third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters

Genetic modifications of pineapple provide the potential to increase fungal resistance without the use of pesticides. Previously, we developed a procedure for pineapple callus transformation, introducing the antifungal chitinase and AP24 genes, and the herbicide-tolerance conferring bar gene as a se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant cell, tissue and organ culture tissue and organ culture, 2016-05, Vol.125 (2), p.303-308
Hauptverfasser: Yabor, Lourdes, Bárbara Valle, René Carlos Rodríguez, Carlos Aragón, Jutta Papenbrock, Christoph C. Tebbe, José Carlos Lorenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 308
container_issue 2
container_start_page 303
container_title Plant cell, tissue and organ culture
container_volume 125
creator Yabor, Lourdes
Bárbara Valle
René Carlos Rodríguez
Carlos Aragón
Jutta Papenbrock
Christoph C. Tebbe
José Carlos Lorenzo
description Genetic modifications of pineapple provide the potential to increase fungal resistance without the use of pesticides. Previously, we developed a procedure for pineapple callus transformation, introducing the antifungal chitinase and AP24 genes, and the herbicide-tolerance conferring bar gene as a selectable marker. The three recombinant genes were under the control of the constitutively expressing promoters OCS-35S CaMV-rice actin I, 35S CaMV, and maize Ubi1, respectively. The objective of this study was to analyze whether these genetic modifications caused unintentional side effects on growth-related properties under field conditions. We analyzed the third vegetative generation of a transgenic pineapple clone, approximately 7 years after the genetic modification occurred. Plant height and diameter, chlorophyll and phenolic contents, fruit mass and D leaf (middle-age) mass, water content, succulence, sap pH, transpiration, CO₂ assimilation, and water use efficiency were recorded and compared to a micro-propagated cultivar. A macro-propagated variant was also cultivated at the field site in order to distinguish unintended effects of the propagation method from that of the genetic modification. While all parameters analyzed in this study were highly similar to each other for the three cultivars, statistically analyses revealed significant deviations of the genetically modified variant for the succulence index being higher at in the morning and evening, carbon dioxide assimilation being lower at noon and, at night, the water use efficiency was lower. The minor deviations were all within the range which can be expected between common cultivars grown together.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808714871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259387818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3edc5821293ad4c49eb36952b59f9803cad1ca2849e0998c8c0435c09e597e243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpoLdJHqCrCrrpxunoz5aWJTRtIdBFk7VQ5LGvgi25km9C3qMPXN06UMiii2EG5juHA4eQdwwuGED3qTDGJTTA2gaMgka-IjumOtEokPI12dVH17RadW_I21LuAaAVku3I73Ufck8fcMTVreEB6YgRcz1TpGmgjg4Bp74Zc3qMdM0ulgoET5cQ0S3LhNRPKSIt-_RY6BxiyrSEHikOA_q1HE3-yoaU52fbSJfJxZUu-6cS0pTG4N1EF5fdjCvmckZOBjcVPH_ep-T26svN5bfm-sfX75efrxsvOrE2AnuvNGfcCNdLLw3eidYofqfMYDQI73rmHdf1AcZorz1IoTwYVKZDLsUp-bj5Ljn9OmBZ7RyKx6mGw3QolmnQHZN1KvrhBXqfDjnWdJZzZYTuNNOVYhvlcyol42CXHGaXnywDe-zJbj3ZWoc99mSPIfimKZWNI-Z_zv8Tvd9Eg0vWjTkUe_uTVwCA6dYYLv4AXyChfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259387818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yabor, Lourdes ; Bárbara Valle ; René Carlos Rodríguez ; Carlos Aragón ; Jutta Papenbrock ; Christoph C. Tebbe ; José Carlos Lorenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Yabor, Lourdes ; Bárbara Valle ; René Carlos Rodríguez ; Carlos Aragón ; Jutta Papenbrock ; Christoph C. Tebbe ; José Carlos Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><description>Genetic modifications of pineapple provide the potential to increase fungal resistance without the use of pesticides. Previously, we developed a procedure for pineapple callus transformation, introducing the antifungal chitinase and AP24 genes, and the herbicide-tolerance conferring bar gene as a selectable marker. The three recombinant genes were under the control of the constitutively expressing promoters OCS-35S CaMV-rice actin I, 35S CaMV, and maize Ubi1, respectively. The objective of this study was to analyze whether these genetic modifications caused unintentional side effects on growth-related properties under field conditions. We analyzed the third vegetative generation of a transgenic pineapple clone, approximately 7 years after the genetic modification occurred. Plant height and diameter, chlorophyll and phenolic contents, fruit mass and D leaf (middle-age) mass, water content, succulence, sap pH, transpiration, CO₂ assimilation, and water use efficiency were recorded and compared to a micro-propagated cultivar. A macro-propagated variant was also cultivated at the field site in order to distinguish unintended effects of the propagation method from that of the genetic modification. While all parameters analyzed in this study were highly similar to each other for the three cultivars, statistically analyses revealed significant deviations of the genetically modified variant for the succulence index being higher at in the morning and evening, carbon dioxide assimilation being lower at noon and, at night, the water use efficiency was lower. The minor deviations were all within the range which can be expected between common cultivars grown together.