The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface

Deposition processes of particles with dry diameter larger than about 10 μm are dominated by gravitational settling, while molecular diffusion and Brownian motion predominate the deposition processes of particles smaller than 0.1 μm in dry diameter. Many air pollution derived elements exhibit charac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 1999-12, Vol.33 (28), p.4727-4737
Hauptverfasser: Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius, Zhang, Leiming, Sievering, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4737
container_issue 28
container_start_page 4727
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 33
creator Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius
Zhang, Leiming
Sievering, H
description Deposition processes of particles with dry diameter larger than about 10 μm are dominated by gravitational settling, while molecular diffusion and Brownian motion predominate the deposition processes of particles smaller than 0.1 μm in dry diameter. Many air pollution derived elements exhibit characteristics common to sub-micron particles. The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of meteorological conditions within the turbulent transfer layer on the deposition velocity of particles with dry diameter between 0.1 and 1 μm. It is for these sub-micron particles that particle growth by condensation in the deposition layer, the broken water surface effect and the enhanced transfer process due to atmospheric turbulence in the turbulent transfer layer play important roles in controlling the particle deposition velocity. Results of the present study show that the `dry air’ assumption of Williams’ model is unrealistic. Effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature cannot be ignored in determining the deposition velocity over a water surface. Neglecting effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature will result in defining atmospheric stability incorrectly. It is found that the largest effect of air relative humidity on deposition velocity occurs at an air–water temperature difference corresponding to the point of `displaced neutral stability'. For a given wind speed of U=5 m s −1 the additive effects of water surface temperature, T w, changes from 5 to 25°C and ambient air relative humidity variations from 85 to 60%, respectively, lead to a maximum difference in v d of about 20%. For a higher wind speed of 10 m s −1, however, the corresponding change in v d reduces to less than 5%. This is further confirmation that wind speed is one of the strongest variables that governs the magnitude of v d. The present study also found that the broken surface transfer coefficient, k bs, given as a multiple of the smooth surface transfer coefficient, k ss, is physically more meaningful than assigning it a constant value independent of particle size. The method used in this study requires only a single level of atmospheric data coupled with the surface temperature measurement. The present method is applicable for determining deposition velocity not only at the conventional measurement height of 10 m but also at any other heights that are different from the measurement height.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18093208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231099002022</els_id><sourcerecordid>17668897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-85f6943f81ea6c3bc8c8141a274ac7d02969b24cac747983434fda657d7483863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoqNWfIOQgoofVfO0mOYmIXyB4UM8hZicY2W5qkir-e9NWEU8lgZk3eWYG5kXogJJTSmh39kh5yxrGKTnW-oQQRqraQDtUSd4wJcRmzX-RbbSb8xshhEstd9Db0ytg8B5cwdHj1_k09KF8YTv2OBdbYPH6WWPCeZ68dZBxHHEPs5hDCTWt_xZSzHHAM5tKcMMSKRHb_4V7aMvbIcP-T5yg5-urp8vb5v7h5u7y4r5xQrelUa3vtOBeUbCd4y9OOUUFtUwK62RPmO70CxOuCiG14oIL39uulb0UiquOT9DRqu8sxfc55GKmITsYBjtCnGdDFdGcEbUelF2nlJbrQdEyyuudoHYFurqQnMCbWQpTm74MJWbhlVl6ZRZGGK3N0quqJujwZ4DNzg4-2dGF_FesJaunYucrDOr6PgIkk12A0UEfUjXQ9DGsGfQNECKnyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14521321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius ; Zhang, Leiming ; Sievering, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius ; Zhang, Leiming ; Sievering, H</creatorcontrib><description>Deposition processes of particles with dry diameter larger than about 10 μm are dominated by gravitational settling, while molecular diffusion and Brownian motion predominate the deposition processes of particles smaller than 0.1 μm in dry diameter. Many air pollution derived elements exhibit characteristics common to sub-micron particles. The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of meteorological conditions within the turbulent transfer layer on the deposition velocity of particles with dry diameter between 0.1 and 1 μm. It is for these sub-micron particles that particle growth by condensation in the deposition layer, the broken water surface effect and the enhanced transfer process due to atmospheric turbulence in the turbulent transfer layer play important roles in controlling the particle deposition velocity. Results of the present study show that the `dry air’ assumption of Williams’ model is unrealistic. Effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature cannot be ignored in determining the deposition velocity over a water surface. Neglecting effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature will result in defining atmospheric stability incorrectly. It is found that the largest effect of air relative humidity on deposition velocity occurs at an air–water temperature difference corresponding to the point of `displaced neutral stability'. For a given wind speed of U=5 m s −1 the additive effects of water surface temperature, T w, changes from 5 to 25°C and ambient air relative humidity variations from 85 to 60%, respectively, lead to a maximum difference in v d of about 20%. For a higher wind speed of 10 m s −1, however, the corresponding change in v d reduces to less than 5%. This is further confirmation that wind speed is one of the strongest variables that governs the magnitude of v d. The present study also found that the broken surface transfer coefficient, k bs, given as a multiple of the smooth surface transfer coefficient, k ss, is physically more meaningful than assigning it a constant value independent of particle size. The method used in this study requires only a single level of atmospheric data coupled with the surface temperature measurement. The present method is applicable for determining deposition velocity not only at the conventional measurement height of 10 m but also at any other heights that are different from the measurement height.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Brackish ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Freshwater ; Humidity effect ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Particles and aerosols ; Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution ; Pollution ; Sub-micron particle dry deposition ; Water surfaces</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 1999-12, Vol.33 (28), p.4727-4737</ispartof><rights>1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-85f6943f81ea6c3bc8c8141a274ac7d02969b24cac747983434fda657d7483863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-85f6943f81ea6c3bc8c8141a274ac7d02969b24cac747983434fda657d7483863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1972727$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Leiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievering, H</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Deposition processes of particles with dry diameter larger than about 10 μm are dominated by gravitational settling, while molecular diffusion and Brownian motion predominate the deposition processes of particles smaller than 0.1 μm in dry diameter. Many air pollution derived elements exhibit characteristics common to sub-micron particles. The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of meteorological conditions within the turbulent transfer layer on the deposition velocity of particles with dry diameter between 0.1 and 1 μm. It is for these sub-micron particles that particle growth by condensation in the deposition layer, the broken water surface effect and the enhanced transfer process due to atmospheric turbulence in the turbulent transfer layer play important roles in controlling the particle deposition velocity. Results of the present study show that the `dry air’ assumption of Williams’ model is unrealistic. Effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature cannot be ignored in determining the deposition velocity over a water surface. Neglecting effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature will result in defining atmospheric stability incorrectly. It is found that the largest effect of air relative humidity on deposition velocity occurs at an air–water temperature difference corresponding to the point of `displaced neutral stability'. For a given wind speed of U=5 m s −1 the additive effects of water surface temperature, T w, changes from 5 to 25°C and ambient air relative humidity variations from 85 to 60%, respectively, lead to a maximum difference in v d of about 20%. For a higher wind speed of 10 m s −1, however, the corresponding change in v d reduces to less than 5%. This is further confirmation that wind speed is one of the strongest variables that governs the magnitude of v d. The present study also found that the broken surface transfer coefficient, k bs, given as a multiple of the smooth surface transfer coefficient, k ss, is physically more meaningful than assigning it a constant value independent of particle size. The method used in this study requires only a single level of atmospheric data coupled with the surface temperature measurement. The present method is applicable for determining deposition velocity not only at the conventional measurement height of 10 m but also at any other heights that are different from the measurement height.