Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling
Aim Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public health 2016-06, Vol.24 (3), p.253-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 253 |
container_title | Journal of public health |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Gschmeidler, Brigitte Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena Knitel-Grabher, Elke |
description | Aim
Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings.
Subject and methods
This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies.
Results
There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals.
Conclusion
Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808727276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808727276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b3b9e48719e2d8fa92d73d8760355e01ededc528739bd62974c5a75e6770decb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcBN26qeUzzcCeDjsKAG12HNLmd6dBpatIK_nsz1oUIchcHLt85HA5Cl5TcUELkbaKEK10QKgoiqS7EEZpRQXnBGFfHaMaoVgVVnJ-is5R2hHDOmZ6hagUdDI1LuOnwsAW8B98422LbedynT7cNKbgmP_poXQbhDoeJjKEFHGr8YdsR8LaBaKPL8h3lwtglaNum25yjk9q2CS5-dI7eHh9el0_F-mX1vLxfF45JPRQVrzQsVC4PzKvaauYl90oKwssSCAUP3pVMSa4rL5iWC1daWYKQknhwFZ-j6ym3j-F9hDSYfZNc7mA7CGMyVBElWT6R0as_6C6MscvtDJWalkISqTNFJ8rFkFKE2vSx2dv4aSgxh9XNtLrJq5vD6uaQzCZPymy3gfgr-V_TFxrrhNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791567079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gschmeidler, Brigitte ; Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena ; Knitel-Grabher, Elke</creator><creatorcontrib>Gschmeidler, Brigitte ; Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena ; Knitel-Grabher, Elke</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings.
Subject and methods
This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies.
Results
There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals.
Conclusion
Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2198-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Counseling ; Epidemiology ; Genetics ; Health care ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Public Health ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health, 2016-06, Vol.24 (3), p.253-261</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b3b9e48719e2d8fa92d73d8760355e01ededc528739bd62974c5a75e6770decb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b3b9e48719e2d8fa92d73d8760355e01ededc528739bd62974c5a75e6770decb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gschmeidler, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knitel-Grabher, Elke</creatorcontrib><title>Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling</title><title>Journal of public health</title><addtitle>J Public Health</addtitle><description>Aim
Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings.
Subject and methods
This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies.
Results
There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals.
Conclusion
Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education.</description><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2198-1833</issn><issn>1613-2238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcBN26qeUzzcCeDjsKAG12HNLmd6dBpatIK_nsz1oUIchcHLt85HA5Cl5TcUELkbaKEK10QKgoiqS7EEZpRQXnBGFfHaMaoVgVVnJ-is5R2hHDOmZ6hagUdDI1LuOnwsAW8B98422LbedynT7cNKbgmP_poXQbhDoeJjKEFHGr8YdsR8LaBaKPL8h3lwtglaNum25yjk9q2CS5-dI7eHh9el0_F-mX1vLxfF45JPRQVrzQsVC4PzKvaauYl90oKwssSCAUP3pVMSa4rL5iWC1daWYKQknhwFZ-j6ym3j-F9hDSYfZNc7mA7CGMyVBElWT6R0as_6C6MscvtDJWalkISqTNFJ8rFkFKE2vSx2dv4aSgxh9XNtLrJq5vD6uaQzCZPymy3gfgr-V_TFxrrhNY</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Gschmeidler, Brigitte</creator><creator>Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena</creator><creator>Knitel-Grabher, Elke</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling</title><author>Gschmeidler, Brigitte ; Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena ; Knitel-Grabher, Elke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-b3b9e48719e2d8fa92d73d8760355e01ededc528739bd62974c5a75e6770decb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gschmeidler, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knitel-Grabher, Elke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gschmeidler, Brigitte</au><au>Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena</au><au>Knitel-Grabher, Elke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health</jtitle><stitle>J Public Health</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>253-261</pages><issn>2198-1833</issn><eissn>1613-2238</eissn><abstract>Aim
Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings.
Subject and methods
This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies.
Results
There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals.
Conclusion
Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2198-1833 |
ispartof | Journal of public health, 2016-06, Vol.24 (3), p.253-261 |
issn | 2198-1833 1613-2238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808727276 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Counseling Epidemiology Genetics Health care Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Public Health Values |
title | Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetics%20in%20the%20medical%20and%20psychosocial%20practice:%20on%20the%20role%20of%20value%20hierarchies%20in%20counselling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Gschmeidler,%20Brigitte&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=253-261&rft.issn=2198-1833&rft.eissn=1613-2238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808727276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791567079&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |