Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil

•Quicklime increased soil pH and bacterial alpha diversity of the acidic soil more rapidly.•Manure improved nutrient concentration of the acidic soil more effectively.•Copiotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment.•Oligotrophic taxa were in greater relative abunda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2016-04, Vol.100, p.38-44
Hauptverfasser: Xun, Weibing, Xiong, Wu, Huang, Ting, Ran, Wei, Li, Dongchu, Shen, Qirong, Li, Qiang, Zhang, Ruifu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 44
container_issue
container_start_page 38
container_title Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 100
creator Xun, Weibing
Xiong, Wu
Huang, Ting
Ran, Wei
Li, Dongchu
Shen, Qirong
Li, Qiang
Zhang, Ruifu
description •Quicklime increased soil pH and bacterial alpha diversity of the acidic soil more rapidly.•Manure improved nutrient concentration of the acidic soil more effectively.•Copiotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment.•Oligotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment. Red soil is a kind of Ferralic Cambisol. Good hydrothermal resources but usually acidic and low base saturation make it very easy to be acidified under unreasonable fertilizer managements in agricultural area. In 1990, a series of fertilizer applications were established on a homogeneous field to investigate the soil fertility changes under different fertilizations in Hunan province, among them, long-term chemical nitrogen fertilization (NPK) induced severe soil acidification, whereas long-term chemical plus swine manure fertilization (NPKM) exhibited an overwhelming advantage in terms of nutrient concentration and bacterial diversity. In 2010, to investigate the effect of short-term quicklime and swine manure applications on the acid red soil, a remediation experiment was established on the NPK treatment. Quicklime (CaO) and swine manure (the same as the swine manure in NPKM) applications on NPK soil had different effects on remediating the soil acidification: short-term quicklime application (NPK+Ca) increased soil pH and bacterial diversity more rapidly, whereas short-term swine manure application (NPK+M) improved soil nutrient concentration more effectively. Alteration of environmental conditions caused significant changes of bacterial community: oligotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment, whereas copiotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment. This study provides insights into the two major remediation approaches for an acidic red soil; these insights are important for soil remediating and improving fertility. Taken together, we recommended short-term quicklime application to increase the soil pH quickly and long-term swine manure fertilization to improve soil fertility.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808722300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0929139315301475</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808722300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6b67c5c7d829c6d4cc9766101219ee9cdb2c61bb6f2a446bc7af1516694e52ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQRi1EJS63_AMkvGSTYDuJE2-QUMVLqsSidG05kwmdS2KndlLUdf84vg1rVrOY883jMPZWilIKqT-cSrekQFOphGxKqUohqhfsILu2KoRq1Ut2EEaZQlamesVep3QSQjSqqw7s6eYPeeSz81tE7vzA7zeC3xPNyO_cA_KBxhEj-pXTvDhYEw-ewx3OBG7iSwwLxpUwPWchzEtItFJmwsj7zGOkzOXGvHl6BnPDee6ABgJ-PvuSXYxuSvjmXz2y2y-ff159K65_fP1-9em6gEpXa6F73UID7dApA3qoAUyrdRagpEE0MPQKtOx7PSpX17qH1o2ykVqbGhvlhurI3u9z89X3G6bVzpQAp8l5DFuyshNdq1SV7R1ZvaMQQ0oRR7tEml18tFLYs3N7srtze3ZupbI5lWPv9tjognW_IiV7e5MBLUQeLkybiY87gfnRB8JoExB6wIEiwmqHQP9f8RctYJhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808722300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Xun, Weibing ; Xiong, Wu ; Huang, Ting ; Ran, Wei ; Li, Dongchu ; Shen, Qirong ; Li, Qiang ; Zhang, Ruifu</creator><creatorcontrib>Xun, Weibing ; Xiong, Wu ; Huang, Ting ; Ran, Wei ; Li, Dongchu ; Shen, Qirong ; Li, Qiang ; Zhang, Ruifu</creatorcontrib><description>•Quicklime increased soil pH and bacterial alpha diversity of the acidic soil more rapidly.•Manure improved nutrient concentration of the acidic soil more effectively.•Copiotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment.•Oligotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment. Red soil is a kind of Ferralic Cambisol. Good hydrothermal resources but usually acidic and low base saturation make it very easy to be acidified under unreasonable fertilizer managements in agricultural area. In 1990, a series of fertilizer applications were established on a homogeneous field to investigate the soil fertility changes under different fertilizations in Hunan province, among them, long-term chemical nitrogen fertilization (NPK) induced severe soil acidification, whereas long-term chemical plus swine manure fertilization (NPKM) exhibited an overwhelming advantage in terms of nutrient concentration and bacterial diversity. In 2010, to investigate the effect of short-term quicklime and swine manure applications on the acid red soil, a remediation experiment was established on the NPK treatment. Quicklime (CaO) and swine manure (the same as the swine manure in NPKM) applications on NPK soil had different effects on remediating the soil acidification: short-term quicklime application (NPK+Ca) increased soil pH and bacterial diversity more rapidly, whereas short-term swine manure application (NPK+M) improved soil nutrient concentration more effectively. Alteration of environmental conditions caused significant changes of bacterial community: oligotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment, whereas copiotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment. This study provides insights into the two major remediation approaches for an acidic red soil; these insights are important for soil remediating and improving fertility. Taken together, we recommended short-term quicklime application to increase the soil pH quickly and long-term swine manure fertilization to improve soil fertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>acid soils ; Acidic soil remediation ; Bacteria ; bacterial communities ; Bacterial community ; base saturation ; calcium oxide ; Cambisols ; Chemical property ; environmental factors ; eutrophication ; fertilizer application ; manure spreading ; nitrogen fertilizers ; nutrient content ; pig manure ; Quicklime ; remediation ; soil acidification ; soil fertility ; soil nutrients ; soil pH ; Swine manure</subject><ispartof>Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2016-04, Vol.100, p.38-44</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6b67c5c7d829c6d4cc9766101219ee9cdb2c61bb6f2a446bc7af1516694e52ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6b67c5c7d829c6d4cc9766101219ee9cdb2c61bb6f2a446bc7af1516694e52ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xun, Weibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dongchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Qirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruifu</creatorcontrib><title>Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil</title><title>Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>•Quicklime increased soil pH and bacterial alpha diversity of the acidic soil more rapidly.•Manure improved nutrient concentration of the acidic soil more effectively.•Copiotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment.•Oligotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment. Red soil is a kind of Ferralic Cambisol. Good hydrothermal resources but usually acidic and low base saturation make it very easy to be acidified under unreasonable fertilizer managements in agricultural area. In 1990, a series of fertilizer applications were established on a homogeneous field to investigate the soil fertility changes under different fertilizations in Hunan province, among them, long-term chemical nitrogen fertilization (NPK) induced severe soil acidification, whereas long-term chemical plus swine manure fertilization (NPKM) exhibited an overwhelming advantage in terms of nutrient concentration and bacterial diversity. In 2010, to investigate the effect of short-term quicklime and swine manure applications on the acid red soil, a remediation experiment was established on the NPK treatment. Quicklime (CaO) and swine manure (the same as the swine manure in NPKM) applications on NPK soil had different effects on remediating the soil acidification: short-term quicklime application (NPK+Ca) increased soil pH and bacterial diversity more rapidly, whereas short-term swine manure application (NPK+M) improved soil nutrient concentration more effectively. Alteration of environmental conditions caused significant changes of bacterial community: oligotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment, whereas copiotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment. This study provides insights into the two major remediation approaches for an acidic red soil; these insights are important for soil remediating and improving fertility. Taken together, we recommended short-term quicklime application to increase the soil pH quickly and long-term swine manure fertilization to improve soil fertility.</description><subject>acid soils</subject><subject>Acidic soil remediation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>Bacterial community</subject><subject>base saturation</subject><subject>calcium oxide</subject><subject>Cambisols</subject><subject>Chemical property</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>eutrophication</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>manure spreading</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>pig manure</subject><subject>Quicklime</subject><subject>remediation</subject><subject>soil acidification</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>Swine manure</subject><issn>0929-1393</issn><issn>1873-0272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQRi1EJS63_AMkvGSTYDuJE2-QUMVLqsSidG05kwmdS2KndlLUdf84vg1rVrOY883jMPZWilIKqT-cSrekQFOphGxKqUohqhfsILu2KoRq1Ut2EEaZQlamesVep3QSQjSqqw7s6eYPeeSz81tE7vzA7zeC3xPNyO_cA_KBxhEj-pXTvDhYEw-ewx3OBG7iSwwLxpUwPWchzEtItFJmwsj7zGOkzOXGvHl6BnPDee6ABgJ-PvuSXYxuSvjmXz2y2y-ff159K65_fP1-9em6gEpXa6F73UID7dApA3qoAUyrdRagpEE0MPQKtOx7PSpX17qH1o2ykVqbGhvlhurI3u9z89X3G6bVzpQAp8l5DFuyshNdq1SV7R1ZvaMQQ0oRR7tEml18tFLYs3N7srtze3ZupbI5lWPv9tjognW_IiV7e5MBLUQeLkybiY87gfnRB8JoExB6wIEiwmqHQP9f8RctYJhg</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Xun, Weibing</creator><creator>Xiong, Wu</creator><creator>Huang, Ting</creator><creator>Ran, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Dongchu</creator><creator>Shen, Qirong</creator><creator>Li, Qiang</creator><creator>Zhang, Ruifu</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil</title><author>Xun, Weibing ; Xiong, Wu ; Huang, Ting ; Ran, Wei ; Li, Dongchu ; Shen, Qirong ; Li, Qiang ; Zhang, Ruifu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6b67c5c7d829c6d4cc9766101219ee9cdb2c61bb6f2a446bc7af1516694e52ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>acid soils</topic><topic>Acidic soil remediation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>Bacterial community</topic><topic>base saturation</topic><topic>calcium oxide</topic><topic>Cambisols</topic><topic>Chemical property</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>eutrophication</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>manure spreading</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>pig manure</topic><topic>Quicklime</topic><topic>remediation</topic><topic>soil acidification</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>Swine manure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xun, Weibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dongchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Qirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ruifu</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xun, Weibing</au><au>Xiong, Wu</au><au>Huang, Ting</au><au>Ran, Wei</au><au>Li, Dongchu</au><au>Shen, Qirong</au><au>Li, Qiang</au><au>Zhang, Ruifu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil</atitle><jtitle>Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>38</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>38-44</pages><issn>0929-1393</issn><eissn>1873-0272</eissn><abstract>•Quicklime increased soil pH and bacterial alpha diversity of the acidic soil more rapidly.•Manure improved nutrient concentration of the acidic soil more effectively.•Copiotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment.•Oligotrophic taxa were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment. Red soil is a kind of Ferralic Cambisol. Good hydrothermal resources but usually acidic and low base saturation make it very easy to be acidified under unreasonable fertilizer managements in agricultural area. In 1990, a series of fertilizer applications were established on a homogeneous field to investigate the soil fertility changes under different fertilizations in Hunan province, among them, long-term chemical nitrogen fertilization (NPK) induced severe soil acidification, whereas long-term chemical plus swine manure fertilization (NPKM) exhibited an overwhelming advantage in terms of nutrient concentration and bacterial diversity. In 2010, to investigate the effect of short-term quicklime and swine manure applications on the acid red soil, a remediation experiment was established on the NPK treatment. Quicklime (CaO) and swine manure (the same as the swine manure in NPKM) applications on NPK soil had different effects on remediating the soil acidification: short-term quicklime application (NPK+Ca) increased soil pH and bacterial diversity more rapidly, whereas short-term swine manure application (NPK+M) improved soil nutrient concentration more effectively. Alteration of environmental conditions caused significant changes of bacterial community: oligotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with quicklime treatment, whereas copiotrophic groups were in greater relative abundances with swine manure treatment. This study provides insights into the two major remediation approaches for an acidic red soil; these insights are important for soil remediating and improving fertility. Taken together, we recommended short-term quicklime application to increase the soil pH quickly and long-term swine manure fertilization to improve soil fertility.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0929-1393
ispartof Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2016-04, Vol.100, p.38-44
issn 0929-1393
1873-0272
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808722300
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects acid soils
Acidic soil remediation
Bacteria
bacterial communities
Bacterial community
base saturation
calcium oxide
Cambisols
Chemical property
environmental factors
eutrophication
fertilizer application
manure spreading
nitrogen fertilizers
nutrient content
pig manure
Quicklime
remediation
soil acidification
soil fertility
soil nutrients
soil pH
Swine manure
title Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Swine%20manure%20and%20quicklime%20have%20different%20impacts%20on%20chemical%20properties%20and%20composition%20of%20bacterial%20communities%20of%20an%20acidic%20soil&rft.jtitle=Applied%20soil%20ecology%20:%20a%20section%20of%20Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Xun,%20Weibing&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=38-44&rft.issn=0929-1393&rft.eissn=1873-0272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808722300%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808722300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0929139315301475&rfr_iscdi=true