Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls

We examined genetic variation, populationstructure, and definition of conservation unitsin Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis). Spotted Owls are mostly non-migratory,long-lived, socially monogamous birds that havedecreased population viability due to theiroccupation of highly-fragmented latesuccession...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation genetics 2001, Vol.2 (1), p.25-40
Hauptverfasser: Haig, Susan M, Wagner, R Steven, sman, Eric D, Mullins, Thomas D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Conservation genetics
container_volume 2
creator Haig, Susan M
Wagner, R Steven
sman, Eric D
Mullins, Thomas D
description We examined genetic variation, populationstructure, and definition of conservation unitsin Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis). Spotted Owls are mostly non-migratory,long-lived, socially monogamous birds that havedecreased population viability due to theiroccupation of highly-fragmented latesuccessional forests in western North America. To investigate potential effects of habitatfragmentation on population structure, we usedrandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) toexamine genetic variation hierarchicallyamong local breeding areas, subregionalgroups, regional groups, and subspeciesvia sampling of 21 breeding areas (276individuals) among the three subspecies ofSpotted Owls. Data from 11 variable bandssuggest a significant relationship betweengeographic distance among local breeding groupsand genetic distance (Mantel r = 0.53, P< 0.02) although multi-dimensional scaling ofthree significant axes did not identifysignificant grouping at any hierarchical level. Similarly, neighbor-joining clustering ofManhattan distances indicated geographicstructure at all levels and identified MexicanSpotted Owls as a distinct clade. RAPDanalyses did not clearly differentiate NorthernSpotted Owls from California Spotted Owls. Among Northern Spotted Owls, estimates ofpopulation differentiation (F^sub ST^) rangedfrom 0.27 among breeding areas to 0.11 amongregions. Concordantly, within-group agreementvalues estimated via multi-response permutationprocedures of Jaccard's distances ranged from0.22 among local sites to 0.11 among regions. Pairwise comparisons of F^sub ST^ andgeographic distance within regions suggestedonly the Klamath region was in equilibrium withrespect to gene flow and genetic drift. Merging nuclear data with recent mitochondrialdata provides support for designation of anEvolutionary Significant Unit for MexicanSpotted Owls and two overlapping ManagementUnits for Northern and California Spotted Owls.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1011561101460
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18101939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2145994911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8380e0993b3f8784a761ccafcb451774792879246f1a9796fcb52a4b5323fa433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj71PwzAQxS0EEqUws0YMbAGfv87uVlW0IFXqAMyR4zolVUiC7cC_jxFMDKff07un0ztCroHeAWX8frkACiAVZAhFT8gMJLLSIMfTH61USRWDc3IR45FSUAxhRhYbPxyCHd9aV3za0NrUDn1h-31x8L1P2Y0pTC5NwRdtXzyPQ0p-X-y-unhJzhrbRX_1xzl5XT-8rB7L7W7ztFpuS8ckplJzTT01hte80aiFRQXO2cbVQgKiQMN0HqEasAaNygvJrKglZ7yxgvM5uf29O4bhY_IxVe9tdL7rbO-HKVag88eGmxy8-Rc8DlPoc7cKJTcSlUD-DdKBVR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>753957647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Haig, Susan M ; Wagner, R Steven ; sman, Eric D ; Mullins, Thomas D</creator><creatorcontrib>Haig, Susan M ; Wagner, R Steven ; sman, Eric D ; Mullins, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><description>We examined genetic variation, populationstructure, and definition of conservation unitsin Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis). Spotted Owls are mostly non-migratory,long-lived, socially monogamous birds that havedecreased population viability due to theiroccupation of highly-fragmented latesuccessional forests in western North America. To investigate potential effects of habitatfragmentation on population structure, we usedrandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) toexamine genetic variation hierarchicallyamong local breeding areas, subregionalgroups, regional groups, and subspeciesvia sampling of 21 breeding areas (276individuals) among the three subspecies ofSpotted Owls. Data from 11 variable bandssuggest a significant relationship betweengeographic distance among local breeding groupsand genetic distance (Mantel r = 0.53, P&lt; 0.02) although multi-dimensional scaling ofthree significant axes did not identifysignificant grouping at any hierarchical level. Similarly, neighbor-joining clustering ofManhattan distances indicated geographicstructure at all levels and identified MexicanSpotted Owls as a distinct clade. RAPDanalyses did not clearly differentiate NorthernSpotted Owls from California Spotted Owls. Among Northern Spotted Owls, estimates ofpopulation differentiation (F^sub ST^) rangedfrom 0.27 among breeding areas to 0.11 amongregions. Concordantly, within-group agreementvalues estimated via multi-response permutationprocedures of Jaccard's distances ranged from0.22 among local sites to 0.11 among regions. Pairwise comparisons of F^sub ST^ andgeographic distance within regions suggestedonly the Klamath region was in equilibrium withrespect to gene flow and genetic drift. Merging nuclear data with recent mitochondrialdata provides support for designation of anEvolutionary Significant Unit for MexicanSpotted Owls and two overlapping ManagementUnits for Northern and California Spotted Owls.