The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity
Background Rapid and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly with respect to the presence or absence of perforation, is essential in guiding appropriate management. Although many studies have explored sonographic findings associated with acute appendicitis, few investigations discuss specif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2015-06, Vol.45 (6), p.820-830 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 830 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 820 |
container_title | Pediatric radiology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Tulin-Silver, Sheryl Babb, James Pinkney, Lynne Strubel, Naomi Lala, Shailee Milla, Sarah S. Tomita, Sandra Fefferman, Nancy R. |
description | Background
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly with respect to the presence or absence of perforation, is essential in guiding appropriate management. Although many studies have explored sonographic findings associated with acute appendicitis, few investigations discuss specific signs that can reliably differentiate perforated appendicitis from acute appendicitis prior to abscess formation.
Objective
The purpose of our study was to identify sonographic findings that improve the specificity of US in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our assessment of hepatic periportal echogenicity, detailed analysis of intraperitoneal fluid, and formulation of select constellations of sonographic findings expands upon the literature addressing this important diagnostic challenge.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 116 abdominal US examinations for evaluation of abdominal pain in children ages 2 to 18 years from January 2008 to September 2011 at a university hospital pediatric radiology department. The study group consisted of surgical and pathology proven acute appendicitis (
n
= 51) and perforated appendicitis (
n
= 22) US exams. US exams without a sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis (
n
= 43) confirmed by follow-up verbal communication were included in the study population as the control group. After de-identification, the US exams were independently reviewed on a PACS workstation by four pediatric radiologists blinded to diagnosis and all clinical information. We recorded the presence of normal or abnormal appendix, appendicolith, appendiceal wall vascularity, thick-walled bowel, dilated bowel, right lower quadrant (RLQ) echogenic fat, increased hepatic periportal echogenicity, bladder debris and abscess or loculated fluid. We also recorded the characteristics of intraperitoneal fluid, indicating the relative quantity (number of abdominal regions) and quality of the fluid (simple fluid or complex fluid). We used logistic regression for correlated data to evaluate the association of diagnosis with the presence versus absence of each US finding. We conducted multivariable analysis to identify constellations of sonographic findings that were predictive of perforated appendicitis.
Results
The individual US findings of abscess/loculated fluid, appendicolith, dilated bowel and increased hepatic periportal echogenicity were significantly associated with perforated appendicitis when compared with acute appendicitis (
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808707738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1684432662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5a6e8ee38abf19d6021e5337b9ac533d55611021d5b58695604099062def5a993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFB2CDIrFhExjHfzE7VAFFqsSmrC1fe5LrKtcOdoLUJ-hr43ALQkiI1Yw83zke-xDygsIbCqDeFoCOqxYob1nHulY8IjvKa0O17h-THTCgLXCuz8h5KbcAwARlT8lZJ7iiSvAdub85YOMOdpowjiGOzTot2Za0Rt_4YMeYSihNGpoZ85CyXdA3dp4x-uDCUkchVnmYfMb4rnEplgWnyS6hdpuspJjGbOdDcM0QqiqOVXOcc_qOTZnRhWEzuntGngx2Kvj8oV6Qrx8_3FxetddfPn2-fH_dOq7E0gorsUdkvd0PVHsJHUXBmNpr62r1QkhK66EXe9FLLSRw0Bpk53EQVmt2QV6ffOsG31YsizmG4raVI6a1GNpDr0Ap1v8flT2vny1lV9FXf6G3ac2xPuQnJbmoSVSKniiXUykZBzPncLT5zlAwW6DmFKipgZotUCOq5uWD87o_ov-t-JVgBboTUOoojpj_uPqfrj8AaZasnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684645301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl ; Babb, James ; Pinkney, Lynne ; Strubel, Naomi ; Lala, Shailee ; Milla, Sarah S. ; Tomita, Sandra ; Fefferman, Nancy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl ; Babb, James ; Pinkney, Lynne ; Strubel, Naomi ; Lala, Shailee ; Milla, Sarah S. ; Tomita, Sandra ; Fefferman, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly with respect to the presence or absence of perforation, is essential in guiding appropriate management. Although many studies have explored sonographic findings associated with acute appendicitis, few investigations discuss specific signs that can reliably differentiate perforated appendicitis from acute appendicitis prior to abscess formation.
Objective
The purpose of our study was to identify sonographic findings that improve the specificity of US in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our assessment of hepatic periportal echogenicity, detailed analysis of intraperitoneal fluid, and formulation of select constellations of sonographic findings expands upon the literature addressing this important diagnostic challenge.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 116 abdominal US examinations for evaluation of abdominal pain in children ages 2 to 18 years from January 2008 to September 2011 at a university hospital pediatric radiology department. The study group consisted of surgical and pathology proven acute appendicitis (
n
= 51) and perforated appendicitis (
n
= 22) US exams. US exams without a sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis (
n
= 43) confirmed by follow-up verbal communication were included in the study population as the control group. After de-identification, the US exams were independently reviewed on a PACS workstation by four pediatric radiologists blinded to diagnosis and all clinical information. We recorded the presence of normal or abnormal appendix, appendicolith, appendiceal wall vascularity, thick-walled bowel, dilated bowel, right lower quadrant (RLQ) echogenic fat, increased hepatic periportal echogenicity, bladder debris and abscess or loculated fluid. We also recorded the characteristics of intraperitoneal fluid, indicating the relative quantity (number of abdominal regions) and quality of the fluid (simple fluid or complex fluid). We used logistic regression for correlated data to evaluate the association of diagnosis with the presence versus absence of each US finding. We conducted multivariable analysis to identify constellations of sonographic findings that were predictive of perforated appendicitis.
Results
The individual US findings of abscess/loculated fluid, appendicolith, dilated bowel and increased hepatic periportal echogenicity were significantly associated with perforated appendicitis when compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The sonographic observation of increased hepatic periportal echogenicity demonstrated a statistically significant association with perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The presence of complex fluid yielded a specificity of 87.7% for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. The US findings of ≥2 regions or ≥3 regions with fluid had specificity of 87.3% and 99.0%, respectively, for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. Select combinations of sonographic findings yielded high specificity in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis. These constellations yielded higher specificity than that of each individual finding in isolation. The constellation of dilated bowel, RLQ echogenic fat, and complex fluid had the highest specificity (99.5%) for perforated appendicitis (
P
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that identification of select constellations of findings using abdominal sonography, in addition to focused US examination of the right lower quadrant, can improve sonographic diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in the pediatric population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25471754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Infant ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Pediatric radiology, 2015-06, Vol.45 (6), p.820-830</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5a6e8ee38abf19d6021e5337b9ac533d55611021d5b58695604099062def5a993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5a6e8ee38abf19d6021e5337b9ac533d55611021d5b58695604099062def5a993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkney, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strubel, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lala, Shailee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milla, Sarah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fefferman, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><title>The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity</title><title>Pediatric radiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><description>Background
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly with respect to the presence or absence of perforation, is essential in guiding appropriate management. Although many studies have explored sonographic findings associated with acute appendicitis, few investigations discuss specific signs that can reliably differentiate perforated appendicitis from acute appendicitis prior to abscess formation.
Objective
The purpose of our study was to identify sonographic findings that improve the specificity of US in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our assessment of hepatic periportal echogenicity, detailed analysis of intraperitoneal fluid, and formulation of select constellations of sonographic findings expands upon the literature addressing this important diagnostic challenge.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 116 abdominal US examinations for evaluation of abdominal pain in children ages 2 to 18 years from January 2008 to September 2011 at a university hospital pediatric radiology department. The study group consisted of surgical and pathology proven acute appendicitis (
n
= 51) and perforated appendicitis (
n
= 22) US exams. US exams without a sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis (
n
= 43) confirmed by follow-up verbal communication were included in the study population as the control group. After de-identification, the US exams were independently reviewed on a PACS workstation by four pediatric radiologists blinded to diagnosis and all clinical information. We recorded the presence of normal or abnormal appendix, appendicolith, appendiceal wall vascularity, thick-walled bowel, dilated bowel, right lower quadrant (RLQ) echogenic fat, increased hepatic periportal echogenicity, bladder debris and abscess or loculated fluid. We also recorded the characteristics of intraperitoneal fluid, indicating the relative quantity (number of abdominal regions) and quality of the fluid (simple fluid or complex fluid). We used logistic regression for correlated data to evaluate the association of diagnosis with the presence versus absence of each US finding. We conducted multivariable analysis to identify constellations of sonographic findings that were predictive of perforated appendicitis.
Results
The individual US findings of abscess/loculated fluid, appendicolith, dilated bowel and increased hepatic periportal echogenicity were significantly associated with perforated appendicitis when compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The sonographic observation of increased hepatic periportal echogenicity demonstrated a statistically significant association with perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The presence of complex fluid yielded a specificity of 87.7% for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. The US findings of ≥2 regions or ≥3 regions with fluid had specificity of 87.3% and 99.0%, respectively, for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. Select combinations of sonographic findings yielded high specificity in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis. These constellations yielded higher specificity than that of each individual finding in isolation. The constellation of dilated bowel, RLQ echogenic fat, and complex fluid had the highest specificity (99.5%) for perforated appendicitis (
P
