The exploitation of mutualisms

Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology letters 2001-05, Vol.4 (3), p.277-287
1. Verfasser: Bronstein, Judith L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 287
container_issue 3
container_start_page 277
container_title Ecology letters
container_volume 4
creator Bronstein, Judith L.
description Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing their ecological or evolutionary significance for mutualism. Exploitation is not a unitary phenomenon, but a set of loosely related phenomena: exploiters may follow mixed strategies or pure strategies at either the species or individual level, may or may not be derived from mutualists, and may or may not inflict significant costs on mutualisms. The evolutionary implications of these different forms of exploitation, especially the threats they pose to the stability of mutualism, have as yet been minimally explored. Studies of this issue are usually framed in terms of a “temptation to defect” that generates a destabilizing conflict of interest between partners. I argue that this idea is in fact rather inappropriate for interpreting most observed forms of exploitation in mutualisms. I suggest several alternative and testable ideas for how mutualism can persist in the face of exploitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18115631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18115631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4958-3d8097a7f6c89248a6498c75be58bd3c74e1e7ed07f16a6c2c6fecce9e053fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_guTkLXE3m_0T8CKlrUJU0Irehu1mgqlJU7MJpt_exEjPnubBvN8M7xHiMRowGsnrTcAiyXwaRjoIKWUBpSHTQXdEJofF8UHz91Ny5tymN4axYhNyufpAD7tdUeWNafJq61WZV7ZNa4rcle6cnGSmcHjxN6fkdTFfze785Gl5P7tNfBvFQvs81TRWRmXS6rh_aGQUa6vEGoVep9yqCBkqTKnKmDTShlZmaC3GSAXPUsan5Gq8u6urrxZdA2XuLBaF2WLVOmCaMSH5YNSj0daVczVmsKvz0tR7YBSGQmADQ1YYcsNQCPwWAl2P3ozod17g_t8czJN5L3rcH_HcNdgdcFN_glRcCXh7XEK8eHkWUj2A4D-2DHSm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18115631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The exploitation of mutualisms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bronstein, Judith L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><description>Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing their ecological or evolutionary significance for mutualism. Exploitation is not a unitary phenomenon, but a set of loosely related phenomena: exploiters may follow mixed strategies or pure strategies at either the species or individual level, may or may not be derived from mutualists, and may or may not inflict significant costs on mutualisms. The evolutionary implications of these different forms of exploitation, especially the threats they pose to the stability of mutualism, have as yet been minimally explored. Studies of this issue are usually framed in terms of a “temptation to defect” that generates a destabilizing conflict of interest between partners. I argue that this idea is in fact rather inappropriate for interpreting most observed forms of exploitation in mutualisms. I suggest several alternative and testable ideas for how mutualism can persist in the face of exploitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Cheating ; cooperation ; evolution ; exploitation ; interspecific interactions ; mutualism</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2001-05, Vol.4 (3), p.277-287</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4958-3d8097a7f6c89248a6498c75be58bd3c74e1e7ed07f16a6c2c6fecce9e053fd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4958-3d8097a7f6c89248a6498c75be58bd3c74e1e7ed07f16a6c2c6fecce9e053fd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1461-0248.2001.00218.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1461-0248.2001.00218.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><title>The exploitation of mutualisms</title><title>Ecology letters</title><description>Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing their ecological or evolutionary significance for mutualism. Exploitation is not a unitary phenomenon, but a set of loosely related phenomena: exploiters may follow mixed strategies or pure strategies at either the species or individual level, may or may not be derived from mutualists, and may or may not inflict significant costs on mutualisms. The evolutionary implications of these different forms of exploitation, especially the threats they pose to the stability of mutualism, have as yet been minimally explored. Studies of this issue are usually framed in terms of a “temptation to defect” that generates a destabilizing conflict of interest between partners. I argue that this idea is in fact rather inappropriate for interpreting most observed forms of exploitation in mutualisms. I suggest several alternative and testable ideas for how mutualism can persist in the face of exploitation.</description><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>cooperation</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>exploitation</subject><subject>interspecific interactions</subject><subject>mutualism</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_guTkLXE3m_0T8CKlrUJU0Irehu1mgqlJU7MJpt_exEjPnubBvN8M7xHiMRowGsnrTcAiyXwaRjoIKWUBpSHTQXdEJofF8UHz91Ny5tymN4axYhNyufpAD7tdUeWNafJq61WZV7ZNa4rcle6cnGSmcHjxN6fkdTFfze785Gl5P7tNfBvFQvs81TRWRmXS6rh_aGQUa6vEGoVep9yqCBkqTKnKmDTShlZmaC3GSAXPUsan5Gq8u6urrxZdA2XuLBaF2WLVOmCaMSH5YNSj0daVczVmsKvz0tR7YBSGQmADQ1YYcsNQCPwWAl2P3ozod17g_t8czJN5L3rcH_HcNdgdcFN_glRcCXh7XEK8eHkWUj2A4D-2DHSm</recordid><startdate>20010530</startdate><enddate>20010530</enddate><creator>Bronstein, Judith L.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010530</creationdate><title>The exploitation of mutualisms</title><author>Bronstein, Judith L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4958-3d8097a7f6c89248a6498c75be58bd3c74e1e7ed07f16a6c2c6fecce9e053fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>cooperation</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>exploitation</topic><topic>interspecific interactions</topic><topic>mutualism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bronstein, Judith L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The exploitation of mutualisms</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><date>2001-05-30</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>277-287</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Mutualisms (interspecific cooperative interactions) are ubiquitously exploited by organisms that obtain the benefits mutualists offer, while delivering no benefits in return. The natural history of these exploiters is well‐described, but relatively little effort has yet been devoted to analysing their ecological or evolutionary significance for mutualism. Exploitation is not a unitary phenomenon, but a set of loosely related phenomena: exploiters may follow mixed strategies or pure strategies at either the species or individual level, may or may not be derived from mutualists, and may or may not inflict significant costs on mutualisms. The evolutionary implications of these different forms of exploitation, especially the threats they pose to the stability of mutualism, have as yet been minimally explored. Studies of this issue are usually framed in terms of a “temptation to defect” that generates a destabilizing conflict of interest between partners. I argue that this idea is in fact rather inappropriate for interpreting most observed forms of exploitation in mutualisms. I suggest several alternative and testable ideas for how mutualism can persist in the face of exploitation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-023X
ispartof Ecology letters, 2001-05, Vol.4 (3), p.277-287
issn 1461-023X
1461-0248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18115631
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cheating
cooperation
evolution
exploitation
interspecific interactions
mutualism
title The exploitation of mutualisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20exploitation%20of%20mutualisms&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Bronstein,%20Judith%20L.&rft.date=2001-05-30&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=277-287&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18115631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18115631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true