Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar
Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) are one of the most threatened taxa worldwide, including species in North Carolina and South Carolina. Populations of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in the Carolinas have been significantly reduced from historical levels by a combination of intense fishing and habit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine and coastal fisheries 2015, Vol.7 (1), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Marine and coastal fisheries |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Flowers, H. Jared Hightower, Joseph E |
description | Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) are one of the most threatened taxa worldwide, including species in North Carolina and South Carolina. Populations of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in the Carolinas have been significantly reduced from historical levels by a combination of intense fishing and habitat loss. There is a need for estimates of current abundance, to describe status, and for estimates of historical abundance in order to provide realistic recovery goals. In this study we used N-mixture and distance models with data acquired from side-scan sonar surveys to estimate abundance of sturgeon in six major sturgeon rivers in North Carolina and South Carolina. Estimated abundances of sturgeon greater than 1 m TL in the Carolina distinct population segment (DPS) were 2,031 using the count model and 1,912 via the distance model. The Pee Dee River had the highest overall abundance of any river at 1,944 (count model) or 1,823 (distance model). These estimates do not account for sturgeon less than 1 m TL or occurring in riverine reaches not surveyed or in marine waters. Comparing the two models, the N-mixture model produced similar estimates using less data than the distance model with only a slight reduction of estimated precision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19425120.2014.982334 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808719049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808719049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4481-f318bf1492dcbfee46feb4fc394c3ebead0b8c8ac48e6082a374be2c838cdedb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LwzAYh4soOKffQLBHL535ty7xNuqmwsRD3Tkk6dsZ6ZKZdMi-va1V8LhTwi_PE973lyTXGE0w4ugOC0ammKAJQZhNBCeUspNk1MdZn5_-u58nFzF-IJQzIegoeVjE1m5Va90mLdt92IB36VzvXaWcgdS6tH2HtFDBN9apmK7jD2kryEqjXFp6p8JlclarJsLV7zlO1svFW_GUrV4fn4v5KtOMcZzVFHNdYyZIZXQNwPIaNKsNFcxQ0KAqpLnhyjAOOeJE0RnTQAyn3FRQaTpObod_d8F_7iG2cmujgaZRDvw-SswRn2GBmOhQNqAm-BgD1HIXuj3DQWIk-9LkX2myL00OpXXa_aB92QYORznypVgShBDu5JtBrpWXahNslOuyI_PuccqomHUEGQhtvXdw3Ezf7AeHvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808719049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Flowers, H. Jared ; Hightower, Joseph E</creator><creatorcontrib>Flowers, H. Jared ; Hightower, Joseph E</creatorcontrib><description>Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) are one of the most threatened taxa worldwide, including species in North Carolina and South Carolina. Populations of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in the Carolinas have been significantly reduced from historical levels by a combination of intense fishing and habitat loss. There is a need for estimates of current abundance, to describe status, and for estimates of historical abundance in order to provide realistic recovery goals. In this study we used N-mixture and distance models with data acquired from side-scan sonar surveys to estimate abundance of sturgeon in six major sturgeon rivers in North Carolina and South Carolina. Estimated abundances of sturgeon greater than 1 m TL in the Carolina distinct population segment (DPS) were 2,031 using the count model and 1,912 via the distance model. The Pee Dee River had the highest overall abundance of any river at 1,944 (count model) or 1,823 (distance model). These estimates do not account for sturgeon less than 1 m TL or occurring in riverine reaches not surveyed or in marine waters. Comparing the two models, the N-mixture model produced similar estimates using less data than the distance model with only a slight reduction of estimated precision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-5120</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2014.982334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Fisheries Society</publisher><subject>Acipenser ; Marine</subject><ispartof>Marine and coastal fisheries, 2015, Vol.7 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>H. Jared Flowers and Joseph E. Hightower This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.</rights><rights>2015 The Author(s). Published with license by the American Fisheries Society H. Jared Flowers and Joseph E. Hightower</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4481-f318bf1492dcbfee46feb4fc394c3ebead0b8c8ac48e6082a374be2c838cdedb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4481-f318bf1492dcbfee46feb4fc394c3ebead0b8c8ac48e6082a374be2c838cdedb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1080/19425120.2014.982334$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F19425120.2014.982334$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,864,1417,4024,11562,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,52719</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flowers, H. Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, Joseph E</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar</title><title>Marine and coastal fisheries</title><description>Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) are one of the most threatened taxa worldwide, including species in North Carolina and South Carolina. Populations of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in the Carolinas have been significantly reduced from historical levels by a combination of intense fishing and habitat loss. There is a need for estimates of current abundance, to describe status, and for estimates of historical abundance in order to provide realistic recovery goals. In this study we used N-mixture and distance models with data acquired from side-scan sonar surveys to estimate abundance of sturgeon in six major sturgeon rivers in North Carolina and South Carolina. Estimated abundances of sturgeon greater than 1 m TL in the Carolina distinct population segment (DPS) were 2,031 using the count model and 1,912 via the distance model. The Pee Dee River had the highest overall abundance of any river at 1,944 (count model) or 1,823 (distance model). These estimates do not account for sturgeon less than 1 m TL or occurring in riverine reaches not surveyed or in marine waters. Comparing the two models, the N-mixture model produced similar estimates using less data than the distance model with only a slight reduction of estimated precision.</description><subject>Acipenser</subject><subject>Marine</subject><issn>1942-5120</issn><issn>1942-5120</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LwzAYh4soOKffQLBHL535ty7xNuqmwsRD3Tkk6dsZ6ZKZdMi-va1V8LhTwi_PE973lyTXGE0w4ugOC0ammKAJQZhNBCeUspNk1MdZn5_-u58nFzF-IJQzIegoeVjE1m5Va90mLdt92IB36VzvXaWcgdS6tH2HtFDBN9apmK7jD2kryEqjXFp6p8JlclarJsLV7zlO1svFW_GUrV4fn4v5KtOMcZzVFHNdYyZIZXQNwPIaNKsNFcxQ0KAqpLnhyjAOOeJE0RnTQAyn3FRQaTpObod_d8F_7iG2cmujgaZRDvw-SswRn2GBmOhQNqAm-BgD1HIXuj3DQWIk-9LkX2myL00OpXXa_aB92QYORznypVgShBDu5JtBrpWXahNslOuyI_PuccqomHUEGQhtvXdw3Ezf7AeHvQ</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Flowers, H. Jared</creator><creator>Hightower, Joseph E</creator><general>American Fisheries Society</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar</title><author>Flowers, H. Jared ; Hightower, Joseph E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4481-f318bf1492dcbfee46feb4fc394c3ebead0b8c8ac48e6082a374be2c838cdedb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acipenser</topic><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flowers, H. Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, Joseph E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flowers, H. Jared</au><au>Hightower, Joseph E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar</atitle><jtitle>Marine and coastal fisheries</jtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1942-5120</issn><eissn>1942-5120</eissn><abstract>Sturgeons (Acipenseridae) are one of the most threatened taxa worldwide, including species in North Carolina and South Carolina. Populations of Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in the Carolinas have been significantly reduced from historical levels by a combination of intense fishing and habitat loss. There is a need for estimates of current abundance, to describe status, and for estimates of historical abundance in order to provide realistic recovery goals. In this study we used N-mixture and distance models with data acquired from side-scan sonar surveys to estimate abundance of sturgeon in six major sturgeon rivers in North Carolina and South Carolina. Estimated abundances of sturgeon greater than 1 m TL in the Carolina distinct population segment (DPS) were 2,031 using the count model and 1,912 via the distance model. The Pee Dee River had the highest overall abundance of any river at 1,944 (count model) or 1,823 (distance model). These estimates do not account for sturgeon less than 1 m TL or occurring in riverine reaches not surveyed or in marine waters. Comparing the two models, the N-mixture model produced similar estimates using less data than the distance model with only a slight reduction of estimated precision.</abstract><pub>American Fisheries Society</pub><doi>10.1080/19425120.2014.982334</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-5120 |
ispartof | Marine and coastal fisheries, 2015, Vol.7 (1), p.1-9 |
issn | 1942-5120 1942-5120 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808719049 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; BioOne Open Access Titles; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Acipenser Marine |
title | Estimating Sturgeon Abundance in the Carolinas Using Side-Scan Sonar |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Sturgeon%20Abundance%20in%20the%20Carolinas%20Using%20Side-Scan%20Sonar&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20coastal%20fisheries&rft.au=Flowers,%20H.%20Jared&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1942-5120&rft.eissn=1942-5120&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19425120.2014.982334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808719049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808719049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |