Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK
Rationale Studies suggest that increased breastfeeding rates can provide substantial financial savings, but the scale of such savings in the UK is not known. Objective To calculate potential cost savings attributable to increases in breastfeeding rates from the National Health Service perspective. D...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2015-04, Vol.100 (4), p.334-340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 334 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Pokhrel, S Quigley, M A Fox-Rushby, J McCormick, F Williams, A Trueman, P Dodds, R Renfrew, M J |
description | Rationale Studies suggest that increased breastfeeding rates can provide substantial financial savings, but the scale of such savings in the UK is not known. Objective To calculate potential cost savings attributable to increases in breastfeeding rates from the National Health Service perspective. Design and settings Cost savings focussed on where evidence of health benefit is strongest: reductions in gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media in infants, necrotising enterocolitis in preterm babies and breast cancer (BC) in women. Savings were estimated using a seven-step framework in which an incidence-based disease model determined the number of cases that could have been avoided if breastfeeding rates were increased. Point estimates of cost savings were subject to a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results Treating the four acute diseases in children costs the UK at least £89 million annually. The 2009–2010 value of lifetime costs of treating maternal BC is estimated at £959 million. Supporting mothers who are exclusively breast feeding at 1 week to continue breast feeding until 4 months can be expected to reduce the incidence of three childhood infectious diseases and save at least £11 million annually. Doubling the proportion of mothers currently breast feeding for 7–18 months in their lifetime is likely to reduce the incidence of maternal BC and save at least £31 million at 2009–2010 value. Conclusions The economic impact of low breastfeeding rates is substantial. Investing in services that support women who want to breast feed for longer is potentially cost saving. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306701 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808722853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A414540096</galeid><sourcerecordid>A414540096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-51651c05238f6a0fb424eb48000711fea0c06b5b2244dfc6ae1489303c4864e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EosvCX0CRuHAJjO2J4z1WKyiISuVAz5bjTHa9SuJie1H59zhKQYgLPVljfTPz5j3GKg7vOJfqvY3u2Pvkjn7sawEcawmqBf6EbTgqXb4Qn7INAMh6p7W-YC9SOgFwobV8zi5Eg20rOWzY1deQac7ejhW5MIfJu8pPd9blVA0xTEsRww8_H6oukk15IOqXKtpMqfJzlY9U3X55yZ4Ndkz06uHdstuPH77tP9XXN1ef95fXdac4z3XDVcMdNELqQVkYOhRIHeqitOV8IAsOVNd0QiD2g1OWOOqdBOlQK6RGbtnbdW5R9f1MKZup-EDjaGcK52S4Bt0KoRv5f1TpFgRqFI9A1WLYrvi5ZW_-QU_hHOdyc9ld7NWgcNldr9TBjmT8XKzNdJ9dGEc6kCmW7G_MJXJsEGCnCq9X3sWQUqTB3EU_2fjTcDBL5ObvyM0SuVkjL62vHwSdu4n6P42_My6AXIFuOj1-7C_u2LfG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828880643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Pokhrel, S ; Quigley, M A ; Fox-Rushby, J ; McCormick, F ; Williams, A ; Trueman, P ; Dodds, R ; Renfrew, M J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pokhrel, S ; Quigley, M A ; Fox-Rushby, J ; McCormick, F ; Williams, A ; Trueman, P ; Dodds, R ; Renfrew, M J</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Studies suggest that increased breastfeeding rates can provide substantial financial savings, but the scale of such savings in the UK is not known. Objective To calculate potential cost savings attributable to increases in breastfeeding rates from the National Health Service perspective. Design and settings Cost savings focussed on where evidence of health benefit is strongest: reductions in gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media in infants, necrotising enterocolitis in preterm babies and breast cancer (BC) in women. Savings were estimated using a seven-step framework in which an incidence-based disease model determined the number of cases that could have been avoided if breastfeeding rates were increased. Point estimates of cost savings were subject to a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results Treating the four acute diseases in children costs the UK at least £89 million annually. The 2009–2010 value of lifetime costs of treating maternal BC is estimated at £959 million. Supporting mothers who are exclusively breast feeding at 1 week to continue breast feeding until 4 months can be expected to reduce the incidence of three childhood infectious diseases and save at least £11 million annually. Doubling the proportion of mothers currently breast feeding for 7–18 months in their lifetime is likely to reduce the incidence of maternal BC and save at least £31 million at 2009–2010 value. Conclusions The economic impact of low breastfeeding rates is substantial. Investing in services that support women who want to breast feed for longer is potentially cost saving.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25477310</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Babies ; Breast cancer ; Breast feeding ; Breast Feeding - economics ; Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Cancer ; Child Health ; Childrens health ; Company business management ; Control ; Cost control ; Cost of Illness ; Cost Savings ; Ear diseases ; Economic analysis ; Economic impact ; Economic Research ; Economics ; Evidence ; Female ; Females ; Health aspects ; Health care costs ; Health care expenditures ; Health Policy - economics ; Health services ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Infectious diseases ; Management ; Medical care, Cost of ; Mothers ; Obesity ; Primary Prevention - economics ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Respiratory tract ; Sensitivity analysis ; State Medicine - economics ; United Kingdom ; Women ; Women's health ; Womens health ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2015-04, Vol.100 (4), p.334-340</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-51651c05238f6a0fb424eb48000711fea0c06b5b2244dfc6ae1489303c4864e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-51651c05238f6a0fb424eb48000711fea0c06b5b2244dfc6ae1489303c4864e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/100/4/334.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/100/4/334.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25477310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pokhrel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox-Rushby, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trueman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, M J</creatorcontrib><title>Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Rationale Studies suggest that increased breastfeeding rates can provide substantial financial savings, but the scale of such savings in the UK is not known. Objective To calculate potential cost savings attributable to increases in breastfeeding rates from the National Health Service perspective. Design and settings Cost savings focussed on where evidence of health benefit is strongest: reductions in gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media in infants, necrotising enterocolitis in preterm babies and breast cancer (BC) in women. Savings were estimated using a seven-step framework in which an incidence-based disease model determined the number of cases that could have been avoided if breastfeeding rates were increased. Point estimates of cost savings were subject to a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results Treating the four acute diseases in children costs the UK at least £89 million annually. The 2009–2010 value of lifetime costs of treating maternal BC is estimated at £959 million. Supporting mothers who are exclusively breast feeding at 1 week to continue breast feeding until 4 months can be expected to reduce the incidence of three childhood infectious diseases and save at least £11 million annually. Doubling the proportion of mothers currently breast feeding for 7–18 months in their lifetime is likely to reduce the incidence of maternal BC and save at least £31 million at 2009–2010 value. Conclusions The economic impact of low breastfeeding rates is substantial. Investing in services that support women who want to breast feed for longer is potentially cost saving.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast feeding</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - economics</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic Research</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Policy - economics</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Primary Prevention - economics</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS0EosvCX0CRuHAJjO2J4z1WKyiISuVAz5bjTHa9SuJie1H59zhKQYgLPVljfTPz5j3GKg7vOJfqvY3u2Pvkjn7sawEcawmqBf6EbTgqXb4Qn7INAMh6p7W-YC9SOgFwobV8zi5Eg20rOWzY1deQac7ejhW5MIfJu8pPd9blVA0xTEsRww8_H6oukk15IOqXKtpMqfJzlY9U3X55yZ4Ndkz06uHdstuPH77tP9XXN1ef95fXdac4z3XDVcMdNELqQVkYOhRIHeqitOV8IAsOVNd0QiD2g1OWOOqdBOlQK6RGbtnbdW5R9f1MKZup-EDjaGcK52S4Bt0KoRv5f1TpFgRqFI9A1WLYrvi5ZW_-QU_hHOdyc9ld7NWgcNldr9TBjmT8XKzNdJ9dGEc6kCmW7G_MJXJsEGCnCq9X3sWQUqTB3EU_2fjTcDBL5ObvyM0SuVkjL62vHwSdu4n6P42_My6AXIFuOj1-7C_u2LfG</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Pokhrel, S</creator><creator>Quigley, M A</creator><creator>Fox-Rushby, J</creator><creator>McCormick, F</creator><creator>Williams, A</creator><creator>Trueman, P</creator><creator>Dodds, R</creator><creator>Renfrew, M J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK</title><author>Pokhrel, S ; Quigley, M A ; Fox-Rushby, J ; McCormick, F ; Williams, A ; Trueman, P ; Dodds, R ; Renfrew, M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b611t-51651c05238f6a0fb424eb48000711fea0c06b5b2244dfc6ae1489303c4864e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast feeding</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - economics</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic Research</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Policy - economics</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Primary Prevention - economics</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pokhrel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox-Rushby, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trueman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, M J</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pokhrel, S</au><au>Quigley, M A</au><au>Fox-Rushby, J</au><au>McCormick, F</au><au>Williams, A</au><au>Trueman, P</au><au>Dodds, R</au><au>Renfrew, M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>334-340</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Rationale Studies suggest that increased breastfeeding rates can provide substantial financial savings, but the scale of such savings in the UK is not known. Objective To calculate potential cost savings attributable to increases in breastfeeding rates from the National Health Service perspective. Design and settings Cost savings focussed on where evidence of health benefit is strongest: reductions in gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media in infants, necrotising enterocolitis in preterm babies and breast cancer (BC) in women. Savings were estimated using a seven-step framework in which an incidence-based disease model determined the number of cases that could have been avoided if breastfeeding rates were increased. Point estimates of cost savings were subject to a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results Treating the four acute diseases in children costs the UK at least £89 million annually. The 2009–2010 value of lifetime costs of treating maternal BC is estimated at £959 million. Supporting mothers who are exclusively breast feeding at 1 week to continue breast feeding until 4 months can be expected to reduce the incidence of three childhood infectious diseases and save at least £11 million annually. Doubling the proportion of mothers currently breast feeding for 7–18 months in their lifetime is likely to reduce the incidence of maternal BC and save at least £31 million at 2009–2010 value. Conclusions The economic impact of low breastfeeding rates is substantial. Investing in services that support women who want to breast feed for longer is potentially cost saving.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>25477310</pmid><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-306701</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2015-04, Vol.100 (4), p.334-340 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808722853 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Babies Breast cancer Breast feeding Breast Feeding - economics Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data Breastfeeding & lactation Cancer Child Health Childrens health Company business management Control Cost control Cost of Illness Cost Savings Ear diseases Economic analysis Economic impact Economic Research Economics Evidence Female Females Health aspects Health care costs Health care expenditures Health Policy - economics Health services Humans Illnesses Infectious diseases Management Medical care, Cost of Mothers Obesity Primary Prevention - economics Quality-Adjusted Life Years Respiratory tract Sensitivity analysis State Medicine - economics United Kingdom Women Women's health Womens health Young Children |
title | Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20economic%20impacts%20from%20improving%20breastfeeding%20rates%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Pokhrel,%20S&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=334-340&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306701&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA414540096%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828880643&rft_id=info:pmid/25477310&rft_galeid=A414540096&rfr_iscdi=true |