The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis

In this article, I argue that a growing body of evidence shows that concepts are amodal and I provide a novel interpretation of the body of evidence that was taken to support neo-empiricist theories of concepts: the offloading hypothesis in the 1990s and 2000s.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2016-08, Vol.23 (4), p.1090-1095
1. Verfasser: Machery, Edouard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1095
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1090
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 23
creator Machery, Edouard
description In this article, I argue that a growing body of evidence shows that concepts are amodal and I provide a novel interpretation of the body of evidence that was taken to support neo-empiricist theories of concepts: the offloading hypothesis in the 1990s and 2000s.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809606779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4144958361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13e4da241ee962a5317e234bc44f507cf891eaae93917e0b289c6b217eec50313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmsnXJkcpfkHBSz2H7G623bK7qUn30H9vylYRwVOGmWfeDA9C10DuWS7UQwTGKcMEBCYqV5ifoCkIBlgwSk5TTaTGmik-QRcxbgghQmp5jiY0p5pzKqfofrl2me18ZdusCLbpM9tX2S41fV233lZNv8rW-61PrdjES3RW2za6q-M7Qx_PT8v5K168v7zNHxe45CB2GJjjlaUcnNOS2nRS7ijjRcl5LUhe1kqDs9ZpptOEFFTpUhY01a4UhAGbobsxdxv85-DiznRNLF3b2t75IRpQREsi81wn9PYPuvFD6NN1iQLQoJRmiYKRKoOPMbjabEPT2bA3QMxBphllmiTTHGQannZujslD0bnqZ-PbXgLoCMQ06lcu_Pr639QvQL58wA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811918893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Machery, Edouard</creator><creatorcontrib>Machery, Edouard</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, I argue that a growing body of evidence shows that concepts are amodal and I provide a novel interpretation of the body of evidence that was taken to support neo-empiricist theories of concepts: the offloading hypothesis in the 1990s and 2000s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27294426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brain ; Brief Report ; Codes ; Cognitive Psychology ; Concept Formation ; Heuristic ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Memory ; Philosophers ; Psychological Theory ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2016-08, Vol.23 (4), p.1090-1095</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13e4da241ee962a5317e234bc44f507cf891eaae93917e0b289c6b217eec50313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13e4da241ee962a5317e234bc44f507cf891eaae93917e0b289c6b217eec50313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machery, Edouard</creatorcontrib><title>The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>In this article, I argue that a growing body of evidence shows that concepts are amodal and I provide a novel interpretation of the body of evidence that was taken to support neo-empiricist theories of concepts: the offloading hypothesis in the 1990s and 2000s.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OIlmsnXJkcpfkHBSz2H7G623bK7qUn30H9vylYRwVOGmWfeDA9C10DuWS7UQwTGKcMEBCYqV5ifoCkIBlgwSk5TTaTGmik-QRcxbgghQmp5jiY0p5pzKqfofrl2me18ZdusCLbpM9tX2S41fV233lZNv8rW-61PrdjES3RW2za6q-M7Qx_PT8v5K168v7zNHxe45CB2GJjjlaUcnNOS2nRS7ijjRcl5LUhe1kqDs9ZpptOEFFTpUhY01a4UhAGbobsxdxv85-DiznRNLF3b2t75IRpQREsi81wn9PYPuvFD6NN1iQLQoJRmiYKRKoOPMbjabEPT2bA3QMxBphllmiTTHGQannZujslD0bnqZ-PbXgLoCMQ06lcu_Pr639QvQL58wA</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Machery, Edouard</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis</title><author>Machery, Edouard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13e4da241ee962a5317e234bc44f507cf891eaae93917e0b289c6b217eec50313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machery, Edouard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machery, Edouard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1090</spage><epage>1095</epage><pages>1090-1095</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>In this article, I argue that a growing body of evidence shows that concepts are amodal and I provide a novel interpretation of the body of evidence that was taken to support neo-empiricist theories of concepts: the offloading hypothesis in the 1990s and 2000s.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27294426</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016-08, Vol.23 (4), p.1090-1095
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1809606779
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brain
Brief Report
Codes
Cognitive Psychology
Concept Formation
Heuristic
Humans
Hypotheses
Memory
Philosophers
Psychological Theory
Psychologists
Psychology
Semantics
title The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20amodal%20brain%20and%20the%20offloading%20hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Machery,%20Edouard&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1090&rft.epage=1095&rft.pages=1090-1095&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4144958361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811918893&rft_id=info:pmid/27294426&rfr_iscdi=true