Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system

The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122
Hauptverfasser: Mangalam, Madhur, Fragaszy, Dorothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue
container_start_page 115
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 117
creator Mangalam, Madhur
Fragaszy, Dorothy M.
description The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments. •Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347216300367</els_id><sourcerecordid>4143570511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_grDgxcuuk2S_clIRv6DgpZ5Dupm1WXaTmmwL-9-b0oLgxdNjmN883jxCrilkFGh512XKrnCtdhmLYwZ5FuWEzCiIIq1ZzU7JDAB4yvOKnZOLELo4lgUUM_Kw9MqG1vnB2K9kXGOycnpKne2nJExhxCExdnS_m02_DenoXH9cX5KzVvUBr446J58vz8unt3Tx8fr-9LhIG17BmOq2ZnmMpwGZVlxzxVaiLFumNGMCy0IIEFXJBFdly3PGBWeUcixbUWgucj4ntwffjXffWwyjHExosO-VRbcNktZQV5BTKiJ68wft3NbbmC5SFAoWUR6p4kA13oXgsZUbbwblJ0lB7nuVnTz2Kve9SshllHh3f7jD-O3OoJehMWgb1MZjM0rtzD8OP0WggbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810528083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments. •Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Behavioral biology ; biomechanics ; Comparative analysis ; degree of freedom ; development ; dexterity ; embodied cognition ; perception–action ; tool use</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122</ispartof><rights>2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments. •Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Behavioral biology</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>degree of freedom</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>dexterity</subject><subject>embodied cognition</subject><subject>perception–action</subject><subject>tool use</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_grDgxcuuk2S_clIRv6DgpZ5Dupm1WXaTmmwL-9-b0oLgxdNjmN883jxCrilkFGh512XKrnCtdhmLYwZ5FuWEzCiIIq1ZzU7JDAB4yvOKnZOLELo4lgUUM_Kw9MqG1vnB2K9kXGOycnpKne2nJExhxCExdnS_m02_DenoXH9cX5KzVvUBr446J58vz8unt3Tx8fr-9LhIG17BmOq2ZnmMpwGZVlxzxVaiLFumNGMCy0IIEFXJBFdly3PGBWeUcixbUWgucj4ntwffjXffWwyjHExosO-VRbcNktZQV5BTKiJ68wft3NbbmC5SFAoWUR6p4kA13oXgsZUbbwblJ0lB7nuVnTz2Kve9SshllHh3f7jD-O3OoJehMWgb1MZjM0rtzD8OP0WggbQ</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Mangalam, Madhur</creator><creator>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</title><author>Mangalam, Madhur ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-df824201d0e2da3d3a2b966f2ad229e65990976293a6f3423932113e6f95d3943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Behavioral biology</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>degree of freedom</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>dexterity</topic><topic>embodied cognition</topic><topic>perception–action</topic><topic>tool use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mangalam, Madhur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mangalam, Madhur</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>115</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>115-122</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>The traditional definitions of tool use typically operationalize the functionality of an object and the effect of its use on the environment and, typically, do not account for the dynamic relation among the body, task and environment that result in actions with a tool. This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions for comparisons of tool use behaviour across individuals, populations and species. To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use based on the premise that a tool transforms the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system. It (1) explains the development of a tool use behaviour in terms of constraints on the development of tool use movements imposed by different features of the body, task and environment, (2) measures the dexterity of an actor in terms of the spatiotemporal organization of tool use movements that optimize at least one composite performance outcome variable and (3) measures the complexity in the use of a tool in terms of the control of the biomechanical degrees of freedom of the body-plus-tool system. Such an embodied theory of tool use is applicable across species, tasks and environments. •Traditional definitions of tool use discount the contribution of the body, task and environment.•This omission severely restricts the utility of these definitions.•To address this issue, we propose an embodied theory of tool use.•This theory is applicable across species, tasks and environments.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-0414</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 2016-07, Vol.117, p.115-122
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704119
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animal behavior
Animal populations
Behavioral biology
biomechanics
Comparative analysis
degree of freedom
development
dexterity
embodied cognition
perception–action
tool use
title Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transforming%20the%20body-only%20system%20into%20the%20body-plus-tool%20system&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Mangalam,%20Madhur&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=115-122&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4143570511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810528083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347216300367&rfr_iscdi=true