Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults
The purpose of this study was to investigate a range of selected physical measures for their relative contributions and extent to which they may explain the performance of the Timed “Up and Go” test (TUG) in a sample of healthy older adults. The participants where 194 adults aged 65 and older with n...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Geriatric nursing (New York) 2016-03, Vol.37 (2), p.122-127 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 127 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 122 |
| container_title | Geriatric nursing (New York) |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Benavent-Caballer, Vicent Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro Lisón, Juan Francisco Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro Amer-Cuenca, Juan José Salvador-Coloma, Pablo Segura-Ortí, Eva |
| description | The purpose of this study was to investigate a range of selected physical measures for their relative contributions and extent to which they may explain the performance of the Timed “Up and Go” test (TUG) in a sample of healthy older adults. The participants where 194 adults aged 65 and older with no cognitive impairment and independent in their daily activities from local senior centres and a geriatric nursing home in Valencia, Spain. Age, body mass index (BMI), TUG, Berg balance scale (BBS), One-leg stand test (OLS), grip strength, chair stand test (STS-5), knee extension strength and rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) where measured. Moderate to high significant associations were found between the TUG performance and BBS and knee extension strength (r = −.561 and −.397). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the BBS was a significant and independent predictor (AdjR2 = .373) for the TUG performance. The TUG is highly correlated with the BBS score and knee extension strength, measures that represent common performance tasks in everyday life. The BBS was demonstrated to be the most significant factor explaining the TUG performance. The TUG is demonstrated to be a useful tool for predicting changes in functional balance measured with the BBS. The mobility decline may be better explained as the sum of deficits across multiple domains rather than as a single entity. Clinicians would benefit of those findings by a better understanding of the physical measures, in addition to designing more accurate interventions focusing on the enhancement of mobility.
•The TUG is highly correlated with functional balance tasks common in everyday life and knee extension strength.•The BBS score explains a large proportion of variance in the TUG performance.•The TUG is an appropriate measure for predicting changes in functional balance.•Clinicians would benefit of those findings by designing more accurate interventions for the enhancement of mobility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.11.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810361518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0197457215004164</els_id><sourcerecordid>4152884321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-76c3b8f598dd22a578463d93e18183300dc34831586a1267186a23ec1016cdaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQhy1UVLbQV6CWeuklwWPHsXNEqKVUSHBYzpaxJ-BVNtnaCdLeeJDycjwJXnbLgQunuXzzzZ8fId-AlcCgPlmUdxhDP8WEJWcgS4CSMb5HZiC5LkSjq09kxqBRRSUVPyBfUlowxhqhxWdywGvFlKyqGflzfb9OwdmOttaNQ0x06j3Gbh36OzreI52HJXr6_PjvZkVt7-n58Pz4REdMIw09HboMU-unbkxHZL-1XcKvu3pIbn79nJ_9Li6vzi_OTi8LVzV6LFTtxK1uZaO959xKpata-EYgaNBCMOadqLQAqWsLeVHIlQt0m7udt604JD-23lUc_k55EbMMyWHX2R6HKZnsYaIGmW0fokqpRjOpIKPf36GLYYp9PmQj5LVQ_FWotpSLQ0oRW7OKYWnj2gAzmw3NwrwlYzbJGACTk8mdxzv_dJs_-tb3P4oMnG4BzL97CBhNcgF7hz5EdKPxQ_hwyAsSRaJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812637218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent ; Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro ; Lisón, Juan Francisco ; Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro ; Amer-Cuenca, Juan José ; Salvador-Coloma, Pablo ; Segura-Ortí, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent ; Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro ; Lisón, Juan Francisco ; Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro ; Amer-Cuenca, Juan José ; Salvador-Coloma, Pablo ; Segura-Ortí, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate a range of selected physical measures for their relative contributions and extent to which they may explain the performance of the Timed “Up and Go” test (TUG) in a sample of healthy older adults. The participants where 194 adults aged 65 and older with no cognitive impairment and independent in their daily activities from local senior centres and a geriatric nursing home in Valencia, Spain. Age, body mass index (BMI), TUG, Berg balance scale (BBS), One-leg stand test (OLS), grip strength, chair stand test (STS-5), knee extension strength and rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) where measured. Moderate to high significant associations were found between the TUG performance and BBS and knee extension strength (r = −.561 and −.397). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the BBS was a significant and independent predictor (AdjR2 = .373) for the TUG performance. The TUG is highly correlated with the BBS score and knee extension strength, measures that represent common performance tasks in everyday life. The BBS was demonstrated to be the most significant factor explaining the TUG performance. The TUG is demonstrated to be a useful tool for predicting changes in functional balance measured with the BBS. The mobility decline may be better explained as the sum of deficits across multiple domains rather than as a single entity. Clinicians would benefit of those findings by a better understanding of the physical measures, in addition to designing more accurate interventions focusing on the enhancement of mobility.
