Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment
The results of energy and exergy analyses of two biomass integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles are reported. Fog cooling, steam injection and adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Even with its lower heat valu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renewable energy 2016-07, Vol.92, p.95-103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Renewable energy |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Athari, Hassan Soltani, Saeed Rosen, Marc A. Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Morosuk, Tatiana |
description | The results of energy and exergy analyses of two biomass integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles are reported. Fog cooling, steam injection and adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Even with its lower heat value, biomass can be substituted for fossil fuels. The performances of the cycles are assessed under the same conditions. The assessments show that the combined cycle has a higher efficiency at lower values of compressor pressure ratio but the steam injection plant is advantageous at higher pressure ratio values. The steam injection plant has a higher net power under the same conditions, while the exergy loss rate is higher for the combined cycle at all pressure ratios. But the exergy destruction rate is higher for the steam injection cycle at lower compressor pressure ratios, and for the combined cycle at higher pressure ratios.
•Two cycles with biomass fuels are proposed for utilization of the waste heat.•Fog cooling's effect on these plants is analyzed.•Cycles' thermodynamic performance are compared in their optimum points. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809634484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148116300970</els_id><sourcerecordid>1809634484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-394374480c7aa0e20ba0ce91b8dd842b2ca352508b55d5c020d0dc7f4fbfbab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P1DAMhiMEEsPCP-CQI5cWp02nCQek1QoWpJW4wDnKh7tk1CZD3IKGX0-q4QzyIbL9vLbil7HXAloB4vj21BZMNdquZi2IFvT4hB2EGnUDR9U9ZQfQR2iEVOI5e0F0AhCDGuWB_b63xNetuJiQ04p24TGd0K8xJ25T4D4vey_wc_6FhfuLn5H4RjE98ik_VnrGtVJ53iu7wsW8WCI-bTi_47d8_Y5lyeGS7BI9rx0kWjCtL9mzyc6Er_6-N-zbxw9f7z41D1_uP9_dPjRejnptei37UUoFfrQWsANnwaMWToWgZOc6b_uhG0C5YQiDhw4CBD9OcnKTs071N-zNde655B8b0mqWSB7n2SbMGxmh6nH6ukH-Hx016LpNQ0XlFfUlExWczLnExZaLEWB2V8zJXF0xuysGhKmuVNn7qwzrj39GLIZ8xOQxxFKvbkKO_x7wB9C9mdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790935290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Athari, Hassan ; Soltani, Saeed ; Rosen, Marc A. ; Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad ; Morosuk, Tatiana</creator><creatorcontrib>Athari, Hassan ; Soltani, Saeed ; Rosen, Marc A. ; Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad ; Morosuk, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><description>The results of energy and exergy analyses of two biomass integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles are reported. Fog cooling, steam injection and adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Even with its lower heat value, biomass can be substituted for fossil fuels. The performances of the cycles are assessed under the same conditions. The assessments show that the combined cycle has a higher efficiency at lower values of compressor pressure ratio but the steam injection plant is advantageous at higher pressure ratio values. The steam injection plant has a higher net power under the same conditions, while the exergy loss rate is higher for the combined cycle at all pressure ratios. But the exergy destruction rate is higher for the steam injection cycle at lower compressor pressure ratios, and for the combined cycle at higher pressure ratios.
•Two cycles with biomass fuels are proposed for utilization of the waste heat.•Fog cooling's effect on these plants is analyzed.•Cycles' thermodynamic performance are compared in their optimum points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Biomass ; Combined cycle ; Combined cycle engines ; Energy ; Exergy ; Fog ; Fog cooler ; Pressure ratio ; Steam electric power generation ; Steam injection</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2016-07, Vol.92, p.95-103</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-394374480c7aa0e20ba0ce91b8dd842b2ca352508b55d5c020d0dc7f4fbfbab83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-394374480c7aa0e20ba0ce91b8dd842b2ca352508b55d5c020d0dc7f4fbfbab83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Athari, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morosuk, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><title>Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>The results of energy and exergy analyses of two biomass integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles are reported. Fog cooling, steam injection and adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Even with its lower heat value, biomass can be substituted for fossil fuels. The performances of the cycles are assessed under the same conditions. The assessments show that the combined cycle has a higher efficiency at lower values of compressor pressure ratio but the steam injection plant is advantageous at higher pressure ratio values. The steam injection plant has a higher net power under the same conditions, while the exergy loss rate is higher for the combined cycle at all pressure ratios. But the exergy destruction rate is higher for the steam injection cycle at lower compressor pressure ratios, and for the combined cycle at higher pressure ratios.
