Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels

The main purposes of this study were to investigate patient dose in Spine radiographic examinations, as high dose procedures and propose the first LDRLs (Local Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Khuzestan region, southwest of Iran. ESD (Entrance Skin Dose) values of patients who underwent six spine rad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation measurements 2016-04, Vol.87, p.29-34
Hauptverfasser: Rasuli, Behrouz, Ghorbani, Mohammad, Juybari, Raheleh Tabari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Radiation measurements
container_volume 87
creator Rasuli, Behrouz
Ghorbani, Mohammad
Juybari, Raheleh Tabari
description The main purposes of this study were to investigate patient dose in Spine radiographic examinations, as high dose procedures and propose the first LDRLs (Local Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Khuzestan region, southwest of Iran. ESD (Entrance Skin Dose) values of patients who underwent six spine radiographic procedures containing cervical (AP/LAT), thoracic (AP/LAT) and lumbar (AP/LAT), as high dose procedures, were evaluated. Patient doses were calculated from patient's individual anatomical data (weight, height and organ thickness) and exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, FFD and projection) based on the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Technical Report Series No.457. Indirect dosimetry method was conducted on 412 standard patients (57% men and 43% women) at seven high-patient-load hospitals. This survey reveals significant variations in the radiological practice. Despite large discrepancies found in the tube loadings (3–128 for lumbar AP and 3–200 for lumbar LAT), ESDs in all examinations were lower than the IAEA and EC (European Commission) DRLs (Diagnostic Reference Levels), 1.30, 1.65, 2.29, 3.09, 5, 7.5 mGy for cervical AP, cervical LAT, thoracic AP, lumbar AP, thoracic LAT and lumbar LAT respectively. Optimization of radiological practice could be accelerated by updating clinical audits and patient dose considerations, adequate training of students, implementation of systematic QA and QC programs and the use of qualified diagnostic medical physicists in the imaging sections. It is advisable that DRLs obtained in this study can be used as local DRL and dose surveys must be performed in all regions to establish NDRLs (National Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Iran. Also, national authorities must review periodically reference levels to ensure that it remains appropriate. •Considerable variations in the radiological practice was revealed.•Tube loading varied from 3 to 128 for lumbar AP and 3 to 200 for lumbar LAT.•Huge discrepancies in ESDs for cervical Spine examinations were found.•Max to min ratio of ESD in cervical AP and LAT were 136 and 820, respectively.•ESDs for all projections were below EC and IAEA DRLs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809624159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S135044871630052X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790974150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-47d109e8e2917130952a1dd02970b30fa3a1d1589a86f8031f478e791f29d7463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1KxTAQhYso-PsIQpZuWidp0zQrEfEPBEF0HWIyveTSJjXpFX0E39rUe_euMkO-cyaZUxTnFCoKtL1cV1HbEXWqWG4rYBVQsVcc0U7IEiTj-7muOZRN04nD4jilNQA0suVHxc-Ltk7PLnhiQ0Ky2Gwijuhn0odIpnyX60Q23mJcBedXxIRxzHyanF8E1hk9kK8y6m-CX3p0_s8vEe0tmWKYsq8lQ1ioPGvlQ5qdIRF7jOgNkgE_cUinxUGvh4Rnu_OkeLu7fb15KJ-e7x9vrp9Kwymfy0ZYChI7ZJIKWoPkTFNrgUkB7zX0us4t5Z3UXdt3UNO-ER0KSXsmrWja-qS42Prmp31sMM1qdMngMGiPYZMU7UC2rKFc_o8KCVJkFDLKt6iJIaX8NzVFN-r4rSioJSW1VruU1JKSAqZySll3tdXlDeCnw6iScctWrItoZmWD-8fhF3p9n98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790974150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rasuli, Behrouz ; Ghorbani, Mohammad ; Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasuli, Behrouz ; Ghorbani, Mohammad ; Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</creatorcontrib><description>The main purposes of this study were to investigate patient dose in Spine radiographic examinations, as high dose procedures and propose the first LDRLs (Local Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Khuzestan region, southwest of Iran. ESD (Entrance Skin Dose) values of patients who underwent six spine radiographic procedures containing cervical (AP/LAT), thoracic (AP/LAT) and lumbar (AP/LAT), as high dose procedures, were evaluated. Patient doses were calculated from patient's individual anatomical data (weight, height and organ thickness) and exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, FFD and projection) based on the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Technical Report Series No.457. Indirect dosimetry method was conducted on 412 standard patients (57% men and 43% women) at seven high-patient-load hospitals. This