•The TUG is highly correlated with functional balance tasks common in everyday life and knee extension strength.•The BBS score explains a large proportion of variance in the TUG performance.•The TUG is an appropriate measure for predicting changes in functional balance.•Clinicians would benefit of those findings by designing more accurate interventions for the enhancement of mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-4572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-3984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26707544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Body Mass Index ; Cognitive impairment ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Everyday life ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Geriatric medicine ; Grip strength ; Home care ; Humans ; Male ; Mobility ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Nursing ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Physical performance ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Task performance ; Timed “Up-and-Go” test</subject><ispartof>Geriatric nursing (New York), 2016-03, Vol.37 (2), p.122-127</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar/Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-76c3b8f598dd22a578463d93e18183300dc34831586a1267186a23ec1016cdaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-76c3b8f598dd22a578463d93e18183300dc34831586a1267186a23ec1016cdaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457215004164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26707544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisón, Juan Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amer-Cuenca, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Coloma, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura-Ortí, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults</title><title>Geriatric nursing (New York)</title><addtitle>Geriatr Nurs</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate a range of selected physical measures for their relative contributions and extent to which they may explain the performance of the Timed “Up and Go” test (TUG) in a sample of healthy older adults. The participants where 194 adults aged 65 and older with no cognitive impairment and independent in their daily activities from local senior centres and a geriatric nursing home in Valencia, Spain. Age, body mass index (BMI), TUG, Berg balance scale (BBS), One-leg stand test (OLS), grip strength, chair stand test (STS-5), knee extension strength and rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) where measured. Moderate to high significant associations were found between the TUG performance and BBS and knee extension strength (r = −.561 and −.397). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the BBS was a significant and independent predictor (AdjR2 = .373) for the TUG performance. The TUG is highly correlated with the BBS score and knee extension strength, measures that represent common performance tasks in everyday life. The BBS was demonstrated to be the most significant factor explaining the TUG performance. The TUG is demonstrated to be a useful tool for predicting changes in functional balance measured with the BBS. The mobility decline may be better explained as the sum of deficits across multiple domains rather than as a single entity. Clinicians would benefit of those findings by a better understanding of the physical measures, in addition to designing more accurate interventions focusing on the enhancement of mobility.
•The TUG is highly correlated with functional balance tasks common in everyday life and knee extension strength.•The BBS score explains a large proportion of variance in the TUG performance.•The TUG is an appropriate measure for predicting changes in functional balance.•Clinicians would benefit of those findings by designing more accurate interventions for the enhancement of mobility.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Geriatric medicine</subject><subject>Grip strength</subject><subject>Home care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical performance</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Task performance</subject><subject>Timed “Up-and-Go” test</subject><issn>0197-4572</issn><issn>1528-3984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQhy1UVLbQV6CWeuklwWPHsXNEqKVUSHBYzpaxJ-BVNtnaCdLeeJDycjwJXnbLgQunuXzzzZ8fId-AlcCgPlmUdxhDP8WEJWcgS4CSMb5HZiC5LkSjq09kxqBRRSUVPyBfUlowxhqhxWdywGvFlKyqGflzfb9OwdmOttaNQ0x06j3Gbh36OzreI52HJXr6_PjvZkVt7-n58Pz4REdMIw09HboMU-unbkxHZL-1XcKvu3pIbn79nJ_9Li6vzi_OTi8LVzV6LFTtxK1uZaO959xKpata-EYgaNBCMOadqLQAqWsLeVHIlQt0m7udt604JD-23lUc_k55EbMMyWHX2R6HKZnsYaIGmW0fokqpRjOpIKPf36GLYYp9PmQj5LVQ_FWotpSLQ0oRW7OKYWnj2gAzmw3NwrwlYzbJGACTk8mdxzv_dJs_-tb3P4oMnG4BzL97CBhNcgF7hz5EdKPxQ_hwyAsSRaJ0</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent</creator><creator>Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro</creator><creator>Lisón, Juan Francisco</creator><creator>Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro</creator><creator>Amer-Cuenca, Juan José</creator><creator>Salvador-Coloma, Pablo</creator><creator>Segura-Ortí, Eva</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults</title><author>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent ; Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro ; Lisón, Juan Francisco ; Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro ; Amer-Cuenca, Juan José ; Salvador-Coloma, Pablo ; Segura-Ortí, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-76c3b8f598dd22a578463d93e18183300dc34831586a1267186a23ec1016cdaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Geriatric medicine</topic><topic>Grip strength</topic><topic>Home care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical performance</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Task performance</topic><topic>Timed “Up-and-Go” test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisón, Juan Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amer-Cuenca, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Coloma, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura-Ortí, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Geriatric nursing (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benavent-Caballer, Vicent</au><au>Sendín-Magdalena, Alejandro</au><au>Lisón, Juan Francisco</au><au>Rosado-Calatayud, Pedro</au><au>Amer-Cuenca, Juan José</au><au>Salvador-Coloma, Pablo</au><au>Segura-Ortí, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults</atitle><jtitle>Geriatric nursing (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Geriatr Nurs</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>122-127</pages><issn>0197-4572</issn><eissn>1528-3984</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate a range of selected physical measures for their relative contributions and extent to which they may explain the performance of the Timed “Up and Go” test (TUG) in a sample of healthy older adults. The participants where 194 adults aged 65 and older with no cognitive impairment and independent in their daily activities from local senior centres and a geriatric nursing home in Valencia, Spain. Age, body mass index (BMI), TUG, Berg balance scale (BBS), One-leg stand test (OLS), grip strength, chair stand test (STS-5), knee extension strength and rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) where measured. Moderate to high significant associations were found between the TUG performance and BBS and knee extension strength (r = −.561 and −.397). A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the BBS was a significant and independent predictor (AdjR2 = .373) for the TUG performance. The TUG is highly correlated with the BBS score and knee extension strength, measures that represent common performance tasks in everyday life. The BBS was demonstrated to be the most significant factor explaining the TUG performance. The TUG is demonstrated to be a useful tool for predicting changes in functional balance measured with the BBS. The mobility decline may be better explained as the sum of deficits across multiple domains rather than as a single entity. Clinicians would benefit of those findings by a better understanding of the physical measures, in addition to designing more accurate interventions focusing on the enhancement of mobility.
•The TUG is highly correlated with functional balance tasks common in everyday life and knee extension strength.•The BBS score explains a large proportion of variance in the TUG performance.•The TUG is an appropriate measure for predicting changes in functional balance.•Clinicians would benefit of those findings by designing more accurate interventions for the enhancement of mobility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26707544</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.11.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0197-4572 |
| ispartof | Geriatric nursing (New York), 2016-03, Vol.37 (2), p.122-127 |
| issn | 0197-4572 1528-3984 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810361518 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Activities of daily living Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Body Mass Index Cognitive impairment Cross-Sectional Studies Everyday life Female Geriatric Assessment Geriatric medicine Grip strength Home care Humans Male Mobility Motor Activity - physiology Muscle Strength - physiology Nursing Nursing homes Older people Physical performance Postural Balance - physiology Regression analysis Reproducibility of Results Task performance Timed “Up-and-Go” test |
| title | Physical factors underlying the Timed “Up and Go” test in older adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A40%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20factors%20underlying%20the%20Timed%20%E2%80%9CUp%20and%20Go%E2%80%9D%20test%20in%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Geriatric%20nursing%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Benavent-Caballer,%20Vicent&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=122-127&rft.issn=0197-4572&rft.eissn=1528-3984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4152884321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812637218&rft_id=info:pmid/26707544&rft_els_id=S0197457215004164&rfr_iscdi=true |