•Two cycles with biomass fuels are proposed for utilization of the waste heat.•Fog cooling's effect on these plants is analyzed.•Cycles' thermodynamic performance are compared in their optimum points.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Combined cycle</subject><subject>Combined cycle engines</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Fog</subject><subject>Fog cooler</subject><subject>Pressure ratio</subject><subject>Steam electric power generation</subject><subject>Steam injection</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2P1DAMhiMEEsPCP-CQI5cWp02nCQek1QoWpJW4wDnKh7tk1CZD3IKGX0-q4QzyIbL9vLbil7HXAloB4vj21BZMNdquZi2IFvT4hB2EGnUDR9U9ZQfQR2iEVOI5e0F0AhCDGuWB_b63xNetuJiQ04p24TGd0K8xJ25T4D4vey_wc_6FhfuLn5H4RjE98ik_VnrGtVJ53iu7wsW8WCI-bTi_47d8_Y5lyeGS7BI9rx0kWjCtL9mzyc6Er_6-N-zbxw9f7z41D1_uP9_dPjRejnptei37UUoFfrQWsANnwaMWToWgZOc6b_uhG0C5YQiDhw4CBD9OcnKTs071N-zNde655B8b0mqWSB7n2SbMGxmh6nH6ukH-Hx016LpNQ0XlFfUlExWczLnExZaLEWB2V8zJXF0xuysGhKmuVNn7qwzrj39GLIZ8xOQxxFKvbkKO_x7wB9C9mdE</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Athari, Hassan</creator><creator>Soltani, Saeed</creator><creator>Rosen, Marc A.</creator><creator>Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad</creator><creator>Morosuk, Tatiana</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment</title><author>Athari, Hassan ; Soltani, Saeed ; Rosen, Marc A. ; Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad ; Morosuk, Tatiana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-394374480c7aa0e20ba0ce91b8dd842b2ca352508b55d5c020d0dc7f4fbfbab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Combined cycle</topic><topic>Combined cycle engines</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Fog</topic><topic>Fog cooler</topic><topic>Pressure ratio</topic><topic>Steam electric power generation</topic><topic>Steam injection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Athari, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morosuk, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Athari, Hassan</au><au>Soltani, Saeed</au><au>Rosen, Marc A.</au><au>Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad</au><au>Morosuk, Tatiana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>95</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>95-103</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>The results of energy and exergy analyses of two biomass integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles are reported. Fog cooling, steam injection and adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Even with its lower heat value, biomass can be substituted for fossil fuels. The performances of the cycles are assessed under the same conditions. The assessments show that the combined cycle has a higher efficiency at lower values of compressor pressure ratio but the steam injection plant is advantageous at higher pressure ratio values. The steam injection plant has a higher net power under the same conditions, while the exergy loss rate is higher for the combined cycle at all pressure ratios. But the exergy destruction rate is higher for the steam injection cycle at lower compressor pressure ratios, and for the combined cycle at higher pressure ratios.
•Two cycles with biomass fuels are proposed for utilization of the waste heat.•Fog cooling's effect on these plants is analyzed.•Cycles' thermodynamic performance are compared in their optimum points.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.097</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1481 |
ispartof | Renewable energy, 2016-07, Vol.92, p.95-103 |
issn | 0960-1481 1879-0682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809634484 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Assessments Biomass Combined cycle Combined cycle engines Energy Exergy Fog Fog cooler Pressure ratio Steam electric power generation Steam injection |
title | Gas turbine steam injection and combined power cycles using fog inlet cooling and biomass fuel: A thermodynamic assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gas%20turbine%20steam%20injection%20and%20combined%20power%20cycles%20using%20fog%20inlet%20cooling%20and%20biomass%20fuel:%20A%20thermodynamic%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Athari,%20Hassan&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=95-103&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1809634484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790935290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148116300970&rfr_iscdi=true |