Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE:Centers offering adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) mostly use right lobe grafts due to fears of providing recipients with insufficient hepatic volume, and the technical challenges presented by using left lobe grafts (LLGs). LLGs therefore represent approximately 5% of adult L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2016-09, Vol.264 (3), p.448-456
Hauptverfasser: Halazun, Karim J, Przybyszewski, Eric M, Griesemer, Adam D, Cherqui, Daniel, Michelassi, Fabrizio, Guarrera, James V, Kato, Tomoaki, Brown, Robert S, Emond, Jean C, Samstein, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue 3
container_start_page 448
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 264
creator Halazun, Karim J
Przybyszewski, Eric M
Griesemer, Adam D
Cherqui, Daniel
Michelassi, Fabrizio
Guarrera, James V
Kato, Tomoaki
Brown, Robert S
Emond, Jean C
Samstein, Benjamin
description OBJECTIVE:Centers offering adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) mostly use right lobe grafts due to fears of providing recipients with insufficient hepatic volume, and the technical challenges presented by using left lobe grafts (LLGs). LLGs therefore represent approximately 5% of adult LDLTs performed in the United States. Here we present the largest North American experience with the use of LLG for adult LDLT. METHODS:Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of LDLTs performed from 1998 to 2015 at our institution. RESULTS:A total of 214 adult LDLTs were studied. Fifty-six patients (26%) received LLG. LLG recipients were more likely to be women, had significantly lower BMI, graft weight, and graft-weight-recipient-weight ratios (P < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in vascular or biliary complication between the groups. No significant differences existed in patient or graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (P = 0.747 and P = 0.398 respectively). Despite significantly increased risk of small-for-size syndrome in LLG, there was no increased risk of retransplant within 90-days or perioperative mortality in LLG recipients (P = 0.308 and P = 0.932 respectively). Graft type did not predict patient or graft outcomes on regression analysis (P = 0.857 and 0.399 respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Despite smaller graft sizes, outcomes of adult LDLT using LLG are comparable to right lobe grafts transplants. Left lobes can provide an important resource in an era of severe organ shortages, and these data should serve to allay the concerns of the transplant community in the United States.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001860
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811298672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1811298672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2350-23fd5b1b4d03a73be45e00dcc5cafba2e41eb4408388fcfa58c601cee98277fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtCpQu5T-gwr5yIEUf2XjcFu1BSpFFKntOXKc527AsRfbofQH8r9wSFkhDvji5_HMvGcPQqeUnFFSV29vms0Z-WtRuSYHaEVLJgtKBXmGVhnlhag5O0IvYvySOUKS6hAdsUpwLuv1Cv1sQLnB3ePkcdoCbsCkd_jK6QAq_sYzeOGdD_iz9xZ3j_huj89k3PgO3uDrKWk_QsTeLFcq3ENM-CZzLRQaXIKAP_mQtngzQhi0cvjyxy5X4DTMsr0b3vSTTUXyhZoL3Azf547LFPmQjW6DcnFnlUsqDd69RM-NshFOnvZjdPf-8vb8Y9Fcf7g63zSFZrwkBeOmLzvaiZ5wVfEORAmE9FqXWplOMRAUOiGI5FIabVQp9ZpQDVBLVlVG82P0evHdBf9tyu9rxyFqsHkQ8FNsqaSU1XJdsUwVC1UHH2MA0-7CMKrw2FLSzgG2OcD23wCz7NVTh6kbod-L_iSWCXIhPHibvzR-tdMDhHYLyqbt_71_ARHKqh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811298672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Halazun, Karim J ; Przybyszewski, Eric M ; Griesemer, Adam D ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Michelassi, Fabrizio ; Guarrera, James V ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Brown, Robert S ; Emond, Jean C ; Samstein, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Halazun, Karim J ; Przybyszewski, Eric M ; Griesemer, Adam D ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Michelassi, Fabrizio ; Guarrera, James V ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Brown, Robert S ; Emond, Jean C ; Samstein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:Centers offering adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) mostly use right lobe grafts due to fears of providing recipients with insufficient hepatic volume, and the technical challenges presented by using left lobe grafts (LLGs). LLGs therefore represent approximately 5% of adult LDLTs performed in the United States. Here we present the largest North American experience with the use of LLG for adult LDLT. METHODS:Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of LDLTs performed from 1998 to 2015 at our institution. RESULTS:A total of 214 adult LDLTs were studied. Fifty-six patients (26%) received LLG. LLG recipients were more likely to be women, had significantly lower BMI, graft weight, and graft-weight-recipient-weight ratios (P &lt; 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in vascular or biliary complication between the groups. No significant differences existed in patient or graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (P = 0.747 and P = 0.398 respectively). Despite significantly increased risk of small-for-size syndrome in LLG, there was no increased risk of retransplant within 90-days or perioperative mortality in LLG recipients (P = 0.308 and P = 0.932 respectively). Graft type did not predict patient or graft outcomes on regression analysis (P = 0.857 and 0.399 respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Despite smaller graft sizes, outcomes of adult LDLT using LLG are comparable to right lobe grafts transplants. Left lobes can provide an important resource in an era of severe organ shortages, and these data should serve to allay the concerns of the transplant community in the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001860</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27433896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Donor Selection - methods ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation - methods ; Liver Transplantation - mortality ; Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organ Size ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2016-09, Vol.264 (3), p.448-456</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2350-23fd5b1b4d03a73be45e00dcc5cafba2e41eb4408388fcfa58c601cee98277fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halazun, Karim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherqui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelassi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarrera, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Jean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samstein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:Centers offering adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) mostly use right lobe grafts due to fears of providing recipients with insufficient