcowlp>2.0.co;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Atmospheric models ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Land ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Modeling ; Ocean-atmosphere interaction ; Oceans ; Simulation ; Simulations ; Spatial models ; Surface temperature ; Temperature ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 1998-11, Vol.11 (11), p.2743-2763</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Nov 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26244227$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26244227$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3667,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1635675$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broccoli, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ngar-Cheung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nath, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><title>The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern: Model Simulation and Relevance to Climate Change Detection</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Surface air temperatures from a 1000-yr integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with constant forcing are analyzed by using a method that decomposes temperature variations into a component associated with a characteristic spatial structure and a residual. The structure function obtained from the coupled model output is almost identical to the so-called cold ocean–warm land (COWL) pattern based on observations, in which above-average spatial mean temperature is associated with anomalously cold oceans and anomalously warm land. This pattern features maxima over the high-latitude interiors of Eurasia and North America. The temperature fluctuations at the two continental centers exhibit almost no temporal correlation with each other. The temperature variations at the individual centers are related to teleconnection patterns in sea level pressure and 500-mb height that are similar to those identified in previous observational and modeling studies. As in observations, variations in the polarity and amplitude of this structure function are an important source of spatially averaged surface air temperature variability.
Results from parallel integrations of models with more simplified treatments of the ocean confirm that the contrast in thermal inertia between land and ocean is the primary factor for the existence of the COWL pattern, whereas dynamical air–sea interactions do not play a significant role. The internally generated variability in structure function amplitude in the coupled model integration is used to assess the importance of the upward trend in the amplitude of the observed structure function over the last 25 yr. This trend, which has contributed to the accelerated warming of Northern Hemisphere temperature over recent decades, is unusually large compared with the trends generated internally by the coupled model. If the coupled model adequately estimates the internal variability of the real climate system, this would imply that the recent upturn in the observed structure function may not be purely a manifestation of unforced variability. A similar monotonic trend occurs when the same methodology is applied to a model integration with time-varying radiative forcing based on past and future CO₂ and sulfate aerosol increases. This finding illustrates that this decomposition methodology yields ambiguous results when two distinct spatial patterns, the “natural” COWL pattern (i.e., that associated with internally generated variability) and the anthropogenic fingerprint, are present in the simulated climate record.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Ocean-atmosphere interaction</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1q20AQgJfQQF0nj1AwJoT0YHtmtb9JCBTROgGDfXDwcRmvJGIjS86uTOkt79A37JNUwiaFXnqaw3x8w3yMTRDGiFpOUHIYgRD8Bq01XwDxnmuR3Da-_lHuH_gYxr6-42es905-YD0wVoyMlvIj-xTjFgC5Auix4fIlH6R1mQ3mPqfq99uvFYXdYEZVNlhQ0-ShumDnBZUxvzzNPnv-_m2ZPo5m8-lT-nU28oInTStfo7Qe1iStAYlYKGONEl6SzfzaCIuFlV4nWkCmFSUkbJahV1QUlCElfXZ99O5D_XrIY-N2m-jzsqQqrw_RoUFUIM3_QS2VRdOBw3_AbX0IVfuE45xbaG22haZHyIc6xpAXbh82Owo_HYLriruuo-s6uq64a4u7rrhbpvPVbOG4A5fOHW9NV6dzFD2VRaDKb-JfnUqk0rLFPh-xbWzq8L7mircnuE7-ANvijCE</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>Broccoli, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Lau, Ngar-Cheung</creator><creator>Nath, Mary Jo</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern</title><author>Broccoli, Anthony J. ; Lau, Ngar-Cheung ; Nath, Mary Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-87b159c0ba5980511f689864c5a9dcb8491f95c73740d76a3a49dd1c6affad1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Ocean-atmosphere interaction</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broccoli, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ngar-Cheung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nath, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broccoli, Anthony J.</au><au>Lau, Ngar-Cheung</au><au>Nath, Mary Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern: Model Simulation and Relevance to Climate Change Detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2743</spage><epage>2763</epage><pages>2743-2763</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Surface air temperatures from a 1000-yr integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with constant forcing are analyzed by using a method that decomposes temperature variations into a component associated with a characteristic spatial structure and a residual. The structure function obtained from the coupled model output is almost identical to the so-called cold ocean–warm land (COWL) pattern based on observations, in which above-average spatial mean temperature is associated with anomalously cold oceans and anomalously warm land. This pattern features maxima over the high-latitude interiors of Eurasia and North America. The temperature fluctuations at the two continental centers exhibit almost no temporal correlation with each other. The temperature variations at the individual centers are related to teleconnection patterns in sea level pressure and 500-mb height that are similar to those identified in previous observational and modeling studies. As in observations, variations in the polarity and amplitude of this structure function are an important source of spatially averaged surface air temperature variability.
Results from parallel integrations of models with more simplified treatments of the ocean confirm that the contrast in thermal inertia between land and ocean is the primary factor for the existence of the COWL pattern, whereas dynamical air–sea interactions do not play a significant role. The internally generated variability in structure function amplitude in the coupled model integration is used to assess the importance of the upward trend in the amplitude of the observed structure function over the last 25 yr. This trend, which has contributed to the accelerated warming of Northern Hemisphere temperature over recent decades, is unusually large compared with the trends generated internally by the coupled model. If the coupled model adequately estimates the internal variability of the real climate system, this would imply that the recent upturn in the observed structure function may not be purely a manifestation of unforced variability. A similar monotonic trend occurs when the same methodology is applied to a model integration with time-varying radiative forcing based on past and future CO₂ and sulfate aerosol increases. This finding illustrates that this decomposition methodology yields ambiguous results when two distinct spatial patterns, the “natural” COWL pattern (i.e., that associated with internally generated variability) and the anthropogenic fingerprint, are present in the simulated climate record.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2743:tcowlp>2.0.co;2</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 1998-11, Vol.11 (11), p.2743-2763 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18116058 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Air temperature Atmospheric models Climate Climate change Climate models Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Land Marine Meteorology Modeling Ocean-atmosphere interaction Oceans Simulation Simulations Spatial models Surface temperature Temperature Time series |
title | The Cold Ocean–Warm Land Pattern: Model Simulation and Relevance to Climate Change Detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T04%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cold%20Ocean%E2%80%93Warm%20Land%20Pattern:%20Model%20Simulation%20and%20Relevance%20to%20Climate%20Change%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Broccoli,%20Anthony%20J.&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2743&rft.epage=2763&rft.pages=2743-2763&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011%3C2743:tcowlp%3E2.0.co;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26244227%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222906059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26244227&rfr_iscdi=true |