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that identification of select constellations of findings using abdominal sonography, in addition to focused US examination of the right lower quadrant, can improve sonographic diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in the pediatric population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0301-0449</issn><issn>1432-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhS0EoreFB2CDIrFhExjHfzE7VAFFqsSmrC1fe5LrKtcOdoLUJ-hr43ALQkiI1Yw83zke-xDygsIbCqDeFoCOqxYob1nHulY8IjvKa0O17h-THTCgLXCuz8h5KbcAwARlT8lZJ7iiSvAdub85YOMOdpowjiGOzTot2Za0Rt_4YMeYSihNGpoZ85CyXdA3dp4x-uDCUkchVnmYfMb4rnEplgWnyS6hdpuspJjGbOdDcM0QqiqOVXOcc_qOTZnRhWEzuntGngx2Kvj8oV6Qrx8_3FxetddfPn2-fH_dOq7E0gorsUdkvd0PVHsJHUXBmNpr62r1QkhK66EXe9FLLSRw0Bpk53EQVmt2QV6ffOsG31YsizmG4raVI6a1GNpDr0Ap1v8flT2vny1lV9FXf6G3ac2xPuQnJbmoSVSKniiXUykZBzPncLT5zlAwW6DmFKipgZotUCOq5uWD87o_ov-t-JVgBboTUOoojpj_uPqfrj8AaZasnQ</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl</creator><creator>Babb, James</creator><creator>Pinkney, Lynne</creator><creator>Strubel, Naomi</creator><creator>Lala, Shailee</creator><creator>Milla, Sarah S.</creator><creator>Tomita, Sandra</creator><creator>Fefferman, Nancy R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity</title><author>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl ; Babb, James ; Pinkney, Lynne ; Strubel, Naomi ; Lala, Shailee ; Milla, Sarah S. ; Tomita, Sandra ; Fefferman, Nancy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-5a6e8ee38abf19d6021e5337b9ac533d55611021d5b58695604099062def5a993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babb, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkney, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strubel, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lala, Shailee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milla, Sarah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fefferman, Nancy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tulin-Silver, Sheryl</au><au>Babb, James</au><au>Pinkney, Lynne</au><au>Strubel, Naomi</au><au>Lala, Shailee</au><au>Milla, Sarah S.</au><au>Tomita, Sandra</au><au>Fefferman, Nancy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>820</spage><epage>830</epage><pages>820-830</pages><issn>0301-0449</issn><eissn>1432-1998</eissn><abstract>Background
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly with respect to the presence or absence of perforation, is essential in guiding appropriate management. Although many studies have explored sonographic findings associated with acute appendicitis, few investigations discuss specific signs that can reliably differentiate perforated appendicitis from acute appendicitis prior to abscess formation.
Objective
The purpose of our study was to identify sonographic findings that improve the specificity of US in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Our assessment of hepatic periportal echogenicity, detailed analysis of intraperitoneal fluid, and formulation of select constellations of sonographic findings expands upon the literature addressing this important diagnostic challenge.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 116 abdominal US examinations for evaluation of abdominal pain in children ages 2 to 18 years from January 2008 to September 2011 at a university hospital pediatric radiology department. The study group consisted of surgical and pathology proven acute appendicitis (
n
= 51) and perforated appendicitis (
n
= 22) US exams. US exams without a sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis (
n
= 43) confirmed by follow-up verbal communication were included in the study population as the control group. After de-identification, the US exams were independently reviewed on a PACS workstation by four pediatric radiologists blinded to diagnosis and all clinical information. We recorded the presence of normal or abnormal appendix, appendicolith, appendiceal wall vascularity, thick-walled bowel, dilated bowel, right lower quadrant (RLQ) echogenic fat, increased hepatic periportal echogenicity, bladder debris and abscess or loculated fluid. We also recorded the characteristics of intraperitoneal fluid, indicating the relative quantity (number of abdominal regions) and quality of the fluid (simple fluid or complex fluid). We used logistic regression for correlated data to evaluate the association of diagnosis with the presence versus absence of each US finding. We conducted multivariable analysis to identify constellations of sonographic findings that were predictive of perforated appendicitis.
Results
The individual US findings of abscess/loculated fluid, appendicolith, dilated bowel and increased hepatic periportal echogenicity were significantly associated with perforated appendicitis when compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The sonographic observation of increased hepatic periportal echogenicity demonstrated a statistically significant association with perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis (
P
< 0.01). The presence of complex fluid yielded a specificity of 87.7% for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. The US findings of ≥2 regions or ≥3 regions with fluid had specificity of 87.3% and 99.0%, respectively, for perforated appendicitis compared with the acute appendicitis group. Select combinations of sonographic findings yielded high specificity in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis. These constellations yielded higher specificity than that of each individual finding in isolation. The constellation of dilated bowel, RLQ echogenic fat, and complex fluid had the highest specificity (99.5%) for perforated appendicitis (
P
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that identification of select constellations of findings using abdominal sonography, in addition to focused US examination of the right lower quadrant, can improve sonographic diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in the pediatric population.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25471754</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-0449 |
ispartof | Pediatric radiology, 2015-06, Vol.45 (6), p.820-830 |
issn | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808707738 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging Child Child, Preschool Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Imaging Infant Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroradiology Nuclear Medicine Oncology Original Article Pediatrics Radiology Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography Ultrasound |
title | The challenging ultrasound diagnosis of perforated appendicitis in children: constellations of sonographic findings improve specificity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20challenging%20ultrasound%20diagnosis%20of%20perforated%20appendicitis%20in%20children:%20constellations%20of%20sonographic%20findings%20improve%20specificity&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20radiology&rft.au=Tulin-Silver,%20Sheryl&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=820&rft.epage=830&rft.pages=820-830&rft.issn=0301-0449&rft.eissn=1432-1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00247-014-3232-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1684432662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684645301&rft_id=info:pmid/25471754&rfr_iscdi=true |