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Humidity effect</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Particles and aerosols</subject><subject>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sub-micron particle dry deposition</subject><subject>Water surfaces</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoqNWfIOQgoofVfO0mOYmIXyB4UM8hZicY2W5qkir-e9NWEU8lgZk3eWYG5kXogJJTSmh39kh5yxrGKTnW-oQQRqraQDtUSd4wJcRmzX-RbbSb8xshhEstd9Db0ytg8B5cwdHj1_k09KF8YTv2OBdbYPH6WWPCeZ68dZBxHHEPs5hDCTWt_xZSzHHAM5tKcMMSKRHb_4V7aMvbIcP-T5yg5-urp8vb5v7h5u7y4r5xQrelUa3vtOBeUbCd4y9OOUUFtUwK62RPmO70CxOuCiG14oIL39uulb0UiquOT9DRqu8sxfc55GKmITsYBjtCnGdDFdGcEbUelF2nlJbrQdEyyuudoHYFurqQnMCbWQpTm74MJWbhlVl6ZRZGGK3N0quqJujwZ4DNzg4-2dGF_FesJaunYucrDOr6PgIkk12A0UEfUjXQ9DGsGfQNECKnyA</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius</creator><creator>Zhang, Leiming</creator><creator>Sievering, H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface</title><author>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius ; Zhang, Leiming ; Sievering, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-85f6943f81ea6c3bc8c8141a274ac7d02969b24cac747983434fda657d7483863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Humidity effect</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Particles and aerosols</topic><topic>Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sub-micron particle dry deposition</topic><topic>Water surfaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Leiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievering, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kou-Fang Lo, Aloysius</au><au>Zhang, Leiming</au><au>Sievering, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>28</issue><spage>4727</spage><epage>4737</epage><pages>4727-4737</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Deposition processes of particles with dry diameter larger than about 10 μm are dominated by gravitational settling, while molecular diffusion and Brownian motion predominate the deposition processes of particles smaller than 0.1 μm in dry diameter. Many air pollution derived elements exhibit characteristics common to sub-micron particles. The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of meteorological conditions within the turbulent transfer layer on the deposition velocity of particles with dry diameter between 0.1 and 1 μm. It is for these sub-micron particles that particle growth by condensation in the deposition layer, the broken water surface effect and the enhanced transfer process due to atmospheric turbulence in the turbulent transfer layer play important roles in controlling the particle deposition velocity. Results of the present study show that the `dry air’ assumption of Williams’ model is unrealistic. Effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature cannot be ignored in determining the deposition velocity over a water surface. Neglecting effects of ambient air relative humidity and water surface temperature will result in defining atmospheric stability incorrectly. It is found that the largest effect of air relative humidity on deposition velocity occurs at an air–water temperature difference corresponding to the point of `displaced neutral stability'. For a given wind speed of U=5 m s −1 the additive effects of water surface temperature, T w, changes from 5 to 25°C and ambient air relative humidity variations from 85 to 60%, respectively, lead to a maximum difference in v d of about 20%. For a higher wind speed of 10 m s −1, however, the corresponding change in v d reduces to less than 5%. This is further confirmation that wind speed is one of the strongest variables that governs the magnitude of v d. The present study also found that the broken surface transfer coefficient, k bs, given as a multiple of the smooth surface transfer coefficient, k ss, is physically more meaningful than assigning it a constant value independent of particle size. The method used in this study requires only a single level of atmospheric data coupled with the surface temperature measurement. The present method is applicable for determining deposition velocity not only at the conventional measurement height of 10 m but also at any other heights that are different from the measurement height.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 1999-12, Vol.33 (28), p.4727-4737
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18093208
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
Brackish
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Freshwater
Humidity effect
Marine
Meteorology
Particles and aerosols
Pollutants physicochemistry study: properties, effects, reactions, transport and distribution
Pollution
Sub-micron particle dry deposition
Water surfaces
title The effect of humidity and state of water surfaces on deposition of aerosol particles onto a water surface
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20humidity%20and%20state%20of%20water%20surfaces%20on%20deposition%20of%20aerosol%20particles%20onto%20a%20water%20surface&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Kou-Fang%20Lo,%20Aloysius&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=28&rft.spage=4727&rft.epage=4737&rft.pages=4727-4737&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00202-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17668897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14521321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231099002022&rfr_iscdi=true