Does the relative density of periarticular bone influence the failure pattern of intra-articular fractures?

Abstract Introduction The architecture of joints almost certainly influences the nature of intra-articular fractures, and the concavity is much more likely to fail than the associated convexity. However, local differences in periarticular bone density potentially also plays a critical role. The purp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2016-08, Vol.47 (8), p.1770-1776
Hauptverfasser: Tetsworth, K.D, Borshch, A.Y, Dlaska, C.E, Hohmann, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The architecture of joints almost certainly influences the nature of intra-articular fractures, and the concavity is much more likely to fail than the associated convexity. However, local differences in periarticular bone density potentially also plays a critical role. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there was any difference in periarticular bone density in intra-articular fractures between the two opposing joint surfaces, comparing the convexity to the concavity. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified a series of 1003 intra-articular fractures of the hip, knee, and ankle; 129 of these patients had previously undergone CT scanning during their routine clinical assessment. Periarticular bone density was assessed using Hounsfield Units (HU) as a measure of the composite density of the adjacent bone. Bone density was compared between the opposite sides of each joint, to determine if a relationship exists between local bone density and the risk of articular surface fracture. Results There was a statistically significant difference in density between the two opposing surfaces, with the convexity 19% more dense than the concavity (p = 0.0001). The knee exhibited the largest difference (55%), followed by the hip (18%); in the ankle, an inverse relationship was observed, and the concave surface was paradoxically denser (5%). There was no significant difference between those cases where the concavity failed in isolation compared to those where the convexity also failed (p = 0.28). Conclusion When the results were pooled for all three joints, there was a statistically significant higher local bone density demonstrated on the convex side of an intra-articular fracture. However, while this relationship was clearly exhibited in the knee, this was less evident in the other two joints; in the ankle the reverse was true, and the local bone adjacent to the concavity was found to have greater density. This suggests local bone density plays only a minor role in determining the nature of intra-articular fractures.
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.014