Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system
The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restric...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Mangalam, Madhur Fragaszy, Dorothy M. |
description | The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments.
•Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347216300367</els_id><sourcerecordid>4143570511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_grDgxcuuk2S_clIRv6DgpZ5Dupm1WXaTmmwL-9-b0oLgxdNjmN883jxCrilkFGh512XKrnCtdhmLYwZ5FuWEzCiIIq1ZzU7JDAB4yvOKnZOLELo4lgUUM_Kw9MqG1vnB2K9kXGOycnpKne2nJExhxCExdnS_m02_DenoXH9cX5KzVvUBr446J58vz8unt3Tx8fr-9LhIG17BmOq2ZnmMpwGZVlxzxVaiLFumNGMCy0IIEFXJBFdly3PGBWeUcixbUWgucj4ntwffjXffWwyjHExosO-VRbcNktZQV5BTKiJ68wft3NbbmC5SFAoWUR6p4kA13oXgsZUbbwblJ0lB7nuVnTz2Kve9SshllHh3f7jD-O3OoJehMWgb1MZjM0rtzD8OP0WggbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810528083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments.
•Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Behavioral biology ; biomechanics ; Comparative analysis ; degree of freedom ; development ; dexterity ; embodied cognition ; perception–action ; tool use</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122</ispartof><rights>2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments.
•Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Behavioral biology</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>degree of freedom</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>dexterity</subject><subject>embodied cognition</subject><subject>perception–action</subject><subject>tool use</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_grDgxcuuk2S_clIRv6DgpZ5Dupm1WXaTmmwL-9-b0oLgxdNjmN883jxCrilkFGh512XKrnCtdhmLYwZ5FuWEzCiIIq1ZzU7JDAB4yvOKnZOLELo4lgUUM_Kw9MqG1vnB2K9kXGOycnpKne2nJExhxCExdnS_m02_DenoXH9cX5KzVvUBr446J58vz8unt3Tx8fr-9LhIG17BmOq2ZnmMpwGZVlxzxVaiLFumNGMCy0IIEFXJBFdly3PGBWeUcixbUWgucj4ntwffjXffWwyjHExosO-VRbcNktZQV5BTKiJ68wft3NbbmC5SFAoWUR6p4kA13oXgsZUbbwblJ0lB7nuVnTz2Kve9SshllHh3f7jD-O3OoJehMWgb1MZjM0rtzD8OP0WggbQ</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Mangalam, Madhur</creator><creator>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><author>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Behavioral biology</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>degree of freedom</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>dexterity</topic><topic>embodied cognition</topic><topic>perception–action</topic><topic>tool use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mangalam, Madhur</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>115</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>115-122</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments.
•Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704119 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal populations Behavioral biology biomechanics Comparative analysis degree of freedom development dexterity embodied cognition perception–action tool use |
title | Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transforming%20the%20body-only%20system%20into%20the%20body-plus-tool%20system&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Mangalam,%20Madhur&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=115-122&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4143570511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810528083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347216300367&rfr_iscdi=true |