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-0621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1011561101460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animal breeding ; Animal populations ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic drift ; Genetic structure ; Population structure ; Strix occidentalis</subject><ispartof>Conservation genetics, 2001, Vol.2 (1), p.25-40</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8380e0993b3f8784a761ccafcb451774792879246f1a9796fcb52a4b5323fa433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haig, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, R Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>sman, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><title>Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls</title><title>Conservation genetics</title><description>We examined genetic variation, populationstructure, and definition of conservation unitsin Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis). Spotted Owls are mostly non-migratory,long-lived, socially monogamous birds that havedecreased population viability due to theiroccupation of highly-fragmented latesuccessional forests in western North America. To investigate potential effects of habitatfragmentation on population structure, we usedrandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) toexamine genetic variation hierarchicallyamong local breeding areas, subregionalgroups, regional groups, and subspeciesvia sampling of 21 breeding areas (276individuals) among the three subspecies ofSpotted Owls. Data from 11 variable bandssuggest a significant relationship betweengeographic distance among local breeding groupsand genetic distance (Mantel r = 0.53, P&lt; 0.02) although multi-dimensional scaling ofthree significant axes did not identifysignificant grouping at any hierarchical level. Similarly, neighbor-joining clustering ofManhattan distances indicated geographicstructure at all levels and identified MexicanSpotted Owls as a distinct clade. RAPDanalyses did not clearly differentiate NorthernSpotted Owls from California Spotted Owls. Among Northern Spotted Owls, estimates ofpopulation differentiation (F^sub ST^) rangedfrom 0.27 among breeding areas to 0.11 amongregions. Concordantly, within-group agreementvalues estimated via multi-response permutationprocedures of Jaccard's distances ranged from0.22 among local sites to 0.11 among regions. Pairwise comparisons of F^sub ST^ andgeographic distance within regions suggestedonly the Klamath region was in equilibrium withrespect to gene flow and genetic drift. Merging nuclear data with recent mitochondrialdata provides support for designation of anEvolutionary Significant Unit for MexicanSpotted Owls and two overlapping ManagementUnits for Northern and California Spotted Owls.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic drift</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Strix occidentalis</subject><issn>1566-0621</issn><issn>1572-9737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj71PwzAQxS0EEqUws0YMbAGfv87uVlW0IFXqAMyR4zolVUiC7cC_jxFMDKff07un0ztCroHeAWX8frkACiAVZAhFT8gMJLLSIMfTH61USRWDc3IR45FSUAxhRhYbPxyCHd9aV3za0NrUDn1h-31x8L1P2Y0pTC5NwRdtXzyPQ0p-X-y-unhJzhrbRX_1xzl5XT-8rB7L7W7ztFpuS8ckplJzTT01hte80aiFRQXO2cbVQgKiQMN0HqEasAaNygvJrKglZ7yxgvM5uf29O4bhY_IxVe9tdL7rbO-HKVag88eGmxy8-Rc8DlPoc7cKJTcSlUD-DdKBVR8</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Haig, Susan M</creator><creator>Wagner, R Steven</creator><creator>sman, Eric D</creator><creator>Mullins, Thomas D</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls</title><author>Haig, Susan M ; Wagner, R Steven ; sman, Eric D ; Mullins, Thomas D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-8380e0993b3f8784a761ccafcb451774792879246f1a9796fcb52a4b5323fa433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic drift</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Strix occidentalis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haig, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, R Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>sman, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haig, Susan M</au><au>Wagner, R Steven</au><au>sman, Eric D</au><au>Mullins, Thomas D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls</atitle><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>25-40</pages><issn>1566-0621</issn><eissn>1572-9737</eissn><abstract>We examined genetic variation, populationstructure, and definition of conservation unitsin Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis). Spotted Owls are mostly non-migratory,long-lived, socially monogamous birds that havedecreased population viability due to theiroccupation of highly-fragmented latesuccessional forests in western North America. To investigate potential effects of habitatfragmentation on population structure, we usedrandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) toexamine genetic variation hierarchicallyamong local breeding areas, subregionalgroups, regional groups, and subspeciesvia sampling of 21 breeding areas (276individuals) among the three subspecies ofSpotted Owls. Data from 11 variable bandssuggest a significant relationship betweengeographic distance among local breeding groupsand genetic distance (Mantel r = 0.53, P&lt; 0.02) although multi-dimensional scaling ofthree significant axes did not identifysignificant grouping at any hierarchical level. Similarly, neighbor-joining clustering ofManhattan distances indicated geographicstructure at all levels and identified MexicanSpotted Owls as a distinct clade. RAPDanalyses did not clearly differentiate NorthernSpotted Owls from California Spotted Owls. Among Northern Spotted Owls, estimates ofpopulation differentiation (F^sub ST^) rangedfrom 0.27 among breeding areas to 0.11 amongregions. Concordantly, within-group agreementvalues estimated via multi-response permutationprocedures of Jaccard's distances ranged from0.22 among local sites to 0.11 among regions. Pairwise comparisons of F^sub ST^ andgeographic distance within regions suggestedonly the Klamath region was in equilibrium withrespect to gene flow and genetic drift. Merging nuclear data with recent mitochondrialdata provides support for designation of anEvolutionary Significant Unit for MexicanSpotted Owls and two overlapping ManagementUnits for Northern and California Spotted Owls.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1011561101460</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1566-0621
ispartof Conservation genetics, 2001, Vol.2 (1), p.25-40
issn 1566-0621
1572-9737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18101939
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Animal breeding
Animal populations
Genetic diversity
Genetic drift
Genetic structure
Population structure
Strix occidentalis
title Geographic variation and genetic structure in Spotted Owls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A11%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geographic%20variation%20and%20genetic%20structure%20in%20Spotted%20Owls&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20genetics&rft.au=Haig,%20Susan%20M&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=25-40&rft.issn=1566-0621&rft.eissn=1572-9737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1011561101460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2145994911%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=753957647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true