Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action?
The postharvest phase has been considered an environment for successful application of biological control agents (BCAs). However, the interactions between fungal pathogen, host (fruit), and antagonist are influenced by several parameters such as temperature, oxidative stresses, oxygen composition an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of plant pathology 2016-08, Vol.145 (4), p.711-717 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 717 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 711 |
| container_title | European journal of plant pathology |
| container_volume | 145 |
| creator | Di Francesco, A. Martini, C. Mari, M. |
| description | The postharvest phase has been considered an environment for successful application of biological control agents (BCAs). However, the interactions between fungal pathogen, host (fruit), and antagonist are influenced by several parameters such as temperature, oxidative stresses, oxygen composition and water activity that could determine the success of biocontrol. Knowledge of the modes of action of BCAs is essential in order to enhance their viability and increase their potential in disease control. The antagonists display a wide range of modes of action: antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, parasitism and induction of resistance are considered the main ones. Their efficacy, however, is related to the host and the pathogen; sometimes, these mechanisms could act simultaneously, and it is therefore difficult to establish which is related to a specific antifungal action. The current review presents a brief summary of the research that has led to a better understanding of the mode of action of BCAs with particular emphasis on the most recent literature. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808733976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4146468581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f6c5dd3bd70799ca166cce20cc816f75b02d58b91f1a91ac3f82c9132c008acc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLuCGzfV3MamiRvRwRcMuNF1SG_TmUjbjLkdxX9vhroQwVUg-c7h5GPsBPg5cF5dEHBZqpyDzLmSVc532AzKSuTqUupdNuO60DmoSuyzA6I3njJaFzOGtz50YenRdhmGYYyhy0KbrQONKxs_HI1Z48lZcpTVX1nvMYbaJ9gOo12GwdNIV9kqfGa9HdK7w5VNlz1tWyyOPgzXR2yvtR2545_zkL3e373MH_PF88PT_GaRo7jUY95KLJtG1E213YYWpER0BUdUINuqrHnRlKrW0ILVYFG0qkANokDOlUUUh-xs6l3H8L5J003vCV3X2cGFDRlQPAkQupIJPf2DvoVNHNK6RAEkcyBEomCi0qeJomvNOvrexi8D3Gy1m0m7SdrNVrvhKVNMGUrssHTxV_O_oW9mO4Zi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811157133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Di Francesco, A. ; Martini, C. ; Mari, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Francesco, A. ; Martini, C. ; Mari, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The postharvest phase has been considered an environment for successful application of biological control agents (BCAs). However, the interactions between fungal pathogen, host (fruit), and antagonist are influenced by several parameters such as temperature, oxidative stresses, oxygen composition and water activity that could determine the success of biocontrol. Knowledge of the modes of action of BCAs is essential in order to enhance their viability and increase their potential in disease control. The antagonists display a wide range of modes of action: antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, parasitism and induction of resistance are considered the main ones. Their efficacy, however, is related to the host and the pathogen; sometimes, these mechanisms could act simultaneously, and it is therefore difficult to establish which is related to a specific antifungal action. The current review presents a brief summary of the research that has led to a better understanding of the mode of action of BCAs with particular emphasis on the most recent literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biological control ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Disease control ; Ecology ; Fungi ; Harvest ; Life Sciences ; Mode of action ; Oxidative stress ; Parasitism ; Pathogens ; Plant diseases ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2016-08, Vol.145 (4), p.711-717</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f6c5dd3bd70799ca166cce20cc816f75b02d58b91f1a91ac3f82c9132c008acc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f6c5dd3bd70799ca166cce20cc816f75b02d58b91f1a91ac3f82c9132c008acc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Francesco, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action?</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>The postharvest phase has been considered an environment for successful application of biological control agents (BCAs). However, the interactions between fungal pathogen, host (fruit), and antagonist are influenced by several parameters such as temperature, oxidative stresses, oxygen composition and water activity that could determine the success of biocontrol. Knowledge of the modes of action of BCAs is essential in order to enhance their viability and increase their potential in disease control. The antagonists display a wide range of modes of action: antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, parasitism and induction of resistance are considered the main ones. Their efficacy, however, is related to the host and the pathogen; sometimes, these mechanisms could act simultaneously, and it is therefore difficult to establish which is related to a specific antifungal action. The current review presents a brief summary of the research that has led to a better understanding of the mode of action of BCAs with particular emphasis on the most recent literature.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mode of action</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOD5-gLuCGzfV3MamiRvRwRcMuNF1SG_TmUjbjLkdxX9vhroQwVUg-c7h5GPsBPg5cF5dEHBZqpyDzLmSVc532AzKSuTqUupdNuO60DmoSuyzA6I3njJaFzOGtz50YenRdhmGYYyhy0KbrQONKxs_HI1Z48lZcpTVX1nvMYbaJ9gOo12GwdNIV9kqfGa9HdK7w5VNlz1tWyyOPgzXR2yvtR2545_zkL3e373MH_PF88PT_GaRo7jUY95KLJtG1E213YYWpER0BUdUINuqrHnRlKrW0ILVYFG0qkANokDOlUUUh-xs6l3H8L5J003vCV3X2cGFDRlQPAkQupIJPf2DvoVNHNK6RAEkcyBEomCi0qeJomvNOvrexi8D3Gy1m0m7SdrNVrvhKVNMGUrssHTxV_O_oW9mO4Zi</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Di Francesco, A.</creator><creator>Martini, C.</creator><creator>Mari, M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action?</title><author>Di Francesco, A. ; Martini, C. ; Mari, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-f6c5dd3bd70799ca166cce20cc816f75b02d58b91f1a91ac3f82c9132c008acc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mode of action</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Francesco, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Francesco, A.</au><au>Martini, C.</au><au>Mari, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>717</epage><pages>711-717</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>The postharvest phase has been considered an environment for successful application of biological control agents (BCAs). However, the interactions between fungal pathogen, host (fruit), and antagonist are influenced by several parameters such as temperature, oxidative stresses, oxygen composition and water activity that could determine the success of biocontrol. Knowledge of the modes of action of BCAs is essential in order to enhance their viability and increase their potential in disease control. The antagonists display a wide range of modes of action: antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, parasitism and induction of resistance are considered the main ones. Their efficacy, however, is related to the host and the pathogen; sometimes, these mechanisms could act simultaneously, and it is therefore difficult to establish which is related to a specific antifungal action. The current review presents a brief summary of the research that has led to a better understanding of the mode of action of BCAs with particular emphasis on the most recent literature.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0929-1873 |
| ispartof | European journal of plant pathology, 2016-08, Vol.145 (4), p.711-717 |
| issn | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808733976 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Biological control Biomedical and Life Sciences Disease control Ecology Fungi Harvest Life Sciences Mode of action Oxidative stress Parasitism Pathogens Plant diseases Plant Pathology Plant Sciences |
| title | Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A08%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20control%20of%20postharvest%20diseases%20by%20microbial%20antagonists:%20how%20many%20mechanisms%20of%20action?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Di%20Francesco,%20A.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=717&rft.pages=711-717&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-016-0867-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4146468581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811157133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |