Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score

Nurses’ ‘worry’ is used as a calling criterion in many Rapid Response Systems, however it is valued inconsistently. Furthermore, barriers to call the Rapid Response Team can cause delay in escalating care. The literature identifies nine indicators which trigger nurses to worry about a patient's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing studies 2016-07, Vol.59, p.134-140
Hauptverfasser: Douw, Gooske, Huisman-de Waal, Getty, van Zanten, Arthur R.H., van der Hoeven, Johannes G., Schoonhoven, Lisette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue
container_start_page 134
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 59
creator Douw, Gooske
Huisman-de Waal, Getty
van Zanten, Arthur R.H.
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
Schoonhoven, Lisette
description Nurses’ ‘worry’ is used as a calling criterion in many Rapid Response Systems, however it is valued inconsistently. Furthermore, barriers to call the Rapid Response Team can cause delay in escalating care. The literature identifies nine indicators which trigger nurses to worry about a patient's condition. The objective of this study is to determine the significance of nurses’ ‘worry’ and/or indicators underlying ‘worry’ to predict unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality among surgical ward patients. A prospective cohort study. A 500-bed tertiary University affiliated teaching hospital. Adult, native speaking surgical patients, admitted to three surgical wards (traumatology, vascular- and abdominal/oncological surgery). We excluded patients with a non-ICU policy or with no curative treatment. Mentally incapacitated patients were also excluded. We developed a new clinical assessment tool, the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score (DENWIS) based on signs underlying ‘worry’. Nurses systematically scored their ‘worry’ and the DENWIS once per shift or at any moment of ‘worry’. DENWIS measurements were linked to routinely measured vital signs. The composite endpoint was unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality. The DENWIS-indicators were included in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequently inserting ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score into the model. We calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. In 3522 patients there were 102 (2.9%) patients with unplanned Intensive Care Unit/High Dependency Unit-admissions or unexpected mortality. ‘Worry’ (0.81) and the DENWIS-model (0.85) had a lower area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve than the Early Warning Score (0.86). Adding ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score to the DENWIS-model resulted in higher areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (0.87 and 0.91, respectively) compared with the Early Warning Score only based on vital signs. In this single-center study we showed that adding the Early Warning Score based on vital signs to the DENWIS-indicators improves prediction of unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810360885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748916300244</els_id><sourcerecordid>1810360885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6f63794ad34bb4933eeac8376fb6a9808c439c36fceda0c317e51031020ed9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhFSpLXLg42LETJ5yo2gKVKjgAgpvldSZdr7LxYjut9taXQILX65MwYVsOXHryH_1mvpnvI-RI8EJwUb9eF349TjHlqSjxXXBVcF4_IgvRaMlUK74_JgvOS860atoD8iylNedcNLx5Sg5KXZalqpoF-fkRm0C6vflNb29-XYcYd_PdJrqN0HmXQ6Shpx1kiD5Em_14SdMUL72zA722saNb_IQxpzf0GItC2oLL_gqoC6sQM8URu93cI6-Ank7ZrdiZjcOO_VVm32ZJdj6ilkUx9tmFCM_Jk94OCV7cnYfk67uzLycf2MWn9-cnxxfMKa0zs3VfS90q20m1XKpWSgDrGqnrflnbFnd1SrZO1r2DznInhYZKcCnQF-haKw_Jq31fnPvHBCmbjU8OhsGOEKZkRIN0zZumehjVrdBSyrpB9OV_6DpMccRFZkpVpeJVi1S9pxx6liL0Zhv9xsadEdzMGZu1uc_YzBkbrgxmjIVHd-2n5Qa6f2X3oSLwdg8AWnflIZrkMCH0wEfMxnTBP6TxB8Q0wO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1794524059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Douw, Gooske ; Huisman-de Waal, Getty ; van Zanten, Arthur R.H. ; van der Hoeven, Johannes G. ; Schoonhoven, Lisette</creator><creatorcontrib>Douw, Gooske ; Huisman-de Waal, Getty ; van Zanten, Arthur R.H. ; van der Hoeven, Johannes G. ; Schoonhoven, Lisette</creatorcontrib><description>Nurses’ ‘worry’ is used as a calling criterion in many Rapid Response Systems, however it is valued inconsistently. Furthermore, barriers to call the Rapid Response Team can cause delay in escalating care. The literature identifies nine indicators which trigger nurses to worry about a patient's condition. The objective of this study is to determine the significance of nurses’ ‘worry’ and/or indicators underlying ‘worry’ to predict unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality among surgical ward patients. A prospective cohort study. A 500-bed tertiary University affiliated teaching hospital. Adult, native speaking surgical patients, admitted to three surgical wards (traumatology, vascular- and abdominal/oncological surgery). We excluded patients with a non-ICU policy or with no curative treatment. Mentally incapacitated patients were also excluded. We developed a new clinical assessment tool, the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score (DENWIS) based on signs underlying ‘worry’. Nurses systematically scored their ‘worry’ and the DENWIS once per shift or at any moment of ‘worry’. DENWIS measurements were linked to routinely measured vital signs. The composite endpoint was unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality. The DENWIS-indicators were included in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequently inserting ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score into the model. We calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. In 3522 patients there were 102 (2.9%) patients with unplanned Intensive Care Unit/High Dependency Unit-admissions or unexpected mortality. ‘Worry’ (0.81) and the DENWIS-model (0.85) had a lower area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve than the Early Warning Score (0.86). Adding ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score to the DENWIS-model resulted in higher areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (0.87 and 0.91, respectively) compared with the Early Warning Score only based on vital signs. In this single-center study we showed that adding the Early Warning Score based on vital signs to the DENWIS-indicators improves prediction of unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27222458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Characteristics ; Clinical assessment ; Cohort analysis ; DENWIS ; Dependency ; Deterioration ; Early recognition ; Female ; Hospital Rapid Response Team ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Unit ; Intensive care units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Netherlands ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Surgical wards ; Teaching ; Teaching hospitals ; Teams ; Unplanned ; Worry</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2016-07, Vol.59, p.134-140</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6f63794ad34bb4933eeac8376fb6a9808c439c36fceda0c317e51031020ed9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6f63794ad34bb4933eeac8376fb6a9808c439c36fceda0c317e51031020ed9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748916300244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27222458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douw, Gooske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman-de Waal, Getty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zanten, Arthur R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hoeven, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonhoven, Lisette</creatorcontrib><title>Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>Nurses’ ‘worry’ is used as a calling criterion in many Rapid Response Systems, however it is valued inconsistently. Furthermore, barriers to call the Rapid Response Team can cause delay in escalating care. The literature identifies nine indicators which trigger nurses to worry about a patient's condition. The objective of this study is to determine the significance of nurses’ ‘worry’ and/or indicators underlying ‘worry’ to predict unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality among surgical ward patients. A prospective cohort study. A 500-bed tertiary University affiliated teaching hospital. Adult, native speaking surgical patients, admitted to three surgical wards (traumatology, vascular- and abdominal/oncological surgery). We excluded patients with a non-ICU policy or with no curative treatment. Mentally incapacitated patients were also excluded. We developed a new clinical assessment tool, the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score (DENWIS) based on signs underlying ‘worry’. Nurses systematically scored their ‘worry’ and the DENWIS once per shift or at any moment of ‘worry’. DENWIS measurements were linked to routinely measured vital signs. The composite endpoint was unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality. The DENWIS-indicators were included in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequently inserting ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score into the model. We calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. In 3522 patients there were 102 (2.9%) patients with unplanned Intensive Care Unit/High Dependency Unit-admissions or unexpected mortality. ‘Worry’ (0.81) and the DENWIS-model (0.85) had a lower area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve than the Early Warning Score (0.86). Adding ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score to the DENWIS-model resulted in higher areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (0.87 and 0.91, respectively) compared with the Early Warning Score only based on vital signs. In this single-center study we showed that adding the Early Warning Score based on vital signs to the DENWIS-indicators improves prediction of unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Characteristics</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>DENWIS</subject><subject>Dependency</subject><subject>Deterioration</subject><subject>Early recognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Rapid Response Team</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Unit</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>Surgical wards</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Unplanned</subject><subject>Worry</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhFSpLXLg42LETJ5yo2gKVKjgAgpvldSZdr7LxYjut9taXQILX65MwYVsOXHryH_1mvpnvI-RI8EJwUb9eF349TjHlqSjxXXBVcF4_IgvRaMlUK74_JgvOS860atoD8iylNedcNLx5Sg5KXZalqpoF-fkRm0C6vflNb29-XYcYd_PdJrqN0HmXQ6Shpx1kiD5Em_14SdMUL72zA722saNb_IQxpzf0GItC2oLL_gqoC6sQM8URu93cI6-Ank7ZrdiZjcOO_VVm32ZJdj6ilkUx9tmFCM_Jk94OCV7cnYfk67uzLycf2MWn9-cnxxfMKa0zs3VfS90q20m1XKpWSgDrGqnrflnbFnd1SrZO1r2DznInhYZKcCnQF-haKw_Jq31fnPvHBCmbjU8OhsGOEKZkRIN0zZumehjVrdBSyrpB9OV_6DpMccRFZkpVpeJVi1S9pxx6liL0Zhv9xsadEdzMGZu1uc_YzBkbrgxmjIVHd-2n5Qa6f2X3oSLwdg8AWnflIZrkMCH0wEfMxnTBP6TxB8Q0wO0</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Douw, Gooske</creator><creator>Huisman-de Waal, Getty</creator><creator>van Zanten, Arthur R.H.</creator><creator>van der Hoeven, Johannes G.</creator><creator>Schoonhoven, Lisette</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score</title><author>Douw, Gooske ; Huisman-de Waal, Getty ; van Zanten, Arthur R.H. ; van der Hoeven, Johannes G. ; Schoonhoven, Lisette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-a6f63794ad34bb4933eeac8376fb6a9808c439c36fceda0c317e51031020ed9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Characteristics</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>DENWIS</topic><topic>Dependency</topic><topic>Deterioration</topic><topic>Early recognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Rapid Response Team</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Unit</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>Surgical wards</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Unplanned</topic><topic>Worry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douw, Gooske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisman-de Waal, Getty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zanten, Arthur R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hoeven, Johannes G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonhoven, Lisette</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douw, Gooske</au><au>Huisman-de Waal, Getty</au><au>van Zanten, Arthur R.H.</au><au>van der Hoeven, Johannes G.</au><au>Schoonhoven, Lisette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>134</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>134-140</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>Nurses’ ‘worry’ is used as a calling criterion in many Rapid Response Systems, however it is valued inconsistently. Furthermore, barriers to call the Rapid Response Team can cause delay in escalating care. The literature identifies nine indicators which trigger nurses to worry about a patient's condition. The objective of this study is to determine the significance of nurses’ ‘worry’ and/or indicators underlying ‘worry’ to predict unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality among surgical ward patients. A prospective cohort study. A 500-bed tertiary University affiliated teaching hospital. Adult, native speaking surgical patients, admitted to three surgical wards (traumatology, vascular- and abdominal/oncological surgery). We excluded patients with a non-ICU policy or with no curative treatment. Mentally incapacitated patients were also excluded. We developed a new clinical assessment tool, the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score (DENWIS) based on signs underlying ‘worry’. Nurses systematically scored their ‘worry’ and the DENWIS once per shift or at any moment of ‘worry’. DENWIS measurements were linked to routinely measured vital signs. The composite endpoint was unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality. The DENWIS-indicators were included in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequently inserting ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score into the model. We calculated the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. In 3522 patients there were 102 (2.9%) patients with unplanned Intensive Care Unit/High Dependency Unit-admissions or unexpected mortality. ‘Worry’ (0.81) and the DENWIS-model (0.85) had a lower area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve than the Early Warning Score (0.86). Adding ‘worry’ and the Early Warning Score to the DENWIS-model resulted in higher areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (0.87 and 0.91, respectively) compared with the Early Warning Score only based on vital signs. In this single-center study we showed that adding the Early Warning Score based on vital signs to the DENWIS-indicators improves prediction of unplanned Intensive-Care/High-Dependency-Unit admission or unexpected mortality.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27222458</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2016-07, Vol.59, p.134-140
issn 0020-7489
1873-491X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810360885
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Characteristics
Clinical assessment
Cohort analysis
DENWIS
Dependency
Deterioration
Early recognition
Female
Hospital Rapid Response Team
Hospitalization
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive Care Unit
Intensive care units
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Netherlands
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Staff, Hospital
Prospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Surgical wards
Teaching
Teaching hospitals
Teams
Unplanned
Worry
title Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A44%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nurses%E2%80%99%20%E2%80%98worry%E2%80%99%20as%20predictor%20of%20deteriorating%20surgical%20ward%20patients:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study%20of%20the%20Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Douw,%20Gooske&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=134-140&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1810360885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1794524059&rft_id=info:pmid/27222458&rft_els_id=S0020748916300244&rfr_iscdi=true