Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies
Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechani...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2016-07, Vol.70 (7), p.1047-1061 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1061 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1047 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Fewell, Jennifer H Jon F. Harrison |
description | Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808737883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44856999</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44856999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d6eb2ce1c0822511a23b4e99debdddc92bf401c50e04e03308c3029b4484bc103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAcx4MVLdPYjye5RxC8oeKg9L5vNpKSm2bqbIO2vd0tExIOnGZjnfWfmJeScwg0FKG4DAMuzFGieMlBFujsgEyo4S6HI2SGZABeQZkLwY3ISwgoAcirlhMi5NW3TLRNXJ5_OvyemqxLs0C-3yRAwabokONuYNnYBbZ9Y17quwXBKjmrTBjz7rlOyeHx4u39OZ69PL_d3s9QKLvu0yrFkFqkFyVhGqWG8FKhUhWVVVVaxshZAbQYIAoFzkJYDU6UQUpSWAp-S69F3493HgKHX6yZYbFvToRuCphJkwQspeUSv_qArN_guXqdpoaQSimV5pOhIWe9C8FjrjW_Wxm81Bb3PUo9Z6pil3mepd1HDRk2IbLdE_8v5H9HFKFqF3vmfLfGzLFdKxfnlOK-N02bpm6AXcxYNAOJTjDL-BaBwiDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1798949256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Fewell, Jennifer H ; Jon F. Harrison</creator><creatorcontrib>Fewell, Jennifer H ; Jon F. Harrison</creatorcontrib><description>Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Animal populations ; Ants ; Behavioral Sciences ; Bioenergetics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; brood rearing ; Division of labor ; Energy consumption ; energy efficiency ; Evolutionary biology ; foraging ; Group size ; Honey bee colonies ; humans ; Insect behavior ; Insect colonies ; Insect reproduction ; Insects ; Life Sciences ; Metabolism ; organization of work ; physiology ; REVIEW ; Social insects ; sociology ; variance ; Worker insects ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2016-07, Vol.70 (7), p.1047-1061</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d6eb2ce1c0822511a23b4e99debdddc92bf401c50e04e03308c3029b4484bc103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d6eb2ce1c0822511a23b4e99debdddc92bf401c50e04e03308c3029b4484bc103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44856999$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44856999$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fewell, Jennifer H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jon F. Harrison</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>brood rearing</subject><subject>Division of labor</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>energy efficiency</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Honey bee colonies</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Insect behavior</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Insect reproduction</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>organization of work</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>REVIEW</subject><subject>Social insects</subject><subject>sociology</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Worker insects</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAcx4MVLdPYjye5RxC8oeKg9L5vNpKSm2bqbIO2vd0tExIOnGZjnfWfmJeScwg0FKG4DAMuzFGieMlBFujsgEyo4S6HI2SGZABeQZkLwY3ISwgoAcirlhMi5NW3TLRNXJ5_OvyemqxLs0C-3yRAwabokONuYNnYBbZ9Y17quwXBKjmrTBjz7rlOyeHx4u39OZ69PL_d3s9QKLvu0yrFkFqkFyVhGqWG8FKhUhWVVVVaxshZAbQYIAoFzkJYDU6UQUpSWAp-S69F3493HgKHX6yZYbFvToRuCphJkwQspeUSv_qArN_guXqdpoaQSimV5pOhIWe9C8FjrjW_Wxm81Bb3PUo9Z6pil3mepd1HDRk2IbLdE_8v5H9HFKFqF3vmfLfGzLFdKxfnlOK-N02bpm6AXcxYNAOJTjDL-BaBwiDA</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Fewell, Jennifer H</creator><creator>Jon F. Harrison</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies</title><author>Fewell, Jennifer H ; Jon F. Harrison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d6eb2ce1c0822511a23b4e99debdddc92bf401c50e04e03308c3029b4484bc103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>brood rearing</topic><topic>Division of labor</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>energy efficiency</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Honey bee colonies</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Insect behavior</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Insect reproduction</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>organization of work</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>REVIEW</topic><topic>Social insects</topic><topic>sociology</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Worker insects</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fewell, Jennifer H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jon F. Harrison</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fewell, Jennifer H</au><au>Jon F. Harrison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1047-1061</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2016-07, Vol.70 (7), p.1047-1061 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808737883 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal Ecology Animal populations Ants Behavioral Sciences Bioenergetics Biomedical and Life Sciences brood rearing Division of labor Energy consumption energy efficiency Evolutionary biology foraging Group size Honey bee colonies humans Insect behavior Insect colonies Insect reproduction Insects Life Sciences Metabolism organization of work physiology REVIEW Social insects sociology variance Worker insects Zoology |
title | Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T09%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scaling%20of%20work%20and%20energy%20use%20in%20social%20insect%20colonies&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Fewell,%20Jennifer%20H&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1047-1061&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44856999%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1798949256&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44856999&rfr_iscdi=true |