survey reveals significant variations in the radiological practice. Despite large discrepancies found in the tube loadings (3–128 for lumbar AP and 3–200 for lumbar LAT), ESDs in all examinations were lower than the IAEA and EC (European Commission) DRLs (Diagnostic Reference Levels), 1.30, 1.65, 2.29, 3.09, 5, 7.5 mGy for cervical AP, cervical LAT, thoracic AP, lumbar AP, thoracic LAT and lumbar LAT respectively. Optimization of radiological practice could be accelerated by updating clinical audits and patient dose considerations, adequate training of students, implementation of systematic QA and QC programs and the use of qualified diagnostic medical physicists in the imaging sections. It is advisable that DRLs obtained in this study can be used as local DRL and dose surveys must be performed in all regions to establish NDRLs (National Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Iran. Also, national authorities must review periodically reference levels to ensure that it remains appropriate. •Considerable variations in the radiological practice was revealed.•Tube loading varied from 3 to 128 for lumbar AP and 3 to 200 for lumbar LAT.•Huge discrepancies in ESDs for cervical Spine examinations were found.•Max to min ratio of ESD in cervical AP and LAT were 136 and 820, respectively.•ESDs for all projections were below EC and IAEA DRLs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Diagnostic reference level ; Diagnostic systems ; ESD ; Imaging ; Medical ; Nuclear power generation ; Patient dose ; Patients ; Projection ; Spine ; Spine radiography ; Tubes ; X-ray examination</subject><ispartof>Radiation measurements, 2016-04, Vol.87, p.29-34</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-47d109e8e2917130952a1dd02970b30fa3a1d1589a86f8031f478e791f29d7463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-47d109e8e2917130952a1dd02970b30fa3a1d1589a86f8031f478e791f29d7463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1092-5512</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasuli, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels</title><title>Radiation measurements</title><description>The main purposes of this study were to investigate patient dose in Spine radiographic examinations, as high dose procedures and propose the first LDRLs (Local Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Khuzestan region, southwest of Iran. ESD (Entrance Skin Dose) values of patients who underwent six spine radiographic procedures containing cervical (AP/LAT), thoracic (AP/LAT) and lumbar (AP/LAT), as high dose procedures, were evaluated. Patient doses were calculated from patient's individual anatomical data (weight, height and organ thickness) and exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, FFD and projection) based on the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Technical Report Series No.457. Indirect dosimetry method was conducted on 412 standard patients (57% men and 43% women) at seven high-patient-load hospitals. This survey reveals significant variations in the radiological practice. Despite large discrepancies found in the tube loadings (3–128 for lumbar AP and 3–200 for lumbar LAT), ESDs in all examinations were lower than the IAEA and EC (European Commission) DRLs (Diagnostic Reference Levels), 1.30, 1.65, 2.29, 3.09, 5, 7.5 mGy for cervical AP, cervical LAT, thoracic AP, lumbar AP, thoracic LAT and lumbar LAT respectively. Optimization of radiological practice could be accelerated by updating clinical audits and patient dose considerations, adequate training of students, implementation of systematic QA and QC programs and the use of qualified diagnostic medical physicists in the imaging sections. It is advisable that DRLs obtained in this study can be used as local DRL and dose surveys must be performed in all regions to establish NDRLs (National Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Iran. Also, national authorities must review periodically reference levels to ensure that it remains appropriate. •Considerable variations in the radiological practice was revealed.•Tube loading varied from 3 to 128 for lumbar AP and 3 to 200 for lumbar LAT.•Huge discrepancies in ESDs for cervical Spine examinations were found.•Max to min ratio of ESD in cervical AP and LAT were 136 and 820, respectively.•ESDs for all projections were below EC and IAEA DRLs.