hepatic volume, and the technical challenges presented by using left lobe grafts (LLGs). LLGs therefore represent approximately 5% of adult LDLTs performed in the United States. Here we present the largest North American experience with the use of LLG for adult LDLT. METHODS:Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of LDLTs performed from 1998 to 2015 at our institution. RESULTS:A total of 214 adult LDLTs were studied. Fifty-six patients (26%) received LLG. LLG recipients were more likely to be women, had significantly lower BMI, graft weight, and graft-weight-recipient-weight ratios (P &lt; 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in vascular or biliary complication between the groups. No significant differences existed in patient or graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (P = 0.747 and P = 0.398 respectively). Despite significantly increased risk of small-for-size syndrome in LLG, there was no increased risk of retransplant within 90-days or perioperative mortality in LLG recipients (P = 0.308 and P = 0.932 respectively). Graft type did not predict patient or graft outcomes on regression analysis (P = 0.857 and 0.399 respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Despite smaller graft sizes, outcomes of adult LDLT using LLG are comparable to right lobe grafts transplants. Left lobes can provide an important resource in an era of severe organ shortages, and these data should serve to allay the concerns of the transplant community in the United States.</description><subject>Donor Selection - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtCpQu5T-gwr5yIEUf2XjcFu1BSpFFKntOXKc527AsRfbofQH8r9wSFkhDvji5_HMvGcPQqeUnFFSV29vms0Z-WtRuSYHaEVLJgtKBXmGVhnlhag5O0IvYvySOUKS6hAdsUpwLuv1Cv1sQLnB3ePkcdoCbsCkd_jK6QAq_sYzeOGdD_iz9xZ3j_huj89k3PgO3uDrKWk_QsTeLFcq3ENM-CZzLRQaXIKAP_mQtngzQhi0cvjyxy5X4DTMsr0b3vSTTUXyhZoL3Azf547LFPmQjW6DcnFnlUsqDd69RM-NshFOnvZjdPf-8vb8Y9Fcf7g63zSFZrwkBeOmLzvaiZ5wVfEORAmE9FqXWplOMRAUOiGI5FIabVQp9ZpQDVBLVlVG82P0evHdBf9tyu9rxyFqsHkQ8FNsqaSU1XJdsUwVC1UHH2MA0-7CMKrw2FLSzgG2OcD23wCz7NVTh6kbod-L_iSWCXIhPHibvzR-tdMDhHYLyqbt_71_ARHKqh4</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Halazun, Karim J</creator><creator>Przybyszewski, Eric M</creator><creator>Griesemer, Adam D</creator><creator>Cherqui, Daniel</creator><creator>Michelassi, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Guarrera, James V</creator><creator>Kato, Tomoaki</creator><creator>Brown, Robert S</creator><creator>Emond, Jean C</creator><creator>Samstein, Benjamin</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation</title><author>Halazun, Karim J ; Przybyszewski, Eric M ; Griesemer, Adam D ; Cherqui, Daniel ; Michelassi, Fabrizio ; Guarrera, James V ; Kato, Tomoaki ; Brown, Robert S ; Emond, Jean C ; Samstein, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2350-23fd5b1b4d03a73be45e00dcc5cafba2e41eb4408388fcfa58c601cee98277fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Donor Selection - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halazun, Karim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przybyszewski, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesemer, Adam D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherqui, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelassi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarrera, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Jean C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samstein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halazun, Karim J</au><au>Przybyszewski, Eric M</au><au>Griesemer, Adam D</au><au>Cherqui, Daniel</au><au>Michelassi, Fabrizio</au><au>Guarrera, James V</au><au>Kato, Tomoaki</au><au>Brown, Robert S</au><au>Emond, Jean C</au><au>Samstein, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>264</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>448-456</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:Centers offering adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) mostly use right lobe grafts due to fears of providing recipients with insufficient hepatic volume, and the technical challenges presented by using left lobe grafts (LLGs). LLGs therefore represent approximately 5% of adult LDLTs performed in the United States. Here we present the largest North American experience with the use of LLG for adult LDLT. METHODS:Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of LDLTs performed from 1998 to 2015 at our institution. RESULTS:A total of 214 adult LDLTs were studied. Fifty-six patients (26%) received LLG. LLG recipients were more likely to be women, had significantly lower BMI, graft weight, and graft-weight-recipient-weight ratios (P &lt; 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in vascular or biliary complication between the groups. No significant differences existed in patient or graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (P = 0.747 and P = 0.398 respectively). Despite significantly increased risk of small-for-size syndrome in LLG, there was no increased risk of retransplant within 90-days or perioperative mortality in LLG recipients (P = 0.308 and P = 0.932 respectively). Graft type did not predict patient or graft outcomes on regression analysis (P = 0.857 and 0.399 respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Despite smaller graft sizes, outcomes of adult LDLT using LLG are comparable to right lobe grafts transplants. Left lobes can provide an important resource in an era of severe organ shortages, and these data should serve to allay the concerns of the transplant community in the United States.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>27433896</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000001860</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2016-09, Vol.264 (3), p.448-456
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1811298672
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Donor Selection - methods
Female
Graft Survival
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Transplantation - methods
Liver Transplantation - mortality
Living Donors - supply & distribution
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Size
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Tissue Donors - supply & distribution
Treatment Outcome
title Leaning to the Left: Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leaning%20to%20the%20Left:%20Increasing%20the%20Donor%20Pool%20by%20Using%20the%20Left%20Lobe,%20Outcomes%20of%20the%20Largest%20Single-center%20North%20American%20Experience%20of%20Left%20Lobe%20Adult-to-adult%20Living%20Donor%20Liver%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Halazun,%20Karim%20J&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=264&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=448-456&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001860&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1811298672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811298672&rft_id=info:pmid/27433896&rfr_iscdi=true