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Actin ; adverse effects ; Assimilation ; Bar gene ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Callus ; Carbon dioxide ; Chitinase ; Chlorophyll ; Cloning ; corn ; Cultivars ; Fruits ; fungi ; Fungicides ; Genes ; genetic engineering ; Genetic modification ; Herbicides ; leaves ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Original Article ; Parameter modification ; Pesticides ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Physiological effects ; Pineapples ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Propagation ; sap ; Side effects ; Statistical analysis ; Transgenic plants ; Transpiration ; Water content ; Water use ; Water use efficiency ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture, 2016-05, Vol.125 (2), p.303-308</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3edc5821293ad4c49eb36952b59f9803cad1ca2849e0998c8c0435c09e597e243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3edc5821293ad4c49eb36952b59f9803cad1ca2849e0998c8c0435c09e597e243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yabor, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárbara Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>René Carlos Rodríguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlos Aragón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutta Papenbrock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoph C. Tebbe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>José Carlos Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><title>third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters</title><title>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</title><addtitle>Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult</addtitle><description>Genetic modifications of pineapple provide the potential to increase fungal resistance without the use of pesticides. Previously, we developed a procedure for pineapple callus transformation, introducing the antifungal chitinase and AP24 genes, and the herbicide-tolerance conferring bar gene as a selectable marker. The three recombinant genes were under the control of the constitutively expressing promoters OCS-35S CaMV-rice actin I, 35S CaMV, and maize Ubi1, respectively. The objective of this study was to analyze whether these genetic modifications caused unintentional side effects on growth-related properties under field conditions. We analyzed the third vegetative generation of a transgenic pineapple clone, approximately 7 years after the genetic modification occurred. Plant height and diameter, chlorophyll and phenolic contents, fruit mass and D leaf (middle-age) mass, water content, succulence, sap pH, transpiration, CO₂ assimilation, and water use efficiency were recorded and compared to a micro-propagated cultivar. A macro-propagated variant was also cultivated at the field site in order to distinguish unintended effects of the propagation method from that of the genetic modification. While all parameters analyzed in this study were highly similar to each other for the three cultivars, statistically analyses revealed significant deviations of the genetically modified variant for the succulence index being higher at in the morning and evening, carbon dioxide assimilation being lower at noon and, at night, the water use efficiency was lower. The minor deviations were all within the range which can be expected between common cultivars grown together.</description><subject>Actin</subject><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Bar gene</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Callus</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chitinase</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>genetic engineering</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameter modification</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Physiological effects</subject><subject>Pineapples</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>sap</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Transgenic plants</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0167-6857</issn><issn>1573-5044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpoLdJHqCrCrrpxunoz5aWJTRtIdBFk7VQ5LGvgi25km9C3qMPXN06UMiii2EG5juHA4eQdwwuGED3qTDGJTTA2gaMgka-IjumOtEokPI12dVH17RadW_I21LuAaAVku3I73Ufck8fcMTVreEB6YgRcz1TpGmgjg4Bp74Zc3qMdM0ulgoET5cQ0S3LhNRPKSIt-_RY6BxiyrSEHikOA_q1HE3-yoaU52fbSJfJxZUu-6cS0pTG4N1EF5fdjCvmckZOBjcVPH_ep-T26svN5bfm-sfX75efrxsvOrE2AnuvNGfcCNdLLw3eidYofqfMYDQI73rmHdf1AcZorz1IoTwYVKZDLsUp-bj5Ljn9OmBZ7RyKx6mGw3QolmnQHZN1KvrhBXqfDjnWdJZzZYTuNNOVYhvlcyol42CXHGaXnywDe-zJbj3ZWoc99mSPIfimKZWNI-Z_zv8Tvd9Eg0vWjTkUe_uTVwCA6dYYLv4AXyChfw</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Yabor, Lourdes</creator><creator>Bárbara Valle</creator><creator>René Carlos Rodríguez</creator><creator>Carlos Aragón</creator><creator>Jutta Papenbrock</creator><creator>Christoph C. Tebbe</creator><creator>José Carlos Lorenzo</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters</title><author>Yabor, Lourdes ; Bárbara Valle ; René Carlos Rodríguez ; Carlos Aragón ; Jutta Papenbrock ; Christoph C. Tebbe ; José Carlos Lorenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-3edc5821293ad4c49eb36952b59f9803cad1ca2849e0998c8c0435c09e597e243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actin</topic><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Bar gene</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Callus</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chitinase</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>genetic engineering</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameter modification</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Physiological effects</topic><topic>Pineapples</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>sap</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Transgenic plants</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yabor, Lourdes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárbara Valle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>René Carlos Rodríguez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlos Aragón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutta Papenbrock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoph C. Tebbe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>José Carlos Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yabor, Lourdes</au><au>Bárbara Valle</au><au>René Carlos Rodríguez</au><au>Carlos Aragón</au><au>Jutta Papenbrock</au><au>Christoph C. Tebbe</au><au>José Carlos Lorenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters</atitle><jtitle>Plant cell, tissue and organ culture</jtitle><stitle>Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult</stitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>303-308</pages><issn>0167-6857</issn><eissn>1573-5044</eissn><abstract>Genetic modifications of pineapple provide the potential to increase fungal resistance without the use of pesticides. Previously, we developed a procedure for pineapple callus transformation, introducing the antifungal chitinase and AP24 genes, and the herbicide-tolerance conferring bar gene as a selectable marker. The three recombinant genes were under the control of the constitutively expressing promoters OCS-35S CaMV-rice actin I, 35S CaMV, and maize Ubi1, respectively. The objective of this study was to analyze whether these genetic modifications caused unintentional side effects on growth-related properties under field conditions. We analyzed the third vegetative generation of a transgenic pineapple clone, approximately 7 years after the genetic modification occurred. Plant height and diameter, chlorophyll and phenolic contents, fruit mass and D leaf (middle-age) mass, water content, succulence, sap pH, transpiration, CO₂ assimilation, and water use efficiency were recorded and compared to a micro-propagated cultivar. A macro-propagated variant was also cultivated at the field site in order to distinguish unintended effects of the propagation method from that of the genetic modification. While all parameters analyzed in this study were highly similar to each other for the three cultivars, statistically analyses revealed significant deviations of the genetically modified variant for the succulence index being higher at in the morning and evening, carbon dioxide assimilation being lower at noon and, at night, the water use efficiency was lower. The minor deviations were all within the range which can be expected between common cultivars grown together.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6857
ispartof Plant cell, tissue and organ culture, 2016-05, Vol.125 (2), p.303-308
issn 0167-6857
1573-5044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808714871
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Actin
adverse effects
Assimilation
Bar gene
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Callus
Carbon dioxide
Chitinase
Chlorophyll
Cloning
corn
Cultivars
Fruits
fungi
Fungicides
Genes
genetic engineering
Genetic modification
Herbicides
leaves
Life Sciences
Moisture content
Original Article
Parameter modification
Pesticides
Phenolic compounds
Phenols
Physiological effects
Pineapples
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Propagation
sap
Side effects
Statistical analysis
Transgenic plants
Transpiration
Water content
Water use
Water use efficiency
Zea mays
title third vegetative generation of a field-grown transgenic pineapple clone shows minor side effects of transformation on plant physiological parameters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A09%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=third%20vegetative%20generation%20of%20a%20field-grown%20transgenic%20pineapple%20clone%20shows%20minor%20side%20effects%20of%20transformation%20on%20plant%20physiological%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Plant%20cell,%20tissue%20and%20organ%20culture&rft.au=Yabor,%20Lourdes&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=303-308&rft.issn=0167-6857&rft.eissn=1573-5044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11240-016-0950-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259387818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259387818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true