Does the relative density of periarticular bone influence the failure pattern of intra-articular fractures?
Abstract Introduction The architecture of joints almost certainly influences the nature of intra-articular fractures, and the concavity is much more likely to fail than the associated convexity. However, local differences in periarticular bone density potentially also plays a critical role. The purp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2016-08, Vol.47 (8), p.1770-1776 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Introduction The architecture of joints almost certainly influences the nature of intra-articular fractures, and the concavity is much more likely to fail than the associated convexity. However, local differences in periarticular bone density potentially also plays a critical role. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there was any difference in periarticular bone density in intra-articular fractures between the two opposing joint surfaces, comparing the convexity to the concavity. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified a series of 1003 intra-articular fractures of the hip, knee, and ankle; 129 of these patients had previously undergone CT scanning during their routine clinical assessment. Periarticular bone density was assessed using Hounsfield Units (HU) as a measure of the composite density of the adjacent bone. Bone density was compared between the opposite sides of each joint, to determine if a relationship exists between local bone density and the risk of articular surface fracture. Results There was a statistically significant difference in density between the two opposing surfaces, with the convexity 19% more dense than the concavity (p = 0.0001). The knee exhibited the largest difference (55%), followed by the hip (18%); in the ankle, an inverse relationship was observed, and the concave surface was paradoxically denser (5%). There was no significant difference between those cases where the concavity failed in isolation compared to those where the convexity also failed (p = 0.28). Conclusion When the results were pooled for all three joints, there was a statistically significant higher local bone density demonstrated on the convex side of an intra-articular fracture. However, while this relationship was clearly exhibited in the knee, this was less evident in the other two joints; in the ankle the reverse was true, and the local bone adjacent to the concavity was found to have greater density. This suggests local bone density plays only a minor role in determining the nature of intra-articular fractures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.014 |