</description><subject>Diagnostic reference level</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>ESD</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Nuclear power generation</subject><subject>Patient dose</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine radiography</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>X-ray examination</subject><issn>1350-4487</issn><issn>1879-0925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1KxTAQhYso-PsIQpZuWidp0zQrEfEPBEF0HWIyveTSJjXpFX0E39rUe_euMkO-cyaZUxTnFCoKtL1cV1HbEXWqWG4rYBVQsVcc0U7IEiTj-7muOZRN04nD4jilNQA0suVHxc-Ltk7PLnhiQ0Ky2Gwijuhn0odIpnyX60Q23mJcBedXxIRxzHyanF8E1hk9kK8y6m-CX3p0_s8vEe0tmWKYsq8lQ1ioPGvlQ5qdIRF7jOgNkgE_cUinxUGvh4Rnu_OkeLu7fb15KJ-e7x9vrp9Kwymfy0ZYChI7ZJIKWoPkTFNrgUkB7zX0us4t5Z3UXdt3UNO-ER0KSXsmrWja-qS42Prmp31sMM1qdMngMGiPYZMU7UC2rKFc_o8KCVJkFDLKt6iJIaX8NzVFN-r4rSioJSW1VruU1JKSAqZySll3tdXlDeCnw6iScctWrItoZmWD-8fhF3p9n98</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Rasuli, Behrouz</creator><creator>Ghorbani, Mohammad</creator><creator>Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-5512</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels</title><author>Rasuli, Behrouz ; Ghorbani, Mohammad ; Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-47d109e8e2917130952a1dd02970b30fa3a1d1589a86f8031f478e791f29d7463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic reference level</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>ESD</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Nuclear power generation</topic><topic>Patient dose</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine radiography</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>X-ray examination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasuli, Behrouz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasuli, Behrouz</au><au>Ghorbani, Mohammad</au><au>Juybari, Raheleh Tabari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels</atitle><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>29-34</pages><issn>1350-4487</issn><eissn>1879-0925</eissn><abstract>The main purposes of this study were to investigate patient dose in Spine radiographic examinations, as high dose procedures and propose the first LDRLs (Local Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Khuzestan region, southwest of Iran. ESD (Entrance Skin Dose) values of patients who underwent six spine radiographic procedures containing cervical (AP/LAT), thoracic (AP/LAT) and lumbar (AP/LAT), as high dose procedures, were evaluated. Patient doses were calculated from patient's individual anatomical data (weight, height and organ thickness) and exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, FFD and projection) based on the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Technical Report Series No.457. Indirect dosimetry method was conducted on 412 standard patients (57% men and 43% women) at seven high-patient-load hospitals. This survey reveals significant variations in the radiological practice. Despite large discrepancies found in the tube loadings (3–128 for lumbar AP and 3–200 for lumbar LAT), ESDs in all examinations were lower than the IAEA and EC (European Commission) DRLs (Diagnostic Reference Levels), 1.30, 1.65, 2.29, 3.09, 5, 7.5 mGy for cervical AP, cervical LAT, thoracic AP, lumbar AP, thoracic LAT and lumbar LAT respectively. Optimization of radiological practice could be accelerated by updating clinical audits and patient dose considerations, adequate training of students, implementation of systematic QA and QC programs and the use of qualified diagnostic medical physicists in the imaging sections. It is advisable that DRLs obtained in this study can be used as local DRL and dose surveys must be performed in all regions to establish NDRLs (National Diagnostic Reference Levels) in Iran. Also, national authorities must review periodically reference levels to ensure that it remains appropriate. •Considerable variations in the radiological practice was revealed.•Tube loading varied from 3 to 128 for lumbar AP and 3 to 200 for lumbar LAT.•Huge discrepancies in ESDs for cervical Spine examinations were found.•Max to min ratio of ESD in cervical AP and LAT were 136 and 820, respectively.•ESDs for all projections were below EC and IAEA DRLs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-5512</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-4487
ispartof Radiation measurements, 2016-04, Vol.87, p.29-34
issn 1350-4487
1879-0925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809624159
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Diagnostic reference level
Diagnostic systems
ESD
Imaging
Medical
Nuclear power generation
Patient dose
Patients
Projection
Spine
Spine radiography
Tubes
X-ray examination
title Radiation dose measurement for patients undergoing common spine medical x-ray examinations and proposed local diagnostic reference levels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20dose%20measurement%20for%20patients%20undergoing%20common%20spine%20medical%20x-ray%20examinations%20and%20proposed%20local%20diagnostic%20reference%20levels&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20measurements&rft.au=Rasuli,%20Behrouz&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=29-34&rft.issn=1350-4487&rft.eissn=1879-0925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790974150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790974150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S135044871630052X&rfr_iscdi=true